It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Poor air quality is known to be one of the leading contributors to poor child health globally, and a wealth of evidence has linked pollution exposure during pregnancy to adverse birth and early-life outcomes. While there is some evidence pollution exposure during pregnancy is associated with slowed child growth, this evidence is largely limited to empirical settings in which it is difficult to disentangle the role of pollution from other co-varying factors. Here we rely on quasi-random variation in pollution conditions induced by thermal inversions to estimate the impact of pollution spikes during pregnancy on childhood stunting. We find that thermal inversions during pregnancy worsen air quality and increase the likelihood of childhood stunting, but only in places with poor baseline air quality and particularly for younger children and in lower-wealth communities. Our estimates imply that a 1 µg m−3 increase in average PM2.5 concentration during pregnancy increases the probability of stunting by an average of 4.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.2–8.0). This translates to an 11.2% increase (95% CI: 0.6%–21.9%) in stunting risk from the sample baseline of 37% children stunted. Our results suggest that policies that limit baseline daily PM2.5 levels, particularly during seasons when thermal inversions are more frequent, have potential to generate meaningful improvements in long-run child outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States of America
2 The World Bank , Washington, DC, United States of America
3 Department of Economics, Stockholm University , Stockholm, Sweden
4 Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States of America; Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States of America; National Bureau of Economic Research , Cambridge, MA, United States of America