Reflexive Discourses of the Lived Experiences of Postmodern Supervisors

Abstract

Supervision has a significant role in the development of supervisors and supervisees. Reflection on issues related to supervisor growth could include reflexive discourse on generative change in the supervisor and supervisee. Postmodernism in the supervisory relationship may involve the supervisor creating discourse to explore competency and ethics. In this study, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was the approach used to identify reflexive discourse in supervisors’ lived experiences of postmodern supervision, focusing on competency and ethics. Interviews occurred with purposively sampled postmodern supervisors. This study of reflexive discourse about competency and ethics could show supervisors how to critically consider new or renewed ideas or assumptions to promote a high standard of care for supervisees and clients. In addition, this study provided insight into supervisors’ motivations, limitations, and opportunities for growth. 

Seven participants took part in semistructured interviews to discuss their lived experiences as postmodern supervisors. Data analysis with the IPA protocol showed that postmodern supervisors benefited from discussing their experiences. Findings also showed that incorporating a collaborative approach in the supervisory process resulted in new and renewed meanings. Opportunities for moments of inward and outward thought enabled the supervisors to strengthen themselves and the supervisee–supervisory relationship. The participants also strengthened the profession through conversations of competency with a postmodern approach and a curious, not-knowing stance. The supervisors shared their unique experiences and offered insight into promoting ethical and useful supervisory moments and personal and professional growth.