It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The performance gains achieved by deep learning models nowadays are mainly attributed to the usage of ever larger datasets. In this study, we present and contrast the performance gains that can be achieved via accessing larger high-quality datasets versus the gains that can be achieved from harnessing the latest deep learning architectural and training advances. Modelling neonatal EEG is particularly affected by the lack of publicly available large datasets. It is shown that greater performance gains can be achieved from harnessing the latest deep learning advances than using a larger training dataset when adopting AUC as a metric, whereas using AUC90 or AUC-PR as metrics greater performance gains are achieved from using a larger dataset than harnessing the latest deep learning advances. In all scenarios the best performance is obtained by combining both deep learning advances and larger datasets. A novel developed architecture is presented that outperforms the current state-of-the-art model for the task of neonatal seizure detection. A novel method to fine-tune the presented model towards site-specific settings based on pseudo labelling is also outlined. The code and the weights of the model are made publicly available for benchmarking future model performances for neonatal seizure detection.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Munster Technological University, Department of Mathematics, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.510393.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 9343 1765); University College Cork, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 8773); University College Cork, INFANT Research Centre, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
2 University College Cork, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 8773); University College Cork, INFANT Research Centre, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
3 University College Cork, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2331 8773)




