It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
Biomarkers are paramount for managing heart failure (HF) patients as prognostic and therapeutic efficacy index tools. Systemic levels of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) can add to the HF biomarker scenario, allowing for potentiated efficacy in diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and prediction of patient response to a given therapeutic intervention because BDNF is one of the primary rulers of myocardial function. Yet, whether BDNF is a reliable clinical biomarker awaits clinical validation. Hence, we aimed to answer this relevant question via a systematic review and meta‐analysis of existing studies.
Methods and results
International databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science, were comprehensively searched for studies assessing BDNF levels in patients with HF versus non‐HF controls or as a prognostic factor for HF complications. Data were extracted and analysed by random‐effect meta‐analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to pool the results of studies. We included 11 studies in the final review, among which six underwent meta‐analysis. These studies analysed 1420 HF patients, with a mean age of 65.4 ± 11.2 years. Meta‐analysis revealed that patients with HF had significantly lower circulating BDNF levels than healthy controls (SMD −2.47, 95% CI −4.39 to −0.54, P‐value = 0.01). Moreover, patients with higher New York Heart Association functional classification had lower levels of BDNF. Adverse clinical outcomes such as all‐cause mortality and HF rehospitalization were also associated with lower levels of BDNF in individual studies.
Conclusions
BDNF levels are decreased in patients with HF. Most importantly, we observed an association between lower BDNF levels and poor prognosis in patients with HF. Our study supports BDNF as an easy‐to‐dose diagnostic and prognostic biomarker to be implemented in clinical practice for HF. Further studies are warranted to address this ability specifically.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Fazlollahpour‐Naghibi, Andarz 2 ; Bagheri, Kimia 2 ; Goshtasbi, Parmis 3 ; Mohseni, Ghazal 4 ; El Kanty, Aouatif Erasmia 5 ; Vinciguerra, Caterina 6 ; Cannavo, Alessandro 6 1 Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
3 College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
4 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
5 Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
6 Department of Translational Medicine Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy





