Abstract
Research impact is an important manifestation of research competence and the focus of medical education. This study is dedicated to exploring the relationships between coauthorship networks and the research impact of Chinese medical doctoral students from a social capital perspective. A total of 16291 scientific papers from 237 doctoral students and 126 mentors at Chinese universities were selected from databases, and a study dataset including 19 variables was constructed. Nine independent variables were defined and obtained through coauthorship network analysis, and the doctoral students’ research impact, as the only dependent variable, was used to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables. The results show that the betweenness centrality, student-mentor coauthorship count and the partnership ability index significantly affect the h-index. Specifically, the coauthorship unit count plays the most important role in developing centrality, which, in turn, produces a higher h-index. In addition, betweenness centrality, student–mentor coauthorship count and the partnership ability index are good predictors of the likelihood of doctoral students entering the greater research impact group and especially improving their betweenness centrality. Specifically, doctoral students whose partnership ability index is greater than 2, student-mentor coauthorship count is greater than 4, coauthorship unit count is greater than 6, and betweenness centrality is greater than 0.02 are considered to have greater research impact. These findings suggest that the important roles of cooperation in the development of research competence and good mentorship in the acquisition of social capital by doctoral students should be emphasized. Several strategies are advised for harnessing social capital rooted in doctoral students’ coauthorship network for relevant organizations, mentors and doctoral students who want to increase medical doctoral students’ research impact.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Chongqing, China (GRID:grid.410570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 6682); Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Biomedical Analysis Center, College of Basic Medicine, Chongqing, China (GRID:grid.410570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 6682)
2 Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Biomedical Analysis Center, College of Basic Medicine, Chongqing, China (GRID:grid.410570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 6682)
3 University of Jinan, School of Foreign Languages, Jinan, China (GRID:grid.454761.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 9355)
4 Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Chongqing, China (GRID:grid.410570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 6682)




