It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mineral licks, critical for the survival of many large-bodied mammals in the Amazon, serve as keystone resources that influence the behavior and ecological dynamics of these species. This study presents the most comprehensive analysis to date on the drivers of geophagy—the consumption of soil by animals—at mineral licks in the Peruvian Amazon. Using a combination of camera traps and soil analyses from 52 mineral licks, we examined the visitation patterns of six large-bodied mammals: the black agouti (Dasyprocta fuliginosa), paca (Cuniculus paca), collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), Brazilian porcupine (Coendou prehensilis), lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), and red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus). Our results reveal that mineral licks provide essential nutrients, particularly sodium (Na), which may be deficient in the diets of frugivorous species such as agouti, paca, and red howler monkey, supporting the mineral supplementation hypothesis. Conversely, the toxin adsorption hypothesis, which posits that animals consume soil to mitigate dietary toxins, was most strongly supported for the herbivorous Brazilian porcupine. The omnivorous collared peccary and the mixed-diet tapir exhibited complex interactions between soil characteristics, suggesting that both mineral supplementation and toxin adsorption play roles in their geophagy. This study highlights the importance of mineral licks for the conservation of Amazonian mammals, emphasizing their role in supporting biodiversity by providing critical nutritional resources that enhance species fitness and ecological resilience. Our findings underscore the need for the protection of these sites, which are integral not only to the survival of individual species but also to the health of the broader Amazonian ecosystem.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Earth Commons—Georgetown University’s Institute for Environment & Sustainability, Washington, D.C., USA (GRID:grid.213910.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 1955 1644)
2 George Mason University, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032)
3 University of Delaware, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 0454 4791)
4 George Mason University, School of Integrative Studies, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032)




