INTRODUCTION
Humans need healthy food to meet the essential requirements of their bodies because foodstuffs and their active components have a substantial impact on the health and nutrition of consumers (Abedini et al., 2023; Fathi et al., 2018; Mohammadzadeh-Aghdash et al., 2017). Among food pollution, microbiological contaminants are deliberated as the main risks concerning food safety risk assessment and public health. Besides, food deterioration has become an increasingly imperative problem globally, and most food spoilage happens during food storage as a result of chemical reactions or the activity of different organisms (Dehghan et al., 2018). In developed countries, one-third of the population is affected by foodborne diseases. Several studies have reported that more than 200 physical, chemical, and microbial factors are responsible for the occurrence of these illnesses. The CDC (Centers for Disease Control) in 2011 reported that annually more than 2000 people die because of diseases transmitted via food and around 128,000 people are hospitalized in the USA (Finger et al., 2019). Chemical food additives are largely employed to inhibit food deterioration and remove foodborne diseases in humans and animals (Gallo et al., 2020; Sohrabi et al., 2017). Although chemical food additives are the most important part of the daily diet as functional additives, their use has been restricted by the US (United States), and FDA (Food and Drug Administration). Although some of these chemical antioxidants did not display any harmful effects on the human body after being added to food products, nevertheless, most of them possess a significant impact on both in vitro and in vivo studies. Recent studies showed that a few of these chemical antioxidants are permitted for use in functional foods and prohibited in some countries owing to their harmful effects (Xu et al., 2021). Table 1 displays the properties of synthetic phenolic antioxidants compared to natural ones. Tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and propyl gallate (PG) are increasingly utilized as efficient antioxidants in various industries food, cosmeceutical, and pharmaceutical and their effects on human health should be considered (Shahidi & Zhong, 2010; Xu et al., 2021). Although these components are legally used in food products, they could be detrimental if their body uptake is more than the acceptable levels. TBHQ, BHA, and PG have been broadly employed in preservative processed foods like numerous meat products, unsaturated vegetable oils, edible animal fats, hair products, adhesives, and lubricants to prevent rancidity and spoilage, inhibit microbial growth, and preserve the freshness of the food products (Gulcin, 2020). Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and the interaction of food antioxidants with albumins like serum albumin are of attention for investigators to comprehend its possible danger to human health (Xu et al., 2021). Figure 1 shows the main disorders caused by long-term consumption of synthetic antioxidants. In this context, it is shown that cyto-genotoxicity of TBHQ, BHA, and PG in various cell lines using different procedures investigated in recent years and their interaction with serum albumin can cause conformational alterations in biological samples. Likewise, the stimulation of intracellular and extracellular accelerators, like oxidative stress, and amyloid fibril creation of serum albumin upon interaction with antioxidants caused various illnesses like diabetes, obesity, and gastric cancers. Herein, in this study, we will outline cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and complex creation of aforementioned food antioxidants with serum albumin. Cytotoxicity and albumin interactions of these dietary antioxidants have been commonly evaluated by numerous researchers in the past decades. Due to the prevalent usage of synthetic food antioxidants, it is important to analyze the cyto-genotoxicity results of food antioxidants and interaction of them with albumin using numerous techniques to comprehend the mechanisms of their toxicity and interaction (Xu et al., 2021).
TABLE 1 Synthetic and natural phenolic antioxidants: A comparison of their properties.
Synthetic phenolic antioxidant | Natural phenolic antioxidant | References |
|
|
Liu and Mabury (2020) and Zeb (2020) |
|
|
Santos-Sánchez et al. (2017) and Xu et al. (2021) |
|
|
Zeb (2020) |
|
|
Martelli and Giacomini (2018) and Xu et al. (2021) |
|
|
Berdahl et al. (2010) and Zeb (2020) |
|
|
Andishmand et al. (2023) and Martelli and Giacomini (2018) |
|
|
Liu and Mabury (2020) |
|
|
Martelli and Giacomini (2018) and Zeb (2020) |
|
|
Liu and Mabury (2020) |
|
|
Augustyniak et al. (2010) |
|
|
Augustyniak et al. (2010) |
|
|
Rodrigues et al. (2020) and Xu et al. (2021) |
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
PROPERTIES OF SYNTHETIC PHENOLIC ANTIOXIDANTS
TBHQ
Sources
TBHQ is a synthetic phenolic compound with chemical formula: C10-H14-O2, CAS number 1948-33-0, and E number E319 which metabolically be constructed from 3-tertbutyl-4-hydroxyanisole. It is known as tert-butylhydroquinone or tertiary butylhydroquinone and can be produced through many methods but mainly it can be chemically synthesized. It is the hydroquinone derivative, replaced with a tert-butyl element. TBHQ is insoluble in water and soluble in ethanol. It's a light-colored crystalline product with a slight odor. Also, TBHQ protects foods that contain iron from discoloration (Van Esch, 1986).
Benefits
TBHQ is the most effective antioxidant in different foodstuffs including various meat products, edible animal fats, unsaturated oils, and oils versus oxidative deterioration. Thus, delaying the expansion of rancidity and extending of shelf life of these products at a level of less than 0.02 percent is possible using this additive. TBHQ neither change the color of food products even in the iron existence nor modify the taste and smell of the food substrates to which it is added. It is also used as a stabilizer to inhibit auto-polymerization in some foodstuffs. The utilization of this substance extends to industrial applications where it serves as an antioxidant, commonly found in various cosmetic items such as blushers, eye shadows, and lipstick, typically at a concentration below 0.1%. TBHQ can be found in an excessive variety of foods containing lipids. It is an approved food antioxidant in the United States, the European Union, Australia, and many other regions. A major benefit of various foods is their stability at high temperatures, and the maintenance of antioxidant capacity during the process and after heating and frying at 180°C or above (Beker et al., 2016; Hojjati-Najafabadi et al., 2020).
Side effects
It has some side effects in large amounts like changes in DNA structure and stomach tumors in experimental animals (Blundell et al., 2022). Nowadays, the exerted nephrotoxicity influence of the TBHQ in rats and cortical apoptosis and traumatic brain damage in mice has been proven by several authors. Current research demonstrates that TBHQ could affect the 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine production in calf thymus DNA as an outcome of the generation of ROS (reactive oxygen species). Even though recent studies have observed that TBHQ triggers cancer cell death at high doses, they have also paradoxically found that TBHQ increases carcinogenic effects when studied in laboratory animals. However, the TBHQ effect on breast cancer has not been entirely explored. It has been pointed out that there is probably a relationship between the occurrence of various diseases like breast cancer and the extensive application of TBHQ in processed foods (Kashanian & Dolatabadi, 2009).
Limitations
TBHQ is the most commonly used food antioxidant owing to its low cost, high performance, and wide availability. It has previously been assessed via the former SCF (Scientific Committee on Food), but there was still a need for further information. The acceptable daily intake (ADI) of TBHQ ranges from 0 to 0.7 mg per kg of body weight. If a mixture of TBHQ, PG, and BHA is used, the separate levels should be decreased proportionately. Table 2 shows the acceptable daily intake and the results of different cellular and molecular methods to investigate the effects of TBHQ, BHA, and PG (Eskandani et al., 2014).
TABLE 2 Acceptable daily intake and results of different cellular and molecular methods to investigate the effects of TBHQ, BHA, and PG.
Food additives | ADI mg/kg | Cell viability | Apoptotic cells | Necrotic cells | Albumin binding site | References |
TBHQ | 0 and 0.7 | 28% | 34% | 38% | Subdomain IIA | Eskandani et al. (2014) and Shahabadi et al. (2011) |
BHA | 0 and 0.5 | 7.51% | 87.40% | 5.09% | Subdomain IIA | Gu et al. (2021) and Vandghanooni et al. (2013) |
PG | 0 and 0.5 | 20.66% | 76% | 3.34% | Subdomain IB | Dolatabadi et al. (2014) and Hamishehkar et al. (2014) |
BHA
Sources
BHA is also named 4-methoxyphenol with chemical formula: C11-H16-O2, CAS number 25013-16-5, and E number 320. It is composed of two isomeric organic compounds, 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole, and 2-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole that could be chemically created through an interaction of methoxyphenol with isobutene (Additives et al., 2018).
Benefits
BHA has been frequently utilized as a food antioxidant to stabilize and protect the nutritive rate and other organoleptic properties such as animal feed harvests and freshness/flavor of foodstuffs for many years. It is applied to decrease free radical formation and prohibit food deterioration and lipid oxidation, especially in fried foods. BHA is utilized as a preservative in food for human consumption, animal feeds, veterinary medications, and related food items. Moreover, it is commonly perceived as a safe component when present in a quantity below 0.02% in food products with oil or fat constituents. BHA is normally approved as a safe (GRAS) by the FDA once utilized by good manufacturing practice. In addition, the toxicity and radiation poisoning of numerous xenobiotics and mutagens can be prevented using BHA antioxidants (Adeyemi, 2021; Dawidowicz et al., 2015).
Side effects
Some literature displayed that BHA reveals an extensive range of biological activities in in vivo models (Xu et al., 2021). According to the literature, BHA can act as a tumor motivator or a tumor promoter in different animal tissues (Imbabi et al., 2021). In this regard, hydroxyanisole-triggered carcinoma development in the stomach of laboratory animals like hamsters, mice, and rats once fed constantly in large amounts, and the proliferative impact of BHA in mammals and pigs' esophagus has been reported. Vandghanooni et al. (2013) reported that BHA can stimulate cytotoxicity and another study demonstrated that BHA in smooth muscle cells induces HO-1 gene expression. Acute toxicity of BHA, immune response, stimulation of phase II detoxifying enzymes, and particularly tumor-promoting activities have been proved by recent studies (Branen, 1975). Therefore, it should be noted that the widespread use of BHA in foods can lead to cytogenetic and molecular toxicity.
Limitations
About 50 states allow the BHA application as a potential antioxidant for food consumption at acceptable levels. BHA is quickly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and its metabolites are excreted in the urine and feces of animal species. According to the FDA, ADI for hydroxyanisole is between 0 and 0.5 mg/kg body weight (b/w) per day (Additives et al., 2018; Emerton & Choi, 2008).
PG
Sources
PG is also called propyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate with chemical formula: C10-H12-O5, CAS number 121-79-9, and E number 310. It is generated by extraction with propane-1-ol from pods of the Tara tree and subsequent purification. PG also is a chemical that can be produced by a reaction of propyl alcohol with gallic acid accompanied by condensation to eliminate excess alcohol (Nguyen et al., 2021).
Benefits
PG is broadly used as a potential synthetic antioxidant in numerous industries such as cosmetics and food products to inhibit fat rancidity and oxidative deterioration, particularly to protect polyunsaturated fats (Dolatabadi & Kashanian, 2010). PG is commonly utilized together with other food antioxidants, e.g., BHA and TBHQ. In contrast to PG, gallates exhibit a prolonged chain structure, providing enhanced solubility in fats and increased stability during food processing. A study revealed that PG antioxidants can affect lipid peroxidation in sunflower and sorghum seedlings. Gallate serves as a crucial antioxidant-based hepatoprotector in both in vitro and in vivo models (Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2023). The use of PG might be a hopeful option to control pericarp frying, inhibit tyrosinase activity, and increase the shelf life of commercially harvested fruits (Xu et al., 2021). It has been reported that preventing nucleic acid synthesis and the respiration system inhibits the growth mechanism of microorganisms by PG, and recently the cytoprotective and antioxidative properties of PG have been studied (Dolatabadi et al., 2014).
Side effects
Due to the prevalent use of PG antioxidants in various industries, it has extensively been studied in both in vitro and in vivo models to recognize cytotoxicity and genotoxicity properties (Silva et al., 2017). Considering the low PG toxicity, it has undesirable effects on the regular functions of target cells and tissues. According to recent studies, PG can contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent cellular respiration inhibition, which might cause ATP (adenosine triphosphate) depletion (Dolatabadi et al., 2014; Shahidi & Ambigaipalan, 2015). The toxicological behaviors of chemical antioxidants like PG were reported using DNA, DAPI, and MTT fragmentation tests. While PG is recognized as an antioxidant substance, recent research has shown that it cannot only reduce the level of intracellular glutathione but also increase the volume of ROS by inhibiting various enzyme activities including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. PG material, when present with Cu (II), causes single-strand breaks with minimal DNA damage due to metal ions. However, when PG transforms into GA (gallic acid) in the existence of metal ions, it is known to induce DNA breaks. It has been emphasized that GA plays a critical role in the cytotoxic and carcinogenic effects of gallate (Additives et al., 2020; Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2023).
Limitations
The use of PG is permitted in all types of oils, fats, and fat-containing foods with extreme limits of gallate such as BHA and TBHQ. PG is listed as a GRAS substance by the US federal FDA with a total concentration of 0.02% of the fat or oil content of food products. Therefore, if mixtures of TBHQ, BHA, BHT, gallates, and PG are utilized, the individual limits should be reduced proportionally (Emerton & Choi, 2008).
CYTO/GENOTOXICITY STUDIES OF SYNTHETIC PHENOLIC ANTIOXIDANTS
The side effects of synthetic food additives on human health have been reported in recent studies (Xu et al., 2021). Various research results showed that consuming high amounts of synthetic food additives can lead to neurological and gastrointestinal disorders (Zeb, 2020). In several studies, it has also been observed that synthetic food additives change the composition of the intestinal microbiota and accelerate gastrointestinal disorders (Xu et al., 2021). It is supposed that the consumption of synthetic additives such as hydroquinone, hydroxyanisole, and gallate significantly reduces the cell layer and has a role in chronic inflammatory diseases such as colitis and chronic disease, colon cancer, obesity, and diabetes (Wang et al., 2021). In this regard, a meaningful assessment of the genotoxicity of food additives can only be done after considering any confounding cytotoxicity effects. Food additives were shown to be cytotoxic when administered orally to laboratory animals (Additives et al., 2020). Several procedures are employed for viable cells measurement via 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), trypan blue, dual dye viability, histopathology, acridine orange, Evans blue staining, and neutral diffusion techniques (Ramasamy & Pakshirajan, 2022). In recent years, the capacity of living cells to absorb certain dyes to remove dead cells has been used as a cytotoxicity indicator. However, the MTT test is currently applied to determine the cytotoxicity of various food additives (Andishmand et al., 2024).
Genotoxicity defines the feature of chemical substances that damage the genetic information inside cells and cause mutations in the genetic material that may induce cancer (Menz et al., 2023). Synthetic food additives are materials that directly or indirectly contribute to human foodstuffs. For this reason, studies on the genotoxicity effects of food additives along with their effects on human health are perfectly abundant (Xu et al., 2021). Genotoxicity effects of these additives have been reported exactly in different cell lines and cause a structural change in the subcellular. There are different methods for in vitro genotoxicity assessment of food additives including alkaline comet, DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fragmentation, and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining techniques. Study results showed that these additives have increased the frequency of DNA damage and chromatin fragmentation in treated cells in comparison to negative control cells (Pinter et al., 2020).
Cyto/genotoxicity of TBHQ
The cytotoxicity of TBHQ additives on A549 and HUVEC cells was assessed through the MTT test, and genotoxicity effects were assessed using DAPI staining, DNA fragmentation, and alkaline comet procedures in vitro. The outcomes of the above test exhibited that TBHQ was capable of triggering cytotoxicity in both case-study cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner as presented in Figure 2. Flow cytometry results confirmed incidence of early/late apoptosis in the treated cells with TBHQ (Figure 3a). Also, the morphology of breaked DNA and DAPI-stained cells based on electrophoresis exhibited distinct fragmentation in the DNA rings and chromatin of cell's treated with TBHQ (Figure 3b). Indeed, the mechanism of TBHQ toxicity was understood using alkaline comet and DNA fragmentation methods (Figure 3c) (Eskandani et al., 2014). Another study demonstrated that TBHQ could induce cytotoxic and genotoxic effect in HUVECs. Braeuning and coworkers reported that incubation of murine 3T3 cells with TBHQ (300 μg/mL) induces the death of treated cells (Braeuning et al., 2012). Previous studies displayed that stromal cells from bone marrow are sensitive to toxicity caused by benzene metabolites like TBHQ and also it could trigger QR (quinone reductase) in the bone marrow of stromal cells as a consequence of stromal toxicity (Twerdok et al., 1992). In addition, the TBBQ (tert butyl benzoquinone) as a major oxidation product of TBHQ, in the time- and dose-dependent manner declined the cell's activity and suppressed DNA synthesis by modulating the S/G2 cell cycle transition (Ye et al., 2018). The cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and modification of biological activities are cyto-genotoxic effects of TBHQ at high concentrations (Sanidad et al., 2016). Among all the hydroquinones tested, TBHQ was the most toxic, followed by 2,5-di(tert-butyl)-1,4-benzohydroquinone and hydroquinone in rat hepatocytes, and this toxicity can arise from the oxygen consumption rate through each hydroquinone (Liu & Mabury, 2020). Another study suggested that TBHQ metabolites such as TBBQ decreased the viability of RAW 264.7 cells and induced autophagy in a dose-dependent manner (Meng et al., 2020).
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Cyto/genotoxicity of BHA
Among numerous food additives, BHA is widely employed for inhibiting rancidity or oxidation of food products. Due to its extensive application in the field of food products, all individuals who partake in them effectively consume boxed food items. Previously, cytotoxicity effects of BHA were tested using flow cytometry and MTT methods whereas genotoxicity was estimated by DAPI staining, alkaline comet, and DNA fragmentation techniques in A549 cells in vitro, and it had been shown that BHA decreased the A549 cells growth in a time- and dose-dependent way as presented in Figure 3b. Early and late apoptosis in the incubated cells with BHA was specified based on the flow cytometry assay. The morphology of DAPI-stained cells exhibited considerable alteration in the DNA and chromatin inside the cell's nucleus, which was presented in Figure 3b. In addition, DNA fragmentation has been observed using the alkaline comet method (Figure 3c) (Vandghanooni et al., 2013). In this regard, the mechanism of BHA toxicity was inferred by alkaline comet assays and DNA breakage due to significant intracellular DNA fragmentation. Additionally, relevant studies displayed that oral consumption of BHA induces cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, increases the progress of neoplastic lesions and preneoplastic in the bladder and stomach of mice, causing forestomach squamous cell carcinomas in lab animals, and boosted tumor promotion at high concentrations (Yu et al., 2000). Yu et al. (2000) showed that stimulating mitochondrial permeability alteration upon binding of the BHA with cell mitochondria could lead to cytochrome-c releasing, apoptosis, and necrosis occurrence. The direct contact of BHA with macromolecules such as DNA and reactive intermediates production was reported in in vitro models (Xu et al., 2021). A new work proposes that BHA can induce cytotoxic and genotoxic effect in root tip cells of A. cepa. Indeed, it should not be consumed in packed food products in higher dosages and even low dosages may be detrimental due to the persistent use of these antioxidants. Besides, its accumulation in the body may cause cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects on humans (Pandey & Kumar, 2021). In addition, enhancement of cell proliferation, stimulation of oxidative DNA damage, and cyto/genotoxicity effects of BHA on human lymphocytes were investigated in vitro as well (Xu et al., 2021).
Cyto/genotoxicity of propyl gallate
One of the main important properties of synthetic phenolic antioxidants is their possible toxicity effects in in vivo and in vitro models (Xu et al., 2021). Imbalance in the cell's signaling and physiology is the foremost cause of cytotoxicity and apoptosis of PG compound. The toxicity of PG is one of the challengeable matters deriving from its extensive use in various food industries. The cytotoxic effects of PG were investigated on A549 lung cancer cells and showed that PG decreased the A549 cell growth in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Besides, early and late apoptosis in incubated cells with PG was confirmed by flow cytometry test. The morphologic changes, chromatin breaks, and DNA fragmentation were detected by the DAPI staining producers (Hamishehkar et al., 2014). Upon former studies, the cyto/genotoxicity of PG using the alkaline comet test was observed. It has been noted that cell respiration disorder arising from mitochondrial dysfunction occurs due to a reduction in operating system (OS)-related enzyme action including catalase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) owing to increase in food antioxidants concentration such as PG (Han & Park, 2009). In addition, Nakagawa et al. (1995) revealed that PG and gallates are toxic to hepatocytes and its cyto/genotoxicity impacts might be owing to mitochondrial impairment. The carcinogenesis and mutagenesis properties of PG have been described to be both enhancing and suppressing effects (Rosin & Stich, 1980). Ultimately, Tayam and Nakagawa (2001) reported that the induction of SCEs (sister-chromatid exchanges) and CAs (chromosomal aberrations) are cyto/genotoxicity properties of gallate in CHO-K1 cells.
BASIC EXPLANATION ABOUT PHENOLIC FOOD ADDITIVES-DNA INTERACTION
Food additives are widely employed for a variety of reasons, such as preservation, pigmentation, and enhancing sweetness. These compounds are incorporated to prevent or postpone the degradation of nutrients due to bacterial, enzymatic, or chemical alterations in edibles, as well as to prolong the duration of storage and the overall excellence of food products. Synthetic food antioxidants occupy a significant place in the food industry (Nanditha & Prabhasankar, 2008; Thorat et al., 2013). Recently, additives have fascinated the attention as probable causes of numerous diseases such as hepatic and nephritic failures, mutagenic and cancer, etc. There are various studies that displayed the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of diverse additives in various cell lines. Among the numerous food additives, TBHQ, BHA, and PG exhibit the capacity to establish molecular complexes with the DNA (nucleic acid) framework (Pandir, 2016; Yang et al., 2023; Yilmaz et al., 2014).
TBHQ–DNA interaction
Several authors have reported that the interaction of TBHQ with DNA likely occurs through a mechanism of intercalation, exhibiting a high affinity that could potentially lead to damage in CT-DNA (Wang et al., 2020). The characterization of TBHQ's interaction with DNA through hyperchromism in the absorption spectrum was conducted. The observed typical binding mode implies potential damage to the DNA helix structure following the intercalation of TBHQ. A fluorescence spectral analysis was carried out to investigate the interaction between TBHQ and DNA, revealing a decrease in DNA emission intensity with increasing TBHQ concentration, providing evidence of their interaction (Dolatabadi & Kashanian, 2010; Wang et al., 2020). Kashanian et al.'s study in 2009 demonstrated the ability of TBHQ to intercalate between base pairs of the DNA molecule, as evidenced by hyperchromism in the UV absorption band of DNA, an increase in the specific viscosity of DNA, and a reduction in TBHQ fluorescence with increasing concentrations of DNA. The electrochemical method has recently been widely employed as a straightforward and efficient approach to investigate the interaction of food compounds with the DNA molecule (Dolatabadi & Kashanian, 2010). Nagai et al. (1996) displayed that the interaction of TBHQ with DNA can be a cause for the creation of 8-hydrox deoxyguanosine in calf thymus DNA owing to its binding with TBHQ. Another study employed multispectroscopic technique, viscosity measurements, chemometrics, molecular docking, and gel electrophoresis assays to examine the interaction of TBHQ with cDNA, leading to the alteration of DNA conformation from B-form to A-form. The study above examined the potential of TBHQ and Cu (II) in causing DNA damage through the application of gel electrophoresis technique. It was found that the interaction between TBHQ and DNA is largely driven by hydrophobic forces with moderate affinity. A noteworthy biomarker for DNA damage resulting from oxidative stress, 8-hydroxy-2′-Deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), was generated at 37, 60°C, and pH 7.4. This process involved the reaction of TBHQ with 2′-deoxyguanosine-5′-monophosphate within DNA, and the analysis was carried out using reversed-phase HPLC assay with a UV detector set at 254 nm wavelength (Handayani et al., 2017).
BHA–DNA interaction
In recent researches, the interaction of BHA with calf thymus DNA at physiological condition was studied by spectrofluorometric, voltammetric, viscosimetric assays, and other techniques. It has also been discovered that BHA has the potential to intercalate with the base pairs of the DNA molecule (Dolatabadi & Kashanian, 2010; Kashanian & Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, 2009). A fluorescence spectrum study of the interaction between BHA and DNA was performed, and the emission intensity of DNA was reduced by increasing the amount of added BHA impurities, indicating that the BHA-DNA interaction exists (Figure 3b). Fluorescence studies have also been used to determine the binding constant between BHA and DNA, as reported by Kashanian and Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi in 2009. In this regard, the value of binding constant (Kb) was high sufficient to show that BHA can intercalate in within DNA molecule. Recently thermodynamic parameters of BHA and DNA complex at four different temperatures 283, 293, 303, and 310 K through Van't Hoff equation were determined (Kashanian & Dolatabadi, 2009). The ∆H and ∆S values of the BHA–DNA formation were −89.02 kJ/mol and −211.21 J/mol, respectively. As it is clear the response is exothermic and enthalpy preferred, the negative entropy values approve the intercalative constant mode of BHA and DNA (Wang et al., 2014). It has been reported that BHA interaction with DNA is through intercalation mode using fluorimetry method. Stern–Volmer equation displayed a Ksv (fluorescence quenching by DNA) rise with reducing pH reaching a minimum at pH 3. This proposes that interaction between BHA and DNA at low pH is an electrostatic interaction mode. Molecular docking studies by other studies showed that BHA bound more sensitively to the G-C-rich regions of ctDNA but analysis of CD spectra showed that BHA-DNA binding changed the B-like DNA conformation to A-like one. The binding constants for BHA and DNA formation were 2.03 × 104, 1.92 × 104, and 1.59 × 104 L/mol at 298, 304, and 310 K, respectively (Wang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2023).
PG–DNA interaction
PG is another imperative antioxidant that is a natural molecule. Its ability to intercalate a DNA molecule has not been observed. By increasing the amount of added DNA, the emission intensity of the PG molecule decreases, indicating that there is an important interaction between PG and DNA (Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2023). For PG-DNA interaction, the Kb value was not high enough to indicate that PG can be intercalated between DNA base pairs. The Kb values clearly emphasize the remarkably low affinity of PG for DNA (Table 1). In fact, PG binds to CT-DNA through lateral binding, such as electrostatic binding. PG can also cause conformational changes in CT-DNA, but not as severe as other food additives. Thermodynamic parameters of PG-DNA formation at four different temperatures (283, 293, 303, and 310 K) were determined (Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2021). DH and DS values of PG-DNA complex were 67.91 kJ/mol and +227.58 J/mol, respectively (Table 1). The positive entropy confirms the non-intercalated binding mode of PG to DNA. The specific viscosity of the DNA sample clearly decreases with the addition of PG. In fact, the interaction of PG with DNA causes the contraction of the DNA helix, the shortening of the DNA molecule, and the reduction of DNA viscosity. Therefore, it can be confirmed that the interaction between PG and DNA occurs through external binding and non-intercalation (Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2023).
INTERACTION OF SYNTHETIC ANTIOXIDANTS WITH SERUM ALBUMIN
Synthetic phenolic antioxidants have been commonly evaluated for their toxicological and biological properties. Thus, once the toxicity data of these phenolic antioxidants becomes available, their use in different industries ought to be reviewed (Mohammadzadeh-Aghdash et al., 2017). Interactions between synthetic chemicals and biological macromolecules have received increasing attention from several researchers in recent years. Among the various macromolecules, serum albumin is the most abundant soluble protein in the mammalian circulatory system, which has several important physiological functions (Fathi et al., 2016; Sohrabi et al., 2017). Therefore, reviewing the interaction between synthetic chemicals and albumins like human serum albumin (HSA) is significant for many researchers to comprehend its possible hazard to public health.
TBHQ interaction with serum albumin
The binding of TBHQ with serum albumin was considered by various procedures such as spectrophotometry, spectrofluorimetry, CD (circular dichroism), FT-IR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy), and SPR (surface plasmon resonance) under physiological conditions (Zhang et al., 2012). Previous studies' results proved that the quenching procedure of albumin with TBHQ was a static mode, and the attained results of the SPR technique showed that TBHQ can dynamically interact with albumin with high affinity which has been led to the dose–response sensogram attained for TBHQ. Numerous binding parameters including a positive value of ∆S and a negative value of ∆H specified that hydrogen bond and hydrophobic forces have main roles in the TBHQ and albumin binding (Fathi et al., 2016; Shahabadi et al., 2011). The binding sites on HSA are located in IIIA and IIA, which were studied by Zhang et al. (2008). Therefore, it is proposed that TBHQ mainly interacts with a hydrophobic site placed in subdomain IIA of albumin (Bi et al., 2005). Figure 4 illustrates the interaction results of TBHQ additives and albumin macromolecule as shown by an arrow.
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
BHA interaction with serum albumin
After absorption by the gastrointestinal tract, BHA can enter the blood through non-covalent bonds and interact with serum albumin, which affects its free concentration, metabolism, distribution, and absorption. On the other hand, the BHA binding with albumin triggers the structural alterations of albumin, influencing the biological activities of it (Shahabadi et al., 2011; Sohrabi et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2017). The BHA binding with albumin and effects of its on human health were evaluated by several authors using various procedures such as molecular docking, multi-spectroscopy, and CD techniques. A previous study disclosed that the mechanism of albumin fluorescence quenching by BHA is in static mode. The binding constant and thermodynamic parameters of recent studies showed that BHA and albumin interact with each other in a relatively stable conformation via hydrophobic procedure and molecular docking experiments proved that site I within subdomain IIA plays a key role in the interaction of BHA and albumin macromolecule as presented in Figure 4 (Al-Shabib et al., 2017; Gu et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2015).
PG interaction with serum albumin
PG is an example of a phenolic antioxidant agent, which has prevalent use in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Dolatabadi et al. investigated the PG interaction with albumin under physiological conditions. The obtained results showed that PG could meaningfully bind to albumin with high affinity, by which the intrinsic fluorescence of albumin is strongly quenched and the thermodynamic variable showed that the hydrophobic binding plays a key role in the complexation of the PG with albumin and molecular modeling results indicated that site IB play major role in the binding of PG with albumin (Dolatabadi et al., 2014; Fathi et al., 2016; Javaheri-Ghezeldizaj et al., 2020). As demonstrated, the maximum hydrophobic forces on PG interaction with albumin happen in the subdomain IB owing to the existence of hydrophobic amino acids including L-tyrosine and L-tryptophan residues as shown by an arrow in Figure 4. It has been noted that the binding of PG to serum albumin causes structural changes in albumin.
CONCLUSION
TBHQ, BHA, and PG possess high antioxidant and multifunctional characteristics and are broadly utilized in various fields such as food products, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. Therefore, the study of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity effects and their binding with biological molecules like serum albumin is highly demanded. TBHQ, BHA, and PG could be metabolized in the human gastric system and directly enter into biological routes through eating foods, drugs, and numerous products and may lead to alimentary deficiency and many illnesses. The toxicity effects of the above-mentioned food antioxidants on human health are confirmed at amounts higher than the permissible limit. Previous studies have presented an effective combination of synthetic phenolic antioxidants with various purposes in food products. However, more studies on the use of these synthetic antioxidants in different industries are needed. In this context, comprehensive studies may be required, and they can be considered for shifting the outlook of industries toward the application of TBHQ, BHA, and PG as harmless antioxidants. The mentioned antioxidants have toxicity effects on human health via cyto/genotoxicity, interaction with albumin, and the initiation of inflammatory routes, metabolic disorders, augmented of diabetes. Recent studies result in this overview revealed that TBHQ, BHA, and PG antioxidants have cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects if absorbed in high doses through the gastrointestinal tract. Thermodynamic parameters showed that the hydrophobic binding plays a major role in the complexation of the TBHQ, BHA, and PG with albumin. The molecular modeling results indicated that subdomain IIA plays a major role in the binding of TBHQ, BHA, and albumin. Finally, based on the aforementioned studies, we can suggest that TBHQ, BHA, and PG synthetic food antioxidants intake in human diets via the digestive system should be decreased.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for supporting this project (Grant No: 73884).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
This study does not involve any human or animal testing.
Abedini, A., Dakhili, S., Bazzaz, S., Kamaladdin Moghaddam, S., Mahmoudzadeh, M., & Andishmand, H. (2023). Fortification of chocolates with high‐value‐added plant‐based substances: Recent trends, current challenges, and future prospects. Food Science & Nutrition, 11(7), 3686–3705.
Additives, E. P. O., Feed, P. O. S. U. I. A., Bampidis, V., Azimonti, G., De Lourdes Bastos, M., Christensen, H., Dusemund, B., Kos Durjava, M., Kouba, M., López‐Alonso, M., López Puente, S., Marcon, F., Mayo, B., Pechová, A., Petkova, M., Ramos, F., Sanz, Y., Villa, R. E., Woutersen, R., … Innocenti, M. L. (2020). Safety and efficacy of propyl gallate for all animal species. EFSA Journal, 18(4), [eLocator: e06069].
Additives, E. P. O., Feed, P. O. S. U. I. A., Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., Bastos, M. L., Bories, G., Chesson, A., Cocconcelli, P. S., Flachowsky, G., Kolar, B., Kouba, M., López‐Alonso, M., Puente, S. L., Mantovani, A., Mayo, B., Ramos, F., Saarela, M., … Gropp, J. (2018). Safety and efficacy of butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) as a feed additive for all animal species. EFSA Journal, 16(3), [eLocator: e05215].
Adeyemi, K. D. (2021). Comparative effect of dietary Morinda lucida leaf and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) on carcass traits, meat quality, and oxidative stability of broiler chickens. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58, 1–11.
Al‐Shabib, N. A., Khan, J. M., Ali, M. S., Al‐Lohedan, H. A., Khan, M. S., Al‐Senaidy, A. M., Husain, F. M., & Shamsi, M. B. (2017). Exploring the mode of binding between food additive “butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)” and human serum albumin: Spectroscopic as well as molecular docking study. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 230, 557–564.
Andishmand, H., Masoumi, B., Torbati, M., Homayouni‐Rad, A., Azadmard‐Damirchi, S., & Hamishehkar, H. (2023). Ultrasonication/dynamic maceration‐assisted extraction method as a novel combined approach for recovery of phenolic compounds from pomegranate peel. Food Science & Nutrition, 11, 7160–7171.
Andishmand, H., Yousefi, M., Jafari, N., Azadmard‐Damirchi, S., Homayouni‐Rad, A., Torbati, M., & Hamishehkar, H. (2024). Designing and fabrication of colloidal nano‐phytosomes with gamma‐oryzanol and phosphatidylcholine for encapsulation and delivery of polyphenol‐rich extract from pomegranate peel. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 256, [eLocator: 128501].
Augustyniak, A., Bartosz, G., Čipak, A., Duburs, G., Horáková, L. U., Łuczaj, W., Majekova, M., Odysseos, A. D., Rackova, L., Skrzydlewska, E., Stefek, M., Strosová, M., Tirzitis, G., Venskutonis, P. R., Viskupicova, J., Vraka, P. S., & Zarković, N. (2010). Natural and synthetic antioxidants: An updated overview. Free Radical Research, 44(10), 1216–1262.
Beker, S. A., da Silva, Y. P., Bücker, F., Cazarolli, J. C., de Quadros, P. D., Peralba, M. D. C. R., Piatnicki, C. M. S., & Bento, F. M. (2016). Effect of different concentrations of tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) on microbial growth and chemical stability of soybean biodiesel during simulated storage. Fuel, 184, 701–707.
Berdahl, D., Nahas, R., & Barren, J. (2010). Synthetic and natural antioxidant additives in food stabilization: Current applications and future research. In Oxidation in foods and beverages and antioxidant applications (pp. 272–320). Taylor & Francis.
Bi, S., Song, D., Tian, Y., Zhou, X., Liu, Z., & Zhang, H. (2005). Molecular spectroscopic study on the interaction of tetracyclines with serum albumins. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 61(4), 629–636.
Blundell, R., Shah, M. A., Azzopardi, J. I., Chauhdary, Z., Shah, S., & Shah, G. M. (2022). Tert‐butylhydroquinone. In Antioxidants effects in health (pp. 227–234). Elsevier.
Braeuning, A., Vetter, S., Orsetti, S., & Schwarz, M. (2012). Paradoxical cytotoxicity of tert‐butylhydroquinone in vitro: What kills the untreated cells? Archives of Toxicology, 86(9), 1481–1487.
Branen, A. (1975). Toxicology and biochemistry of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 52(2), 59–63.
Dawidowicz, A. L., Olszowy, M., & Jóźwik‐Dolęba, M. (2015). Antagonistic antioxidant effect in butylated hydroxytoluene/butylated hydroxyanisole mixture. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 39(6), 2240–2248.
Dehghan, P., Mohammadi, A., Mohammadzadeh‐Aghdash, H., & Dolatabadi, J. E. N. (2018). Pharmacokinetic and toxicological aspects of potassium sorbate food additive and its constituents. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 80, 123–130.
Dolatabadi, J. E. N., & Kashanian, S. (2010). A review on DNA interaction with synthetic phenolic food additives. Food Research International, 43(5), 1223–1230.
Dolatabadi, J. E. N., Panahi‐Azar, V., Barzegar, A., Jamali, A. A., Kheirdoosh, F., Kashanian, S., & Omidi, Y. (2014). Spectroscopic and molecular modeling studies of human serum albumin interaction with propyl gallate. RSC Advances, 4(110), 64559–64564.
Emerton, V., & Choi, E. (2008). Essential guide to food additives: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Eskandani, M., Hamishehkar, H., & Dolatabadi, J. E. N. (2014). Cytotoxicity and DNA damage properties of tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) food additive. Food Chemistry, 153, 315–320.
Fathi, F., Dolatanbadi, J. E. N., Rashidi, M.‐R., & Omidi, Y. (2016). Kinetic studies of bovine serum albumin interaction with PG and TBHQ using surface plasmon resonance. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 91, 1045–1050.
Fathi, F., Mohammadzadeh‐Aghdash, H., Sohrabi, Y., Dehghan, P., & Dolatabadi, J. E. N. (2018). Kinetic and thermodynamic studies of bovine serum albumin interaction with ascorbyl palmitate and ascorbyl stearate food additives using surface plasmon resonance. Food Chemistry, 246, 228–232.
Finger, J. A., Baroni, W. S., Maffei, D. F., Bastos, D. H., & Pinto, U. M. (2019). Overview of foodborne disease outbreaks in Brazil from 2000 to 2018. Food, 8(10), 434.
Gallo, M., Ferrara, L., Calogero, A., Montesano, D., & Naviglio, D. (2020). Relationships between food and diseases: What to know to ensure food safety. Food Research International, 137, [eLocator: 109414].
Gu, J., Zheng, S., Huang, X., He, Q., & Sun, T. (2021). Exploring the mode of binding between butylated hydroxyanisole with bovine serum albumin: Multispectroscopic and molecular docking study. Food Chemistry, 357, [eLocator: 129771].
Gulcin, İ. (2020). Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: An updated overview. Archives of Toxicology, 94(3), 651–715.
Hamishehkar, H., Khani, S., Kashanian, S., Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, J., & Eskandani, M. (2014). Geno‐and cytotoxicity of propyl gallate food additive. Drug and Chemical Toxicology, 37(3), 241–246.
Han, Y. H., & Park, W. H. (2009). Propyl gallate inhibits the growth of HeLa cells via regulating intracellular GSH level. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47(10), 2531–2538.
Handayani, S., Dani, I., & Pakuanisa, D. (2017). Study of DNA adduct 8 hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyguanosine (8‐OHdG) formation through fenton reaction with tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) and butyl hydroxy toluene (BHT). Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Hojjati‐Najafabadi, A., Rahmanpour, M. S., Karimi, F., Zabihi‐Feyzaba, H., Malekmohammad, S., Agarwal, S., & Khalilzadeh, M. A. (2020). Determination of tert‐butylhydroquinone using a nanostructured sensor based on CdO/SWCNTs and ionic liquid. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 15, 6969–6980.
Imbabi, T., Hassan, A., Ahmed‐Farid, O., El‐Garhy, O., Sabeq, I., Moustafa, M., Mohammadein, A., Hassan, N., Osman, A., & Sitohy, M. (2021). Supplementing rabbit diets with butylated hydroxyanisole affects oxidative stress, growth performance, and meat quality. Animal, 15(9), [eLocator: 100339].
Javaheri‐Ghezeldizaj, F., Alizadeh, A. M., Dehghan, P., & Dolatabadi, J. E. N. (2023). Pharmacokinetic and toxicological overview of propyl gallate food additive. Food Chemistry, 423, [eLocator: 135219].
Javaheri‐Ghezeldizaj, F., Soleymani, J., Kashanian, S., Dolatabadi, J. E. N., & Dehghan, P. (2020). Multi‐spectroscopic, thermodynamic and molecular dockimg insights into interaction of bovine serum albumin with calcium lactate. Microchemical Journal, 154, [eLocator: 104580].
Kashanian, S., & Dolatabadi, J. E. N. (2009). DNA binding studies of 2‐tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) food additive. Food Chemistry, 116(3), 743–747.
Kashanian, S., & Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, J. (2009). In vitro study of calf thymus DNA interaction with butylated hydroxyanisole. DNA and Cell Biology, 28(10), 535–540.
Liu, R., & Mabury, S. A. (2020). Synthetic phenolic antioxidants: A review of environmental occurrence, fate, human exposure, and toxicity. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19), 11706–11719.
Martelli, G., & Giacomini, D. (2018). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities for natural and synthetic dual‐active compounds. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 158, 91–105.
Meng, X., Xia, C., Ye, Q., & Nie, X. (2020). Tert‐butyl‐p‐benzoquinone induces autophagy by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 cells. Food & Function, 11(5), 4193–4201.
Menz, J., Götz, M. E., Gündel, U., Gürtler, R., Herrmann, K., Hessel‐Pras, S., Kneuer, C., Kolrep, F., Nitzsche, D., Pabel, U., Sachse, B., Schmeisser, S., Schumacher, D. M., Schwerdtle, T., Tralau, T., Zellmer, S., & Schäfer, B. (2023). Genotoxicity assessment: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose–response data. Archives of Toxicology, 97(9), 2303–2328.
Mohammadzadeh‐Aghdash, H., Dolatabadi, J. E. N., Dehghan, P., Panahi‐Azar, V., & Barzegar, A. (2017). Multi‐spectroscopic and molecular modeling studies of bovine serum albumin interaction with sodium acetate food additive. Food Chemistry, 228, 265–269.
Nagai, F., Okubo, T., Ushiyama, K., Satoh, K., & Kano, I. (1996). Formation of 8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine in calf thymus DNA treated with tert‐butylhydroquinone, a major metabolite of butylated hydroxyanisole. Toxicology Letters, 89(2), 163–167.
Nakagawa, Y., Nakajima, K., Tayama, S., & Moldeus, P. (1995). Metabolism and cytotoxicity of propyl gallate in isolated rat hepatocytes: Effects of a thiol reductant and an esterase inhibitor. Molecular Pharmacology, 47(5), 1021–1027.
Nanditha, B., & Prabhasankar, P. (2008). Antioxidants in bakery products: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 49(1), 1–27.
Nguyen, V. H., Le, M. N., Nguyen, H. B., Ha, K. O., Pham, T. H. V., Nguyen, T. H., Dao, N. S. H., Nguyen, V. G., Nguyen, D. L., & Trinh, N. T. (2021). Propyl gallate. Molbank, 2021(2), M1201.
Pandey, H., & Kumar, S. (2021). Butylated hydroxytoluene and butylated hydroxyanisole induced cyto‐genotoxicity in root cells of Allium cepa L. Heliyon, 7(5), [eLocator: e07055].
Pandir, D. (2016). DNA damage in human germ cell exposed to the some food additives in vitro. Cytotechnology, 68(4), 725–733.
Pinter, E., Rainer, B., Czerny, T., Riegel, E., Schilter, B., Marin‐Kuan, M., & Tacker, M. (2020). Evaluation of the suitability of mammalian in vitro assays to assess the genotoxic potential of food contact materials. Food, 9(2), 237.
Ramasamy, S., & Pakshirajan, K. (2022). Product evaluation: Cytotoxicity assays. In Biomedical product and materials evaluation (pp. 373–408). Elsevier.
Rodrigues, J. S., do Valle, C. P., Uchoa, A. F. J., Ramos, D. M., da Ponte, F. A. F., de Sousa Rios, M. A., de Queiroz Malveira, J., & Ricardo, N. M. P. S. (2020). Comparative study of synthetic and natural antioxidants on the oxidative stability of biodiesel from tilapia oil. Renewable Energy, 156, 1100–1106.
Rosin, M., & Stich, H. (1980). Enhancing and inhibiting effects of propyl gallate on carcinogen‐induced mutagenesis. Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology, 4(1), 159–167.
Sanidad, K. Z., Sukamtoh, E., Wang, W., Du, Z., Florio, E., He, L., Xiao, H., Decker, E. A., & Zhang, G. (2016). Oxidative conversion mediates antiproliferative effects of tert‐butylhydroquinone: Structure and activity relationship study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64(19), 3743–3748.
Santos‐Sánchez, N. F., Salas‐Coronado, R., Valadez‐Blanco, R., Hernández‐Carlos, B., & Guadarrama‐Mendoza, P. C. (2017). Natural antioxidant extracts as food preservatives. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Technologia Alimentaria, 16(4), 361–370.
Shahabadi, N., Maghsudi, M., Kiani, Z., & Pourfoulad, M. (2011). Multispectroscopic studies on the interaction of 2‐tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), a food additive, with bovine serum albumin. Food Chemistry, 124(3), 1063–1068.
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015). Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects–a review. Journal of Functional Foods, 18, 820–897.
Shahidi, F., & Zhong, Y. (2010). Novel antioxidants in food quality preservation and health promotion. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 112(9), 930–940.
Silva, I., Polaquini, C., Regasini, L., Ferreira, H., & Pavan, F. (2017). Evaluation of cytotoxic, apoptotic, mutagenic, and chemopreventive activities of semi‐synthetic esters of gallic acid. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 105, 300–307.
Sohrabi, Y., Panahi‐Azar, V., Barzegar, A., Dolatabadi, J. E. N., & Dehghan, P. (2017). Spectroscopic, thermodynamic and molecular docking studies of bovine serum albumin interaction with ascorbyl palmitate food additive. BioImpacts: BI, 7(4), 241.
Sun, Q., He, J., Yang, H., Li, S., Zhao, L., & Li, H. (2017). Analysis of binding properties and interaction of thiabendazole and its metabolite with human serum albumin via multiple spectroscopic methods. Food Chemistry, 233, 190–196.
Tayama, S., & Nakagawa, Y. (2001). Cytogenetic effects of propyl gallate in CHO‐K1 cells. Mutation Research, Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 498(1–2), 117–127.
Thorat, I. D., Jagtap, D. D., Mohapatra, D., Joshi, D., Sutar, R., & Kapdi, S. (2013). Antioxidants, their properties, uses in food products and their legal implications. International Journal of Food Studies, 2(1), 81–104.
Twerdok, L. E., Rembish, S. J., & Trush, M. A. (1992). Induction of quinone reductase and glutathione in bone marrow cells by 1, 2‐dithiole‐3‐thione: Effect on hydroquinone‐induced cytotoxicity. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 112(2), 273–281.
Van Esch, G. (1986). Toxicology of tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 24(10–11), 1063–1065.
Vandghanooni, S., Forouharmehr, A., Eskandani, M., Barzegari, A., Kafil, V., Kashanian, S., & Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, J. (2013). Cytotoxicity and DNA fragmentation properties of butylated hydroxyanisole. DNA and Cell Biology, 32(3), 98–103.
Wang, L., Zhang, G., Pan, J., Xiong, C., & Gong, D. (2014). Intercalation binding of food antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole to calf thymus DNA. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 141, 253–261.
Wang, R., Li, N., Hu, X., Pan, J., Zhang, G., Zeng, X., & Gong, D. (2020). Characterizing the binding of tert‐butylhydroquinone and its oxidation product tert‐butylquinone with calf thymus DNA in vitro. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 302, [eLocator: 112338].
Wang, W., Xiong, P., Zhang, H., Zhu, Q., Liao, C., & Jiang, G. (2021). Analysis, occurrence, toxicity and environmental health risks of synthetic phenolic antioxidants: A review. Environmental Research, 201, [eLocator: 111531].
Wu, D., Yan, J., Tang, P., Li, S., Xu, K., & Li, H. (2015). Binding properties and structure–affinity relationships of food antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole and its metabolites with lysozyme. Food Chemistry, 188, 370–376.
Xu, X., Liu, A., Hu, S., Ares, I., Martínez‐Larrañaga, M.‐R., Wang, X., Martínez, M., Anadón, A., & Martínez, M. A. (2021). Synthetic phenolic antioxidants: Metabolism, hazards and mechanism of action. Food Chemistry, 353, [eLocator: 129488].
Yang, S. J., Wang, Y. S., Zhang, L. D., Ding, Z. M., Zhou, X., Duan, Z. Q., Liu, M., Liang, A. X., & Huo, L. J. (2023). High‐dose synthetic phenolic antioxidant propyl gallate impairs mouse oocyte meiotic maturation through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA damage. Environmental Toxicology, 38, 1800–1810.
Ye, Q., Meng, X., & Jiang, L. (2018). Identification and assessment of residual levels of the main oxidation product of tert‐butylhydroquinone in frying oils after heating and its cytotoxicity to RAW 264.7 cells. Food Chemistry, 264, 293–300.
Yilmaz, S., Ünal, F., Yüzbaşıoğlu, D., & Celik, M. (2014). DNA damage in human lymphocytes exposed to four food additives in vitro. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 30(10), 926–937.
Yu, R., Mandlekar, S., & Kong, A.‐N. T. (2000). Molecular mechanisms of butylated hydroxylanisole‐induced toxicity: Induction of apoptosis through direct release of cytochromec. Molecular Pharmacology, 58(2), 431–437.
Zeb, A. (2020). Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 44(9), [eLocator: e13394].
Zhang, G., Ma, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, J. (2012). Multispectroscopic studies on the interaction of maltol, a food additive, with bovine serum albumin. Food Chemistry, 133(2), 264–270.
Zhang, G., Que, Q., Pan, J., & Guo, J. (2008). Study of the interaction between icariin and human serum albumin by fluorescence spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Structure, 881(1–3), 132–138.
Zhang, X. J., Diao, M. N., & Zhang, Y. F. (2023). A review of the occurrence, metabolites and health risks of butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 103, 6150–6166.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Synthetic food antioxidants such as tert‐butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and propyl gallate (PG) have been extensively utilized in different food industries because of their high protectant activities to stop food spoilage and remove foodborne diseases in humans and animals. It would be emphasized that increasing the intake of antioxidants through intracellular may lead to cyto/genotoxicity, and their complex formation with biological molecules eventually accelerate the progress of various diseases like multiple sclerosis, diabetes, neurological disorders, cardiac vascular disease, cancer, etc. Therefore, their toxicity is one of the challenging subjects due to their extensive use in food‐related industries. TBHQ, BHA, and PG antioxidants have cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects if absorbed in high doses through the gastrointestinal tract. Thermodynamic parameters presented that the hydrophobic bind plays a key role in the complexation of the TBHQ, BHA, and PG with albumin. The molecular modeling results showed that subdomain IIA plays a vital role in the interaction of TBHQ and BHA with albumin. To comprehend the mechanisms of the cyto/genotoxicity effects of these food antioxidants and conformational alterations of albumin macromolecule, we aim to overview numerous types of research that evaluated the cyto/genotoxicity effects of these antioxidants using several procedures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Pharmaceutical Analysis Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
4 Miandoab Schools of Medical Sciences, Miandoab, Iran
5 Food and Beverages Safety Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
6 Student Research Committee, Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
7 Department of Internal Medicne, School of Medicine, Solid Tumor Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran