It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Identifying relationships between structural and functional networks is crucial for understanding the large-scale organization of the human brain. The potential contribution of emerging techniques like functional near-infrared spectroscopy to investigate the structure–functional relationship has yet to be explored. In our study, using simultaneous Electroencephalography (EEG) and Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) recordings from 18 subjects, we characterize global and local structure–function coupling using source-reconstructed EEG and fNIRS signals in both resting state and motor imagery tasks, as this relationship during task periods remains underexplored. Employing the mathematical framework of graph signal processing, we investigate how this relationship varies across electrical and hemodynamic networks and different brain states. Results show that fNIRS structure–function coupling resembles slower-frequency EEG coupling at rest, with variations across brain states and oscillations. Locally, the relationship is heterogeneous, with greater coupling in the sensory cortex and increased decoupling in the association cortex, following the unimodal to transmodal gradient. Discrepancies between EEG and fNIRS are noted, particularly in the frontoparietal network. Cross-band representations of neural activity revealed lower correspondence between electrical and hemodynamic activity in the transmodal cortex, irrespective of brain state while showing specificity for the somatomotor network during a motor imagery task. Overall, these findings initiate a multimodal comprehension of structure–function relationship and brain organization when using affordable functional brain imaging.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Sano Center for Computational Medicine, Computer Vision lab, Krakow, Poland
2 CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland (GRID:grid.433220.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0390 8241); École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Neuro-X Institute, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5333.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 9049); University of Geneva, Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 2154)
3 Sano Center for Computational Medicine, Computer Vision lab, Krakow, Poland (GRID:grid.8591.5)
4 AGH University of Science and Technology, Computer Science faculty, Krakow, Poland (GRID:grid.9922.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9174 1488)