Introduction
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) were first described by Klemperer and Coleman [1] in 1992 as malignant neoplasms that arise in the pleura.
SFTs are composed of various pleomorphic spindle-shaped cells mixed with collagen fibers. They are characterized by mixed collagen, arranged in disorganized, short fascicles.
SFTs develop primarily within the thoracic cavity; however, they can occur in various anatomic sites, with approximately 30%-40% of SFTs detected outside the thoracic cavity and only 1% detected in the retroperitoneum [2]. Ten percent to 15% of SFTs are malignant, and those with higher mitotic counts, necrosis, or calcification on pathological examination represent aggressive neoplasms.
Surgical resection is the standard of care, while there are no established guidelines on chemotherapy or radiation therapy [3]. However, the incidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgical resection depends on many factors such as the patient’s age, initial tumor diameter, the presence of residual tumor, and pathological findings indicating highly aggressive malignancy [4].
In this report, we describe a case of SFT in the retroperitoneum that required an artificial vascular replacement of the abdominal aorta. This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at the 85th Annual Congress of Japan Surgical Association on November 16-18, 2023.
Case presentation
A 42-year-old male presented an abdominal mass detected on ultrasonography during a medical check-up.
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor measuring approximately 65 mm tangential, surrounding the left side of the abdominal aorta, without the interposition of the fatty layer (Figures 1-3).
Figure 1
Preoperative contrast CT scan
A 65 mm-long mass semi-peripheral to the aorta is seen on the left side of the aorta. There is no intervening fat layer between the aortic wall and the tumor. The tumor is in contact with the left ureter (arrow)
CT: computed tomography
Figure 2
Preoperative contrast CT scan
The tumor is in contact with the left ureter (arrows)
CT: computed tomography
Figure 3
MRI T1-enhanced image
The solitary fibrous tumor (arrows) was seen tangential to the left side of the abdominal aorta, and there was no interposition of fatty layer between the abdominal aorta and the SFT
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SFT, solitary fibrous tumor
The tumor was located near the inferior mesenteric artery and the inferior mesenteric vein (Figure 4).
Figure 4
3D CT
The tumor is near the inferior mesenteric artery and the inferior mesenteric vein
CT: computed tomography
Positron emission tomography-CT revealed a low fludeoxyglucose F18 uptake tumor with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of approximately 2.5 and no signs of distant metastasis (Figure 5).
Figure 5
PET-CT scan
There is a low-intensity tumor (arrow) with an SUVmax of approximately 2.5, with no discernible signs suggestive of distant metastasis. The tumor is in contact with the left ureter
PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value
CT-guided biopsy was performed, and pathological examination revealed spindle cell proliferation with mild-to-moderate cellular atypia. Immunostaining was positive for cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), and the Ki-67 index was <5% (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD34 (A), as well as signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (B). The magnification for both is ×100
CD34: cluster of differentiation 34
The preoperative diagnosis was SFT. On imaging, the tumor was in contact with the left abdominal aorta; however, no obvious invasion was noted, and the tumor was considered dissectible. A surgical resection was scheduled.
Surgical procedure
The operation was performed via laparotomy. Owing to the proximity of the tumor to the left ureter, a left ureteral stent was placed prior to laparotomy. The prehypogastric nerve fascia was incised to reach the posterior rectal space. The left common iliac artery was encircled. A cephalic tumor was identified in the area near that site (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Surgical image (A) and schema (B)
The tumor in the retroperitoneal cavity is detached from the surrounding stromal tissue, and the inferior mesenteric artery and left common iliac artery are taped. Schema credits: Naoto Tanabe
IMA, inferior mesenteric artery; SFT, solitary fibrous tumor; CIA, common iliac artery; Ao, aorta
The inferior mesenteric artery was taped and dissected around the tumor. The tumor and abdominal aorta were bluntly and sharply dissected. Bleeding from the abdominal aorta near the center of the tumor was observed, and it was controlled as much as possible by compression. The abdominal aorta and the right common iliac artery above the tumor level were encircled (Figure 8).
Figure 8
Surgical image (A) and schema (B)
The aortic wall and some areas were difficult to dissect; aortic complications required resection and the taping of major vessels. Bilateral common iliac arteries were taped. Schema credits: Naoto Tanabe
The biggest part of the tumor was resected, and the view around the abdominal aorta was cleared. After clamping the abdominal aorta and right and left common iliac arteries, the remnant tumor on the aortic adventitia was completely removed by external resection involving the aorta. Thereafter, a type I artificial vessel replacement was performed just below the inferior mesenteric artery (Figure 9).
Figure 9
Surgical image (A) and schema (B)
Hemorrhage occurred as we proceeded to dissect the tumor from the aortic wall. First, most of the tumor was resected to secure the visual field. The remnant tumor on the adventitia and a part of the aorta was resected in combination after clamping the abdominal aorta and right and left common iliac arteries, and a type I artificial vessel replacement was performed just below the inferior mesenteric artery. Schema credits: Naoto Tanabe
IMA: inferior mesenteric artery
A drainage tube was placed in the retroperitoneal space to quantify bleeding. The operative time was three hours and 39 minutes, and the blood loss was 1,080 mL.
Pathological findings
The specimen was a 6 × 5.5 × 4 cm tumor. Macroscopically, it was described as an elastic hard internal white tumor, and microscopic examination revealed a disorganized proliferation of mild-to-moderate spindle-shaped cells. Nuclear pleomorphism, mitosis, calcification, or necrosis was not observed (Figures 10, 11).
Figure 10
Postoperative pathology: macroscopic solitary fibrous tumor
The tumor diameter was 6 × 5.5 × 4 cm. The proliferation of spindle-shaped cells showing mild-to-moderate atypia
Figure 11
Postoperative pathology: microscopic solitary fibrous tumor
Calcification (-), necrosis (-), and mitotic count (0/10 HPF)
HPF: high-power field
Tumor cells infiltrating the aortic adventitia were also observed (Figures 12, 13).
Figure 12
Postoperative pathology: macroscopic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) remnant in the aortic wall
Macroscopically, the SFT showed an infiltration of the aortic wall (arrow)
Figure 13
Postoperative pathology: microscopic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) remnant in the aortic wall
Microscopically, the tumor cells invaded the aortic adventitia (circle)
Clinical course
The patient was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 9 without major complications and remained asymptomatic, without recurrence for nine months after surgery.
Discussion
SFTs have a relatively good prognosis if the tumor can be completely resected, while the risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis is relatively low; however, various factors such as extrathoracic lesions, positive margins, tumor diameter of >10 cm, mitotic count of >4/10 high-power field (HPF), nuclear pleomorphism, increased cell count, and the presence of necrotic tissue increase the risk of relapse.
Demicco et al. [4] published a risk stratification model that classified distant metastasis and mortality based on risk factors such as age, tumor diameter, and mitotic count. The present case was classified as low risk with a score of 1 for a tumor diameter of 65 mm in a patient <55 years of age and a mitotic count at 0/10 HPF. Similarly, according to the risk stratification model reported by Salas et al., the patient had a score of 0, indicating a good prognosis [5]. Tolstrup et al. [6] reported that Ki-67 expression was associated with the risk of recurrence. In this case, the Ki-67 index was low.
Two points need to be discussed in this study.
The first point was the necessity of artificial vessel replacement. Georgiesh et al. [7] reported that local recurrence occurs in 19% of cases; therefore, R0 resection is preferred. In 2019, Kotani et al. [8] reported a case of an SFT that required prosthetic replacement in which the SFT was in contact with the distal aortic arch. The authors reported that the tumor invaded the aortic adventitia; therefore, artificial vessel replacement was performed to prevent recurrence from tumor residual cells. In our case, the tumor had invaded the aortic adventitia, and artificial vessel replacement was necessary to prevent relapse. Considering the patient’s age and general condition, this procedure was feasible. Our patient was relatively young, in his 40s, and the risk of recurrence or metastasis would be higher in the presence of tumor remnants; therefore, the aim was to minimize recurrence risk.
The second point was whether artificial vessel replacement could have been planned preoperatively. Since the tumor was in semi-peripheral contact with the aorta on imaging before surgery and no evidence of fatty tissue interposition was noted, it was possible that the tumor was quite close to the aorta; therefore, the possibility of partial tissue invasion was considered.
In 2002, Kume et al. [9] reported a case in which SFT arising in the retroperitoneum was in contact with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA); however, no infiltration was noted, and the SMA was dissected in clean margins. In our case, a preoperative CT-guided biopsy revealed a low-grade tumor, and no obvious aortic wall deformation was noted on imaging, which may have led to an underestimation of tumor extension.
Accurately predicting the degree of invasion preoperatively is challenging; in cases where the tumor in contact with the SMA can be dissected, however, it is suspected to be invasive. Therefore, when the tumor is in close contact with the aorta on imaging, even if the tumor is preoperatively estimated to be low grade, the possibility of invasion should be considered, and a preoperative evaluation should be performed by the vascular surgical team.
Conclusions
SFTs have a good prognosis in the case of complete tumor excision; however, the risk of recurrence or distant metastasis varies depending on tumor size, pathological grade, age, and the presence of tumor remnants. In the case presented, although the SFT was a low-grade tumor and the patient was young, abdominal aortic replacement after complete tumor resection was performed to reduce the risk of recurrence. Additionally, when the SFT and aorta are in contact, the possibility of invasion should be considered, and a cardiovascular surgery team should perform a preoperative assessment to ascertain efficiency and safety during the procedure.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2024, Tanabe et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are mesenchymal tumors, and retroperitoneal occurrence is rare. It has been identified in a variety of soft tissues and organs, such as the pleura, peritoneum, and meninges. In this case, the tumor was in contact with the abdominal aorta, and the invasion was difficult to judge preoperatively. Intraoperatively, it was revealed that the tumor could not be completely removed without aortic replacement.
Although SFTs have a generally good prognosis, certain factors, such as tumor incomplete resection, have been reported to increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis. We were able to completely remove the tumor by performing a combined resection of the aorta. The specimens were microscopically disorganized proliferation of spindle-shaped cells. Immunostaining was positive for cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). The tumor cells infiltrating into aortic adventitia were observed. This is a valuable case in which artificial blood vessel replacement was able to reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis due to tumor remnants. We report a rare case of SFT resected with artificial blood vessel replacement.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer