It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Various multi-criteria decision-making methods have been utilized in literature to address vendor selection challenges in various contexts. This study reflects on these decision-making techniques for vendor selection in the software ecosystem during software outsourcing. For the same, firstly, a requirement framework for the decision-making process for software vendor selection is proposed. Afterwards, five selected different multi-criteria decision-making techniques are compared and critically analysed against this requirement framework. This study supports software practitioners and decision-makers by providing information about which decision-making method to choose, considering the trade-off between the benefits and drawbacks of adopting each method or using hybrid approaches by combining two or more techniques with fuzzy logic. It is found that decision-making techniques generally lack in modelling the problem itself and handling the conflicts and uncertainties that may prevail during the decision-making process. Furthermore, it has been identified that artificial neural networks (ANN) and analytic network process (ANP) can support the dependencies between alternatives and criteria while handling complex interactions in the software ecosystem. On the other hand, due to its comparative ease of use, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can serve better in scenarios where decision-makers are not experienced, or past data to train the ANN or ANP models is unavailable.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer