Abstract
Background
The two main input indicators needed to assess the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) strategies are cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome. Therefore, we focused in our study on the direct cost associated with the Progesterone Prime Ovulation Induction Protocol (P-P-OP protocol) compared to other protocols, and the clinical outcomes of this strategy were measured in their effect on implantation and pregnancy rates.
Methods
A pilot single-armed study was conducted on 47 infertile women coming for an ICSI cycle. Progesterone priming was started with 10 mg dydrogesterone along with HMG 150–300 IU from the second day of the menstrual cycle and was maintained until the day of ovulation trigger. The primary outcome was the cost per cycle, while the secondary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. The cost per cycle, including the cryopreservation cost, was calculated for economic evaluation.
Results
Per each cycle, the number of retrieved oocytes was 14.87 ± 8.09, the number of mature oocytes was 9.81 ± 4.67, the number of total embryos was 8.74 ± 4.28 (grade A = 67.40%, grade B = 11.92%, grade C = 20.68%), and the number of transferred embryos was 2.43 ± 0.68. The clinical pregnancy rate in our study was 42.5%. Economically, the cost of the P-P-OP protocol for each patient was only 56 USD.
Conclusion
The P-P-OP protocol is a simplified approach suitable for freeze-only strategies, offering the benefits of positive results, fewer injections, lower costs, and increased patient convenience.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Medical Research and Clinical Studies Institute, National Research Centre, Reproductive Health and Family Planning Research Department, Cairo, Egypt (GRID:grid.419725.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8157)
2 Walad We Bent Fertility Center, Cairo, Egypt (GRID:grid.419725.c)
3 Al-Azhar University, Histology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt (GRID:grid.411303.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2155 6022)
4 Walad We Bent Fertility Center, Cairo, Egypt (GRID:grid.411303.4)
5 Al-Azhar University, International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Cairo, Egypt (GRID:grid.411303.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2155 6022)





