This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Lycii Cortex (LC) was initially documented in the Western Han Dynasty in the “52 Diseases Formula.” Based on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) principles, the LC is classified under the lung meridian. It is renowned for its therapeutic effects, including clearing heat, detoxifying, nourishing yin, moistening dryness, reducing inflammation, and stopping bleeding. Yam deficiency is commonly used to alleviate lung heat symptoms. Modern pharmacological research has shown that LC exhibits various activities, including hypotensive, hypoglycemic, antibacterial, antiviral, antipyretic, and antiparoxysmal effects. The active ingredients of LC mainly consist of alkaloids and organic acids, which have drawn the attention of pharmacologists. Recent research has focused on alkaloid compounds, which have shown promise in the clinical treatment of conditions such as pneumonia, lung cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease [1–3].
Due to the influence of the geographical environment, harvesting, and storage, the composition of compounds in LC and their pharmacological effects are different, resulting in uneven LC quality. According to the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, the source of Cortex Lycii is clearly the dry root bark of Lycium chinense Mill. or Lycium barbarum L. However, there is no established quality standard for LC, which raises questions about the selection of high-quality drugs and the identification of premium production regions. Therefore, the establishment of methods for determining the content is crucial for researching high-quality medicinal materials and identifying regions with optimal production, which will ensure effective quality control [4]. In 2016, the academician Changxiao Liu in China proposed the concept of a quality marker (Q-marker) based on five core principles: traceability and transitivity, specificity, measurability, effectiveness, and prescription compatibility. By screening chemical substances closely related to the safety and effectiveness of TCM, this process provides a reference for the quality control of Chinese herbal medicine.
In recent years, scholars have begun to study LC content determination methods. Zhang et al. established a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry method for 24 components in LC [5] and developed a method for structural characterization of phenolic amides from LC by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with linear ion trap orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry [6]. Zhao et al. established a characteristic RSLC fingerprint with 14 common peaks [7]. Li et al. used kukoamine A and kukoamine B as Q-markers and established a quality control method for LC using HPLC [8]. Although many scholars have conducted extensive research, the specificity and effectiveness of the measured indicators are still unclear. Therefore, it is extremely necessary to establish comprehensive and effective quality control methods. Network pharmacology [9] is a research method that utilizes the correlation between composition and efficacy as a Q-marker. This technique is used to explore the mechanism of multicomponent and multitarget TCM treatment. It has been widely used in the study of Q-markers for various Chinese herbal medicines, Chinese herbal pieces, and Chinese herbal compounds. The pattern recognition method in chemometrics is the key method to screen the Q-markers of TCM. Pattern recognition technology mainly includes principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis, partial least squares (PLS) method, etc., which can reduce the dimension of high-dimensional data, improve the identification of fingerprints, and accurately classify the functions and characteristics of medicinal materials. In this paper, network pharmacology combined with chemometrics methods were used to analyze and process the data. According to the traceability, effectiveness, and measurability of Q-markers, the Q-markers of LC were screened out, which laid a scientific foundation for the LC quality control and evaluation model.
Based on the effectiveness, measurability, and traceability of the Q-marker, the chemical components in LC and the prototype components in the plasma, urine, and feces of rats after oral administration of LC were identified by UPLC–Q-TOF-MS technology. The “component–target–disease” network was constructed by network pharmacology to predict potential Q-markers in LC. UPLC–MS/MS was used to determine the concentrations of 11 potential markers, and the concentrations of 35 batches of LC from seven producing areas were determined. Finally, multivariate statistical analysis was used to analyze the high-quality producing areas of LC. The results of this study could provide a reference for the quality control and evaluation of LC and lay the foundation for further research. The workflow of this study is presented in Figure 1.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
Eleven pure compounds were used as reference standards (purity ≥ 98%). Among these compounds, guanosine (111977-201501), chlorogenic acid (110753-201817), caffeic acid (110885-201701), ferulic acid (110773-201614), kaempferol (110861-202013), luteolin (111520-202006), apigenin (111901-202004), and emodin (110756-201913) were purchased from the China Consummate Testing International Academy of Inspection and Monitoring (Beijing, China). Kukoamine A (ST82040105, 7314), kukoamine B (ST79760105, 7315), and scopolin (ST05010120, 7317) were purchased from Shanghai Shidande Standard Technical Service Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
2.2. Animals
Eighteen male Wistar rats weighing 180–220 g supplied by SPF (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (License Number: SCXK (Beijing, China) 2019-0010 and Animal Certificate Number: 1112511911000098) were kept under specific pathogen-free (SPF)-grade conditions (22°C ± 2°C, a natural light–dark cycle, a relative humidity of 50 ± 10%) and provided water and food ad libitum. The animals were acclimatized to the facilities for 1 week and then fasted with access to water for 12 h prior to each experiment. The animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the study protocol was reviewed by the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Reference Number: IRM-DWLL-2022135).
One hundred grams of LC was weighed, 10 times the amount of water was added to extract for 1 h, the sample was filtered, 8 times the amount of water was added for 40 min, the sample was filtered, the filtrate was combined twice, the sample was concentrated to 100 mL, and the sample was stored in a refrigerator at −4°C for later use. Eighteen Wistar rats were randomly divided into a blank group, a plasma group, and a urine/feces group, with six rats in each group. Except for the blank group, which was given physiological saline by gavage, the other groups were given LC drug solution by gavage at a dose of 2.43 g·kg−1.
2.3. Sample Preparation
2.3.1. Preparation of LC Solution
The medicinal materials of the LC were removed, crushed, and passed through a No. 3 sieve. The powder (0.1 g) was placed in a 25-mL conical bottle with a stopper. Then, 25 mL of 70% methanol was added, and the mass was accurately measured. Ultrasonic treatment (power: 250 W, frequency: 40 kHz) was conducted for 30 min. After cooling, the sample was reweighed, and 70% methanol was added to minimize mass loss. The mixture was shaken well and centrifuged at
2.3.2. Preparation of Plasma, Urine, and Feces Solutions for UPLC–Q/TOF-MS
In the plasma group, after fasting but with free access to water for 12 h, the rats were orally administered drugs. Blood samples were collected from the eye vein plexus at 15, 30, and 60 min and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after administration. The samples were placed in 1% sodium heparin anticoagulant tubes and centrifuged at 4°C and
Urine/feces group: Rats were housed in metabolic cages with free access to water but not food. The test substance was orally administered, and urine and feces were collected at 0–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–24, and 24–48 h and stored at −80°C for later use. Urine and feces samples from each time point were pooled separately, and urine samples were prepared in the same manner as plasma samples. One gram of dried feces was extracted by ultrasonic extraction with 1 mL of methanol for 60 min and centrifuged at
2.4. UPLC–Q/TOF-MS Conditions
LC was separated on a Waters CORTECS T3 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.6 μm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (Solvent A) and acetonitrile (Solvent B). The gradient elution program was set as follows: 0–3 min, 0% ⟶ 2% B; 3–10 min, 2% B; 10–12 min, 2% ⟶ 5% B; 12–18 min, 5% B; 18–40 min, 5% ⟶ 8% B; 40–55 min, 8% ⟶ 28% B; 55–65 min, 28% ⟶ 100% B; 65–70 min, 100% B; 70–72 min, 100% ⟶ 0% B; and 72–80 min, 0% B. Mass spectrometry was performed using an ESI source.
Positive and negative ion switching modes in the range of m/z 100–1500 were used for MS analysis. The ion source parameters were capillary voltages of 3.00 kV (ESI+) and 2.50 kV (ESI−), a sampling cone voltage of 50 V, a source temperature of 120°C, and a cone gas flow rate of 50 L·h−1. The desolvation gas was heated to 800°C and delivered at a gas flow rate of 550 L·h−1. The parameters were set to be the same in both positive and negative ion modes. The reference solution was 200 pg·μL−1 leucine enkephalin, and real-time correction was performed at a flow rate of 10 μL·min−1.
2.5. Component–Target–Disease Network Construction
Through the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP) (https://tcmsp-e.com/tcmsp.php), the compounds and targets of the TCM LC were identified. The active ingredients and targets were screened for oral bioavailability (OB) ≥ 30% and drug likeness (DL) ≥ 0.18. Combined with a literature search, the active ingredients were preliminarily determined. The SwissTargetPrediction (https://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/) and HERB (https://herb.ac.cn/Search/) databases were used to assist in identifying supplementary targets. All targets were retrieved from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/), and nonhuman targets were excluded using the filter “Homosapiens.” After summarizing and removing duplicates, the compound components and the total number of targets were obtained.
The GeneCards database was used to obtain genes related to the efficacy of LC treatment. The keywords used were “relieving fever,” “cough with lung heat,” and “hypoglycemic rash.” Scores greater than the median of the relevant scores were combined to eliminate repetitive items, and the targets related to the efficacy of LC were obtained as disease targets.
The LC component targets and the LC efficacy targets were imported into the Venn diagram online platform (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) for the intersection. The “LC” and “Effect” were used to indicate the efficacy of LC and LC, respectively. The intersection was used to identify the common targets, and a Venn diagram was created.
Finally, the component–target–disease pathway network was established and visualized using Cytoscape 3.9.1 software.
2.6. UPLC–MS/MS Conditions
An Acquity H-Class UPLC and a Xevo TQ-S Micro triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI interface were used in this study (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). Twenty-four analytes were separated using an Acquity UPLC BEH Shield C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm), and the column temperature was set at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The gradient elution conditions were as follows: 0–8 min, acetonitrile changed from 5% to 95%; 8–9 min, acetonitrile decreased to 5%; and 9–13 min, acetonitrile was maintained at 5%.
The desolvation and cone gases were set at 800 L/h and 150 L/h, respectively. Helium was selected as the collision gas. The capillary voltage was set to 2.5 kV. The source and desolvation temperatures were both set to 400°C. Multiple reaction monitoring and positive/negative ESI modes were used for quantitative analysis [10] (Table 1, Figure 2).
Table 1
Mass spectrum parameters of the 11 index components.
No. | RT (min) | Analytes | MRM | ||||
Parent | Daughters | Cone voltage | Collision energy | Ion mode | |||
1 | 0.79 | Kukoamine A | 531.30 | 222.10 | 47 | 11 | + |
2 | 1.03 | Guanosine | 284.10 | 152.10 | 46 | 22 | + |
3 | 1.77 | Kukoamine B | 531.30 | 222.10 | 47 | 11 | + |
4 | 2.07 | Chlorogenic acid | 352.70 | 190.60 | 36 | 34 | − |
5 | 2.14 | Scopolin | 354.74 | 193.07 | 42 | 14 | + |
6 | 2.37 | Caffeic acid | 178.95 | 134.94 | 46 | 18 | − |
7 | 3.04 | Ferulic acid | 192.80 | 133.20 | 36 | 16 | − |
8 | 3.89 | Kaempferol | 286.95 | 153.02 | 42 | 32 | + |
9 | 3.89 | Luteolin | 284.90 | 133.00 | 50 | 20 | − |
10 | 4.34 | Apigenin | 268.80 | 116.60 | 50 | 20 | − |
11 | 6.52 | Emodin | 269.15 | 225.07 | 46 | 26 | − |
Abbreviations: MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; RT, retention time.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
2.7. Method Validation
According to the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, the method of multi-index content determination, including accuracy, precision, linearity, range, repeatability, stability, and sample recovery, was verified.
2.8. Content Determination
LC was purchased from Tianjin Modern Innovation Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd. The sources of these batches were identified by Professor Guo Baolin from the Institute of Medicinal Plants, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. A total of 35 batches of LC were divided into seven categories according to the different producing areas and suppliers. Then, the test solution was prepared, analyzed, and determined according to the conditions of liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry, the peak area of each component was recorded, and the contents of guanosine, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, kaempferol, luteolin, apigenin, emodin, kukoamine A, kukoamine B, and scopolin in different batches of ground bark samples were calculated. Information on the origin of the medicinal materials is given in Table 2.
Table 2
Information on 35 batches of Lycii Cortex.
No. | Batch number | Producing area | Remark |
1 | DGP-20180806 | Xinmi County, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province | CD1 |
2 | DGP-20180807 | ||
3 | DGP-20180808 | ||
4 | DGP-20180809 | ||
5 | DGP-20180810 | ||
6 | DGP-181107-1 | Ningxia Province | CD2 |
7 | DGP-181107-2 | ||
8 | DGP-181107-3 | ||
9 | DGP-181107-4 | ||
10 | DGP-181107-5 | ||
11 | DGP-20180811 | Wenxi County, Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province | CD3 |
12 | DGP-20180812 | ||
13 | DGP-20180813 | ||
14 | DGP-20180814 | ||
15 | DGP-20180815 | ||
16 | DGP-20180801 | Pucheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province | CD4 |
17 | DGP-20180802 | ||
18 | DGP-20180803 | ||
19 | DGP-20180804 | ||
20 | DGP-20180805 | ||
21 | DGP-20181027-201 | Chengcheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province | CD5 |
22 | DGP-20181027-202 | ||
23 | DGP-20181027-203 | ||
24 | DGP-20181027-204 | ||
25 | DGP-20181027-205 | ||
26 | DGP-20181027-301 | Pucheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province | CD6 |
27 | DGP-20181027-302 | ||
28 | DGP-20181027-303 | ||
29 | DGP-20181027-304 | ||
30 | DGP-20181027-305 | ||
31 | DGP-20181027-101 | Lintong District, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province | CD7 |
32 | DGP-20181027-102 | ||
33 | DGP-20181027-103 | ||
34 | DGP-20181027-104 | ||
35 | DGP-20181027-105 |
Note: The same origin is not classified as a class of suppliers.
3. Results
3.1. Identification of the Prototype Components of LC
The results of total ion chromatography (BPI) in positive and negative ion modes are shown in Figure 1. To determine the chemical composition of the compound, the exact mass of the compound was calculated according to the molecular formula, and full-scan chromatographic peaks such as [M − H]−, [M + H]+, and [M + Na]+ were extracted. The fragment ion information of the compound was obtained by MS/MS mass spectrometry and identified by reference to the target compound. Forty-four compounds were eventually identified (Table 3 and Figure 3). Among them, there were 23 alkaloids, 8 phenylpropanoids, 4 flavonoids, 2 organic acids, 1 quinone compound, and 6 unknown compounds. Eleven components were compared with standard substances and are listed in Table 3.
Table 3
Chemical composition analysis of Lycii Cortex.
No. | RT (min) | Positive ions | Negative ions | Formula | Compounds | Blood | Urine | Fecal |
1 | 0.93 | 284.1388 | 282.9585 | C10H13N5O5 | Guanosine∗ | + | − | − |
2 | 1.03 | 176.0907 | — | C7H13NO4 | Calystegine B2/B5 | − | − | + |
3 | 1.08 | — | 317.0526 | C18H22O5 | 4-Hydroxy-coumaroyl-2-nonenoic acid | + | + | + |
4 | 1.12 | 118.0864 | — | C5H11NO2 | l-Valine | + | + | + |
5 | 1.21 | — | 387.1135 | C25H26O13 | Isomer of hydroxycinnamic acid -ferulic acid glucoside | − | − | + |
6 | 1.26 | 365.1052 | 341.1081 | C15H18O9 | Hydroxycinnamic acid glucoside | − | − | + |
7 | 1.38 | 365.1052 | 341.1081 | C15H18O9 | Isomer of hydroxycinnamic acid glucoside | − | − | + |
8 | 2.21 | 215.0177 | 191.0191 | C6H8O7 | Isocitric acid | − | + | − |
9 | 2.26 | 407.0399 | 405.027 | C6H8O7 | Citric acid | − | + | − |
10 | 3.42 | 235.1196 | — | — | Unknown | − | − | − |
11 | 3.63 | 235.1196 | — | — | Unknown | − | − | − |
12 | 13.57 | 195.1130 | — | C10H10O4 | Ferulic acid∗ | + | + | + |
13 | 15.11 | 202.0998 | — | — | Unknown | − | − | − |
14 | 15.19 | 457.132 | 479.1398 | C21H22O10 | Prunin | − | − | − |
15 | 16.26 | 251.1405 | 249.1243 | C13H18N2O3 | (E)-N-Caffeoylputrescine | − | + | − |
16 | 16.42 | 207.1518 | — | C13H18N2O3 | Isomer of (E)-N-caffeoylputrescine | − | + | − |
17 | 16.95 | 144.0821 | — | C17H19NO4 | Dihydro-caffeoyltyramine | − | + | + |
18 | 19.37 | — | 179.0366 | C9H8O4 | Caffeic acid∗ | + | + | − |
19 | 19.98 | 531.3184 | 529.3038 | C28H42N4O6 | Kukoamine A∗ | + | − | + |
20 | 21.68 | 531.3163 | 529.2984 | C28H42N4O6 | Kukoamine B∗ | + | − | + |
21 | 23.04 | 355.0991 | — | C16H18O9 | Chlorogenic acid∗ | + | + | + |
22 | 24.56 | 529.3063/265.1543 | — | C28H40N4O6/C14H20N2O3 | N1-Caffeoyl-N10-dihydrocaffeoylspermine/N-feruloyl putrescine subaphylline | − | − | − |
− | − | − | ||||||
23 | 25.63 | 281.1692 | — | — | Unknown | − | − | − |
24 | 29.32 | 474.2598 | 472.2442 | C25H35N3O6 | N1, N10-bis (Dihydrocaffeoyl) spermidine | − | − | − |
25 | 33.26 | 193.052 | — | C16H12O6 | 5,7-Dihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavone | − | + | + |
26 | 47.27 | 545.1991 | — | C29H44N4O6 | N-Dihydroferuoyl-N′-dihydrocaffeoylspermine | − | + | + |
27 | 51.51 | 874.3758 | 872.3596 | C42H51N9O12 | Lyciumin A | + | + | + |
28 | 53.73 | 542.7795 | 1082.5367 | C51H59N10O17 | Dimethyl lycium B | − | + | − |
29 | 54.35 | 897.3904 | 895.377 | C44H52N10O11 | Lyciumin B | − | − | + |
30 | 55.65 | 964.4244 | 962.4056 | C47H53N11O12 | Lyciumin D | − | − | + |
31 | 57.56 | — | 285.1377 | C15H10O6 | Luteolin∗ | + | + | + |
32 | 58.28 | 287.1204 | — | C15H10O6 | Kaempferol∗ | + | + | + |
33 | 59.28 | 274.2743 | — | C17H17NO4 | Caffeoyltyramine | + | + | + |
34 | 59.46 | 331.3022 | — | C17H14O7 | 3,4-Dimethyl-quercetin | + | + | + |
35 | 60.53 | 316.2866 | — | C18H21NO4 | Dihydro-feruloyltyramine | − | − | + |
36 | 62.78 | — | 269.1557 | C15H10O5 | Apigenin∗ | + | + | + |
37 | 63.05 | — | 295.2295 | C15H23N2O4 | Sinapoyl putrescine | − | + | + |
38 | 65.22 | — | 269.1559 | C15H10O5 | Emodin∗ | + | + | − |
39 | 65.73 | — | 339.2311 | C15H16O9 | Sinapoyl malate | − | + | − |
40 | 65.88 | — | 282.2785 | C17H17NO3 | Isomer of coumaroyltyramine | − | + | + |
41 | 65.97 | — | 354.2705 | C17H21NO4 | Scopolin∗ | + | + | − |
42 | 66.03 | — | 337.234 | C20H23NO4 | Dimethyl-N-feruloyltyramine | − | − | + |
43 | 66.12 | — | 337.2941 | C20H23NO4 | Isomer of dimethyl-N-feruloyl tyramine | − | − | + |
44 | 67.22 | 284.2967 | — | C17H17NO3 | Coumaroyltyramine | − | + | + |
∗Compared with the standard solution.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
Ferulic acid was used as an example to illustrate the resolution process of organic acid compounds. In the negative ion mode, the parent ion of compound 12 was m/z 193.1130 [M − H]−, and its molecular formula was calculated to be C10H10O4. The parent ion removes a molecule of CH3 to produce a fragment ion at m/z 178.0274, a molecule of CO2 is removed to produce a fragment ion at m/z 134.0372, or the parent ion removes a molecule of CO2 and a molecule of CH3 to produce fragment ions at m/z 149.0616 and m/z 134.0372. Its retention time and mass spectrometry fragmentation behavior were consistent with those of the reference substance ferulic acid. The resolution process of alkaloid compounds was illustrated by the example of kukoamine B. In the negative ion mode, the precursor ion of compound 20 is m/z 529.2984 [M − H]−, and its molecular formula is calculated to be C28H42N4O6. The parent ion removed C19H34N4O3 to produce a fragment ion at m/z 165.0589, or the parent ion C9H8O3 generated a fragment ion at m/z 367.2708. Its retention time and mass spectrometry lysis behavior were consistent with those of the reference substance kukoamine B. According to the same method, other chemical constituents were identified by the polarity of the compound, the secondary fragment of its mass spectrum, the fragmentation rules, and the comparison with the literature data.
3.2. Identification of Prototype Components of LC in Rat Plasma, Urine, and Feces
By comparison with the 44 compounds identified by the research group in the previous stage, the prototype components in plasma, urine, and feces were screened. A total of 36 prototype components of LC were identified in rat plasma, urine, and feces, including 16 in plasma, 25 in urine, and 27 in feces. There are 10 common components in the prototype components of plasma, urine, and feces, one unique component in plasma, five unique components in urine, and nine unique components in feces. This reflects the metabolic law of the active ingredients in LC in vivo. The specific analytical results are listed in Table 3.
3.3. Component–Target–Disease Network Analysis
Based on the effectiveness of the Q-marker, we used network pharmacology technology to further analyze the relationships among drug components, targets, and diseases. Based on UPLC–Q-TOF-MS, 44 components in LC were identified. Combined with the components of LC in the TCMSP database, OB ≥ 30% and DL ≥ 0.18 were used as conditions to screen active components and targets. Through a literature search, 38 active components were initially identified. A total of 595 protein targets of 38 active components in LC were identified via the TCMSP, HERB, and UniProt databases. At the same time, a total of 854, 831, and 629 targets related to antipyretics, lung heat cough, and hypoglycemia, respectively, were identified. After deleting duplicate targets, 1695 disease targets related to LC efficacy were obtained. The 595 targets corresponding to LC were crossed with disease targets, and a total of 249 identical targets were obtained as potential targets for LC to exert its efficacy. Cytoscape 3.7.1 software was used to construct a component–target–disease network interaction map for topological analysis. A component–target–disease network diagram was constructed, as shown in Figure 4. The 38 active components in LC were based on 295 targets for the treatment of fever, lung heat cough, and hypoglycemia, including 290 nodes and 1679 edges, reflecting the interaction between the active components of LC and their efficacy. According to the degree value, 38 components, such as apigenin, may be the core active components of LC. The components entering the blood are usually the components through which the drug enters the body to exert its efficacy. Therefore, we compared the precursor components of LC in rat plasma. According to the specificity and measurability of the components, a total of 11 components, such as kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, kaempferol, guanosine, emodin, apigenin, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and luteolin, were screened as potential Q-markers of LC. This study lays a foundation for the subsequent selection of active ingredients as preparation components for content determination in LC.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.4. Determination of the Content of Different Batches of LC
3.4.1. Method Validation
The mass concentration of 11 components showed a good linear relationship with the peak area,
Table 4
Standard curve, correlation coefficient, and linear range test results of 11 chemical components.
Compounds | Representative | Linear range (ng/mL) | |
Kukoamine A | y = 0.87x − 321.52 | 0.9918 | 26.26∼2363.76 |
Kukoamine B | y = 1.397x − 1598.4 | 0.9920 | 38.61∼3475.08 |
Scopolin | y = 369.56x + 20055 | 0.9982 | 37.44∼3369.24 |
Kaempferol | y = 2761.9x + 324688 | 0.9955 | 28.64∼2577.87 |
Guanosine | y = 10.239x + 158930 | 0.9908 | 33.82∼3043.87 |
Emodin | y = 436.2x + 248471 | 0.9932 | 39.04∼3513.60 |
Apigenin | y = 19.194x + 2291 | 0.9959 | 35.12∼3160.80 |
Ferulic acid | y = 0.5171x − 214.94 | 0.9924 | 38.15∼3433.32 |
Caffeic acid | y = 347.02x − 147558 | 0.9927 | 38.62∼3475.53 |
Chlorogenic acid | y = 17.354x + 1781.3 | 0.9905 | 36.53∼3287.25 |
Luteolin | y = 17.974x + 997.94 | 0.9996 | 35.24∼3171.78 |
3.4.2. Content Determination
The samples of 35 batches of LC from different origins were prepared and analyzed. The contents of kukoamine A, guanosine, kukoamine B, chlorogenic acid, scopolin, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, kaempferol, luteolin, apigenin and emodin in different batches of LC samples were calculated. The measurement results are shown in Table 5 and Figure 5. The contents of kukoamine A and kukoamine B were relatively high, with mass fractions ranging from 1.24 mg/g to 17.12 mg/g and from 5.25 mg/g to 67.35 mg/g, respectively. The mass fraction of scopoline ranged from 0.05 to 0.18 mg/g. The mass fraction of guanosine ranged from 0.02 to 0.83 mg/g. The mass fraction of ferulic acid ranged from 0.012 to 0.220 mg/g. The mass fraction of caffeic acid ranged from 0.012 to 0.460 mg/g. The mass fraction of chlorogenic acid ranged from 0.220 to 0.425 mg/g. However, the contents of kaempferol, emodin, apigenin, and luteolin were very low and could not be detected in some batches. Therefore, a variety of active ingredients can be controlled simultaneously in the quality control of medicinal materials to reflect the quality of medicinal materials more comprehensively.
Table 5
Contents of 11 index components from Lycii Cortex.
Batch number | Kukoamine A (mg/g) | Kukoamine B (mg/g) | Scopoline (mg/g) | Kaempferol (μg/g) | Guanosine (mg/g) | Emodin (μg/g) | Apigenin (μg/g) | Ferulic acid (mg/g) | Caffeic acid (mg/g) | Chlorogenic acid (mg/g) | Luteolin (μg/g) |
DGP-20181027-101 | 4.19 | 17.75 | 0.08 | 0.036 | 0.05 | 0.034 | — | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.040 | 0.0134 |
DGP-20181027-102 | 7.82 | 33.68 | 0.10 | 0.021 | 0.08 | 0.061 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.079 | 0.0002 |
DGP-20181027-103 | 4.11 | 16.47 | 0.08 | 0.023 | 0.10 | 0.049 | 0.05 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.077 | 0.0048 |
DGP-20181027-104 | 3.10 | 13.08 | 0.08 | 0.040 | 0.06 | 0.039 | 0.11 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.071 | 0.0043 |
DGP-20181027-105 | 1.24 | 5.25 | 0.06 | 0.021 | 0.07 | 0.041 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.0004 |
DGP-20181027-201 | 10.74 | 37.99 | 0.13 | 0.027 | 0.18 | 0.074 | 0.35 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.073 | 0.0016 |
DGP-20181027-202 | 14.45 | 57.67 | 0.09 | 0.013 | 0.14 | 0.025 | — | 0.014 | 0.019 | 0.085 | 0.0004 |
DGP-20181027-203 | 15.56 | 60.89 | 0.06 | 0.007 | 0.37 | 0.038 | — | 0.013 | 0.030 | 0.176 | — |
DGP-20181027-204 | 11.07 | 42.86 | 0.18 | 0.017 | 0.10 | 0.030 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.027 | 0.425 | — |
DGP-20181027-205 | 12.45 | 43.64 | 0.08 | 0.014 | 0.32 | 0.031 | — | 0.020 | 0.019 | 0.182 | — |
DGP-20181027-301 | 6.92 | 30.77 | 0.11 | 0.014 | 0.18 | 0.032 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.047 | — |
DGP-20181027-302 | 2.69 | 12.27 | 0.10 | 0.035 | 0.11 | 0.032 | 0.05 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.070 | 0.0006 |
DGP-20181027-303 | 8.71 | 37.31 | 0.10 | 0.062 | 0.10 | 0.004 | 0.11 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.047 | 0.0056 |
DGP-20181027-304 | 7.42 | 31.41 | 0.10 | 0.028 | 0.18 | 0.010 | 0.08 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.041 | — |
DGP-20181027-305 | 3.54 | 16.25 | 0.10 | 0.013 | 0.11 | 0.018 | — | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.032 | — |
DGP-20180801 | 11.31 | 45.26 | 0.10 | 0.061 | 0.69 | 0.049 | 0.24 | 0.014 | 0.029 | 0.074 | 0.0097 |
DGP-20180802 | 11.51 | 45.66 | 0.10 | 0.059 | 0.65 | 0.036 | 0.27 | 0.020 | 0.029 | 0.077 | 0.0023 |
DGP-20180803 | 17.12 | 67.35 | 0.09 | 0.012 | 0.07 | 0.017 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.130 | — |
DGP-20180804 | 14.18 | 62.75 | 0.11 | 0.024 | 0.19 | 0.012 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.080 | 0.0006 |
DGP-20180805 | 14.82 | 62.40 | 0.11 | 0.018 | 0.19 | 0.022 | 0.03 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.085 | — |
DGP-181107-1 | 12.37 | 43.89 | 0.08 | 0.059 | 0.42 | 0.021 | 0.45 | 0.020 | 0.018 | 0.030 | 0.0013 |
DGP-181107-2 | 12.57 | 46.62 | 0.07 | 0.039 | 0.49 | 0.033 | 0.36 | 0.017 | 0.046 | 0.083 | 0.0011 |
DGP-181107-3 | 13.99 | 49.12 | 0.09 | 0.090 | 0.61 | 0.026 | 0.24 | 0.015 | 0.039 | 0.144 | 0.0407 |
DGP-181107-4 | 14.40 | 50.71 | 0.08 | 0.098 | 0.76 | 0.032 | 0.61 | 0.018 | 0.027 | 0.095 | 0.0495 |
DGP-181107-5 | 11.28 | 41.00 | 0.07 | 0.087 | 0.50 | 0.022 | 0.39 | 0.020 | 0.026 | 0.059 | 0.0205 |
DGP-20180806 | 8.01 | 30.82 | 0.08 | 0.027 | 0.83 | 0.017 | 0.15 | 0.015 | 0.020 | 0.097 | 0.0017 |
DGP-20180807 | 5.60 | 20.76 | 0.05 | 0.010 | 0.19 | 0.016 | — | 0.019 | 0.045 | 0.041 | 0.0005 |
DGP-20180808 | 7.55 | 28.20 | 0.07 | 0.025 | 0.70 | 0.013 | 0.10 | 0.015 | 0.028 | 0.086 | 0.0407 |
DGP-20180809 | 5.32 | 20.66 | 0.05 | 0.011 | 0.18 | 0.030 | — | 0.022 | 0.045 | 0.042 | — |
DGP-20180810 | 6.39 | 21.38 | 0.07 | 0.013 | 0.29 | 0.025 | — | 0.014 | 0.027 | 0.131 | — |
DGP-20180811 | 8.18 | 27.82 | 0.13 | 0.033 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 0.07 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.047 | 0.0159 |
DGP-20180812 | 8.26 | 30.07 | 0.08 | 0.034 | 0.33 | 0.039 | 0.20 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.062 | 0.0366 |
DGP-20180813 | 10.61 | 40.22 | 0.10 | 0.023 | 0.16 | 0.056 | 0.23 | 0.014 | 0.020 | 0.281 | 0.0016 |
DGP-20180814 | 11.29 | 39.83 | 0.12 | 0.026 | 0.04 | 0.009 | 0.05 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.068 | 0.0145 |
DGP-20180815 | 10.98 | 40.87 | 0.11 | 0.028 | 0.02 | 0.021 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.071 | 0.0034 |
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.5. High-Quality Production Area Analysis
To directly compare different origins to the differences in the chemical composition of the LC, PCA and PLS discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed on LC in 35 different regions using the MetaboAnalyst website (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/). According to the PCA score chart, the different producing areas can be divided into their own categories. Among them, in Chengcheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province; Xinmi County, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province; and Wenxi County, Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province, the difference in ground quality in LC is small. It can be seen from the PLS-DA diagram that the analysis results are consistent with the PCA results, but the crossover of each origin is significantly narrowed, as shown in Figure 6. A VIP value > 1.0 indicated a significant effect. The differences in the contents of five components kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, guanosine, and emodin may be one of the reasons for the differences in the quality of the LC medicinal materials. The results are shown in Figure 7.
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Discussion
Due to the complex situation of multiple sources and multiple production areas of Chinese medicinal materials, the quality of Chinese medicinal products varies greatly, especially the amount of active ingredients. Therefore, in 2016, the academician Changxiao Liu proposed a Q-marker for TCM, which is used for the quality control of TCM decoction pieces for harvesting, processing, and preparation. According to the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, the source of LC is the dried root bark of Lycium chinense Mill. or Lycium barbarum L., and there is no specific method for determining its content. Therefore, it is urgent to establish an efficient, sensitive, and reliable modern analysis method to realize the overall quality control of LC. The material chosen for our study was Lycium chinense Mill. To clarify the pharmacodynamic basis of LC, it is necessary to study the metabolic process of its main active ingredients in vivo. In recent years, many scholars have shown that blood components may be effective drug components. Compared with those in plasma, urine, and feces, there are more metabolites in plasma, urine, and feces. The comprehensive analysis of metabolites in serum, urine, and feces can help researchers better understand the metabolism and excretion process of active components in LC in vivo. In this study, 44 chemical components were identified in LC. UPLC–Q-TOF-MS analysis was subsequently performed on plasma, urine, and feces samples collected from rats after intragastric administration of LC. A total of 16 prototype components were identified in plasma, 25 prototype components in urine, and 27 prototype components in feces. Kaempferol, apigenin, ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid, and luteolin can be detected in plasma, urine, and feces. After absorption by the gastrointestinal tract, some of them enter the systemic circulation and are excreted in the urine, and some of them enter the small intestine through bile secretion and are excreted in the feces. Scopolin, emodin, and caffeic acid were detected in plasma and urine and were excreted mainly through the kidney after metabolism. Kukoamine A and kukoamine B were detected in plasma and feces. After metabolism, they are mainly absorbed into the blood through the small intestine or excreted via the feces. Guanosine is only detected in the blood and is mainly absorbed into the blood through the gastrointestinal tract after metabolism. The pharmacodynamic material basis of LC in vivo was preliminarily elucidated. Using the Q-marker method to further determine the quality of LC, we established a component–target–disease network through network pharmacology technology and exploited a method for determining the levels of 11 components, such as kukoamine A, via liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry. The contents of 35 batches of LC from different producing areas were determined for the screening of high-quality LC-producing areas.
This study determined the levels of 11 indicator components, including kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, kaempferol, guanosine, emodin, apigenin, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and luteolin, in the LC from different producing areas. The 35 batches of LC from different producing areas were determined to meet the “Q-marker measurability.” The “effect component” (blood component) in the blood is the final link of the quality transfer system, and it is also an important basis for the determination of Q-markers of TCM. Eleven quantitative components in LC, including kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, kaempferol, guanosine, emodin, apigenin, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and luteolin, are blood components that meet the requirements of “Q-marker traceability.” The selected indicator components all have certain pharmacological effects on LC. A total of 38 active components in LC were screened out based on 295 targets for the treatment of fever, lung heat cough, and hypoglycemia by network pharmacology. Kukoamine A and kukoamine B are more abundant in the cuticle. The two are the isomers of spermine alkaloids and the main active components of LC, which have pharmacological effects, such as antioxidation [11], anti-inflammation [12], neuroprotection [13], lowering blood pressure [14], regulating blood lipids [15], and preventing Parkinson’s disease [16]. Liu Wenwu [14] showed that in a rotenone-induced PC12 cell Parkinson’s disease model, kukoamine A can reduce ROS and MDA levels and increase SOD activity to resist oxidative stress, thus playing an anti-Parkinson’s role. In addition, kukoamine A improved gross motor function and neuronal activity in a Parkinson’s disease model, increased the number of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive cells in the substantia nigra (SN) and striatum (Str), and decreased the expression of alpha-synuclein in the brain. The inhibition of apoptosis and enhancement of autophagy have protective effects on neurotoxin-induced PD [10]. Some scholars have shown that preconditioning with kukoamine A can alleviate the cell damage induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and the dephosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3β, thus playing a neuroprotective role [13]. Kadilya established a rat model of otitis media and reported that kukoamine A could alleviate inflammation in rats by reducing the levels of inflammation-related cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), in a dose-dependent manner [15]. Caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and chlorogenic acid are polyphenols in the LC. Studies have shown that polyphenols in the LC have antioxidant effects and can significantly increase the glutathione content and SOD activity in HSF cells damaged by H2O2 [16, 17]. An anti-inflammatory test of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells by Xue Qiang showed that scopolin had a good anti-inflammatory effect. Pan et al. [18] reported that scopolin can reduce IL-6, VEGF, and FGF-2 expression in rat synovial tissues, which can reduce the clinical symptoms of AIA in rats by inhibiting inflammation and angiogenesis. Chlorogenic acid is metabolized into caffeic acid and ferulic acid in vivo and has various pharmacological effects, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory [19–22], antitumor [23], and neuroprotective effects. Flavonoids such as kaempferol, luteolin, apigenin, and emodin have pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antidepressant effects, but their contents in the LC are relatively low. The above 11 components were confirmed to have “Q-marker effectiveness.”
Therefore, from the perspectives of “measurability,” “traceability,” and “effectiveness,” kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, kaempferol, guanosine, emodin, apigenin, FA, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and luteolin were analyzed. Kukoamine A, kukoamine B, scopolin, guanosine, and emodin are the main differential components in LC and can be used to screen for high-quality medicinal materials and production areas of LC. Kukoamine A and kukoamine B met the requirements of the “five principles” and could be used as Q-markers for LC. It can be used for quality control, which provides a theoretical basis for the establishment of a comprehensive LC quality evaluation method and lays a foundation for subsequent related mechanism research.
5. Conclusion
In summary, this experiment established an LC-MS analysis method for the identification of LC chemical components and in vivo prototype components. Through network pharmacology research and content determination analysis, two potential marker system Q-markers of LC were determined based on the principles of traceability, specificity, effectiveness, and measurability: kukoamine A and kukoamine B, and the high-quality production area of LC was determined to be Chengcheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province. This system can comprehensively and systematically reflect its quality and provide a reference for the further study of LC quality standards and the development of medicinal materials in the future.
Author Contributions
Dailin Liu: providing research funding for this project and writing–reviewing and editing. Jingze Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, and data checking. Xinrui Wang: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing, and original draft preparation. Haoqiang Ding, Xiqing Du, Lanying Zhang, and Guotong Li: visualization and investigation. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (10.13039/501100012166) (2022YFC3501805).
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2022YFC3501805).
Glossary
Nomenclature
LC:Lycii Cortex
Q-marker:Quality markers
UPLC–Q-TOF-MS/MS:Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry
UPLC–MS/MS:A rapid and sensitive analytical method for ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry
PCA:Principal component analysis
TCM:Trational Chinese medicine
Goqi:Lycium chinense Mill.
Ningxia Goqi:Lycium barbarum L.
HPLC:High-performance liquid chromatography
ESI:Electrospray ionization
TCMSP:Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform
OB:Oral bioavailability
DL:Drug likeness
BPI:Base peak ion
RSD:Relative standard deviation
QC:Quality control
RE:Relative error
RSD:Relative standard deviation
PLS-DA:Partial least squares discriminant analysis
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
MDA:Malondialdehyde
SOD:Superoxide dismutase
TH:Tyrosine hydroxylase
SN:Substantia nigra
Str:Striatum
NMDA:N-Methyl-D-aspartate
IL-4:Interleukin-4
IFN-γ:Interferon-gamma
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor-α
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
FGF-2:Fiber growth factor 2
FDA:Food and Drug Administration
LLOQ:Lower limit of quantification
[1] Z. Guo, H. Yin, T. Wu, "Study on the Mechanism of Cortex Lycii on Lung Cancer Based on Network Pharmacology Combined With Experimental Validation," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 293,DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115280, 2022.
[2] G. Jiang, M. Takase, Y. Aihara, H. Shigemori, "Inhibitory Activities of Kukoamines A and B From Lycii Cortex on Amyloid Aggregation Related to Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes," Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 74 no. 1, pp. 247-251, DOI: 10.1007/s11418-019-01337-0, 2020.
[3] Y. Y. Li, D. A. Stewart, X. M. Ye, "A Metabolomics Approach to Investigate Kukoamine B-A Potent Natural Product With Anti-Diabetic Properties," Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 9,DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01575, 2018.
[4] M. Yan, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, "Difference Analysis of Different Parts of Chicory Based on HPLC Fingerprint and Multi-Component Content Determination," Chinese Herbal Medicines, vol. 14 no. 2, pp. 317-323, DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2022.01.006, 2022.
[5] J. X. Zhang, S. H. Guan, M. Yang, "Simultaneous Determination of 24 Constituents in Cortex Lycii Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry," Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 77, pp. 63-70, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.01.014, 2013.
[6] J. Zhang, S. Guan, J. Sun, "Characterization and Profiling of Phenolic Amides from Cortex Lycii by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled With LTQ-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 407 no. 2, pp. 581-595, DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8296-4, 2015.
[7] X. L. Zhao, X. Yao, X. Y. Zhang, P. Ma, C. N. He, Y. Peng, "[Study on RSLC Fingerprint of Lycii Cortex]," Zhong Yao Cai, vol. 36 no. 6, pp. 895-899, 2013.
[8] Y. Y. Li, R. Di, W. L. Hsu, Y. Q. Huang, H. Y. Cheung, "Quality Control of Lycium chinense and Lycium barbarum Cortex (Digupi) by HPLC Using Kukoamines as Markers," Chinese Medicine, vol. 12 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/s13020-016-0121-x, 2017.
[9] Z. Wang, S. Li, "Network Pharmacology in Quality Control of Traditional Chinese Medicines," Chinese Herbal Medicines, vol. 14 no. 4, pp. 477-478, DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2022.09.001, 2022.
[10] X. Wang, J. Zhang, L. Luo, X. Song, P. Wang, D. Liu, "Comparative Pharmacokinetics of 24 Major Bioactive Components in Normal and ARDS Rats After Oral Administration of Xuanfei Baidu Granules," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 296,DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115472, 2022.
[11] H. Xu, G. Zhang, L. Deng, "Kukoamine A Activates Akt/GSK-3 β Signaling Pathway to Inhibit Oxidative Stress and Relieve Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury," Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 37 no. 4,DOI: 10.1590/acb370407, 2022.
[12] D. Wang, H. Qu, H. Kang, F. Xu, W. Huang, X. Cai, "Kukoamine A Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Apoptosis, Extracellular Matrix Degradation, and Inflammation in Nucleus Pulposus Cells by Activating the P13K/Akt Pathway," Bioengineered, vol. 13 no. 4, pp. 8772-8784, DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2051855, 2022.
[13] Y. Yang, L. Gao, Y. Niu, "Kukoamine A Protects Against NMDA-Induced Neurotoxicity Accompanied With Down-Regulation of GluN2B-Containing NMDA Receptors and Phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt/GSK-3 β Signaling Pathway in Cultured Primary Cortical Neurons," Neurochemical Research, vol. 45 no. 11, pp. 2703-2711, DOI: 10.1007/s11064-020-03114-y, 2020.
[14] C. A. Butts, D. I. Hedderley, S. Martell, "Influence of Oral Administration of Kukoamine A on Blood Pressure in a Rat Hypertension Model," PLoS One, vol. 17 no. 5,DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267567, 2022.
[15] G. Li, F. Zhou, Y. Chen, W. Zhang, N. Wang, "Kukoamine A Attenuates Insulin Resistance and Fatty Liver through Downregulation of Srebp-1c," Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 89, pp. 536-543, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.02.024, 2017.
[16] X. Hu, Q. Song, X. Li, "Neuroprotective Effects of Kukoamine A on Neurotoxin-Induced Parkinson’s Model Through Apoptosis Inhibition and Autophagy Enhancement," Neuropharmacology, vol. 117, pp. 352-363, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.02.022, 2017.
[17] Q. Xue, P. Yin, K. Li, "Identification of Bioactive Phenolics From Porana Sinensis Hemsl. Stem by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and the Confirmation of Anti-Inflammatory Indicators Using LPS-Induced RAW264.7 Cells," Inflammopharmacology, vol. 27 no. 5, pp. 1055-1069, DOI: 10.1007/s10787-018-00558-1, 2019.
[18] R. Pan, Y. Dai, X. Gao, Y. Xia, "Scopolin Isolated From Erycibe Obtusifolia Benth Stems Suppresses Adjuvant-Induced Rat Arthritis by Inhibiting Inflammation and Angiogenesis," International Immunopharmacology, vol. 9 no. 7-8, pp. 859-869, DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.02.019, 2009.
[19] D. Li, Y. X. Rui, S. D. Guo, F. Luan, R. Liu, N. Zeng, "Ferulic Acid: A Review of Its Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Derivatives," Life Sciences, vol. 284,DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119921, 2021.
[20] A. Nouri, K. Ghatreh-Samani, H. Amini-Khoei, A. Mohammadi, E. Heidarian, M. Najafi, "Ferulic Acid Prevents Cyclosporine-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats Through Exerting Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects via Activation of Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling and Suppression of NF-Κb/tnf- α axis," Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 395 no. 4, pp. 387-395, DOI: 10.1007/s00210-022-02212-8, 2022.
[21] H. G. Choi, P. T. Tran, J. H. Lee, B. S. Min, J. A. Kim, "Anti-inflammatory Activity of Caffeic Acid Derivatives Isolated From the Roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge," Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 41 no. 1, pp. 64-70, DOI: 10.1007/s12272-017-0983-1, 2018.
[22] M. Miao, L. Xiang, "Pharmacological Action and Potential Targets of Chlorogenic Acid," Advances in Pharmacology, vol. 87, pp. 71-88, DOI: 10.1016/bs.apha.2019.12.002, 2020.
[23] M. T. Huang, R. C. Smart, C. Q. Wong, A. H. Conney, "Inhibitory Effect of Curcumin, Chlorogenic Acid, Caffeic Acid, and Ferulic Acid on Tumor Promotion in Mouse Skin by 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-Acetate," Cancer Research, vol. 48 no. 21, pp. 5941-5946, 1988.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 Xinrui Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Based on the effectiveness, measurability, and traceability of the quality marker (Q-marker) theory of traditional Chinese medicine, the Q-marker of Lycii Cortex (LC) was preliminarily predicted and analyzed. A UPLC–Q-TOF-MS qualitative analysis method for LC samples was established. A total of 44 LC chemical components, 16 plasma prototype components, 25 urine prototype components, and 27 fecal prototype components were identified. At the same time, the “component–target–disease” network diagram was constructed by network pharmacology to predict the potential active components of LC. A UPLC–MS/MS quantitative analysis method was established to determine the contents of 11 components such as kukoamine A in 35 batches of LC from seven producing areas. Principal component analysis, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, and other mathematical analysis methods were used to screen the differential components. Based on the comprehensive consideration of the Q-marker traceability, transitivity, specificity, effectiveness, and measurability, kukoamine A and kukoamine B were preliminarily predicted as LC potential Q-markers, and the high-quality producing area was determined to be Chengcheng County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province. The prediction analysis of the LC Q-marker provides a reference for the comprehensive control of the quality of LC medicinal materials and also lays a foundation for the research and exploration of the substance basis and mechanism of action of LC.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 State Key Laboratory of Component-Based Chinese Medicine Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Tianjin 301617 China; TCM Formula R&D Department Tianjin Modern Innovation Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd. Tianjin 300380 China
2 TCM Formula R&D Department Tianjin Modern Innovation Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd. Tianjin 300380 China