It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Since 2011, holopelagic Sargassum have been massively stranding in the coastal environments of the Caribbean Islands inducing damages to coastal ecosystems, public health and the economy. To limit the risks associated with Sargassum stranding, floating barriers with nets can be placed in front of sensitive areas, to divert Sargassum away from the coast. To evaluate the potential transfer of metallic trace element (MTE) from Sargassum to adjacent marine life, seagrasses (Halophila stipulacea, Thalassia testidinum) and urchin (Lytechinus variegatus) were sampled, both close (0 m) and far (200 m) from barriers installed during 4 years in two bays: Baie Cayol (BC) and Cap Est (CE) in Martinique (FWI). A bay without barriers Baie-Tresor (BT) was also sampled in order to compare the effects of Sargassum accumulated in a natural environment versus an environment with floating barriers. The short-term effects of barriers were evaluated by measuring the evolution of MTE after four days, in the algae (Dictyota spp.), located close to Sargassum accumulations. All sampling was realized during two periods of active (July 2021) and reduced (January 2022) Sargassum stranding. The measured concentrations of 19 metal(loid)s trace elements revealed that the proximity of Sargassum to the barriers did not increase MTE concentration. The absence of increase in MTE was observed all sites (BT, BC and CE) and during periods of limited and important Sargassum stranding. Similarly, translocations of Dictyota close to Sargassum accumulations did not reveal any increase in MTE concentrations in the algae after 4 days. The present study suggests that the use of barriers to manage Sargassum stranding would not constitute an important threat of MTE contamination of marine environments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Université des Antilles, Équipe Biologie de la Mangrove, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB, UMR 7205, UFR SEN, Pointe-à-Pitre, France (GRID:grid.463994.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 7618); Polytechnic University of Marche, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Ancona, Italy (GRID:grid.7010.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1017 3210)
2 Centre d’Études Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372, CNRS-La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, France (GRID:grid.11698.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 7335)
3 Centre Eau, Terre et Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Québec, Canada (GRID:grid.418084.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9582 2314)
4 Université des Antilles, Équipe Biologie de la Mangrove, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB, UMR 7205, UFR SEN, Pointe-à-Pitre, France (GRID:grid.463994.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 7618)