It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The ATP-independent chaperone SurA protects unfolded outer membrane proteins (OMPs) from aggregation in the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria, and delivers them to the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) for folding into the outer membrane (OM). Precisely how SurA recognises and binds its different OMP clients remains unclear. Escherichia coli SurA comprises three domains: a core and two PPIase domains (P1 and P2). Here, by combining methyl-TROSY NMR, single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET), and bioinformatics analyses we show that SurA client binding is mediated by two binding hotspots in the core and P1 domains. These interactions are driven by aromatic-rich motifs in the client proteins, leading to SurA core/P1 domain rearrangements and expansion of clients from collapsed, non-native states. We demonstrate that the core domain is key to OMP expansion by SurA, and uncover a role for SurA PPIase domains in limiting the extent of expansion. The results reveal insights into SurA-OMP recognition and the mechanism of activation for an ATP-independent chaperone, and suggest a route to targeting the functions of a chaperone key to bacterial virulence and OM integrity.
Dual binding sites are identified in the outer membrane chaperone SurA, providing substrate recognition and mechanistic insights into this ATP-independent chaperone.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 University of Leeds, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
2 University of Leeds, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); University of Leeds, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
3 University of Leeds, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); Edgbaston, School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
4 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.14509.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 4904)