It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Bcakground
Soil respiration (Rs), as the second largest CO2 emissions of terrestrial ecosystems, is sensitive to disturbance and consequent environmental changes. Mowing is strategically implemented as an management approach and has the potential to influence carbon cycling in meadow steppes. However, it remains unclear how and why Rs and its heterotrophic (Rh) and autotrophic (Ra) components respond to consecutive mowing and associated ecological consequences. Here, we conducted a field mowing experiment in a meadow steppe in 2018 and monitored Rs, Rh, and Ra from 2019 to 2022.
Results
We observed a significant reduction in Rs by 4.8% across four years, primarily attributed to a decrease in Rh. This decline in Rs intensified over time, indicating an accumulative effect of mowing. In addition, mowing induced an generally increasing Ra/Rs ratio over the experimental years with a simultaneous increase in the ratio of belowground to aboveground biomass (BGB/AGB). Furthermore, structural equation modeling results revealed that the decline in Rs was largely ascribed to reduced microbial biomass carbon (MBC) under mowing, while the increased Ra/Rs was primarily explained by the enhanced BGB/AGB. Partial regression analysis suggested that the biotic factor of microbial biomass dominated changes in soil respiration induced by mowing rather than abiotic soil temperature.
Conclusions
Our findings showed that consecutive mowing decreased Rs and raised Ra/Rs in meadow steppe by decreasing plant biomass and altering the proportion of biomass allocation. This observed decline in Rs would help to reduce CO2 concentration in atmosphere as well as alleviate global warming. However, considering the concurrent lower microbial biomass, the potential positive impacts of mowing on climate and ecosystem function should be reevaluated in future grassland management practices.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410727.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 1937)
2 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410727.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 1937); Lanzhou University, State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou, China (GRID:grid.32566.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 8571 0482)