INTRODUCTION
Chromosomal aberrations in human embryos are very high, ranging from 20% to 80%,1 and are strictly correlated with female age.2 The aneuploidy rate of embryos increases exponentially with increasing maternal age and is a major cause of pregnancy failure, pregnancy loss, and congenital anomalies.3,4 One way to overcome these problems is through the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), in which a portion of a trophectoderm (TE) cell is biopsied and the chromosomes of that cell are analyzed to determine the aneuploidy of the embryo. PGT-A has been reported to improve the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and reduce the miscarriage rate in older patients.5–7 However, there are also reports of no improvement in overall pregnancy rates8 pregnancy rates in younger patients5 or cumulative birth rates in younger patients9; therefore, further accumulation of knowledge is important.
Technically, embryos can have mosaicism, which is a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells; however, when TE-biopsied cells are mosaic, it does not always accurately indicate the condition of the embryo.10 In fact, there are several reports of healthy babies being born after the transfer of embryos diagnosed with mosaicism,11–13 and the birth rate has been reported to be over 40%.14,15 In addition, TE biopsy in PGT-A is invasive to the embryo and may affect embryo viability and subsequent development.16–18 Therefore, a minimally invasive testing method that does not involve embryo biopsy is desirable.
In 1948, cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (cfDNA) was discovered in human blood,19 and in 1997, fetal-derived cfDNA was discovered in maternal plasma.20 Noninvasive prenatal testing has been performed for certain genetic abnormalities in the fetus during pregnancy using cfDNA21–23 and has become an important method for liquid biopsy. In 2013, embryo-derived cfDNA was reported to be present in the spent culture mediums (SCMs) of human embryos.24 In 2016, noninvasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) with SCM without the need for TE biopsy was reported as a minimally invasive embryo evaluation method.25 In the same year, niPGT-A by array comparative genomic hybridization was reported; however, the concordance rate was lower than that of TE biopsy.26 Subsequently, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of niPGT-A. Although niPGT-A was initially found to be superior to TE biopsy,27,28 some studies have recently reported a similar29 or up to 93.8% concordance rate with TE biopsy results.30 However, further optimization of SCM biopsy techniques is needed for clinical application because of the overwhelming lack of knowledge regarding niPGT-A.
Among the optimized culture techniques, the culture time of embryos has been intensively studied. It has been reported that changing the medium on day 3 is important to reduce the probability of contamination by maternally derived cells.25 However, another study reported that changing the medium on day 4 and incubating for 2–3 days increased the concordance rate.31 Other studies have also used culture periods of 24 h or longer from days 3/4 to 5/6, suggesting that a culture period of 1–2 days may provide the most stable results.29–38 However, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and birth rates in blastocyst transfer have been reported to decrease at days 5, 6, and 7, respectively39; therefore, the embryo culture times for niPGT-A should be within 24 h. Currently, there are no reports to our knowledge evaluating the effects of culture times within 24 h, the presence or absence of a clear zone, or the effects of blastocyst dynamics. In addition, when considering blastocysts transferred on day 5 (d5-BLs), when in-vitro fertilization (IVF) results are the most optimal, niPGT-A using the SCM cultured from day 4 embryos would be ideal; however, there are few reports that have evaluated only early blastocysts transferred on day 4 (d4-BL2s).
Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify the optimal cultural environment by analyzing (1) optimal culture times by evaluating the effect of different culture times on the concordance rate of whole embryo (WE), SCM, and TE chromosome test results; (2) the effect of the presence or absence of the zona pellucida (ZP) at the optimal culture times; (3) the accuracy of the results obtained by culturing embryos from d4-BL2s for clinical use; and (4) the relationship between the number of blastocyst contractions in each condition (culture times, ZP presence or absence, and d4-BL2s).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical approval
This study was conducted on blastocysts of patients who had completed IVF treatment and which were treated as discarded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Clinical Research Ethics Review Committee of Mie University Hospital (H2022-175), conducted within the guidelines established by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (No. 104), and registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1040220121).
Procedure
The primary endpoint of this study was the concordance rate of karyotype analysis results between the WE, SCM, and TE of thawed blastocysts (Figure 1). First, the optimal culture times for the SCM were investigated at 8, 16, and 24 h (n = 5 for each). Second, to determine the effect of the presence or absence of the ZP, blastocysts with the clear zone removed were cultured at the culture time that showed the highest agreement rate among the SCM culture times described above and were compared to the agreement rate with the clear zone (n = 10). Finally, we evaluated the agreement rate when d4-BL2s were cultured at the culture times that showed the highest agreement rate (n = 10).
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Embryo background
Thirty-five blastocysts discarded from 24 patients who underwent IVF at Minoura Ladies Clinic and Mie University Hospital by December 2022 were used in this study after obtaining informed consent. Embryos were obtained from patients who had terminated infertility treatment for various reasons, such as having the desired number of children and wishing to discard the embryos. The mean age of the patients was 36.9 ± 2.9 years (Figure 2). We evaluated blastocysts before freezing, at the end of culture, and immediately after TE biopsy using the Gardner Classification.40
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Embryo thawing and blastocyst culture
Blastocysts were thawed in thawing media (Kitazato) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Assisted hatching was performed while the embryos contracted during thawing, using the LYKOS Clinical IVF laser system and Clinical Laser Software Legacy 5.12 (Hamilton Thorne). Thawed blastocysts were transferred to a multipurpose processing medium (Multipurpose Handling Medium [MHM]; Irvine Scientific) containing 10% v/v dextran serum supplement (DSS; Irvine Scientific) and washed three to four times. The blastocysts were then transferred to a 10 μL drop of HiGROW OVIT PLUS (Fuso Industries) and cultured one at a time in LUX3 FL (Axion Biosystems) at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 6% O2. Time-lapse observations were also conducted. Five blastocysts were cultured for 8, 16, and 24 h. After the end of culture, 8 μL of the SCM was sampled into polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes according to the manufacturer's (Igenomix Japan) recommended protocol.
Trophectoderm biopsies were performed after the SCM sampling. ZPs were fixed in a drop of 10% DSS-containing MHM with a holding pipette (CooperSurgical), and five to ten cells were biopsied and collected in PCR tubes, according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The WEs were sampled by fixing the ZPs of the blastocysts remaining after TE biopsy with a holding pipette, aspirating and evacuating the cells with a TE biopsy pipette (CooperSurgical), and collecting them in PCR tubes, excluding the ZPs. Blastocysts without ZP (ZP free; ZF) were cultured for 24 h after a short exposure of blastocysts in Acidic Tyrode's solution (Merck) immediately after thawing to remove the ZP, and sampling was performed in the same way. d4-BL2s were cultured for 24 h immediately after thawing and sampled in the same manner. Each sample was stored at −80°C until analysis, and samples were sent to Igenomix for NGS.
Time-lapse observation of contraction
Images taken with the LUX3 FL were analyzed with SytoSMART (Axion Biosystems). The time interval was 10 min for time-lapse observation. Each imaging time was assessed and the number of contractions was counted.
NGS
Whole genome amplification and DNA barcoding were performed using the Ion ReproSeq PGS Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer's recommendations, using a modified protocol for spent blastocyst medium. Batches of 96 samples were pooled. Nucleic acid extraction was performed using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). The extracted DNA was amplified using the ReproSeqTM PGTS kit with Ion 530TM Chips (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and DNA libraries were prepared and sequenced using Ion GeneStudio S5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Numerical chromosome aberrations and imbalanced structural aberrations were detected in the obtained sequence data using Ion Reporter Software (ThermoFisher Scientific). In addition, Igenomix's proprietary analysis algorithm was used for PGT-A41 and niPGT-A.42 The samples were quantified and diluted using a Qubit High Sensitivity dsDNA Kit (Life Technologies) and loaded into Ion Chef (ThermoFisher Scientific) for automated template preparation and chip loading. The runs of the 96 samples were performed using 530 chips. Chip sequencing was performed using an S5 sequencer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Aneuploidy and copy number polymorphisms were analyzed using Ion Reporter software (ThermoFisher Scientific). Analysis data after NGS in WEs, SCMs, and TEs were output as described above (Figures S1–S3).
Statistical analysis
In this study, a Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the agreement rate owing to the small sample size. The age and number of contractions were compared using the Dunn's multiple comparison test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 9.4.1 (GraphPad Software); p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Overall findings
In this study, karyotyping was performed on 35 blastocysts via NGS using the WE, SCM, and TE. Patient age, fertilization method, grade, karyotyping results for each sample, and the number of contractions are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in patient age between the groups (Figure 2). The blastocysts used in this study were either d5-BLs or d4-BL2s before freezing, and most embryos were BL3BB or of higher quality after culture, except for one. Most of the embryos after TE biopsy were BL3BB or of higher quality, except for two.
TABLE 1 Comparison of results from 35 samples.
No. | Age | Fertilization method | Grade | Karyotype | Contractions (time) | ||||
Before culture | After culture | After biopsy | WE | SCM | TE | ||||
8–1 | 35 | Rescue ICSI | BL4AB | BL4AB | BL4AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Non-Info | XY, Euploid | 0 |
8–2 | 39 | ICSI | BL3BB | BL3BB | BL3BB | XX, +20, 21 | XX, +4, −10, +20, +21 | XX, +20, 21 | 3 |
8–3 | 38 | IVF | BL3BB | BL2BB | BL2BB | XY, Euploid | No DNA | XY, Euploid | 1 |
8–4 | 37 | IVF | BL3BB | BL4BA | BL4BA | XY, −7 | XY, −7, −17 | XY, −7 | 0 |
8–5 | 38 | IVF | BL4AA | BL4AA | BL4AA | XY, −16 | XY, −16 | XY, −16 | 0 |
16–1 | 37 | IVF | BL4BB | BL5AA | BL5AA | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 2 |
16–2 | 36 | IVF | BL3BB | BL3BB | BL3BC | XX, Euploid | XX, −19 | XX, Euploid | 2 |
16–3 | 36 | ICSI | BL4AB | BL4AB | BL4AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 4 |
16–4 | 40 | IVF | BL4AA | BL4AA | BL4AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Complex Mosaic | 4 |
16–5 | 38 | IVF | BL3BB | BL3BB | BL3BB | XY, Euploid | XY, −7, −14 | XY, Euploid | 3 |
24–1 | 35 | IVF | BL4AB | BL5AA | BL5AA | XX, +3q | XX, +3q | XX, +3q | 3 |
24–2 | 35 | IVF | BL3BB | BL3BA | BL3BB | XY, −16 | XY, −16 | XY, −10, 16 | 6 |
24–3 | 39 | IVF | BL3BB | BL5BA | BL5BA | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | 6 |
24–4 | 36 | ICSI | BL4BB | BL4BB | BL4BB | XY, low mosaic −7 | XY, low mosaic −7 | XY, low mosaic −7 | 3 |
24–5 | 38 | IVF | BL4AA | BL6AA | BL6AA | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 4 |
ZF-1 | 38 | IVF | BL4AB | BL5AA | BL5AA | XY, High mosaic trisomy 19 | XY, Euploid | XY, Trisomy 19 | 3 |
ZF-2 | 40 | Rescue ICSI | BL4BB | BL5AA | BL5AA | XY, Trisomy 14 and 16 | XY, −2p, +14, +16 | XY, Trisomy 14 and 16 | 2 |
ZF-3 | 36 | IVF | BL4AB | BL4AB | BL4AB | XY, Euploid | XY, +2, +4, +18, −20 | XY, Euploid | 3 |
ZF-4 | 40 | Rescue ICSI | BL4BA | BL4BA | BL4BA | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 2 |
ZF-5 | 38 | ICSI | BL3AA | BL4AA | BL4AB | XX, Complex aneuploid Monosomy 14 and 16, Partial monosomy 2q35q37.3 (23 Mb) | XX, −2q, −14, −16 | XX, Complex aneuploid Monosomy 14 and 16, Partial monosomy 2q35q37.3 (23 Mb) | 2 |
ZF-6 | 29 | ICSI | BL5AA | BL6AA | BL6AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 0 |
ZF-7 | 29 | ICSI | BL4AA | BL4AA | BL4AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 2 |
ZF-8 | 29 | ICSI | BL4BA | BL5AA | BL5AB | XY, Euploid | XY, −7, +8 | XY, Euploid | 2 |
ZF-9 | 38 | ICSI | BL4AA | BL5AA | BL5AB | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | XY, Euploid | 0 |
ZF-10 | 38 | ICSI | BL4AA | BL5AA | BL5AB | XX, Trisomy 18 and 21 | XX, Non-info | XX, Trisomy 18 and 21 | 2 |
BL2-1 | 37 | IVF | BL2 | BL4AA | BL4AA | XY, Trisomy 10 and 21 | XY, Non-info | XY, Trisomy 10 and 21 | 1 |
BL2-2 | 39 | IVF | BL2 | BL3BB | BL3BB | XX, High mosaic monosomy 22 | XX, −22 | XX, Monosomy 22 | 3 |
BL2-3 | 36 | Rescue ICSI | BL2 | BL3BB | BL3BB | XY, Monosomy 16 | XY, −16 | XY, Monosomy 16 | 2 |
BL2-4 | 38 | IVF | BL2 | BL3AC | BL3AC | XY, Trisomy 16 | XY, Non-info | XY, Trisomy 16 and 20 | 2 |
BL2-5 | 37 | IVF | BL2 | BL4BB | BL4BB | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | 3 |
BL2-6 | 36 | ICSI | BL2 | BL4BB | BL4BB | XX, Euploid | XX, −13 | XX, Euploid | 4 |
BL2-7 | 40 | IVF | BL2 | BL5AA | BL5AA | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | XX, Euploid | 3 |
BL2-8 | 37 | IVF | BL2 | BL4AB | BL4AB | XX, Aneuploid Monosomy 18 | XX, Non-info | XX, Aneuploid Monosomy 18 | 2 |
BL2-9 | 40 | IVF | BL2 | BL6AA | BL6AA | XX, Euploid | XX, +3q | XX, Euploid | 2 |
BL2-10 | 38 | IVF | BL2 | BL4BB | BL4BB | XX, Euploid | XX, Non-info | XX, Euploid | 1 |
For the 35 blastocysts analyzed, the karyotypes of the WE, SCM, and TE were 100% (35/35), 80% (28/35), and 100% (35/35), respectively. The concordance rates for the WE versus the SCM, the WE versus the TE, and the TE versus the SCM were 51.4% (18/35), 91.4% (32/35), and 51.4% (18/35), respectively (Table S1). The number of contractions was 2.3 ± 1.5 (Table S1). The aneuploid rates of the WE, TE, and SCM for all embryos were 42.9% (15/35), 45.7% (16/35), and 45.7% (16/35), respectively (Table S1). Non-information or no DNA was observed in 20.0% (7/35) of patients with SCM.
Culture times of the SCM
Fifteen thawed d5-BLs were cultured for 8, 16, and 24 h and observed over time (n = 5 for each). The concordance rates of the WE versus the SCM, the WE versus the TE, and the TE versus the SCM for all SCM culture times were 60.0% (9/15), 93.3% (14/15), and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (Table S1). The number of contractions was 2.7 ± 1.9 (Table S1). The aneuploid rate in the WEs was 40.0% (6/15) (Table S2), and the karyotype of the aneuploid was low mosaic (Table 1). The aneuploid rate in the TE was 46.7% (7/15) (Table S1), and the karyotypes of the aneuploids were low mosaic and complex mosaic (Table 1). The aneuploidy rate in the SCM was 53.3% (8/15), the rate of no DNA and non-information was 13.3% (2/15) (Table 1), and one of the aneuploids had a low mosaic rate (Table 1).
The concordance of the karyotypes of the WE, SCM, and TE at each culture time point was examined. Only results that were identical with respect to euploidy and degree of mosaicism were considered concordant; partial concordance was considered discordant. The SCM for 16 and 24 h was successfully analyzed in all cases (Table 1). The SCM for 8 h was analyzed in 60.0% (3/5) of the cases, the remainder of which consisted of non-information or no DNA (Table 1). At 8, 16, and 24 h, the concordance rate between the WE versus the SCM was 20% (1/5), 60.0% (3/5), and 100% (5/5), respectively (Table S2), with significant differences between 8 and 24 h (Figure 3A). Two samples showed partial concordance at 8 h (8–2 and 8–4), whereas two samples showed complete disagreement at 16 h (16–2 and 16–5) (Table 1). For the WE and SCM, the concordance rate for each culture period was high, ranging from 80 to 100%. At 8, 16, and 24 h, the concordance rate between the TE versus the SCM was 20% (1/5), 40.0% (2/5), and 80% (5/5), respectively, with no significant differences (Table S2). For each SCM culture time point, 24 h was found to be optimal.
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Next, considering that the number of contractions is important in increasing the concordance rate, we examined the number of contractions at each culture time. At 8, 16, and 24 h, the number of contractions was 0.8 ± 1.1, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 4.4 ± 1.3, respectively (Table S2), and there were significantly more contractions at 24 h than at 8 (Figure 3B).
Influence of the presence or absence of the ZP
After thawing and removal of the ZP, d5-BLs were analyzed for WE, SCM, and TE karyotypes after culturing under time-lapse for 24 h (n = 10). ZF blastocysts were cultured at the 24-h culture time that was determined to be optimal, and the results of blastocytes with the ZP (ZP+) cultured for the same 24 h were used for comparison. The aneuploid rates of the WE, TE, and SCM for all embryos were 40.0% (4/10) each (Table S3).
Next, the karyotype concordance rates for the WE, SCM, and TE were examined. The concordance rates for the WE versus the SCM, the WE versus the TE, and the TE versus the SCM were 50.0% (5/10), 100.0% (10/10), and 50.0% (5/10), respectively (Table S3). The five concordances in the SCM were euploid (ZF-4, ZF-6, ZF-7, and ZF-9) and aneuploid (ZF-5) (Table 1). The five discrepancies were aneuploid-to-euploid (ZF-1), partial aneuploid agreement (ZF-2), euploid-to-aneuploid (ZF-3 and ZF-8), and aneuploid-to-non-information (ZF-10) (Table 1). No significant differences were observed between ZP+ and ZF blastocysts, but a trend toward lower concordance was observed in ZF blastocysts (Figure 4A). The number of contractions was 1.8 ± 1.0, with no significant difference between ZP+ and ZF blastocysts (Figure 4B).
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Early blastocysts
d4-BL2s were thawed. After they were cultured for 24 h under time-lapse conditions, the karyotypes of the WE, SCM, and TE were analyzed by NGS (n = 10). The WE, SCM, and TE values in the d4-BL2 aneuploid group were 50.0% (5/10), 40.0% (4/10), and 50.0% (5/10), respectively (Table S4).
Next, we examined karyotype concordance rates for the WE, SCM, and TE. The concordance rates for the WE versus the SCM, the WE versus the TE, and the TE versus the SCM were 40.0% (4/10), 90.0% (9/10), and 40.0% (4/10), respectively (Table S4). In the SCM, two of the four concordances were euploid (BL2-5 and BL2-7) and two were aneuploid (BL2-2 and BL2-3) (Table 1). There were two discrepancies, with euploid being determined to be aneuploid (BL2-6 and BL2-9) (Table 1). Four cases of non-information were evaluated using strict criteria for median absolute pairwise difference (MAPD) values (MAPD = 0.25). Thus, when the criteria were relaxed, BL2-1, BL2-4, BL2-8, and BL2-10 were trisomies 10 and 21, trisomies 16 and 18, trisomies 3 and 4, and euploid, respectively (Figure S2). BL2-1 and BL2-10 were concordant, whereas BL2-4 and BL2-8 were discordant. In the concordance rates of the WE versus the SCM, there was a significant difference between ZP+ blastocysts cultured for 24 h and BL2s (10 cases) (Figure 5A), but not when non-information was excluded (Table S5). The number of contractions was 2.3 ± 0.9 (Table S4), with no significant difference between ZP+ blastocysts cultured for 24 h and BL2s (Figure 5B).
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
DISCUSSION
This study attempted to evaluate the genetic testing performance of WE, SCM, and TE biopsy samples when using d4-BL2s, with the aim of applying this to embryo transfer using d5-BLs, which are considered to have the highest pregnancy rate. First, using the d5-BLs, concordance rates for the 8-, 16-, and 24-h SCM versus the WE and TE versus the WE were compared, and the 24-h SCM was found to have a higher match rate than the TE. Next, to examine the effect of the presence or absence of the ZP, we compared the agreement rates between the SCM with and without the ZP. These results indicated that the ZP is important for improving the accuracy of niPGT-A because the SCM without the ZP decreases the agreement rate. Finally, we compared the results of the SCM, TE, and WE of d4-BL2s for 24-h culture and found that the TE showed a high agreement rate of 90%, while the SCM showed an overall agreement rate of 40% and a non-information rate of 40% (even when non-information was excluded, the agreement rate was 66.7%). In addition, few sex discrepancies were detected (with one showing no DNA in the 8-h culture SCM).
The origin and developmental mechanism of cfDNA in embryos are not clear but are thought to be derived from programmed cell death, such as apoptosis and necrosis.43 Compared to the waveform data obtained by NGS, those obtained from the 8- and 16-h cultures were more unstable than those obtained from the 24-h cultures (Figures S1–S3). This may be owing to the non-information and absence of DNA in the SCM with the shortest culture time of 8 h and the low amount of cfDNA in the embryo culture medium. Non-information or no DNA was not observed after prolonged culture (16 h or later), and a 100% concordance rate was obtained after 24 h of culture. Blastocysts undergo repeated expansion and contraction before hatching and exiting the ZP and are thought to exchange luminal fluid through contraction and expansion.44,45 We hypothesized that the cfDNA in the blastocyst cavity generated during culture was expelled from the blastocyst by contraction and expansion and compared the number of contractions at each culture time. The 24-h culture resulted in significantly more contractions and the highest concordance rate compared with the 8-h culture. It has recently been reported that 24 h is the optimal incubation time during niPGT-A, and our results were similar.46 However, the mechanism by which cfDNA content increases during contraction and dilation is unknown.
Although the maintenance of intercellular structures is an important role of the ZP,47 human oocytes that are ZF develop to the blastocyst stage, and healthy babies are born after embryo transfer.48 Therefore, the ZP is not essential for postfertilization development. To investigate whether the ZP inhibits the dispersion of cfDNA into the SCM, the karyotype of blastocysts from which the ZP was removed prior to culture was evaluated by NGS. The results showed that the agreement between the WE and TE was 100%, whereas that between the WE and SCM was 40%. In addition, ZF blastocysts tended to have a lower shrinkage frequency. It has been reported that maternal cell contamination is reduced and the concordance rate increases significantly when cultured in multiple washes rather than in a one-step wash for niPGT-A,49 and in this study, blastocysts were washed three to four times from ZF blastocysts to culture in order to increase the concordance rate for niPGT-A. In addition, it has been reported that being ZF reduces cytoplasmic fragmentation in time-lapse analyses of human embryos.50 Therefore, it is possible that the reduction in cytoplasmic fragmentation by ZF-suppressed programmed cell death is a factor in the generation of cfDNA. Furthermore, the fact that blastocysts in the ZP state were washed multiple times, which did not ensure a sufficient amount of cfDNA, may have reduced the concordance rate.
Embryo transfer is performed on d5-BLs at many centers, as d5-BLs have the highest clinical pregnancy rate. We considered the clinical application of niPGT-A and evaluated its concordance rate in SCMs with d4-BL2s cultured for 24 h. WE and SCM concordance for d4-BL2s was 40%, a significant difference from d5-BLs cultured for 24 h. However, when non-information in four cases was excluded in the SCM of d4-BL2s, the concordance rate was 66.7%, and there was no significant difference between this SCM and the d5-BLs cultured for 24 h (Table S4). Furthermore, because a strict MAPD value threshold for non-information was set in this study for MAPD values exceeding 0.25, we examined whether the agreement rate increased when the threshold was relaxed. The concordance rate was as low as 50% (two out of four concordant cases), and no significant difference was found between the d5-BLs after 24 h of culture (data not shown). Apoptosis has been reported to occur at a relatively low frequency in early mouse blastocysts and to increase in later stages.51 In human blastocysts, apoptosis has also been reported to occur in TE cells during pre-implantation embryogenesis, playing an important role in normal embryonic development and quality control.52 Therefore, in the case of d4-BLs, apoptosis, which plays an important role in the development of cfDNA, may have occurred at a low frequency for a certain period of time, resulting in a lack of cfDNA and thus a reduced fitness rate. Therefore, SCM techniques for early blastocysts need to be optimized, including extended culture time.
Maternal DNA contamination can adversely affect the niPGT-A results. niPGT-A concordance rates are mostly reported for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles25,28,30,42,53,54; however, maternal genetic contamination remains a problem.29 Therefore, it is important to use cryopreserved blastocysts to prevent maternal DNA contamination.53 It has also been reported that niPGT-A in conventional IVF (con-IVF) cycles can increase the concordance rate by interspersing multiple embryo washes.49 In this study, 26 frozen blastocysts con-IVF and nine ICSI embryos were subjected to multiple washing processes without awareness, and there was almost no evidence of maternal cell contamination. In short, embryo freezing before niPGT-A and multiple washes just before culture for the SCM are likely to be useful in improving the accuracy of the SCM; however, unnecessary freezing should be avoided in clinical applications, and the protocol of this study needs to be optimized.
Our study had several limitations. First, 35 blastocysts were donated for this study; however, the sample size was small. Therefore, a larger sample size may result in a significant difference in the comparison of concordance rates between ZP+ and ZF blastocysts. The second limitation was the clinical outcome. Mosaic embryos may recover from aneuploidy during postimplantation development,55 and it is not known whether the chromosomal state of the implanted embryo is identical to that of the fetus. Third, only frozen embryos were used in this study. The amount of cfDNA increased with increased cell death during the thawing process and subsequent culture process, which may have resulted in more favorable conditions compared to niPGT-A in fresh embryos. In clinical IVF, unnecessary freezing and thawing should be avoided, and optimization in fresh embryos may be important in the future.
In conclusion, niPGT-A requires at least 24 h of culture. For the first time to our knowledge, it was found that niPGT-A showed a higher concordance rate than TE biopsies when collected on day 6 and that 24-h cultures had the highest number of contractions. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that the ZP has been found to be required for SCM culture. In addition, in niPGT-A using SCMs after 24 h of culture with d4-BL2s, the concordance rate for SCMs was lower than that for the TE. In the present study, high concordance rates were observed in almost all specimens used for sex determination. This study may therefore aid in the clinical application of niPGT-A, which is not yet technically mature.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Naoto Hokaze and Ryota Tachibana for their technical assistance. We thank Igenomix for performing the contracted tests for niPGT-A and PGT-A in this study and Toshiki Matsuoka for technical advice on each test. This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24K19724 to M. Nishioka, Minoura Ladies Clinic Business Expenses to H. Minoura, and Mie University's subsidy for operating expenses to H. Takeuchi.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Hiroki Takeuchi, upon reasonable request.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Review Committee of Mie University Hospital (H2022-175), and the study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (No. 104). All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments.
INFORMED CONSENT
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1040220121).
Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–663.e1.
Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980;44(2):151–178.
Nybo Andersen WJ, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708–1712.
Spandorfer SD, Davis OK, Barmat LI, Chung PH, Rosenwaks Z. Relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1265–1269.
Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, Yoruk GDA, Candurmaz NN, Coetzee K. Single best euploid versus single best unknown‐ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):629–636.
Shi WH, Jiang ZR, Zhou ZY, Ye MJ, Qin NX, Huang HF, et al. Different strategies of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies in women of advanced maternal age: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3800.
Iwasa T, Kuwahara A, Takeshita T, Taniguchi Y, Mikami M, Irahara M. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and chromosomal structural rearrangement: a summary of a nationwide study by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1): [eLocator: e12518].
Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen‐thawed embryo transfer in good‐prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071–1079.e7.
Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, et al. Live birth with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2047–2058.
Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A, Menten B, Heindryckx B. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):313–334.
Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2089–2090.
Zore T, Kroener LL, Wang C, Liu L, Buyalos R, Hubert G, et al. Transfer of embryos with segmental mosaicism is associated with a significant reduction in live‐birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(1):69–76.
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Babariya D, Tarozzi N, Borini A, et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid‐aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Genet. 2017;136(7):805–819.
Maxwell SM, Colls P, Hodes‐Wertz B, McCulloh DH, McCaffrey C, Wells D, et al. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case‐control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next‐generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1414–1419.e5.
Zhang L, Wei D, Zhu Y, Gao Y, Yan J, Chen ZJ. Rates of live birth after mosaic embryo transfer compared with euploid embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(1):165–172.
Zhang WY, von Versen‐Hoynck F, Kapphahn KI, Fleischmann RR, Zhao Q, Baker VL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(2):283–290. e2.
Makhijani R, Bartels CB, Godiwala P, Bartolucci A, DiLuigi A, Nulsen J, et al. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):340–348.
Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, Whitehead C, Kim J, Hanson B, et al. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next‐generation sequencing‐based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(3):627–637.
Mandel P, Metais P. Nuclear acids in human blood plasma. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948;142(3–4):241–243.
Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350(9076):485–487.
Wright CF, Burton H. The use of cell‐free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(1):139–151.
Stokowski R, Wang E, White K, Batey A, Jacobsson B, Brar H, et al. Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(12):1243–1246.
Bianchi DW, Chiu RWK. Sequencing of circulating cell‐free DNA during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(5):464–473.
Stigliani S, Anserini P, Venturini PL, Scaruffi P. Mitochondrial DNA content in embryo culture medium is significantly associated with human embryo fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2652–2660.
Xu J, Fang R, Chen L, Chen D, Xiao JP, Yang W, et al. Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(42):11907–11912.
Shamonki MI, Jin H, Haimowitz Z, Liu L. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell‐free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1312–1318.
Vera‐Rodriguez M, Diez‐Juan A, Jimenez‐Almazan J, Martinez S, Navarro R, Peinado V, et al. Origin and composition of cell‐free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(4):745–756.
Ho JR, Arrach N, Rhodes‐Long K, Ahmady A, Ingles S, Chung K, et al. Pushing the limits of detection: investigation of cell‐free DNA for aneuploidy screening in embryos. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):467–475.e2.
Xu CL, Wei YQ, Tan QY, Huang Y, Wu JJ, Li CY, et al. Concordance of PGT for aneuploidies between blastocyst biopsies and spent blastocyst culture medium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46(3):483–490.
Huang L, Bogale B, Tang Y, Lu S, Xie XS, Racowsky C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(28):14105–14112.
Rubio C, Navarro‐Sanchez L, Garcia‐Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, et al. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell‐free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):e1–e13.
Yeung QSY, Zhang YX, Chung JPW, Lui WT, Kwok YKY, Gui B, et al. A prospective study of non‐invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (NiPGT‐A) using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) on spent culture media (SCM). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(8):1609–1621.
Gombos K, Galik B, Kalacs KI, Godony K, Varnagy A, Alpar D, et al. NGS‐based application for routine non‐invasive pre‐implantation genetic assessment in IVF. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2568.
Hanson BM, Tao X, Hong KH, Comito CE, Pangasnan R, Seli E, et al. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy exhibits high rates of deoxyribonucleic acid amplification failure and poor correlation with results obtained using trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):1461–1470.
Lledo B, Morales R, Ortiz JA, Rodriguez‐Arnedo A, Ten J, Castillo JC, et al. Consistent results of non‐invasive PGT‐A of human embryos using two different techniques for chromosomal analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(3):555–563.
Shitara A, Takahashi K, Goto M, Takahashi H, Iwasawa T, Onodera Y, et al. Cell‐free DNA in spent culture medium effectively reflects the chromosomal status of embryos following culturing beyond implantation compared to trophectoderm biopsy. PLoS One. 2021;16(2): [eLocator: e0246438].
Sialakouma A, Karakasiliotis I, Ntala V, Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B. Embryonic cell‐free DNA in spent culture medium: a non‐invasive tool for aneuploidy screening of the corresponding embryos. In Vivo. 2021;35(6):3449–3457.
Sonehara H, Matsumoto R, Nakayama N, Kobanawa M, Numata K, Kawasaki A, et al. Aneuploidy and sex concordance rate between cell‐free DNA analysis from spent culture media of preimplantation embryo and DNA from whole embryo with respect to different morphological grading. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21(1): [eLocator: e12493].
Du T, Wang Y, Fan Y, Zhang S, Yan Z, Yu W, et al. Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on day 7: are they of clinical value? Hum Reprod. 2018;33(6):1038–1051.
Gardner DKLM, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–1158.
Capalbo A, Poli M, Rienzi L, Girardi L, Patassini C, Fabiani M, et al. Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non‐selection clinical trial. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(12):2238–2247.
Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro‐Sánchez L, Cimadomo D, García‐Pascual CM, Albricci L, et al. Embryonic cell‐free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):510–519.
van der Vaart M, Pretorius PJ. The origin of circulating free DNA. Clin Chem. 2007;53(12):2215–2221.
Baltz JM, Smith SS, Biggers JD, Lechene C. Intracellular ion concentrations and their maintenance by Na+/K(+)‐ATPase in preimplantation mouse embryos. Zygote. 1997;5(1):1–9.
Marcos J, Pérez‐Albalá S, Mifsud A, Molla M, Landeras J, Meseguer M. Collapse of blastocysts is strongly related to lower implantation success: a time‐lapse study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2501–2508.
Ardestani G, Banti M, García‐Pascual CM, Navarro‐Sánchez L, Van Zyl E, Castellón JA, et al. Culture time to optimize embryo cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for frozen‐thawed blastocysts undergoing non‐invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT‐A). Fertil Steril. 2024;7(24): [eLocator: 271].
Fan W, Homma M, Xu R, Kunii H, Bai H, Kawahara M, et al. The use of a two‐step removal protocol and optimized culture conditions improve development and quality of zona free mouse embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;577:116–123.
Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Kinutani M, Kinutani K. Vitrification of human hatched blastocysts: a report of 4 cases. J Reprod Med. 2007;52(5):413–415.
Chow JFC, Lam KKW, Cheng HHY, Lai SF, Yeung WSB, Ng EHY. Optimizing non‐invasive preimplantation genetic testing: investigating culture conditions, sample collection, and IVF treatment for improved non‐invasive PGT‐A results. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024;41(2):465–472.
Yumoto K, Shimura T, Mio Y. Removing the zona pellucida can decrease cytoplasmic fragmentations in human embryos: a pilot study using 3PN embryos and time‐lapse cinematography. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(6):1349–1354.
Miao X, Sun T, Barletta H, Mager J, Cui W. Loss of RBBP4 results in defective inner cell mass, severe apoptosis, hyperacetylated histones and preimplantation lethality in mice. Biol Reprod. 2020;103(1):13–23.
Hardy K, Stark J, Winston RM. Maintenance of the inner cell mass in human blastocysts from fragmented embryos. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1165–1169.
Xie P, Zhang S, Gu Y, Jiang B, Hu L, Tan YQ, et al. Non‐invasive preimplantation genetic testing for conventional IVF blastocysts. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):396.
Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro‐Sánchez L, Cimadomo D, García‐Pascual CM, Albricci L, et al. Embryonic cell‐free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertility and sterility. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):510–519.
Abhari S, Kawwass JF. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after transfer of mosaic embryos: a review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(7):1450.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Purpose
Recently, noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT‐A) using cell‐free deoxyribonucleic acid has been developed; however, there are few reports on this and the results are inconsistent. This study was conducted to optimize the cultural environment.
Methods
We used 35 blastocysts that had been discarded after in‐vitro fertilization. The concordance rate of karyotype analysis results between whole embryos (WEs), spent culture mediums (SCMs), and trophectoderms after 8, 16, and 24 h of culture was examined. Next, zona pellucida (ZP)‐free blastocysts and then early blastocysts were cultured for 24 h each.
Results
Regarding the optimal culture times, the concordance rate between WEs and SCMs was 20%, 60%, and 100% at 8, 16, and 24 h, respectively. Significant differences were found between 8 and 24 h. The concordance rate with ZP cultures was 40.0%, and no significant differences were found. The concordance rate of early blastocysts thawed and cultured for 24 h was 40.0%, which was significantly lower than that of day 5 blastocysts.
Conclusions
The optimal culture times for niPGT‐A were 24 h, and the concordance rate with free ZP was higher. The concordance rate for early blastocysts was low, suggesting that optimization of the conditions may be necessary.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan, Center of Advanced Reproductive Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan, Center of Advanced Reproductive Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan, IVF Shiroko Clinic, Suzuka, Japan
3 Center of Advanced Reproductive Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan, Minoura Ladies Clinic, Suzuka, Japan
5 Minoura Ladies Clinic, Suzuka, Japan
6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan, Center of Advanced Reproductive Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan