Abstract

Background & objective

The Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend vancomycin trough levels of 15–20 mg/L for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, recent consensus guidelines of four infectious disease organizations no longer recommend vancomycin dosing using minimum serum trough concentrations. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of low (< 15 mg/L) vs. high (≥ 15 mg/L) vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections.

Method

A systematic literature review from inception to December 2022 was conducted using four online databases, followed by a meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest included clinical response/efficacy, microbial clearance, length of ICU stay, treatment failure, nephrotoxicity, and mortality.

Results

Fourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria from which vancomycin trough concentration data were available for 5,228 participants. Our analysis found no association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical response [OR = 1.06 (95%CI 0.41–2.72], p = 0.91], microbial clearance [OR = 0.47 (95% CI 0.23–0.96), p = 0.04], ICU length of stay [MD=-1.01 (95%CI -5.73–3.71), p = 0.68], or nephrotoxicity [OR = 0.57 (95% CI 0.31–1.06), p = 0.07]. However, low trough levels were associated with a non-significant trend towards a lower risk of treatment failure [OR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.73–1.10), p = 0.28] and were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality [OR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.90), p = 0.002].

Conclusion

Except for a lower risk of treatment failure and all-cause mortality at low vancomycin trough levels, this meta-analysis found no significant association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections.

Details

Title
Effect of low vs. high vancomycin trough level on the clinical outcomes of adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author
Chander, Subhash; Kumari, Roopa; Hong Yu Wang; Yaqub, Nadeem Mohammed; Parkash, Om; Lohana, Sindhu; Sorath, FNU; Lohana, Abhi Chand; Sadarat, FNU; Shiwlani, Sheena
Pages
1-16
Section
Systematic Review
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
e-ISSN
14712334
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3115121381
Copyright
© 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.