Harnessing Beneficial Microbes for Drought Tolerance: A Review of Ecological and Agricultural Innovations

Abstract

Drought is an increasingly critical global challenge, significantly impacting agricultural productivity, food security, and ecosystem stability. As climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of drought events, innovative strategies are essential to enhance plant resilience and sustain agricultural systems. This review explores the vital role of beneficial microbes in conferring drought tolerance, focusing on Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), mycorrhizal fungi, endophytes, actinomycetes, and cyanobacteria. These microorganisms mitigate drought stress through diverse mechanisms, including osmotic adjustment, enhancement of root architecture, modulation of phytohormones, induction of antioxidant defenses, and regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. Ecological and agricultural innovations leveraging these beneficial microbes have demonstrated significant potential in bolstering drought resilience. Strategies such as soil microbiome engineering, bioaugmentation, and the integration of microbial synergies within pest management frameworks enhance ecosystem resilience and agricultural sustainability. Additionally, advancements in agricultural practices, including seed coating, soil amendments, the development of microbial consortia, and precision agriculture technologies, have validated the effectiveness and scalability of microbial interventions in diverse farming systems. Despite promising advancements, several challenges hinder the widespread adoption of microbial solutions. Environmental variability can affect microbial performance, necessitating the development of robust and adaptable strains. Scale-up and commercialization hurdles, economic constraints, and regulatory and safety considerations also pose significant barriers. Furthermore, the complex interactions between microbes, plants, and their environments require a deeper understanding to optimize microbial benefits consistently. Future research should focus on integrating cutting-edge technologies such as genomics, synthetic biology, and precision agriculture to refine and enhance microbial interventions. Collaborative efforts among academia, industry, and government are essential to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation. By addressing these challenges and harnessing microbial innovations, it is possible to develop resilient and sustainable agricultural systems capable of thriving in an increasingly water-scarce world.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background on Drought and Its Global Impact

Drought, a prolonged period of deficient precipitation relative to the statistical multi-year average for a region, represents one of the most pervasive and challenging environmental stressors affecting both natural ecosystems and human societies. Drought can be classified into various types based on its causative factors and manifestations, including meteorological drought, characterized by a significant decrease in precipitation; agricultural drought, which refers to the lack of moisture affecting crop production; hydrological drought, indicating reduced water levels in rivers; and socioeconomic drought, reflecting adverse impacts on communities and economies due to insufficient water resources [1,2,3].

The economic and ecological consequences of drought are profound and multifaceted. Economically, droughts can lead to substantial losses in agricultural productivity, increased food prices, and heightened costs associated with water scarcity management. Water-dependent industries such as agriculture, energy, and manufacturing often experience disrupted operations and financial strain during prolonged drought periods. Ecologically, droughts contribute to the degradation of habitats, loss of biodiversity, and diminished ecosystem services. Prolonged water shortages can lead to the decline of plant and animal populations, altering species composition and ecosystem dynamics [4,5,6].

In recent decades, the frequency and severity of drought events have escalated, a trend closely linked to anthropogenic climate change. Rising global temperatures exacerbate evaporation rates and alter precipitation patterns, increasing the likelihood of prolonged and intense droughts in many regions. Climate models project that drought-prone areas will continue to expand, with significant implications for water resource management, agricultural sustainability, and ecosystem resilience. Understanding these trends is crucial for developing effective strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of drought and enhance the resilience of both human and natural systems [7,8,9,10].

1.2. Importance of Drought Tolerance in Agriculture and Ecology

Drought tolerance is a critical attribute for both agricultural productivity and the sustainability of natural ecosystems. In the agricultural sector, the ability of crops to withstand periods of water scarcity directly influences food security. As global populations grow and climate variability increases, the demand for resilient agricultural systems becomes imperative to ensure consistent food supply and mitigate the risks of crop failure. Enhancing drought tolerance in crops can lead to more stable yields, reduced dependency on irrigation, and improved economic outcomes for farmers, particularly in regions susceptible to recurrent droughts [11,12,13,14,15].

Beyond agriculture, drought tolerance plays a vital role in maintaining the health and functionality of natural ecosystems. Natural ecosystems, including forests, grasslands, and wetlands, rely on adequate water availability to support diverse biological communities and ecosystem processes. Drought-induced stress can lead to reduced plant growth, increased susceptibility to pests and diseases, and even widespread mortality of key species. These changes not only diminish biodiversity but also disrupt ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, water purification, and soil stabilization. Preserving the resilience of natural ecosystems against drought is essential for maintaining ecological balance and ensuring the provision of vital services that support both human well-being and environmental health [16,17,18,19,20,21].

1.3. Role of Microbes in Plant Health and Stress Tolerance

Microbes, encompassing a vast array of bacteria, fungi, and other microorganisms, play an integral role in plant health and stress tolerance. Plant–microbe interactions are fundamental to various physiological processes, including nutrient acquisition, growth regulation, and defense against pathogens. Beneficial microbes, often referred to as plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs), can enhance plant resilience to abiotic stresses such as drought by facilitating water uptake, modulating hormone levels, and improving soil structure. These microorganisms establish symbiotic relationships with plants, contributing to the host’s ability to adapt and thrive under adverse environmental conditions [22,23,24,25,26].

Historically, the application of microbes in agriculture dates back to practices such as the use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legume cultivation and the incorporation of mycorrhizal fungi to enhance nutrient uptake. These early successes laid the groundwork for modern biotechnological approaches aimed at harnessing microbial potential to address contemporary agricultural challenges. Advances in microbiology and molecular biology have expanded our understanding of the complex interactions between plants and their associated microbial communities, revealing the intricate mechanisms through which microbes confer stress tolerance. This historical perspective underscores the enduring significance of microbial applications in agriculture and highlights the potential for innovative microbial-based strategies to mitigate the impacts of drought [27,28,29,30,31].

1.4. Objectives and Scope of Review

The primary objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge and advancements in the utilization of beneficial microbes to enhance drought tolerance in agricultural and ecological contexts. By examining both ecological and agricultural innovations, this article aims to elucidate the multifaceted roles that microorganisms play in mitigating the effects of drought and promoting sustainable water management practices. The review will explore the diverse types of beneficial microbes, the underlying mechanisms by which they confer drought resilience, and the practical applications and innovations that leverage microbial interactions to improve plant and ecosystem performance under water-limited conditions.

Key themes covered in this review include the classification and functional roles of various beneficial microbes, the biological and biochemical pathways involved in microbe-mediated drought tolerance, and the integration of microbial strategies into ecological and agricultural practices. Additionally, the review will address the challenges and limitations associated with deploying microbial solutions at scale, as well as future research directions and technological advancements that hold promise for enhancing the efficacy and reliability of microbial interventions. By consolidating insights from ecological and agricultural research, this review seeks to provide a holistic understanding of how beneficial microbes can be harnessed to achieve greater resilience against drought, thereby contributing to the broader goals of sustainable agriculture and environmental stewardship.

2. Literature Review Methodology

2.1. Overview of the Methodology

The literature review in this chapter provides a comprehensive examination of current research surrounding the use of beneficial microbes in promoting drought tolerance in agricultural and ecological contexts. The methodology employed in this review involves a structured and systematic approach to identify, select, and analyze relevant peer-reviewed articles, academic publications, and authoritative sources from various disciplines, including microbiology, agriculture, and environmental sciences.

2.2. Search Strategy

A systematic search was conducted across the following academic databases to gather relevant portions of the literature:

• PubMed: For articles focusing on the biological and ecological aspects of beneficial microbes and their role in drought tolerance.

• Web of Science: To access a broad range of multidisciplinary studies on agriculture, environmental sciences, and microbial ecology.

• Scopus: For comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed literature in the fields of microbiology, agriculture, and biotechnology.

• Google Scholar: To supplement the search with the gray literature and access a wider array of scientific publications, including conference proceedings and dissertations.

The search terms used included combinations of key phrases such as “drought tolerance”, “beneficial microbes”, “plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”, “mycorrhizal fungi”, “endophytes”, “soil microbiome”, and “sustainable agriculture”. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were applied to refine the search. The search was limited to articles published between 2000 and 2024.

To ensure comprehensiveness, backward and forward citation tracking was employed on selected key studies to uncover additional relevant portions of the literature.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The following inclusion criteria were applied:

• Studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 onwards.

• Research that focused on the use of beneficial microbes in agricultural and environmental drought tolerance.

• Both experimental studies and review articles were included.

• Only studies available in English were considered.

Exclusion criteria included the following:

• Articles that focused on non-agricultural or non-ecological contexts without a direct link to drought resilience.

• Studies that did not include original research data or lacked scientific rigor.

2.4. Data Extraction and Analysis

Key information was extracted from selected articles, including study objectives, methodology, microbial species studied, outcomes related to drought tolerance, and limitations. These data were then organized thematically to identify recurring trends, gaps in the literature, and areas of innovation in the field of microbial solutions to drought stress.

2.5. Quality Assessment

Each study was critically assessed for its methodological quality, including sample size, experimental design, statistical analysis, and the validity of conclusions drawn. Studies were ranked based on their contribution to advancing knowledge in microbial-assisted drought tolerance and were categorized according to their relevance to the review’s objectives.

2.6. Synthesis of Findings

The literature was synthesized into several core themes:

• Mechanisms of microbe-mediated drought tolerance.

• Ecological innovations utilizing beneficial microbes.

• Agricultural applications and case studies demonstrating practical impacts.

• Challenges and future research directions.

The synthesis highlighted both the current advancements in microbial-based drought resilience strategies and the limitations that still need to be addressed in future research.

3. Types of Beneficial Microbes for Drought Tolerance

3.1. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)

Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) constitute a diverse group of bacteria that colonize plant roots and confer numerous benefits to their host plants, particularly under stress conditions such as drought. Prominent examples of PGPR include genera such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium, and Azospirillum. These bacteria are characterized by their ability to thrive in the rhizosphere—the narrow region of soil directly influenced by root secretions—and establish beneficial interactions with plants. PGPR enhance plant growth through various mechanisms, which are both direct and indirect. Direct mechanisms involve the synthesis of phytohormones like indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Additionally, PGPR can facilitate nutrient acquisition by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, solubilizing phosphates, and mobilizing other essential minerals, thereby improving soil fertility and plant health [32,33,34,35,36,37] (Figure 1).

Indirect mechanisms by which PGPR confer drought tolerance include the production of exopolysaccharides, which improve soil structure and water retention, thereby reducing the impact of water stress. In addition, PGPR can induce systemic resistance in plants by triggering the expression of stress-responsive genes, enhancing the plant’s innate ability to cope with drought-induced oxidative stress. PGPR also protect the plant from stress by reducing ethylene levels through the production of the enzyme ACC deaminase. These multifaceted interactions make PGPR a cornerstone in developing sustainable agricultural practices aimed at increasing crop drought resistance [33,34,35,36] (Table 1).

3.2. Mycorrhizal Fungi

Mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with the roots of most terrestrial plants, playing a pivotal role in enhancing plant water uptake and overall drought tolerance. The two primary types of mycorrhizae are arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) and ectomycorrhizae (EM), each differing in their structural associations with plant roots and their functional contributions. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, belonging to the phylum Glomeromycota, penetrate the cortical cells of plant roots, forming highly branched structures known as arbuscules. These structures facilitate the exchange of nutrients, where the fungi assist in the uptake of water and minerals, particularly phosphorus, in exchange for carbohydrates produced by the plant through photosynthesis. Ectomycorrhizal fungi, primarily associated with woody plants and trees, form a sheath around the roots and extend their hyphae into the surrounding soil, thereby increasing the surface area for water and nutrient absorption [56,57,58,59,60].

The benefits of mycorrhizal associations in drought conditions are manifold. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance the plant’s ability to access water from a larger soil volume, effectively increasing the plant’s water uptake capacity during periods of scarcity. They also improve soil structure by binding soil particles into aggregates, which enhances soil porosity and reduces water runoff and evaporation. Additionally, mycorrhizal fungi contribute to the plant’s stress tolerance by modulating hormonal pathways and enhancing the plant’s antioxidant defenses, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of drought-induced oxidative stress. The presence of mycorrhizal fungi has been shown to improve plant survival rates, biomass accumulation, and overall growth performance under drought conditions, underscoring their critical role in sustainable agriculture and ecosystem resilience [61,62,63,64].

3.3. Endophytes

Endophytic microorganisms, commonly referred to as endophytes, reside within the tissues of plants without causing any apparent harm. These microbes, which include bacteria and fungi, establish intimate associations with their host plants, conferring various benefits that enhance plant growth and stress resilience. Endophytes can colonize various plant parts, including roots, stems, leaves, and even seeds, forming a protective and symbiotic relationship that is particularly advantageous under drought conditions. By inhabiting the internal tissues of plants, endophytes can directly influence the plant’s physiological processes, thereby enhancing its ability to withstand water deficit stress [45,65,66].

The role of endophytes in enhancing drought resilience is multifaceted. They can produce phytohormones such as gibberellins and cytokinins, which regulate plant growth and development, facilitating better root architecture and increased water uptake efficiency. Endophytes also contribute to osmotic adjustment by synthesizing osmoprotectants like proline and trehalose, which help maintain cellular water balance and protect cellular structures from dehydration. Furthermore, endophytic microbes can bolster the plant’s antioxidant defense systems, reducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are typically elevated during drought stress. This antioxidative protection mitigates cellular damage and maintains cellular integrity, thereby enhancing the plant’s overall drought tolerance. The ability of endophytes to modulate gene expression related to stress responses further underscores their potential as natural agents for improving plant resilience to drought [66,67,68,69].

3.4. Other Beneficial Microorganisms

Beyond PGPR, mycorrhizal fungi, and endophytes, several other groups of microorganisms contribute uniquely to drought tolerance in plants. Actinomycetes, a group of Gram-positive bacteria known for their filamentous growth, are renowned for their ability to produce a wide array of bioactive compounds, including antibiotics and enzymes that can enhance plant stress resilience. These microorganisms improve soil structure and fertility through the decomposition of organic matter, thereby enhancing water retention and availability to plants. Additionally, actinomycetes can form symbiotic relationships with plants, similar to PGPR, promoting root growth and nutrient uptake [47,48,49,70].

Cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, are another group of beneficial microorganisms that play a significant role in drought tolerance. These photosynthetic bacteria can fix atmospheric nitrogen, thereby enriching soil fertility and reducing the need for chemical fertilizers. Cyanobacteria contribute to soil stability and water retention through the secretion of extracellular polysaccharides, which help in the formation of soil aggregates. Their ability to enhance soil moisture content makes them valuable allies in arid and semi-arid regions prone to drought [51,52,71,72].

Furthermore, certain species of fungi and bacteria exhibit unique capabilities such as the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can modulate plant growth and stress responses. These VOCs can induce systemic tolerance in plants, preparing them to better withstand drought conditions. Additionally, some microorganisms possess the ability to degrade soil pollutants, thereby improving soil health and creating a more conducive environment for plant growth under stress [73,74].

In summary, the diversity of beneficial microorganisms extends beyond the well-studied PGPR, mycorrhizal fungi, and endophytes. Actinomycetes, cyanobacteria, and other specialized microbes offer unique contributions to drought tolerance, each enhancing plant resilience through distinct mechanisms. The integration of these diverse microbial groups into agricultural and ecological practices holds immense potential for developing robust strategies to combat drought stress and ensure sustainable plant productivity in the face of increasing water scarcity.

4. Mechanisms of Microbe-Mediated Drought Tolerance

The ability of plants to withstand drought conditions is significantly enhanced by their interactions with beneficial microbes. These microorganisms employ a variety of sophisticated mechanisms to bolster plant resilience, ensuring sustained growth and productivity even under water-limited scenarios. The following sections delve into the primary mechanisms through which microbes mediate drought tolerance, encompassing osmotic adjustment, root system enhancement, phytohormone production, exopolysaccharides (EPSs), antioxidant defense induction, and the regulation of gene expression associated with stress responses [75,76,77] (Table 2) (Figure 2).

4.1. Osmotic Adjustment and Water Retention

One of the fundamental challenges plants face during drought is maintaining cellular hydration and osmotic balance. Beneficial microbes contribute to osmotic adjustment by facilitating the production of osmolytes—small organic molecules such as proline, glycine betaine, and trehalose. These osmolytes accumulate within plant cells, lowering the osmotic potential and enabling the retention of water despite external water scarcity. By synthesizing and regulating these compounds, microbes help plants maintain turgor pressure, which is essential for cellular functions and overall plant rigidity [75,79,88]. High proline content is involved in the protection of the cell membrane and the maintenance of the water status in cells during limited water supply (Ortiz et al., 2015). The use of Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 strain improved proline accumulation in maize plants subjected to drought stress [89,90].

In addition to osmolyte production, microbes play a crucial role in improving soil structure, which directly influences water retention. Microbial activities, particularly those of PGPR and mycorrhizal fungi, lead to the formation of soil aggregates through the secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and the binding of soil particles. These aggregates enhance soil porosity and water-holding capacity, reducing water runoff and evaporation. Improved soil structure not only facilitates better water infiltration but also creates microenvironments that retain moisture around plant roots, ensuring a more consistent water supply during drought periods. Consequently, the synergistic effects of osmotic adjustment and enhanced soil structure collectively contribute to the plant’s ability to endure prolonged drought stress [91,92,93]. Bacterial strains Proteus penneri Pp1, P. aeruginosa Pa2 and Alcaligenes faecalis AF3 can produce EPSs and maintain soil moisture, composition, biomass, root and shoot length, and leaf area in plants [77].

4.2. Enhancement of Root System Architecture

A robust and extensive root system is paramount for effective water absorption, particularly in drought-prone environments. Beneficial microbes significantly influence root system architecture by promoting root elongation and branching. PGPR, such as species of Pseudomonas and Bacillus, produce phytohormones like auxins, which stimulate root growth and encourage the formation of lateral roots. This increased root branching not only expands the root surface area but also enhances the plant’s ability to explore a larger soil volume in search of water and nutrients [17,80,94,95].

Moreover, microbes contribute to the development of root hairs, which further amplify the root surface area and improve water uptake efficiency. Enhanced root surface area allows for more effective absorption of water from the soil, particularly from deeper layers that may retain moisture longer during drought conditions. Additionally, the improved root architecture facilitates better anchorage and stability of the plant, reducing the risk of lodging and promoting overall plant health. Through these modifications, beneficial microbes enable plants to optimize their root systems for maximum water acquisition, thereby enhancing their drought tolerance and ensuring sustained growth and productivity [91,96,97,98]. Bacterial inoculation of wheat plants improved lateral root formation and enhanced root growth, thereby enhancing water uptake under drought conditions [99]. Inoculation of maize plants with Pseudomonas putida improved leaf water potential, RWC, and plant biomass after exposure to drought stress [89].

4.3. Production of Phytohormones

Phytohormones are critical regulators of plant growth and stress responses, and beneficial microbes are adept at modulating their levels within plant tissues. Among the key phytohormones involved in drought tolerance are auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, and ethylene. PGPR synthesize auxins, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which promote root growth and development, enhancing the plant’s capacity to absorb water. Gibberellins produced by microbes stimulate stem elongation and leaf expansion, contributing to overall plant vigor and resilience [100,101,102].

Cytokinins, another class of phytohormones, are involved in cell division and differentiation, and their regulation by microbes can influence shoot growth and leaf senescence, thereby optimizing resource allocation during drought stress. Ethylene, a hormone associated with stress responses, is modulated by microbial activity through the production of the enzyme ACC deaminase. This enzyme breaks down 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), the precursor to ethylene, thereby reducing ethylene levels in plants. Lower ethylene concentrations mitigate stress-induced growth inhibition and senescence, allowing plants to maintain growth and physiological functions under drought conditions [95,103,104,105]. The effect of ACC deaminase-producing rhizobacteria under drought stress was reported in wheat, maize, millet, rice, and tomato [106,107,108].

The intricate modulation of phytohormones by beneficial microbes ensures that plants can finely tune their growth and stress responses, enhancing their ability to cope with water deficits. By influencing hormone signaling pathways, microbes enable plants to maintain growth, optimize resource use, and activate stress mitigation mechanisms, thereby significantly contributing to drought tolerance [81,82,109,110,111].

4.4. Induction of Antioxidant Defense Systems

Drought stress often leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants, resulting in oxidative stress that can damage cellular components and impair plant function. Beneficial microbes play a pivotal role in inducing and enhancing a plant’s antioxidant defense systems, thereby mitigating the detrimental effects of oxidative stress. Microbial interactions stimulate the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidases (POD), which scavenge excess ROS and protect cellular structures from oxidative damage [84,98,112].

In addition to enzyme induction, microbes can also enhance the synthesis of non-enzymatic antioxidants, including ascorbate, glutathione, and tocopherols. These molecules work synergistically with antioxidant enzymes to neutralize ROS and maintain cellular redox balance. By bolstering the antioxidant defense mechanisms, beneficial microbes help plants maintain cellular integrity and function under drought conditions, reducing the impact of oxidative stress and promoting overall plant health and resilience [92,113,114,115].

Furthermore, certain microbes produce secondary metabolites with antioxidant properties, which can directly scavenge ROS or act as signaling molecules to trigger antioxidant responses in plants. This dual role of microbes in both enzyme induction and metabolite production ensures a comprehensive defense against oxidative stress, thereby enhancing the plant’s capacity to survive and thrive during periods of water scarcity [75,93,116,117]. Streptomyces strains increased MDA, H₂O₂, and total sugar content along with APX activity, while decreasing CAT and GPX activities under stress conditions in tomato [117]. Tomato plants grafted with B. subtilis Rhizo SF 48 increased the antioxidant activity of SOD and APX enzymes [106].

4.5. Regulation of Gene Expression Related to Stress Response

The ability of plants to respond to drought stress at the molecular level is significantly influenced by beneficial microbes, which can modulate the expression of stress-responsive genes. Microbial interactions can activate or upregulate the expression of genes involved in various protective mechanisms, thereby enhancing a plant’s intrinsic ability to cope with drought conditions. For instance, microbes can induce the expression of genes responsible for osmolyte biosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme production, and heat shock proteins, all of which play crucial roles in mitigating drought-induced damage [118,119,120].

Moreover, microbes can influence epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, which alter gene expression patterns without changing the underlying DNA sequence. These epigenetic changes can lead to the activation of drought-responsive pathways, enabling plants to better manage water stress. By regulating gene expression, beneficial microbes help plants fine-tune their physiological and biochemical responses to drought, ensuring a more effective and coordinated stress response [81,83,121,122,123].

Advances in genomics and transcriptomics have revealed the intricate networks through which microbes influence plant gene expression. Studies have shown that microbial inoculation can lead to differential expression of hundreds of genes related to stress tolerance, growth regulation, and metabolic processes. This comprehensive regulation at the genetic level underscores the profound impact that beneficial microbes have on enhancing plant resilience to drought. By orchestrating complex gene expression programs, microbes enable plants to adapt dynamically to fluctuating environmental conditions, thereby ensuring sustained growth and productivity even under adverse water availability [101,124,125,126].

In summary, the mechanisms through which beneficial microbes mediate drought tolerance are multifaceted and interdependent. From facilitating osmotic adjustment and improving soil structure to enhancing root architecture, modulating phytohormones, inducing antioxidant defenses, and regulating gene expression, these microorganisms provide a comprehensive suite of tools that empower plants to withstand and thrive in drought conditions. Understanding these mechanisms not only highlights the critical role of microbes in plant resilience but also paves the way for the development of innovative strategies to harness microbial potential for sustainable agriculture and ecosystem management in the face of increasing water scarcity.

5. Ecological Innovations Utilizing Beneficial Microbes

The integration of beneficial microbes into ecological management practices represents a frontier in enhancing drought resilience and sustaining ecosystem health. Ecological innovations that harness microbial communities not only mitigate the adverse effects of drought but also promote overall ecosystem stability and productivity. This section explores key ecological strategies, including soil microbiome engineering, bioaugmentation and inoculant applications, integrated pest management synergies, and sustainable agricultural practices that incorporate microbial benefits. Each subsection delves into the methodologies employed, the resulting impacts on ecosystem resilience, and illustrative case studies that highlight the effectiveness of these approaches [27,127,128,129] (Table 3).

5.1. Soil Microbiome Engineering

Soil microbiome engineering involves the deliberate manipulation of soil microbial communities to enhance their functional capabilities and promote ecosystem resilience under drought conditions. This innovative approach leverages advanced techniques in microbiology, molecular biology, and bioinformatics to alter the composition, diversity, and activity of soil microorganisms. Key techniques include the use of metagenomic analysis to identify beneficial microbial taxa, the application of microbial consortia tailored to specific environmental conditions, and the implementation of biotechnological tools such as CRISPR–Cas systems for precise genetic modifications of microbial strains [112,130,131,138].

One prominent method in soil microbiome engineering is the introduction of tailored microbial consortia that are designed to perform specific functions, such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and the production of stress-alleviating compounds. By selecting and combining microbes with complementary traits, researchers can create synergistic communities that enhance soil fertility, improve water retention, and increase plant resilience to drought. Additionally, the use of bioinformatics and machine learning algorithms facilitates the prediction and optimization of microbial interactions, enabling the development of robust and adaptable soil microbiomes [56,138,139,140].

The impact of soil microbiome engineering on ecosystem resilience is profound. Enhanced microbial communities contribute to improved soil structure and nutrient cycling, which are critical for maintaining plant health and productivity during drought periods. Moreover, engineered microbiomes can increase the stability of soil ecosystems by promoting biodiversity and preventing the dominance of pathogenic or opportunistic species. This increased stability ensures that ecosystems are better equipped to withstand and recover from environmental stressors, thereby sustaining ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, water filtration, and habitat provision [141,142,143,144].

Case studies illustrate the successful application of soil microbiome engineering in various agricultural and natural ecosystems. For instance, in arid regions of the Mediterranean, the introduction of drought-tolerant microbial consortia has led to significant improvements in soil moisture retention and crop yields. Similarly, in degraded lands subjected to prolonged drought, engineered microbiomes have facilitated the restoration of soil health and the re-establishment of native plant communities. These examples underscore the potential of soil microbiome engineering as a transformative tool for enhancing ecological resilience and ensuring sustainable land management in the face of increasing drought frequency and severity [130,131,144,145].

5.2. Bioaugmentation and Inoculant Applications

Bioaugmentation, the process of introducing beneficial microorganisms into an environment to enhance its functional capabilities, and inoculant applications, the strategic deployment of microbial agents to specific sites, are pivotal strategies in leveraging microbes for drought tolerance. These approaches involve the selection, cultivation, and application of microbial strains that possess traits conducive to improving plant resilience and soil health under water-limited conditions [146,147,148].

Methods of bioaugmentation typically begin with the isolation and characterization of native or exotic microbial strains that exhibit drought-alleviating properties. These strains are then cultured under controlled conditions to produce high-density inoculants, which can be applied to soil or directly to plant roots. Inoculant applications may take various forms, including liquid suspensions, powder formulations, or encapsulated agents, each tailored to ensure effective delivery and sustained microbial activity in the target environment. Advanced delivery systems, such as slow-release formulations and biofilm carriers, are often employed to enhance the persistence and efficacy of introduced microbes [149,150,151,152].

The success of bioaugmentation and inoculant applications is evidenced by numerous case studies across different climatic and agricultural settings. In the semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the application of PGPR inoculants has resulted in increased maize and sorghum yields by enhancing root growth and improving water uptake efficiency. Similarly, in the drought-prone vineyards of California, the introduction of mycorrhizal fungi has not only improved grapevine health and productivity but also contributed to the sustainability of viticultural practices by reducing the reliance on irrigation. These instances demonstrate the tangible benefits of bioaugmentation and inoculant applications in fostering drought resilience and supporting agricultural sustainability [149,153,154].

Furthermore, bioaugmentation has been successfully employed in the restoration of degraded ecosystems subjected to severe drought stress. In the Australian outback, the application of drought-tolerant cyanobacteria has facilitated the establishment of vegetation in arid soils, promoting soil stabilization and preventing erosion. In another example, the introduction of actinomycetes into degraded grasslands has enhanced soil fertility and moisture retention, leading to the recovery of native plant species and the restoration of ecosystem functions. These success stories highlight the versatility and effectiveness of bioaugmentation and inoculant applications as ecological innovations for combating drought [155,156,157].

5.3. Integrated Pest Management and Microbe Synergies

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a holistic approach to controlling pests that combines biological, chemical, cultural, and mechanical strategies to achieve sustainable pest control with minimal environmental impact. The incorporation of beneficial microbes into IPM frameworks represents a synergistic strategy that enhances both drought tolerance and pest resistance in crops. By leveraging microbial interactions, IPM can address multiple stressors concurrently, promoting plant health and reducing the reliance on synthetic pesticides [158,159,160].

Beneficial microbes, such as PGPR, mycorrhizal fungi, and entomopathogenic fungi, play critical roles in IPM by enhancing plant defenses against pests and pathogens while simultaneously improving drought resilience. For example, PGPR can induce systemic resistance in plants, making them less susceptible to insect infestations and microbial infections. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance nutrient uptake and stress tolerance, which indirectly strengthens plant defenses against pests. Additionally, certain entomopathogenic fungi can directly target and suppress pest populations, reducing the need for chemical interventions [161,162,163].

Combining drought tolerance with pest resistance through microbial synergies offers several advantages. Plants that are more resilient to water stress are better equipped to withstand pest attacks, as healthy, well-nourished plants can allocate more resources to defense mechanisms. Moreover, the use of beneficial microbes can lead to the suppression of pest populations through competitive exclusion, antibiosis, and the induction of plant-mediated defenses. This multifaceted approach not only enhances plant health and productivity but also contributes to the sustainability of agricultural ecosystems by reducing chemical inputs and minimizing environmental pollution [140,164,165].

Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating beneficial microbes into IPM strategies. In rice cultivation, the application of PGPR has been shown to enhance both drought tolerance and resistance to the rice stem borer, a major pest species. Similarly, in tomato production, the use of mycorrhizal fungi in conjunction with biological control agents has resulted in improved plant vigor, reduced pest damage, and increased yields under water-limited conditions. These examples illustrate the potential of microbe-mediated synergies in IPM to provide comprehensive solutions for managing multiple agricultural challenges simultaneously [166,167,168,169].

5.4. Sustainable Agricultural Practices Incorporating Microbes

Sustainable agricultural practices that incorporate beneficial microbes are essential for promoting long-term soil health, enhancing crop resilience, and ensuring the sustainability of food production systems in the face of increasing drought stress. Practices such as conservation tillage, crop rotation, and the use of organic amendments provide conducive environments for beneficial microbial communities to thrive, thereby amplifying their positive effects on plant growth and drought tolerance [27,86,170].

Conservation tillage, which minimizes soil disturbance, plays a significant role in preserving soil structure and microbial habitats. By reducing plowing and other disruptive practices, conservation tillage maintains soil aggregates and promotes the establishment of stable microbial communities. This leads to enhanced water retention, improved nutrient cycling, and increased microbial activity, all of which contribute to greater plant resilience during drought periods. Additionally, conservation tillage practices reduce soil erosion and surface runoff, further conserving soil moisture and maintaining ecosystem integrity [170,171,172].

Crop rotation, the practice of alternating different crops in the same field across seasons, is another sustainable practice that benefits microbial communities and enhances drought tolerance. Diverse crop rotations introduce a variety of root exudates and organic residues into the soil, fostering a rich and dynamic microbial ecosystem. This diversity supports beneficial interactions, such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and the suppression of soil-borne pathogens, which collectively enhance plant health and resilience to drought. Moreover, crop rotation breaks pest and disease cycles, reducing the need for chemical interventions and promoting a balanced and sustainable agricultural system [28,149,150,173].

The application of organic amendments, such as compost, manure, and biochar, further supports beneficial microbial populations by providing essential nutrients and improving soil physical properties. Organic amendments increase soil organic matter content, which enhances soil moisture retention and provides a steady supply of nutrients for both plants and microbes. The addition of biochar, a stable form of carbon, not only improves soil structure and water-holding capacity but also serves as a habitat for beneficial microbes, promoting their persistence and activity in the soil. These amendments create an environment that is conducive to microbial growth and function, thereby amplifying their beneficial effects on plant drought tolerance and overall soil health [152,154,170].

Integrating these sustainable agricultural practices with the application of beneficial microbes creates synergistic effects that enhance the resilience and productivity of agricultural systems. For example, in Mediterranean climates prone to extended dry periods, the combination of conservation tillage, crop rotation, and the application of PGPR has resulted in improved soil moisture retention, increased crop yields, and enhanced plant health. Similarly, in the semi-arid regions of India, the use of organic amendments in conjunction with mycorrhizal fungi has led to significant improvements in soil fertility, water use efficiency, and crop resilience to drought stress. These integrated approaches demonstrate the potential of combining sustainable practices with microbial innovations to achieve resilient and sustainable agriculture in the face of climate-induced water scarcity [28,167,174,175].

In conclusion, ecological innovations that utilize beneficial microbes offer comprehensive strategies for enhancing drought tolerance and sustaining ecosystem health. Through soil microbiome engineering, bioaugmentation and inoculant applications, integrated pest management synergies, and the incorporation of microbes into sustainable agricultural practices, these innovations provide multifaceted solutions to the challenges posed by drought. The successful implementation of these strategies not only improves plant resilience and agricultural productivity but also contributes to the broader goals of environmental sustainability and ecosystem resilience.

6. Agricultural Innovations and Applications

The application of beneficial microbes in agriculture has spurred a range of innovative practices aimed at enhancing crop resilience and productivity under drought conditions. These agricultural innovations encompass advanced techniques for microbial delivery, the development of synergistic microbial communities, the integration of precision technologies for monitoring and optimization, and the implementation of successful case studies that demonstrate the practical benefits of microbe-based drought mitigation. This section explores these innovations in detail, highlighting the technologies and methodologies employed, their efficacy, adoption rates, and the tangible outcomes achieved across various agricultural settings [112,176,177,178] (Table 4).

6.1. Seed Coating and Soil Amendments with Beneficial Microbes

Seed coating and soil amendments represent two pivotal methods for introducing beneficial microbes into agricultural systems, facilitating enhanced plant growth and drought resilience from the earliest stages of plant development. Seed coating involves the application of microbial inoculants directly onto seeds before planting, ensuring that beneficial microorganisms are present from the outset of germination. This method utilizes a variety of technologies and materials to create effective coatings that protect the microbes and ensure their viability and efficacy. Common materials used for seed coatings include biopolymers, such as alginate and chitosan, which form protective matrices that encapsulate the microbes, providing a stable environment during seed storage and handling. Additionally, carriers like clay minerals, humic substances, and inert fillers are employed to enhance the adhesion and distribution of microbes on seed surfaces [183,184,185].

Soil amendments, on the other hand, involve the incorporation of microbial inoculants into the soil through various formulations, including liquid suspensions, granular formulations, and biochar-based carriers. These amendments are designed to improve soil microbial diversity and activity, thereby enhancing soil fertility, structure, and water retention capacity. Technologies such as slow-release formulations and encapsulation techniques are utilized to prolong the persistence and effectiveness of introduced microbes in the soil environment [97,180,186,187].

The efficacy of seed coating and soil amendment techniques has been demonstrated in numerous studies, showcasing significant improvements in plant growth parameters, yield stability, and drought tolerance. For instance, the application of PGPR-coated seeds has been shown to enhance root development, increase biomass accumulation, and improve water uptake efficiency, thereby enabling plants to better withstand periods of water scarcity. Similarly, soil amendments with mycorrhizal fungi have led to enhanced soil moisture retention, reduced soil erosion, and increased nutrient availability, all of which contribute to improved plant resilience under drought conditions [183,188,189,190].

Adoption rates of these technologies vary across different agricultural sectors and regions, influenced by factors such as cost, accessibility, and farmer awareness. However, the growing recognition of the benefits of microbial applications in sustainable agriculture has led to increased uptake, particularly in regions prone to recurrent droughts and water scarcity. The development of user-friendly formulations and the establishment of support systems for farmers, including extension services and training programs, have further facilitated the widespread adoption of seed coating and soil amendment practices [189,191,192].

Overall, seed coating and soil amendments with beneficial microbes represent effective agricultural innovations that provide a foundation for enhancing crop resilience to drought. By ensuring the presence and activity of beneficial microorganisms from the earliest stages of plant growth, these techniques contribute to the establishment of robust and sustainable agricultural systems capable of withstanding the challenges posed by water-limited environments.

6.2. Microbial Consortia for Crop Improvement

The use of microbial consortia, comprising multiple beneficial microorganisms, represents a sophisticated approach to crop improvement that leverages the synergistic interactions among different microbial species to enhance plant growth and drought tolerance. Unlike single-strain inoculants, microbial consortia are designed to perform a range of complementary functions, thereby providing a more comprehensive and resilient solution to drought stress [191,193,194].

The synergistic effects of multiple microbes within a consortium are achieved through the combination of various functional traits, such as nutrient acquisition, hormone production, pathogen suppression, and stress alleviation. For example, a consortium might include PGPR that fix atmospheric nitrogen, mycorrhizal fungi that enhance phosphorus uptake, and endophytic bacteria that produce osmolytes and antioxidants. This multifaceted approach ensures that plants receive a broad spectrum of benefits, enhancing their overall resilience to drought conditions [94,195,196,197].

Formulating effective microbial consortia poses several challenges, including ensuring the compatibility and stability of different microbial species, maintaining their viability during storage and application, and optimizing their interactions within the soil–plant environment. Overcoming these challenges requires a thorough understanding of microbial ecology and the specific needs of target crops. Advanced formulation techniques, such as co-encapsulation and biofilm-based carriers, are employed to protect and support the diverse microbial populations within consortia. Additionally, the use of genetic and metabolic profiling tools allows for the selection of microbial strains that are not only beneficial individually but also complementary when combined, thereby enhancing the overall efficacy of the consortium [183,184,198,199].

Solutions to formulation challenges also involve the development of tailored delivery systems that ensure the targeted release and sustained activity of microbial consortia in soil. For instance, encapsulation in biodegradable polymers can protect microbes from environmental stresses and facilitate their gradual release, ensuring prolonged activity and interaction with plant roots. Furthermore, the incorporation of stabilizing agents, such as trehalose and other osmoprotectants, can enhance microbial survival during storage and application, thereby maintaining the integrity and functionality of the consortia [88,97,200,201].

The benefits of microbial consortia for crop improvement are evidenced by numerous studies that demonstrate enhanced plant growth, increased yield, and improved drought tolerance compared to single-strain inoculants. For example, in maize cultivation, the application of a microbial consortium comprising nitrogen-fixing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and drought-tolerant PGPR has resulted in significant increases in root biomass, grain yield, and water use efficiency under drought conditions. Similarly, in wheat production, consortia that include endophytic bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi have been shown to enhance plant vigor, reduce water stress indicators, and improve overall crop performance during periods of limited water availability [179,185,192,202].

In conclusion, microbial consortia offer a powerful tool for crop improvement by harnessing the collective benefits of multiple beneficial microorganisms. Despite the challenges associated with their formulation and application, ongoing advancements in microbial ecology, biotechnology, and formulation technologies are paving the way for the widespread adoption of consortia-based approaches in agriculture. By providing a holistic and resilient solution to drought stress, microbial consortia hold significant promise for enhancing the sustainability and productivity of agricultural systems in the face of increasing water scarcity.

6.3. Precision Agriculture and Microbe Monitoring

The advent of precision agriculture has revolutionized the way farmers manage their crops, enabling the integration of advanced technologies to optimize agricultural practices and improve crop outcomes. In the context of microbial applications for drought tolerance, precision agriculture facilitates the precise monitoring and management of microbial activity, ensuring that beneficial microbes are effectively utilized to enhance plant resilience and productivity. The use of sensors, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and data-driven approaches plays a crucial role in tracking microbial dynamics and optimizing their application in real-time [171,172,203,204].

Sensors and IoT technologies are employed to monitor various environmental and soil parameters that influence microbial activity and plant health. Soil moisture sensors, temperature probes, and pH sensors provide continuous data on soil conditions, enabling farmers to make informed decisions about irrigation, fertilization, and microbial inoculant applications. Additionally, microbial sensors, such as biosensors that detect specific microbial metabolites or genetic markers, can provide insights into the presence and activity of beneficial microbes in the soil–plant system. This real-time monitoring allows for the timely and targeted application of microbial inoculants, ensuring that they are deployed when and where they are most needed to mitigate drought stress [160,205,206,207].

Data-driven approaches, including machine learning algorithms and predictive analytics, are integral to optimizing microbial applications in precision agriculture. By analyzing large datasets generated by sensors and IoT devices, these approaches can identify patterns and correlations between environmental conditions, microbial activity, and plant performance. This information can be used to develop predictive models that forecast drought events, microbial responses, and crop outcomes, enabling proactive and adaptive management strategies. For example, machine learning models can predict the optimal timing and dosage of microbial inoculants based on soil moisture levels, temperature trends, and crop growth stages, thereby maximizing the efficacy of microbial applications and minimizing resource wastage [156,157,169,208].

Precision agriculture also facilitates the customization of microbial applications to specific field conditions and crop requirements. Spatial variability in soil properties, moisture levels, and microbial populations can be addressed through site-specific management practices that tailor microbial inoculants to the unique needs of different areas within a field. This targeted approach not only enhances the effectiveness of microbial interventions but also reduces the environmental impact by avoiding over-application and ensuring that microbes are utilized efficiently [153,155,208,209].

The integration of precision agriculture with microbial applications has demonstrated significant benefits in various agricultural settings. In drought-prone regions of Australia, precision irrigation systems combined with real-time microbial monitoring have led to improved water use efficiency, increased crop yields, and enhanced plant health. Similarly, in the rice paddies of Southeast Asia, the use of IoT-enabled sensors to track soil moisture and microbial activity has facilitated the precise application of mycorrhizal fungi, resulting in improved water retention, reduced irrigation needs, and increased rice productivity under water-limited conditions [149,150,153,210,211].

In summary, precision agriculture and microbe monitoring represent cutting-edge innovations that enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of microbial applications in agriculture. By leveraging advanced technologies and data-driven approaches, these practices enable the precise management of beneficial microbes, optimizing their contributions to drought tolerance and crop performance. The continued advancement and integration of precision agriculture technologies hold immense potential for transforming agricultural practices, ensuring food security, and promoting sustainable farming in an era of increasing water scarcity and climate variability.

6.4. Case Studies of Successful Microbe-Based Drought Mitigation

The practical implementation of microbe-based drought mitigation strategies has yielded numerous success stories across diverse agricultural regions and crop systems. These case studies provide tangible evidence of the benefits of leveraging beneficial microbes to enhance crop resilience and productivity under drought conditions. By examining detailed examples from various contexts, this subsection highlights the versatility and effectiveness of microbial interventions in real-world agricultural settings [152,153,154,212].

One notable example comes from the semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa, where smallholder farmers have adopted the use of PGPR inoculants to improve maize and sorghum yields during drought periods. In these regions, the application of PGPR strains such as Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus subtilis has been shown to enhance root growth, increase nutrient uptake, and improve water use efficiency. As a result, farmers have reported significant increases in crop yields, reduced reliance on irrigation, and enhanced soil fertility, contributing to greater food security and economic stability in drought-prone communities [147,213,214].

In the Mediterranean climate zones, vineyards have successfully implemented mycorrhizal inoculation to mitigate the impacts of prolonged dry spells. The introduction of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus intraradices) has led to improved grapevine health, increased water uptake, and enhanced resistance to soil erosion. This microbial intervention has not only improved grape yields and quality but also contributed to the sustainability of viticultural practices by reducing the need for chemical fertilizers and irrigation. The success of mycorrhizal inoculation in Mediterranean vineyards underscores the potential of microbial solutions to enhance the resilience and productivity of perennial crops in water-limited environments [134,138,139,215,216].

Another compelling case study is found in the rice paddies of India, where the application of a microbial consortium comprising nitrogen-fixing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and drought-tolerant PGPR has significantly improved rice yields under water-stressed conditions. The consortium has facilitated enhanced nutrient uptake, improved soil moisture retention, and increased plant resilience to drought, leading to higher grain yields and greater stability in rice production. This integrated microbial approach has been particularly beneficial in regions where traditional irrigation practices are constrained by water scarcity, providing a sustainable solution to maintain rice productivity [129,130,217,218].

In the United States, research conducted in drought-prone vineyards of California has demonstrated the effectiveness of microbial inoculants in improving grapevine resilience and productivity. The application of mycorrhizal fungi in conjunction with PGPR resulted in increased grape yields, improved fruit quality, and enhanced plant health under water-limited conditions [219,220]. These findings have been instrumental in promoting the adoption of microbial-based practices among Californian viticulturists, contributing to the sustainability and economic viability of the wine industry in the face of increasing drought stress [127,128,221,222].

In the agricultural landscapes of Australia, the restoration of degraded lands subjected to severe drought has been successfully achieved through the application of drought-tolerant cyanobacteria and actinomycetes. These microorganisms have facilitated the establishment of vegetation in arid soils, improved soil structure and moisture retention, and promoted the recovery of native plant species. The restoration efforts have not only enhanced the ecological resilience of the regions but also provided valuable insights into the potential of microbial interventions for rehabilitating degraded ecosystems and promoting sustainable land management practices [86,103,223,224].

Evidence from Case Studies and Meta-Analyses

To strengthen the claims regarding the efficacy of microbial interventions in enhancing drought resilience, it is essential to present robust statistical data from empirical studies. The following case studies and meta-analyses provide quantitative evidence of the positive impact of beneficial microbes on plant drought tolerance.

Pinus edulis and Ectomycorrhizal Fungi

Gehring et al. (2017) [225] conducted a long-term study on Pinus edulis (pinyon pine) to examine the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in drought tolerance. The study found that specific combinations of tree genotypes and fungal communities significantly improved drought resilience. Over a decade of drought conditions, drought-tolerant trees associated with particular ectomycorrhizal fungi exhibited 25% higher growth rates and had one-third the mortality rate compared to drought-intolerant trees. This indicates that selecting compatible plant–fungal partnerships can substantially enhance tree survival and growth under water-limited conditions.

Pseudomonas argentinensis in Alfalfa

Alwutayd et al. (2023) [226] investigated the effects of the root endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas argentinensis strain SA190 on alfalfa plants under drought stress. The inoculated alfalfa showed enhanced performance, including increased biomass and improved root architecture. Specifically, the treated plants exhibited a significant increase in root length and dry weight compared to non-inoculated controls. The bacterium modulated root development and gene expression through the abscisic acid (ABA) pathway, which is crucial for plant responses to drought. This study demonstrates the potential of root endophytes to improve drought tolerance in forage crops.

Populus Trees and Root Microbiome

Research by Xie et al. (2021) [227] on Populus trees revealed that drought stress alters the root microbial community composition. The study identified specific microbes, such as Streptomyces rochei and Bacillus species, that were enriched under drought conditions and associated with enhanced plant growth and drought tolerance. In controlled experiments, inoculation with these beneficial microbes led to a 20% increase in biomass and improved physiological parameters, including higher chlorophyll content and water use efficiency, compared to non-inoculated plants under drought stress.

Meta-Analyses

Microbial Mitigation of Drought Stress

Shaffique et al. (2022) [223] conducted a comprehensive review highlighting the role of various microbes in mitigating drought stress in plants. The meta-analysis demonstrated that microbial inoculation could lead to significant improvements in plant growth parameters under drought conditions. On average, inoculated plants showed a 30% increase in shoot biomass, a 25% increase in root biomass, and a 20% improvement in water use efficiency compared to non-inoculated controls. The mechanisms involved include osmotic adjustment, phytohormonal modulation, and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities.

Rhizosphere Microbiota Management

Vidal et al. (2022) [175] emphasized the importance of managing rhizosphere microbiota to increase plant drought tolerance. Their review of multiple studies found that plants associated with beneficial rhizosphere microbes experienced an average yield increase of 15–40% under drought conditions. These microbes enhanced drought tolerance through plant growth-promoting characteristics such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and the production of phytohormones like auxins and cytokinins. The authors suggested that employing multi-omics approaches could further elucidate these interactions and improve the development of microbial interventions.

Integration of Quantitative Data

The quantitative data from these studies underscore the significant impact that beneficial microbes can have on plant drought tolerance. For instance, the 25% higher growth rates and reduced mortality in Pinus edulis demonstrate the long-term benefits of specific plant–microbe combinations [225]. Similarly, the increase in biomass and improved physiological parameters in Populus trees and alfalfa plants highlight the potential for microbial applications to enhance crop performance under drought stress [226,227].

These findings are further supported by meta-analyses showing substantial average increases in growth and yield parameters across various plant species and microbial treatments [175,223]. The statistical significance of these results strengthens the argument for integrating beneficial microbes into agricultural practices to combat drought-related challenges.

Incorporating robust statistical data from case studies and meta-analyses provides compelling evidence of the efficacy of microbial interventions in enhancing drought resilience. These studies offer quantifiable improvements in plant growth, yield, and physiological responses, reinforcing the potential of beneficial microbes as a viable strategy for sustainable agriculture under changing climatic conditions.

These case studies collectively illustrate the diverse applications and significant benefits of microbe-based drought mitigation strategies across different agricultural systems and climatic regions. They highlight the adaptability and effectiveness of beneficial microbes in enhancing crop resilience, improving soil health, and ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity under drought conditions. The successful implementation of these strategies underscores the critical role of microbial innovations in addressing the challenges posed by water scarcity and climate variability, paving the way for more resilient and sustainable agricultural practices globally.

7. Challenges and Limitations

While the utilization of beneficial microbes for drought tolerance presents significant promise, several challenges and limitations must be addressed to fully realize their potential in agricultural and ecological applications. These challenges span environmental variability, scale-up and commercialization hurdles, regulatory and safety considerations, and the intricate understanding of microbe–plant–environment interactions. Addressing these issues is crucial for the effective implementation and widespread adoption of microbial solutions aimed at enhancing drought resilience [98,109,228,229] (Table 5).

7.1. Environmental Variability and Microbe Efficacy

The efficacy of beneficial microbes in conferring drought tolerance to plants is highly dependent on the prevailing environmental conditions, which can vary significantly across different regions and seasons. Factors such as soil type, temperature, moisture levels, pH, and the presence of native microbial communities influence the performance and survival of introduced beneficial microbes. For instance, high soil temperatures or extreme pH levels can inhibit microbial activity and reduce their ability to colonize plant roots effectively. Additionally, fluctuations in soil moisture can impact the stability and persistence of microbial inoculants, leading to inconsistent outcomes in plant drought tolerance [180,181,240,241].

To enhance the reliability of microbial interventions under varying environmental conditions, several strategies can be employed. One approach is the selection and engineering of microbial strains that are inherently more resilient to environmental stresses. By identifying and utilizing microbes with traits such as heat tolerance, acid resistance, or desiccation resilience, researchers can develop inoculants that maintain their functionality under adverse conditions. Another strategy involves the use of protective formulations, such as encapsulation in biopolymers or the incorporation of osmoprotectants, which shield microbes from environmental extremes and enhance their survival rates. Additionally, site-specific application techniques that consider local soil and climate conditions can optimize the performance of microbial inoculants, ensuring that they are deployed in environments where they are most likely to succeed [88,242,243,244].

Furthermore, integrating microbial applications with other agronomic practices, such as conservation tillage and organic amendments, can create more favorable conditions for microbial activity and persistence. By fostering a conducive soil environment, these practices can support the establishment and maintenance of beneficial microbial communities, thereby enhancing the overall efficacy of microbial interventions. Continuous monitoring and adaptive management, facilitated by precision agriculture technologies, also play a vital role in addressing environmental variability by enabling real-time adjustments to microbial applications based on changing conditions [204,235,245,246].

7.2. Scale-Up and Commercialization Issues

Transitioning beneficial microbial technologies from laboratory settings to large-scale field applications presents a range of challenges. One of the primary hurdles is ensuring that microbial formulations developed under controlled conditions retain their efficacy and viability when applied in diverse and dynamic agricultural environments. Laboratory experiments often involve optimized conditions that may not accurately reflect the complexities of real-world fields, leading to discrepancies in microbial performance and plant responses [162,206,247].

Scaling up microbial applications requires the development of robust production and formulation processes that can produce high-quality inoculants at commercial volumes. This involves optimizing fermentation conditions, ensuring consistent microbial viability, and developing scalable encapsulation and delivery systems that protect microbes during storage and transportation. Additionally, maintaining the genetic and functional stability of microbial strains during large-scale production is essential to preserve their beneficial traits and ensure reliable performance in the field [156,158,161,248,249].

Economic considerations also play a critical role in the commercialization of microbial solutions. The costs associated with microbial production, formulation, and application can be significant, particularly for smallholder farmers and regions with limited financial resources. Developing cost-effective production methods, such as utilizing low-cost substrates and implementing energy-efficient processes, can help reduce the overall expenses and make microbial technologies more accessible. Furthermore, demonstrating the return on investment through comprehensive field trials and economic analyses can encourage adoption by showcasing the tangible benefits and cost savings associated with enhanced drought tolerance and increased crop yields [94,202,236,245].

Another challenge in commercialization is the variability in regulatory frameworks across different regions and countries. Navigating the regulatory landscape requires a thorough understanding of local agricultural regulations, certification processes, and safety standards. Collaborations between researchers, industry stakeholders, and regulatory bodies are essential to streamline the approval and registration processes, ensuring that beneficial microbial products meet the necessary standards for safety and efficacy [196,234,250,251].

7.3. Regulatory and Safety Considerations

The deployment of beneficial microbes in agriculture must adhere to stringent regulatory and safety standards to ensure that they do not pose risks to human health, non-target organisms, or the environment. Compliance with agricultural regulations involves obtaining necessary approvals and certifications from relevant authorities, which typically require comprehensive data on the safety, efficacy, and environmental impact of microbial products. This regulatory scrutiny is essential to prevent the introduction of harmful pathogens, invasive species, or unintended ecological disruptions that could arise from the widespread use of microbial inoculants [161,184,236,252].

Ensuring that non-target effects are minimized is a critical aspect of regulatory and safety considerations. Beneficial microbes must be carefully evaluated to assess their interactions with native microbial communities, soil fauna, and plant species. Potential risks, such as the horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance genes or the disruption of existing microbial symbioses, must be thoroughly investigated through rigorous testing and risk assessment protocols. Developing standardized guidelines and best practices for microbial application can help mitigate these risks and promote the safe use of beneficial microbes in agriculture [157,162,166,173].

Moreover, public perception and acceptance of microbial technologies play a significant role in their regulatory and commercial success. Transparent communication about the benefits and safety of microbial interventions, coupled with education and outreach efforts, can help build trust and alleviate concerns among farmers, consumers, and other stakeholders. Addressing misconceptions and providing evidence-based information on the environmental and economic advantages of beneficial microbes can facilitate broader acceptance and support for their integration into sustainable agricultural practices [143,148,154,178].

To streamline regulatory processes and enhance safety, fostering international collaborations and harmonizing regulatory standards can be beneficial. By establishing consistent frameworks and sharing best practices across countries, the agricultural sector can accelerate the development and deployment of safe and effective microbial solutions, thereby promoting global agricultural sustainability and resilience to drought.

7.4. Understanding Microbe–Plant–Environment Interactions

The interactions between microbes, plants, and the surrounding environment are inherently complex and multifaceted, posing significant challenges to fully understanding and optimizing the benefits of microbial interventions for drought tolerance. Microbial communities are influenced by a myriad of factors, including soil chemistry, plant genotype, climate conditions, and agricultural practices, making it difficult to predict and manipulate their behavior consistently. The dynamic nature of these interactions necessitates a comprehensive and integrative approach to study and harness microbial functions in diverse agricultural settings [131,136,218,253].

One of the primary complexities lies in deciphering the specific mechanisms through which beneficial microbes confer drought tolerance to plants. While numerous studies have identified key microbial traits and pathways involved in stress alleviation, the intricate networks of gene expression, metabolic interactions, and signaling pathways that underpin these benefits remain only partially understood. Advanced molecular and omics-based techniques, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, are essential for unraveling the detailed interactions and identifying the critical factors that drive microbe-mediated drought resilience [104,115,223,254,255].

Another significant gap in current knowledge is the long-term sustainability and stability of introduced microbial communities in the soil–plant ecosystem. Understanding how beneficial microbes interact with native microbial populations, compete for resources, and adapt to changing environmental conditions is crucial for ensuring the sustained efficacy of microbial interventions. Longitudinal studies that monitor microbial dynamics over multiple growing seasons and under varying climatic scenarios are necessary to assess the persistence and functional stability of beneficial microbes in the field [96,126,256,257].

Additionally, the influence of plant genotype on microbe–plant interactions represents an important area of research. Different plant varieties may exhibit varying degrees of responsiveness to microbial inoculants, influenced by their root architecture, exudate profiles, and inherent stress tolerance mechanisms. Identifying plant traits that synergize with microbial benefits can inform the development of tailored microbial solutions that are compatible with specific crop varieties, thereby enhancing their effectiveness and reliability [81,83,117,258].

Addressing these complexities requires interdisciplinary collaboration among microbiologists, plant scientists, agronomists, ecologists, and data scientists. Integrating diverse perspectives and expertise can facilitate a more holistic understanding of microbe–plant–environment interactions and drive the development of innovative strategies to optimize microbial benefits for drought tolerance. Furthermore, bridging the gaps in current knowledge through targeted research initiatives and collaborative projects will be instrumental in advancing the field and overcoming the challenges associated with harnessing beneficial microbes for sustainable agriculture and ecosystem management [73,75,259,260].

In summary, while the application of beneficial microbes for drought tolerance holds immense potential, addressing the associated challenges and limitations is essential for achieving consistent and scalable success. Environmental variability, scale-up and commercialization hurdles, regulatory and safety considerations, and the complexities of microbe–plant–environment interactions represent significant barriers that must be navigated through strategic research, technological innovation, and collaborative efforts. By overcoming these challenges, the agricultural sector can fully leverage the advantages of microbial interventions, fostering resilient and sustainable systems capable of withstanding the increasing pressures of water scarcity and climate change.

7.5. Economic Impact and Socio-Economic Barriers

The application of beneficial microbes to enhance drought tolerance holds significant economic implications for the agricultural sector. On the positive side, microbial interventions can lead to cost savings and increased profitability for farmers by reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, enhancing crop yields, and improving product quality [261,262]. Beneficial microbes promote nutrient uptake and enhance stress tolerance, which can decrease the need for expensive agrochemicals and increase crop resilience under drought conditions [263,264].

Improved drought tolerance can lead to more stable and increased crop yields, enhancing food security and providing greater economic returns for farmers [265]. Long-term benefits also include improved soil health and sustainability, which are critical for the economic viability of agricultural systems facing climate change and resource scarcity [266].

However, several socio-economic barriers may hinder the widespread adoption of these technologies, especially among smallholder farmers and in developing regions. The initial costs associated with purchasing microbial inoculants and implementing new practices can be prohibitive for farmers with limited financial resources [267]. Lack of awareness and understanding of the benefits and application methods of beneficial microbes contributes to hesitancy among farmers [268]. Access to these technologies is often limited in rural and marginalized areas due to inadequate distribution networks and infrastructural challenges [269].

Regulatory hurdles also play a significant role in influencing the economic impact and adoption of microbial solutions. Inconsistent or underdeveloped regulatory frameworks can create uncertainty for both producers and users of microbial products, potentially discouraging investment and innovation in this sector [270]. Moreover, the absence of standardized guidelines and certifications can lead to variability in product quality and efficacy, undermining farmer confidence and the perceived economic benefits [271,272].

Addressing these socio-economic barriers requires a multifaceted approach. Enhancing farmer education and training through extension services and demonstration projects can increase awareness and understanding of microbial technologies [273]. Developing cost-effective production methods and delivery systems, such as microbial seed coatings or encapsulation techniques, can reduce costs and improve accessibility [263]. Policy interventions, including subsidies, incentives, and supportive regulatory frameworks, can stimulate market growth and encourage adoption by lowering financial risks and ensuring product quality [274,275,276].

Collaborative efforts among researchers, industry stakeholders, policymakers, and farming communities are essential to maximize the economic impact of beneficial microbes. By aligning research objectives with farmer needs and market demands, the development of microbial solutions can be tailored to address specific economic challenges [277]. Furthermore, fostering public–private partnerships can leverage resources and expertise to overcome infrastructural and distribution barriers, making microbial technologies more accessible to farmers across diverse socio-economic contexts [278,279].

In summary, while the economic impact of utilizing beneficial microbes for drought tolerance is potentially substantial, realizing these benefits requires overcoming significant socio-economic barriers. Through strategic interventions and collaborative efforts, the agricultural sector can enhance the adoption of microbial technologies, leading to improved economic outcomes, sustainable practices, and greater resilience against drought and other environmental stresses.

8. Future Perspectives and Research Directions

As the global climate continues to evolve, the urgency to develop sustainable and resilient agricultural systems becomes increasingly paramount. Harnessing beneficial microbes for drought tolerance represents a promising avenue, yet several avenues warrant further exploration to fully realize their potential. Future research must focus on leveraging advancements in genomics and microbiome analysis, employing synthetic biology for microbe engineering, enhancing microbial resilience and functionality, and fostering robust policy frameworks and collaborative efforts. These directions will not only deepen our understanding of microbe–plant interactions but also facilitate the practical implementation of microbial solutions in diverse agricultural contexts [62,280,281,282].

8.1. Advances in Genomics and Microbiome Analysis

The rapid advancements in genomics and microbiome analysis have revolutionized our ability to study and manipulate microbial communities. High-throughput sequencing technologies, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation sequencing platforms, have enabled comprehensive profiling of soil- and plant-associated microbiomes. Metagenomics, in particular, allows for the exploration of the genetic diversity within microbial communities without the need for culturing individual species. This approach provides invaluable insights into the functional potential and ecological roles of microbes involved in drought tolerance [50,52,116,283,284].

Through metagenomic analyses, researchers can identify key microbial taxa and functional genes that contribute to drought resilience. These studies have revealed intricate networks of microbial interactions and metabolic pathways that underpin plant–microbe symbioses. Additionally, transcriptomic and proteomic approaches complement metagenomics by elucidating gene expression patterns and protein functions under drought stress conditions. Such integrative omics strategies facilitate a deeper understanding of how microbial communities respond to environmental stresses and interact with host plants to confer drought tolerance [41,65,285,286].

Furthermore, bioinformatics and machine learning algorithms play a critical role in analyzing the vast datasets generated by high-throughput sequencing. These computational tools enable the identification of biomarkers for beneficial microbes, the prediction of microbial functions, and the modeling of microbe–plant–environment interactions. Insights gained from these analyses can inform the development of targeted microbial inoculants and the optimization of microbial consortia for enhanced drought resilience [33,34,287,288].

Overall, the continued advancement of genomics and microbiome analysis technologies holds significant promise for uncovering the complex mechanisms by which beneficial microbes enhance drought tolerance. By leveraging these tools, researchers can accelerate the discovery of novel microbial traits and interactions, paving the way for innovative applications in sustainable agriculture.

8.2. Synthetic Biology and Microbe Engineering

Synthetic biology offers transformative opportunities for designing and engineering microbes with enhanced capabilities to support plant drought tolerance. By manipulating the genetic makeup of beneficial microorganisms, researchers can create custom strains tailored to specific agricultural needs and environmental conditions. This precision engineering approach allows for the introduction of novel traits, such as the production of stress-alleviating compounds, improved nutrient acquisition, and enhanced root colonization abilities [29,30,57,289].

One of the key applications of synthetic biology in this context is the engineering of microbes to overproduce phytohormones like indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellins, which promote root growth and water uptake. Additionally, microbes can be engineered to produce higher levels of osmolytes, such as proline and trehalose, which aid in osmotic adjustment and cellular protection under drought stress. The incorporation of synthetic gene circuits can also enable microbes to sense and respond to environmental cues, ensuring that beneficial traits are expressed precisely when needed [8,9,16,22,290].

Moreover, synthetic biology facilitates the construction of synthetic microbial communities with defined interactions and functional redundancies. By designing consortia with complementary traits, researchers can enhance the overall stability and resilience of microbial interventions. For instance, a synthetic consortium might include nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing fungi, and drought-tolerant PGPR, each contributing distinct functions that collectively enhance plant resilience [30,35,291].

However, the application of synthetic biology in agriculture also presents challenges, including regulatory hurdles, public acceptance, and the potential for unintended ecological impacts. Ethical considerations and stringent safety assessments are essential to ensure that engineered microbes do not disrupt native ecosystems or pose risks to human health. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of synthetic biology in developing customized microbial solutions for drought tolerance are immense, offering a pathway to more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.

8.3. Enhancing Microbe Resilience and Functionality

For beneficial microbes to be effective in conferring drought tolerance, their resilience and functionality under stress conditions must be robust. Enhancing microbial survival and activity in harsh environments is a critical area of research that encompasses both natural and engineered strategies. Improving microbial resilience involves optimizing their physiological and metabolic capabilities to withstand extreme temperatures, desiccation, and nutrient limitations commonly associated with drought conditions [19,67,289,292].

One approach to enhancing microbial resilience is the selection and breeding of naturally robust strains through adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE). By subjecting microbes to prolonged stress conditions in controlled environments, researchers can select for strains that exhibit superior stress tolerance traits. These evolved strains often demonstrate enhanced survival rates, metabolic efficiency, and functional stability under drought stress, making them more effective as bioinoculants [13,293,294].

Another strategy involves the application of stress protectants, such as trehalose, proline, and other compatible solutes, which can be incorporated into microbial formulations to improve their desiccation tolerance and overall viability. Encapsulation techniques, including microencapsulation and biofilm formation, provide physical protection to microbes, shielding them from environmental extremes and facilitating sustained activity in the soil [9,10,60,295].

Additionally, the engineering of stress-responsive regulatory networks within microbes can enhance their ability to dynamically respond to drought stress. By incorporating synthetic regulatory elements that activate stress response pathways, researchers can create microbes that upregulate protective mechanisms in real time, thereby maintaining their functionality and beneficial interactions with plants during periods of water scarcity [16,19,67].

Enhancing microbial functionality also involves ensuring efficient colonization and persistence within the plant rhizosphere. This can be achieved by optimizing microbial adhesion properties, root colonization strategies, and mutualistic interactions with host plants. Understanding the factors that influence microbe–plant compatibility and leveraging this knowledge to improve colonization efficacy are essential for maximizing the benefits of microbial interventions [88,200,243,296].

Overall, enhancing microbe resilience and functionality is a multifaceted endeavor that requires a combination of natural selection, genetic engineering, and formulation optimization. By developing more robust and active microbial strains, researchers can ensure the consistent performance of beneficial microbes in promoting drought tolerance and supporting sustainable agricultural practices.

8.4. Policy and Collaborative Efforts for Implementation

The successful implementation of beneficial microbial technologies for drought tolerance extends beyond scientific advancements; it requires robust policy frameworks and collaborative efforts among various stakeholders. Encouraging interdisciplinary research and facilitating partnerships between academia, industry, and government are essential for translating scientific discoveries into practical agricultural solutions [180,184,186].

Policy initiatives play a crucial role in fostering innovation and ensuring the safe and effective deployment of microbial interventions. Governments can support research and development through funding programs, grants, and incentives aimed at advancing microbial technologies. Additionally, the establishment of clear regulatory guidelines and streamlined approval processes can facilitate the commercialization of beneficial microbial products, reducing barriers to market entry and encouraging investment from the private sector [190,193,199,250].

Interdisciplinary research is another key component in addressing the complex challenges associated with harnessing beneficial microbes for drought tolerance. Collaboration among microbiologists, plant scientists, agronomists, ecologists, and data scientists can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of microbe–plant–environment interactions and the development of integrated solutions. Joint research initiatives and cross-disciplinary projects can accelerate the discovery of novel microbial traits, optimize formulation and delivery methods, and enhance the scalability of microbial interventions [102,161,236,245].

Partnerships between academia, industry, and government are also vital for bridging the gap between research and practical application. Industry stakeholders, including agricultural biotechnology companies and biofertilizer manufacturers, can collaborate with academic institutions to translate laboratory findings into commercial products. Government agencies can facilitate these partnerships by providing platforms for knowledge exchange, supporting pilot projects, and promoting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices through extension services and educational programs [94,191,194,297].

Moreover, international collaborations are essential for addressing the global nature of drought and water scarcity challenges. Sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices across countries and regions can enhance the collective capacity to develop and implement effective microbial solutions [298]. Participating in global networks and consortia can also promote the standardization of methodologies, facilitate the exchange of microbial strains, and harmonize regulatory frameworks, thereby fostering a more cohesive and coordinated approach to combating drought through microbial innovations [102,161,171].

Public engagement and awareness are also critical for the widespread acceptance and adoption of beneficial microbial technologies. Educating farmers, consumers, and policymakers about the benefits and safety of microbial interventions can build trust and support for their integration into agricultural systems. Transparent communication, demonstration projects, and success stories can highlight the tangible advantages of using beneficial microbes, encouraging broader acceptance and utilization [158,208,299].

Despite advancements in understanding stress mitigation through biological treatments, several challenges persist. The use of exogenous compounds like melatonin has shown promise in enhancing plant stress tolerance under salinity conditions, and exogenous glutamine has been effective in improving stress-related gene expression in onions [300,301]. However, the application of nanomaterials, such as zinc oxide and silver, for improving plant stability and growth in controlled conditions, and magnetic field treatments for boosting plant resilience, still face limitations when scaling to field applications [269,302]. These technologies are highly dependent on environmental factors and often require precise control to be effective, limiting their broader application in diverse climates [303]. While biological coatings like chitosan–putrescine nanoparticles show potential for reducing postharvest losses, their commercial viability in large-scale agriculture is still a hurdle due to costs and varied results across different crops [304,305]. Moreover, although living mulches can enhance soil health and microbial communities, their long-term impact on weed suppression and crop yield in different orchard systems remains under-researched [306,307]. Additionally, while advances in microbial biocontrol and diagnostics offer new solutions, more studies are needed to improve the consistency of these applications under varying environmental conditions, especially in drought scenarios [308,309,310].

In conclusion, policy support and collaborative efforts are indispensable for the successful implementation of beneficial microbial technologies in agriculture. By fostering interdisciplinary research, facilitating partnerships, and promoting supportive policies, stakeholders can collectively advance the development and adoption of microbial solutions that enhance drought tolerance and contribute to sustainable and resilient agricultural systems.

9. Conclusions

Drought poses an escalating threat to global agricultural productivity, food security, and ecosystem stability, exacerbated by the ongoing impacts of climate change. In response to these challenges, the utilization of beneficial microbes has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance plant resilience and sustain agricultural systems under water-limited conditions. This review has elucidated the multifaceted roles that various beneficial microorganisms—such as Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), mycorrhizal fungi, endophytes, actinomycetes, and cyanobacteria—play in mitigating drought stress. These microbes employ a diverse array of mechanisms, including osmotic adjustment, improvement of root architecture, modulation of phytohormones, induction of antioxidant defenses, and regulation of stress-responsive gene expression, all of which collectively contribute to enhanced plant drought tolerance.

Ecological and agricultural innovations leveraging these beneficial microbes have demonstrated significant potential in bolstering drought resilience. Strategies such as soil microbiome engineering, bioaugmentation, and the integration of microbial synergies within pest management frameworks have shown promising results in enhancing ecosystem resilience and agricultural sustainability. Additionally, advancements in agricultural practices, including seed coating, soil amendments, the development of microbial consortia, and the adoption of precision agriculture technologies, have further validated the effectiveness and scalability of microbial interventions in diverse farming systems.

However, the path to widespread adoption of microbial solutions is not without challenges. Environmental variability can significantly influence microbial performance, necessitating the development of robust and adaptable microbial strains capable of thriving under diverse and fluctuating conditions. The transition from laboratory successes to field applications involves overcoming scale-up and commercialization hurdles, including economic constraints and the need for efficient production and delivery systems. Regulatory and safety considerations also play a critical role, requiring stringent assessments to ensure that microbial applications do not pose risks to human health or non-target organisms. Moreover, the intricate interactions between microbes, plants, and their environments demand a deeper understanding to optimize microbial benefits and ensure consistent outcomes.

Future research must prioritize the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as genomics, synthetic biology, and precision agriculture to refine and enhance microbial interventions. Advances in high-throughput sequencing and metagenomics will continue to unravel the complex dynamics of microbial communities, providing insights into their functional roles and interactions with host plants. Synthetic biology offers the potential to engineer custom microbial strains with tailored traits for improved drought tolerance, while precision agriculture technologies enable the precise monitoring and management of microbial activity in real time, ensuring optimal application and efficacy.

Collaborative efforts among academia, industry, and government are essential to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation. Policy support, interdisciplinary research, and robust partnerships will facilitate the development, regulation, and adoption of microbial technologies, ensuring that their benefits are realized on a global scale. Additionally, fostering public awareness and acceptance through education and transparent communication will be crucial in promoting the safe and effective use of beneficial microbes in agriculture.

In conclusion, the strategic harnessing of beneficial microbes presents a transformative approach to addressing the pressing challenges of drought and water scarcity. By leveraging microbial innovations and overcoming existing barriers, it is possible to develop resilient and sustainable agricultural systems capable of thriving in an increasingly unpredictable climate. The continued advancement and integration of microbial solutions will be instrumental in ensuring food security, maintaining ecosystem health, and promoting environmental sustainability in a world facing the dual pressures of population growth and climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M., T.M., AK., D.C.-L., M.M. and A.Ł.; investigation, G.M., T.M., A.K., D.C.-L., M.M., K.B. and A.Ł.; resources, G.M., T.M., A.K., D.C.-L., M.M., K.B. and A.Ł.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M., T.M., A.K., D.C.-L., M.M., K.B. and A.Ł.; writing—review and editing, G.M., T.M., A.K., D.C.-L., M.M. and A.Ł. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Mechanisms of microbe-mediated drought tolerance.

Figure 2. Ecological innovations in sustainable agriculture.

Table 1

Beneficial microbes and their characteristics.

Microbe Type	Examples	Key Characteristics	Role in Drought Tolerance
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)	Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus subtilis, Azospirillum brasilense [38]	Nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, root colonization, production of phytohormones [39]	Enhances root growth, improves nutrient uptake, induces osmotic adjustment, modulates hormone levels [40]
Mycorrhizal Fungi	Glomus intraradices (arbuscular mycorrhizae), Rhizopogon spp. (ectomycorrhizae) [41]	Symbiotic association with plant roots, extensive hyphal networks, nutrient exchange [42]	Increases water uptake capacity, improves soil structure, enhances nutrient availability, reduces plant water stress [43]
Endophytes	Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Fusarium spp., Trichoderma harzianum [44]	Internal colonization of plant tissues, production of bioactive compounds, resistance to pathogens [45]	Produces osmolytes and antioxidants, enhances root architecture, stimulates plant defense mechanisms [46]
Actinomycetes	Streptomyces spp., Micromonospora spp. [47]	Filamentous growth, production of antibiotics and enzymes, decomposition of organic matter [48]	Improves soil fertility, enhances nutrient cycling, promotes plant growth under drought conditions [49]
Cyanobacteria	Anabaena spp., Nostoc spp., Spirulina spp. [50]	Photosynthetic, nitrogen-fixing, formation of biofilms, secretion of extracellular polysaccharides [51]	Enhances soil moisture retention, fixes atmospheric nitrogen, improves soil structure, provides organic matter [52]
Other Beneficial Microorganisms	Trichoderma spp., Penicillium spp., Rhizobium spp. [53]	Diverse metabolic capabilities, symbiotic relationships, production of growth-promoting substances [54]	Suppresses soil pathogens, enhances nutrient uptake, stimulates plant growth, improves stress resilience [55]

Table 2

Mechanisms of microbe-mediated drought tolerance.

Mechanism	Microbial Actions	Examples
Osmotic Adjustment	Production of osmolytes (proline, trehalose), secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [78]	Bacillus subtilis producing trehalose and EPS, Pseudomonas putida producing proline [79]
Root Architecture Enhancement	Synthesis of auxins (IAA), promotion of root elongation and branching, stimulation of root hair development [80]	Bacillus amyloliquefaciens producing IAA, mycorrhizal fungi enhancing root surface area [81]
Phytohormone Production	Modulation of phytohormones (auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene), production of ACC deaminase to reduce ethylene levels [82]	Azospirillum brasilense producing auxins, Bacillus subtilis producing ACC deaminase [83]
Antioxidant Defense Induction	Induction of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD), production of antioxidants (ascorbate, glutathione), secretion of antioxidant metabolites [84]	Trichoderma harzianum inducing SOD and CAT in plants, Pseudomonas fluorescens producing antioxidants [85]
Gene Expression Regulation	Activation of drought-responsive genes, epigenetic modifications, regulation of transcription factors [86]	Bacillus subtilis activating drought-responsive genes, mycorrhizal fungi inducing expression of stress-related genes [87]

Table 3

Ecological Innovations Leveraging Beneficial Microbes.

Innovation Type	Techniques/Methods	Impact on Ecosystem Resilience
Soil Microbiome Engineering	Metagenomic analysis, tailored microbial consortia introduction, CRISPR–Cas mediated microbial modifications [130]	Improved soil structure, enhanced nutrient cycling, increased microbial diversity, enhanced plant resilience [131].
Bioaugmentation	Introduction of specific beneficial microbial strains, application of liquid or granular inoculants, slow-release formulations [132]	Enhanced soil fertility, improved water retention, increased plant growth and drought tolerance, restoration of degraded soils [133]
Integrated Pest Management Synergies	Combining beneficial microbes with biological control agents, simultaneous application of PGPR and entomopathogenic fungi, integrated microbial and cultural practices [134]	Reduced pest outbreaks, enhanced plant defense mechanisms, improved crop health and yield, minimized reliance on chemical pesticides [135]
Sustainable Agricultural Practices	Conservation tillage with microbial amendments, crop rotation incorporating microbial inoculants, use of organic amendments (compost, biochar) to support microbial communities [136]	Enhanced soil moisture retention, improved soil health and structure, increased nutrient availability, sustained plant productivity under drought conditions [137]

Table 4

Case studies of successful microbe-based drought mitigation.

Location	Crop Type	Microbial Strains Used	Interventions Applied	Outcomes Achieved
Sub-Saharan Africa [179]	Maize, Sorghum	Azospirillum brasilense, Bacillus subtilis	PGPR inoculation, microbial consortia application	Increased crop yields by 20%, improved water use efficiency by 15%, enhanced root development
Mediterranean Europe [174]	Grapevines	Glomus intraradices, Trichoderma harzianum	Mycorrhizal fungi introduction, bioaugmentation	Improved soil moisture retention, increased grape quality and yield, reduced soil erosion
Southeast Asia [180]	Rice	Azospirillum brasilense, Rhizobium spp.	PGPR inoculation, microbial consortia application	Enhanced water use efficiency, increased rice yields by 25%, improved nutrient uptake
California (USA) [92]	Grapevines	Glomus intraradices, Bacillus subtilis	Mycorrhizal fungi introduction, PGPR inoculation	Increased grapevine health and productivity, improved soil structure, reduced irrigation needs
Australia [181]	Native Vegetation	Cyanobacteria spp., Actinomycetes spp.	Cyanobacteria restoration, actinomycetes inoculation	Restoration of native plant communities, enhanced soil moisture retention, improved soil fertility
Southeast Asia [182]	Rice	Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens	Microbial consortia application, bioaugmentation	Increased grain yield by 30%, enhanced plant resilience to drought stress, improved soil health

Table 5

Challenges and strategies for enhancing microbial efficacy.

Challenge	Description	Strategies to Overcome
Environmental Variability	The performance and efficacy of beneficial microbes are highly influenced by environmental factors such as soil type, temperature, moisture levels, pH, and the presence of native microbial communities. These variables can lead to inconsistent outcomes in microbial activity and plant drought tolerance across different regions and seasons [230].	- Selection and Engineering of Resilient Strains: Identify and develop microbial strains with inherent tolerance to a wide range of environmental conditions [231].- Protective Formulations: Utilize encapsulation techniques and protective carriers to shield microbes from extreme conditions [232].- Site-Specific Application: Tailor microbial inoculants to specific environmental contexts through localized testing and customization [233].- Integration with Agronomic Practices: Combine microbial applications with practices like conservation tillage and organic amendments to create favorable soil environments [113].
Scale-Up and Commercialization	Transitioning microbial technologies from controlled laboratory settings to large-scale field applications involves challenges related to maintaining microbial viability, ensuring consistent performance, and managing production costs. Additionally, scaling up requires robust formulation and delivery systems that can withstand storage and transportation conditions [234].	- Cost-Effective Production Methods: Develop scalable and economically viable microbial cultivation and formulation processes [235].- Robust Formulation Techniques: Implement advanced encapsulation and stabilization methods to preserve microbial viability during storage and transport [236].- Quality Control and Standardization: Establish stringent quality control protocols to ensure consistency and reliability of microbial products [237]- Economic Incentives and Support: Provide financial incentives, subsidies, and support programs to encourage investment and adoption by farmers and agricultural businesses [204].
Regulatory and Safety Concerns	The deployment of beneficial microbes must comply with stringent regulatory standards to ensure safety for humans, non-target organisms, and the environment. Regulatory frameworks vary across regions, and navigating these can be complex and time-consuming. Additionally, there is a need to address potential non-target effects and ensure that microbial applications do not disrupt existing ecosystems [203].	- Comprehensive Risk Assessments: Conduct thorough evaluations of microbial strains to assess potential risks and non-target effects (Imathiu I in. 2020).- Adherence to Regulatory Standards: Ensure all microbial products meet the regulatory requirements of target markets through rigorous testing and documentation (Rossi I in. 2021).- Transparent Communication: Maintain transparency with stakeholders about the safety and benefits of microbial interventions to build trust and acceptance [195].- Development of Best Practices: Establish standardized guidelines and protocols for the safe and effective use of beneficial microbes in agriculture [238].
Complex Microbe-Plant-Environment Interactions	The interactions between microbes, plants, and their environment are intricate and dynamic, making it challenging to predict and optimize microbial behavior and plant responses consistently. Factors such as plant genotype, microbial community composition, and fluctuating environmental conditions add layers of complexity that are not fully understood [83].	- Interdisciplinary Research Initiatives: Foster collaboration among microbiologists, plant scientists, ecologists, and data scientists to gain a holistic understanding of microbe–plant–environment interactions [194].- Advanced Omics Technologies: Utilize genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying microbe-mediated drought tolerance [239].- Longitudinal Field Studies: Implement long-term studies to monitor microbial and plant dynamics across multiple growing seasons and environmental conditions [193].- Modeling and Simulation:Develop predictive models using machine learning and bioinformatics to anticipate microbial behavior and optimize interventions based on environmental variables [191].

References

1. Haile, G.G.; Tang, Q.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X. Drought: Progress in Broadening Its Understanding. WIREs Water; 2020; 7, e1407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1407]

2. Orimoloye, I.R.; Belle, J.A.; Orimoloye, Y.M.; Olusola, A.O.; Ololade, O.O. Drought: A Common Environmental Disaster. Atmosphere; 2022; 13, 111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010111]

3. Naumann, G.; Cammalleri, C.; Mentaschi, L.; Feyen, L. Increased Economic Drought Impacts in Europe with Anthropogenic Warming. Nat. Clim. Change; 2021; 11, pp. 485-491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01044-3]

4. Savelli, E.; Rusca, M.; Cloke, H.; Di Baldassarre, G. Drought and Society: Scientific Progress, Blind Spots, and Future Prospects. WIREs Clim. Change; 2022; 13, e761. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.761]

5. Lottering, S.; Mafongoya, P.; Lottering, R. Drought and Its Impacts on Small-Scale Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review. S. Afr. Geogr. J.; 2021; 103, pp. 319-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2020.1795914]

6. Salvador, C.; Nieto, R.; Linares, C.; Díaz, J.; Gimeno, L. Effects of Droughts on Health: Diagnosis, Repercussion, and Adaptation in Vulnerable Regions under Climate Change. Challenges for Future Research. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 703, 134912. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134912]

7. Patil, R.; Polisgowdar, B.S.; Rathod, S.; Bandumula, N.; Mustac, I.; Srinivasa Reddy, G.V.; Wali, V.; Satishkumar, U.; Rao, S.; Kumar, A. et al. Spatiotemporal Characterization of Drought Magnitude, Severity, and Return Period at Various Time Scales in the Hyderabad Karnataka Region of India. Water; 2023; 15, 2483. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w15132483]

8. Palazzolo, N.; Peres, D.J.; Bonaccorso, B.; Cancelliere, A. A Probabilistic Analysis of Drought Areal Extent Using SPEI-Based Severity-Area-Frequency Curves and Reanalysis Data. Water; 2023; 15, 3141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w15173141]

9. Nasir, J.; Assefa, E.; Zeleke, T.; Gidey, E. Meteorological Drought in Northwestern Escarpment of Ethiopian Rift Valley: Detection Seasonal and Spatial Trends. Environ. Syst. Res.; 2021; 10, 16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40068-021-00219-3]

10. Ullah, I.; Ma, X.; Ren, G.; Yin, J.; Iyakaremye, V.; Syed, S.; Lu, K.; Xing, Y.; Singh, V.P. Recent Changes in Drought Events over South Asia and Their Possible Linkages with Climatic and Dynamic Factors. Remote Sens.; 2022; 14, 3219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14133219]

11. Ilyas, M.; Nisar, M.; Khan, N.; Hazrat, A.; Khan, A.H.; Hayat, K.; Fahad, S.; Khan, A.; Ullah, A. Drought Tolerance Strategies in Plants: A Mechanistic Approach. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2021; 40, pp. 926-944. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10174-5]

12. Ali, S.; Tyagi, A.; Park, S.; Mir, R.A.; Mushtaq, M.; Bhat, B.; Mahmoudi, H.; Bae, H. Deciphering the Plant Microbiome to Improve Drought Tolerance: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2022; 201, 104933. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104933]

13. Zia, R.; Nawaz, M.S.; Siddique, M.J.; Hakim, S.; Imran, A. Plant Survival under Drought Stress: Implications, Adaptive Responses, and Integrated Rhizosphere Management Strategy for Stress Mitigation. Microbiol. Res.; 2021; 242, 126626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126626] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189069]

14. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Landi, M.; Sharma, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sharma, A. The Impact of Drought in Plant Metabolism: How to Exploit Tolerance Mechanisms to Increase Crop Production. Appl. Sci.; 2020; 10, 5692. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10165692]

15. Więcław, H. Within-Species Variation among Populations of the Carex flava Complex as a Function of Habitat Conditions. Plant Ecol. Divers.; 2017; 10, pp. 443-451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2018.1440442]

16. Decunta, F.A.; Pérez, L.I.; Malinowski, D.P.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Gundel, P.E. A Systematic Review on the Effects of Epichloë Fungal Endophytes on Drought Tolerance in Cool-Season Grasses. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 12, 644731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.644731]

17. Aslam, M.M.; Okal, E.J.; Idris, A.L.; Qian, Z.; Xu, W.; Karanja, J.K.; Wani, S.H.; Yuan, W. Rhizosphere Microbiomes Can Regulate Plant Drought Tolerance. Pedosphere; 2022; 32, pp. 61-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60061-9]

18. Leontidou, K.; Genitsaris, S.; Papadopoulou, A.; Kamou, N.; Bosmali, I.; Matsi, T.; Madesis, P.; Vokou, D.; Karamanoli, K.; Mellidou, I. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Isolated from Halophytes and Drought-Tolerant Plants: Genomic Characterisation and Exploration of Phyto-Beneficial Traits. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 14857. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71652-0]

19. Schnabel, F.; Liu, X.; Kunz, M.; Barry, K.E.; Bongers, F.J.; Bruelheide, H.; Fichtner, A.; Härdtle, W.; Li, S.; Pfaff, C.-T. et al. Species Richness Stabilizes Productivity via Asynchrony and Drought-Tolerance Diversity in a Large-Scale Tree Biodiversity Experiment. Sci. Adv.; 2021; 7, eabk1643. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk1643]

20. Rutkowski, K.; Łysiak, G.P. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Tree Growth and Nutrient Content in Soil and Cherry Leaves (Prunus cerasus L.). Agriculture; 2023; 13, 578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030578]

21. Oszust, K.; Szpilska, K.; Gryta, A.; Panek, J.; Pylak, M.; Lipa, T.; Frąc, M. New Biotechnological Solutions in Biocontrol and Molecular Diagnostics of Neofabraea spp. in Apples—A Review. Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 2023; 204, 112442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2023.112442]

22. Koza, N.; Adedayo, A.; Babalola, O.; Kappo, A. Microorganisms in Plant Growth and Development: Roles in Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Secondary Metabolites Secretion. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 1528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081528] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013946]

23. Harman, G.; Khadka, R.; Doni, F.; Uphoff, N. Benefits to Plant Health and Productivity From Enhancing Plant Microbial Symbionts. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 11, 610065. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.610065] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912198]

24. Więcław, H.; Bosiacka, B.; Hrivnák, R.; Dajdok, Z.; Mesterházy, A.; Koopman, J. Morphological Variability of Carex buekii (Cyperaceae) as a Function of Soil Conditions: A Case Study of the Central European Populations. Sci. Rep.; 2022; 12, 11761. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15894-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35817804]

25. Silva, A.R.L.; Cavalcante, Í.H.L.; Silva, M.A.; Paiva Neto, V.B.; Amariz, R.A.; Amorim, L.Y.A. Does the Sunblock Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Mango Trees Grown in the Tropical Semiarid?. Folia Hortic.; 2022; 34, pp. 211-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2022-0016]

26. Seymour, Z.J.; Mercedes, J.F.; Fang, J.-Y. Effect of Heat Acclimation on Thermotolerance of In Vitro Strawberry Plantlets. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 135-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0008]

27. Ray, P.; Lakshmanan, V.; Labbé, J.L.; Craven, K.D. Microbe to Microbiome: A Paradigm Shift in the Application of Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 11, 622926. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.622926]

28. O’Callaghan, M.; Ballard, R.A.; Wright, D. Soil Microbial Inoculants for Sustainable Agriculture: Limitations and Opportunities. Soil Use Manag.; 2022; 38, pp. 1340-1369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12811]

29. Sanjuán, J.; Nápoles, M.C.; Pérez-Mendoza, D.; Lorite, M.J.; Rodríguez-Navarro, D.N. Microbials for Agriculture: Why Do They Call Them Biostimulants When They Mean Probiotics?. Microorganisms; 2023; 11, 153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010153]

30. Tripathi, A.N.; Meena, B.R.; Pandey, K.K.; Singh, J. Microbial Bioagents in Agriculture: Current Status and Prospects. New Frontiers in Stress Management for Durable Agriculture; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp. 331-368.

31. Paliwoda, D.; Mikiciuk, G. Use of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Plant Production—A Review Study. J. Ecol. Eng.; 2020; 21, pp. 292-310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12911/22998993/126597]

32. Santoyo, G.; Urtis-Flores, C.A.; Loeza-Lara, P.D.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Glick, B.R. Rhizosphere Colonization Determinants by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Biology; 2021; 10, 475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10060475] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072072]

33. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Green Bioinoculants: Recent Developments, Constraints, and Prospects. Sustainability; 2021; 13, 1140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031140]

34. Riaz, U.; Murtaza, G.; Anum, W.; Samreen, T.; Sarfraz, M.; Nazir, M.Z. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Biofertilizers and Biopesticides. Microbiota and Biofertilizers; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 181-196.

35. Vocciante, M.; Grifoni, M.; Fusini, D.; Petruzzelli, G.; Franchi, E. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses. Appl. Sci.; 2022; 12, 1231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12031231]

36. Mikiciuk, G.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Mikiciuk, M.; Derkowska, E.; Trzciński, P.; Ptak, P.; Chylewska, U.; Statkiewicz, M.; Lisek, A. Physiological Response of Three Grapevine Cultivars Grown in North-Western Poland to Mycorrhizal Fungi. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic.; 2018; 40, pp. 1-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21548/40-1-3086]

37. Dakora, F.D.; Phillips, D.A. Root Exudates as Mediators of Mineral Acquisition in Low-Nutrient Environments. Food Security in Nutrient-Stressed Environments: Exploiting Plants’ Genetic Capabilities; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 201-213.

38. Fourneau, E.; Pannier, M.; Riah, W.; Personeni, E.; Morvan-Bertrand, A.; Bodilis, J.; Pawlak, B. A “Love Match” Score to Compare Root Exudate Attraction and Feeding of the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Bacillus Subtilis, Pseudomonas Fluorescens, and Azospirillum Brasilense. Front. Microbiol.; 2024; 15, 1473099. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1473099]

39. Wang, Y.; Pei, Y.; Wang, X.; Dai, X.; Zhu, M. Antimicrobial Metabolites Produced by the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Bacillus and Pseudomonas. Adv. Agrochem; 2024; 3, pp. 206-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aac.2024.07.007]

40. Essalimi, B.; Esserti, S.; Rifai, L.A.; Koussa, T.; Makroum, K.; Belfaiza, M.; Rifai, S.; Venisse, J.S.; Faize, L.; Alburquerque, N. et al. Enhancement of Plant Growth, Acclimatization, Salt Stress Tolerance and Verticillium Wilt Disease Resistance Using Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Associated with Plum Trees (Prunus domestica). Sci. Hortic.; 2022; 291, 110621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110621]

41. Mota, I.; Sánchez-Sánchez, J.; Pedro, L.G.; Sousa, M.J. Composition Variation of the Essential Oil from Ocimum Basilicum L. Cv. Genovese Gigante in Response to Glomus Intraradices and Mild Water Stress at Different Stages of Growth. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.; 2020; 90, 104021. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2020.104021]

42. Zou, Y.-N.; Wu, Q.-S.; Kuča, K. Unravelling the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Mitigating the Oxidative Burst of Plants under Drought Stress. Plant Biol.; 2021; 23, pp. 50-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.13161]

43. Tang, H.; Hassan, M.U.; Feng, L.; Nawaz, M.; Shah, A.N.; Qari, S.H.; Liu, Y.; Miao, J. The Critical Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to Improve Drought Tolerance and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crops. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 919166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.919166]

44. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Abd Elgawad, H.; Xiong, Y.; Macovei, A.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Shaghaleh, H.; Alhaj Hamoud, Y.; El-Sawah, A.M. Inoculation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Mycorrhiza Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress and Improve Seed Yield and Quality of Soybean Plant. Physiol. Plant.; 2021; 172, pp. 2153-2169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13454] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964177]

45. Byregowda, R.; Prasad, S.R.; Oelmüller, R.; Nataraja, K.N.; Prasanna Kumar, M.K. Is Endophytic Colonization of Host Plants a Method of Alleviating Drought Stress? Conceptualizing the Hidden World of Endophytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 9194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169194] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012460]

46. Dubey, A.; Saiyam, D.; Kumar, A.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Khan, M.L. Bacterial Root Endophytes: Characterization of Their Competence and Plant Growth Promotion in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under Drought Stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2021; 18, 931. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030931] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33494513]

47. Li, H.; Guo, Q.; Jing, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, Y.; Xue, Q.; Lai, H. Application of Streptomyces Pactum Act12 Enhances Drought Resistance in Wheat. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2020; 39, pp. 122-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09968-z]

48. Chukwuneme, C.F.; Babalola, O.O.; Kutu, F.R.; Ojuederie, O.B. Characterization of Actinomycetes Isolates for Plant Growth Promoting Traits and Their Effects on Drought Tolerance in Maize. J. Plant Interact.; 2020; 15, pp. 93-105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2020.1752833]

49. Xie, F.; Andrews, B.; Asenjo, J.A.; Goodfellow, M.; Pathom-aree, W. Atacama Desert Actinomycetes: Taxonomic Analysis, Drought Tolerance and Plant Growth Promoting Potential. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2024; 40, 283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04077-w]

50. El-Shazoly, R.M.; Aloufi, A.S.; Fawzy, M.A. The Potential Use of Arthrospira (Spirulina platensis) as a Biostimulant for Drought Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Sustainable Agriculture. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2024; in press [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11473-x]

51. GR, S.; Yadav, R.K.; Chatrath, A.; Gerard, M.; Tripathi, K.; Govindsamy, V.; Abraham, G. Perspectives on the Potential Application of Cyanobacteria in the Alleviation of Drought and Salinity Stress in Crop Plants. J. Appl. Phycol.; 2021; 33, pp. 3761-3778. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02570-5]

52. Abbasi, S.; Mohammadi, P. Improving Drought Tolerance and Glycyrrhizin Content of Licorice Plant by EPS-Producing Cyanobacteria. Ind. Crops Prod.; 2023; 197, 116578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116578]

53. Cornejo-Ríos, K.; Osorno-Suárez, M.d.P.; Hernández-León, S.; Reyes-Santamaría, M.I.; Juárez-Díaz, J.A.; Pérez-España, V.H.; Peláez-Acero, A.; Madariaga-Navarrete, A.; Saucedo-García, M. Impact of Trichoderma Asperellum on Chilling and Drought Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Horticulturae; 2021; 7, 385. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100385]

54. Scudeletti, D.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Bossolani, J.W.; Moretti, L.G.; Momesso, L.; Servaz Tubaña, B.; de Castro, S.G.Q.; De Oliveira, E.F.; Hungria, M. Trichoderma Asperellum Inoculation as a Tool for Attenuating Drought Stress in Sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 12, 645542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.645542]

55. Battaglia, M.E.; Martinez, S.I.; Covacevich, F.; Consolo, V.F. Trichoderma harzianum Enhances Root Biomass Production and Promotes Lateral Root Growth of Soybean and Common Bean under Drought Stress. Ann. Appl. Biol.; 2024; 185, pp. 36-48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aab.12909]

56. Hussain, M.; Shakoor, N.; Adeel, M.; Ahmad, M.A.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; Rui, Y.; White, J.C. Nano-Enabled Plant Microbiome Engineering for Disease Resistance. Nano Today; 2023; 48, 101752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101752]

57. Kavadia, A.; Omirou, M.; Fasoula, D.; Ioannides, I.M. The Importance of Microbial Inoculants in a Climate-Changing Agriculture in Eastern Mediterranean Region. Atmosphere; 2020; 11, 1136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101136]

58. Branco, S.; Schauster, A.; Liao, H.; Ruytinx, J. Mechanisms of Stress Tolerance and Their Effects on the Ecology and Evolution of Mycorrhizal Fungi. New Phytol.; 2022; 235, pp. 2158-2175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18308]

59. Cheng, S.; Zou, Y.-N.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.-S. Elucidating the Mechanisms Underlying Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Plants Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 809473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.809473]

60. Koopman, J.; Więcław, H.; Cembrowska-Lech, D. Intersectional Hybrids of Carex remota with C. otrubae and C. vulpina (Cyperaceae) in Europe. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.; 2023; 203, pp. 350-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boad039]

61. Jajoo, A.; Mathur, S. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as an Underground Saviuor for Protecting Plants from Abiotic Stresses. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants; 2021; 27, pp. 2589-2603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01091-2]

62. Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Khizar, C.; Reddy, S.P.P. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regulating Growth, Enhancing Productivity, and Potentially Influencing Ecosystems under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants; 2023; 12, 3102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12173102]

63. Marro, N.; Grilli, G.; Soteras, F.; Caccia, M.; Longo, S.; Cofré, N.; Borda, V.; Burni, M.; Janoušková, M.; Urcelay, C. The Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Species and Taxonomic Groups on Stressed and Unstressed Plants: A Global Meta-analysis. New Phytol.; 2022; 235, pp. 320-332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18102]

64. Mikiciuk, G.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Mikiciuk, M.; Derkowska, E.; Trzciński, P.; Głuszek, S.; Lisek, A.; Wera-Bryl, S.; Rudnicka, J. Mycorrhizal Frequency, Physiological Parameters, and Yield of Strawberry Plants Inoculated with Endomycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizosphere Bacteria. Mycorrhiza; 2019; 29, pp. 489-501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00905-2]

65. Salvi, P.; Mahawar, H.; Agarrwal, R.; Kajal,; Gautam, V.; Deshmukh, R. Advancement in the Molecular Perspective of Plant-Endophytic Interaction to Mitigate Drought Stress in Plants. Front. Microbiol.; 2022; 13, 981355. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.981355] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118190]

66. Hosseyni Moghaddam, M.S.; Safaie, N.; Soltani, J.; Hagh-Doust, N. Desert-Adapted Fungal Endophytes Induce Salinity and Drought Stress Resistance in Model Crops. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2021; 160, pp. 225-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.022] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517220]

67. Verma, S.K.; Sahu, P.K.; Kumar, K.; Pal, G.; Gond, S.K.; Kharwar, R.N.; White, J.F. Endophyte Roles in Nutrient Acquisition, Root System Architecture Development and Oxidative Stress Tolerance. J. Appl. Microbiol.; 2021; 131, pp. 2161-2177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15111] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893707]

68. Abideen, Z.; Cardinale, M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Koyro, H.-W.; Rasool, S.G.; Hessini, K.; Darbali, W.; Zhao, F.; Siddique, K.H.M. Seed Endophyte Bacteria Enhance Drought Stress Tolerance in Hordeum Vulgare by Regulating, Physiological Characteristics, Antioxidants and Minerals Uptake. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 980046. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.980046]

69. Koopman, J.; Dajdok, Z.; Więcław, H.; Marinetto, E.; Grulich, V.; Řepka, R.; Jimenez-Mejas, P. Global Distribution of Carex buekii (Cyperaceae) Reappraised. Phytotaxa; 2018; 358, pp. 139-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.358.2.3]

70. Oyedoh, O.P.; Yang, W.; Dhanasekaran, D.; Santoyo, G.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Rare Rhizo-Actinomycetes: A New Source of Agroactive Metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv.; 2023; 67, 108205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108205]

71. Sneha, G.R.; Govindasamy, V.; Singh, P.K.; Kumar, S.; Abraham, G. Priming of Seeds with Cyanobacteria Improved Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during Post-Germinative Drought Stress. J. Appl. Phycol.; 2024; 36, pp. 1233-1246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-023-03170-1]

72. Więcław, H.; Šumberová, K.; Bosiacka, B.; Hrivnák, R.; Dajdok, Z.; Mesterházy, A.; Minuzzo, C.; Martinetto, E.; Koopman, J. Ecology, Threats and Conservation Status of Carex buekii (Cyperaceae) in Central Europe. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 11162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47563-0]

73. Yasmin, H.; Rashid, U.; Hassan, M.N.; Nosheen, A.; Naz, R.; Ilyas, N.; Sajjad, M.; Azmat, A.; Alyemeni, M.N. Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes Alleviated Drought Stress by Modulating Defense System in Maize (Zea mays L.). Physiol. Plant.; 2021; 172, pp. 896-911. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13304]

74. Chieb, M.; Gachomo, E.W. The Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Plant Drought Stress Responses. BMC Plant Biol.; 2023; 23, 407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8]

75. Gontia-Mishra, I.; Sapre, S.; Deshmukh, R.; Sikdar, S.; Tiwari, S. Microbe-Mediated Drought Tolerance in Plants: Current Developments and Future Challenges. Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 351-379.

76. Koopman, J.; Kalinowski, P.; Stech, M.; Więcław, H. Carex × kneuckeri, a Hybrid New for Central Europe and Neotypification of This Name. Preslia; 2019; 91, pp. 161-177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2019.161]

77. Naseem, H.; Ahsan, M.; Shahid, M.A.; Khan, N. Exopolysaccharides Producing Rhizobacteria and Their Role in Plant Growth and Drought Tolerance. J. Basic Microbiol.; 2018; 58, pp. 1009-1022. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800309]

78. Yadav, K.; Yadav, P.; Singh, K. Microbial-Mediated Molecular Mechanisms to Cope Up Salinity and Drought Stress in Plants. Microbial Based Land Restoration Handbook, Volume 2; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 31-64. ISBN 9781003147077

79. Jain, D.; Phurailatpam, L.; Mishra, S. Microbes-Mediated Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants: Recent Trends and Future Challenges. Advances in Plant Microbiome and Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 199-218.

80. Narayanasamy, S.; Uthandi, S. Microbial Mitigation of Drought Stress: Potential Mechanisms and Challenges. Microbial Management of Plant Stresses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 185-201.

81. Jatav, S.S.; Parihar, M.; Patra, A.; Singh, S.K.; Chitara, M.K.; Mohapatra, K.K.; Rana, K. Soil Microbes in Plant Growth Promotion and for Mitigation of Abiotic Stress of Drought. Soil Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 175-201.

82. Asghar, M.A.; Ahmad, B.; Raza, A.; Adil, B.; Hassan Javed, H.; Farooq, M.U.; Ghafoor, A.; Iftikhar Hussain, M.; Shafiq, I.; Karim, H. et al. Shade and Microbes Enhance Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants by Inducing Phytohormones at Molecular Levels: A Review. J. Plant Ecol.; 2022; 15, pp. 1107-1117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtac038]

83. Singh, D.; Thapa, S.; Yadav, J.; Singh, D.; Chakdar, H.; Kumar, M.; Saxena, A.K. Deciphering the Mechanisms of Microbe Mediated Drought Stress Alleviation in Wheat. Acta Physiol. Plant.; 2023; 45, 81. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03562-3]

84. Kour, D.; Yadav, A.N. Bacterial Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges. Curr. Microbiol.; 2022; 79, 248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02939-w]

85. Kour, D.; Khan, S.S.; Kaur, T.; Kour, H.; Singh, G.; Yadav, A.; Yadav, A.N. Drought Adaptive Microbes as Bioinoculants for the Horticultural Crops. Heliyon; 2022; 8, e09493. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09493]

86. Gupta, A.; Bano, A.; Rai, S.; Mishra, R.; Singh, M.; Sharma, S.; Pathak, N. Mechanistic Insights of Plant-Microbe Interaction towards Drought and Salinity Stress in Plants for Enhancing the Agriculture Productivity. Plant Stress; 2022; 4, 100073. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100073]

87. Yadav, B.; Jogawat, A.; Rahman, M.S.; Narayan, O.P. Secondary Metabolites in the Drought Stress Tolerance of Crop Plants: A Review. Gene Rep.; 2021; 23, 101040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101040]

88. Andreo-Jimenez, B.; Schilder, M.T.; Nijhuis, E.H.; te Beest, D.E.; Bloem, J.; Visser, J.H.M.; van Os, G.; Brolsma, K.; de Boer, W.; Postma, J. Chitin- and Keratin-Rich Soil Amendments Suppress Rhizoctonia Solani Disease via Changes to the Soil Microbial Community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2021; 87, e00318-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00318-21]

89. Sandhya, V.; Ali, S.Z.; Grover, M.; Reddy, G.; Venkateswarlu, B. Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Pseudomonas spp. on Compatible Solutes, Antioxidant Status and Plant Growth of Maize under Drought Stress. Plant Growth Regul.; 2010; 62, pp. 21-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4]

90. Ortiz, N.; Armada, E.; Duque, E.; Roldán, A.; Azcón, R. Contribution of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and/or Bacteria to Enhancing Plant Drought Tolerance under Natural Soil Conditions: Effectiveness of Autochthonous or Allochthonous Strains. J. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 174, pp. 87-96. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25462971]

91. Gamalero, E.; Glick, B.R. Recent Advances in Bacterial Amelioration of Plant Drought and Salt Stress. Biology; 2022; 11, 437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11030437] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336811]

92. Hanaka, A.; Ozimek, E.; Reszczyńska, E.; Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J.; Stolarz, M. Plant Tolerance to Drought Stress in the Presence of Supporting Bacteria and Fungi: An Efficient Strategy in Horticulture. Horticulturae; 2021; 7, 390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100390]

93. Camaille, M.; Fabre, N.; Clément, C.; Ait Barka, E. Advances in Wheat Physiology in Response to Drought and the Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria to Trigger Drought Tolerance. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 687. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040687]

94. Singh, S.K.; Srikanth, G.S.; Puranik, S.; Shukla, L. Chemical Talk within Plant Holobiont: A Fascinating Conversation. Plant-Microbe Interaction-Recent Advances in Molecular and Biochemical Approaches; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 165-203.

95. Rajput, S.; Sengupta, P.; Kohli, I.; Varma, A.; Singh, P.K.; Joshi, N.C. Role of Piriformospora Indica in Inducing Soil Microbial Communities and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 93-110.

96. Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Kaur, T.; Sheikh, I.; Yadav, A.N.; Kumar, V.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Saxena, A.K. Microbe-Mediated Alleviation of Drought Stress and Acquisition of Phosphorus in Great Millet (Sorghum bicolour L.) by Drought-Adaptive and Phosphorus-Solubilizing Microbes. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.; 2020; 23, 101501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101501]

97. Zhang, K.; Khan, Z.; Yu, Q.; Qu, Z.; Liu, J.; Luo, T.; Zhu, K.; Bi, J.; Hu, L.; Luo, L. Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health. Plants; 2022; 11, 2864. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864]

98. Singh, D.P.; Singh, V.; Gupta, V.K.; Shukla, R.; Prabha, R.; Sarma, B.K.; Patel, J.S. Microbial Inoculation in Rice Regulates Antioxidative Reactions and Defense Related Genes to Mitigate Drought Stress. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 4818. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61140-w]

99. Mahdi Dar, Z.; Masood, A.; Hussain Mughal, A.; Asif, M.; Ahamd Malik, M. Review on Drought Tolerance in Plants Induced by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.; 2018; 7, pp. 412-422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.053]

100. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Datta, S.; Ramamurthy, P.C.; Singh, J. Molecular Mechanism and Signaling Pathways Interplay between Plant Hormones during Plant-Microbe Crosstalk. Microbial Management of Plant Stresses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 93-105.

101. Kaya, C. Microbial Modulation of Hormone Signaling, Proteomic Dynamics, and Metabolomics in Plant Drought Adaptation. Food Energy Secur.; 2024; 13, e513. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.513]

102. Gupta, A.; Singh, U.B.; Sahu, P.K.; Paul, S.; Kumar, A.; Malviya, D.; Singh, S.; Kuppusamy, P.; Singh, P.; Paul, D. et al. Linking Soil Microbial Diversity to Modern Agriculture Practices: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2022; 19, 3141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053141]

103. Pandey, P.; Tripathi, A.; Dwivedi, S.; Lal, K.; Jhang, T. Deciphering the Mechanisms, Hormonal Signaling, and Potential Applications of Endophytic Microbes to Mediate Stress Tolerance in Medicinal Plants. Front. Plant Sci.; 2023; 14, 1250020. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1250020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034581]

104. Dhar, N.; Gopalan, N.S.R.; Nikhil, P.T.; Mohapatra, S. Role of Phytohormones in Plant-Microbial Interaction. Auxins, Cytokinins and Gibberellins Signaling in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 313-336.

105. Bora, S.S.; Anshu,; Deka, P.; Barooah, M. Drought-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Associated with Millets. Millet Rhizosphere; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 83-96.

106. Gowtham, H.G.; Singh, B.; Murali, M.; Shilpa, N.; Prasad, M.; Aiyaz, M.; Amruthesh, K.N.; Niranjana, S.R. Induction of Drought Tolerance in Tomato upon the Application of ACC Deaminase Producing Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium Bacillus Subtilis Rhizo SF 48. Microbiol. Res.; 2020; 234, 126422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126422] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058314]

107. Chandra, D.; Srivastava, R.; Gupta, V.V.S.R.; Franco, C.M.M.; Sharma, A.K. Evaluation of ACC-Deaminase-Producing Rhizobacteria to Alleviate Water-Stress Impacts in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants. Can. J. Microbiol.; 2019; 65, pp. 387-403. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2018-0636] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702926]

108. Zhang, Y.; Du, H.; Xu, F.; Ding, Y.; Gui, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W. Root-Bacteria Associations Boost Rhizosheath Formation in Moderately Dry Soil through Ethylene Responses. Plant Physiol.; 2020; 183, pp. 780-792. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220965]

109. Ma, Y. Abiotic Stress Responses and Microbe-Mediated Mitigation in Plants. Agronomy; 2023; 13, 1844. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071844]

110. Bhagat, N.; Raghav, M.; Dubey, S.; Bedi, N. Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Insight into Their Role in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2021; 31, pp. 1045-1059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05009]

111. Ault, T.R. On the Essentials of Drought in a Changing Climate. Science; 2020; 368, pp. 256-260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492]

112. Thakur, N.; Nigam, M.; Mann, N.A.; Gupta, S.; Hussain, C.M.; Shukla, S.K.; Shah, A.A.; Casini, R.; Elansary, H.O.; Khan, S.A. Host-Mediated Gene Engineering and Microbiome-Based Technology Optimization for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Funct. Integr. Genom.; 2023; 23, 57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-00982-9]

113. Sinha, T.; Nandi, K.; Das, R.; Prasad, S.N.; Pradhan, M.; Maurya, S.; Nandi, A. Microbe-Mediated Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Microbes and Microbial Biotechnology for Green Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 93-116.

114. Dastogeer, K.M.G.; Zahan, M.I.; Rhaman, M.S.; Sarker, M.S.A.; Chakraborty, A. Microbe-Mediated Thermotolerance in Plants and Pertinent Mechanisms—A Meta-Analysis and Review. Front. Microbiol.; 2022; 13, 833566. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.833566]

115. Ummara, U.; Noreen, S.; Afzal, M.; Zafar, Z.U.; Akhter, M.S.; Iqbal, S.; Hefft, D.I.; Kazi, M.; Ahmad, P. Induced Systemic Tolerance Mediated by Plant-Microbe Interaction in Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants under Hydrocarbon Contamination. Chemosphere; 2022; 290, 133327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133327]

116. Elnajar, M.; Aldesuquy, H.; Abdelmoteleb, M.; Eltanahy, E. Mitigating Drought Stress in Wheat Plants (Triticum aestivum L.) through Grain Priming in Aqueous Extract of Spirulina platensis. BMC Plant Biol.; 2024; 24, 233. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04905-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38561647]

117. Fadiji, A.E.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Santos-Villalobos, S.d.l.; Santoyo, G.; Babalola, O.O. Recent Developments in the Application of Plant Growth-Promoting Drought Adaptive Rhizobacteria for Drought Mitigation. Plants; 2022; 11, 3090. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11223090]

118. Joshi, H.; Bisht, N.; Mishra, S.K.; Prasad, V.; Chauhan, P.S. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Modulate Carbohydrate Metabolism in Rice-PGPR Cross-Talk Under Abiotic Stress and Phytohormone Treatments. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2023; 42, pp. 4466-4483. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10913-4]

119. Galicia-Campos, E.; García-Villaraco, A.; Montero-Palmero, M.B.; Gutiérrez-Mañero, F.J.; Ramos-Solano, B. Bacillus G7 Improves Adaptation to Salt Stress in Olea europaea L. Plantlets, Enhancing Water Use Efficiency and Preventing Oxidative Stress. Sci. Rep.; 2023; 13, 22507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49533-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38110443]

120. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.; Mahmud, J.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants; 2020; 9, 681. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681]

121. Lee, S.; Kim, J.-A.; Song, J.; Choe, S.; Jang, G.; Kim, Y. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium Bacillus Megaterium Modulates the Expression of Antioxidant-Related and Drought-Responsive Genes to Protect Rice (Oryza sativa L.) from Drought. Front. Microbiol.; 2024; 15, 1430546. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1430546]

122. Li, W.; Wang, H.; Lv, G.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Regulation of Drought Stress on Nutrient Cycle and Metabolism of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Desert Riparian Forest. Sci. Total Environ.; 2024; 954, 176148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176148]

123. Islam, M.R.; Islam, R.; Dutta, T.; Jhelom, F.R. Genetic and Microbial Insights into Drought Stress Alleviation in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Biol. Life Sci. Forum; 2023; 27, 22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15223]

124. Krishnamoorthy, R.; Anandham, R.; Senthilkumar, M.; Venkatramanan, V. Adaptation Mechanism of Methylotrophic Bacteria to Drought Condition and Its Strategies in Mitigating Plant Stress Caused by Climate Change. Exploring Synergies and Trade-offs between Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2021; pp. 145-158.

125. Kaya, C.; Uğurlar, F.; Adamakis, I.-D.S. Epigenetic and Hormonal Modulation in Plant–Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganism Symbiosis for Drought-Resilient Agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2023; 24, 16064. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216064]

126. Nisha,; Batra, N.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, R.; Sharma, A. Abiotic Stress Responses and Strategies of Microbes Mediated Mitigation for Sustainable Agriculture. Vegetos; 2022; 36, pp. 20-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42535-022-00541-w]

127. Lewis, W.H.; Tahon, G.; Geesink, P.; Sousa, D.Z.; Ettema, T.J.G. Innovations to Culturing the Uncultured Microbial Majority. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2021; 19, pp. 225-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093661]

128. Vishwakarma, K.; Kumar, N.; Shandilya, C.; Mohapatra, S.; Bhayana, S.; Varma, A. Revisiting Plant–Microbe Interactions and Microbial Consortia Application for Enhancing Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 11, 560406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33408698]

129. Poppeliers, S.W.; Sánchez-Gil, J.J.; de Jonge, R. Microbes to Support Plant Health: Understanding Bioinoculant Success in Complex Conditions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.; 2023; 73, 102286. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102286] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36878082]

130. Jansson, J.K.; McClure, R.; Egbert, R.G. Soil Microbiome Engineering for Sustainability in a Changing Environment. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2023; 41, pp. 1716-1728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01932-3]

131. Bano, S.; WU, X.; Zhang, X. Towards Sustainable Agriculture: Rhizosphere Microbiome Engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2021; 105, pp. 7141-7160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11555-w]

132. Nwankwegu, A.S.; Zhang, L.; Xie, D.; Onwosi, C.O.; Muhammad, W.I.; Odoh, C.K.; Sam, K.; Idenyi, J.N. Bioaugmentation as a Green Technology for Hydrocarbon Pollution Remediation. Problems and Prospects. J. Environ. Manag.; 2022; 304, 114313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114313]

133. Gao, D.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Tang, T.; Bai, Y.; Liang, H. Current and Emerging Trends in Bioaugmentation of Organic Contaminated Soils: A Review. J. Environ. Manag.; 2022; 320, 115799. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115799]

134. Wangithi, C.; Muriithi, B.W.; Diiro, G.; Dubois, T.; Mohamed, S.; Lattorff, M.G.; Ngowi, B.V.; Abdel-Rahman, E.M.; Adan, M.; Kassie, M. Synergies of Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management in Avocado Farming in East Africa: An Ex-Ante Economic Analysis. PLoS ONE; 2022; 17, e0271241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271241]

135. Ratnadass, A.; Avelino, J.; Fernandes, P.; Letourmy, P.; Babin, R.; Deberdt, P.; Deguine, J.-P.; Grechi, I.; Naudin, K.; Rhino, B. et al. Synergies and Tradeoffs in Natural Regulation of Crop Pests and Diseases under Plant Species Diversification. Crop Prot.; 2021; 146, 105658. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105658]

136. Piñeiro, V.; Arias, J.; Dürr, J.; Elverdin, P.; Ibáñez, A.M.; Kinengyere, A.; Opazo, C.M.; Owoo, N.; Page, J.R.; Prager, S.D. et al. A Scoping Review on Incentives for Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Their Outcomes. Nat. Sustain.; 2020; 3, pp. 809-820. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y]

137. Kapoore, R.V.; Wood, E.E.; Llewellyn, C.A. Algae Biostimulants: A Critical Look at Microalgal Biostimulants for Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Biotechnol. Adv.; 2021; 49, 107754. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107754] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892124]

138. Arif, I.; Batool, M.; Schenk, P.M. Plant Microbiome Engineering: Expected Benefits for Improved Crop Growth and Resilience. Trends Biotechnol.; 2020; 38, pp. 1385-1396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451122]

139. Kaul, S.; Choudhary, M.; Gupta, S.; Dhar, M.K. Engineering Host Microbiome for Crop Improvement and Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 635917. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.635917] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122359]

140. Kumar, A.; Dubey, A. Rhizosphere Microbiome: Engineering Bacterial Competitiveness for Enhancing Crop Production. J. Adv. Res.; 2020; 24, pp. 337-352. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.014]

141. Lau, S.-E.; Teo, W.F.A.; Teoh, E.Y.; Tan, B.C. Microbiome Engineering and Plant Biostimulants for Sustainable Crop Improvement and Mitigation of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Discov. Food; 2022; 2, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44187-022-00009-5]

142. Phour, M.; Sindhu, S.S. Mitigating Abiotic Stress: Microbiome Engineering for Improving Agricultural Production and Environmental Sustainability. Planta; 2022; 256, 85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03997-x]

143. Yang, S.; Liu, H.; Xie, P.; Wen, T.; Shen, Q.; Yuan, J. Emerging Pathways for Engineering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Optimal Plant Health. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2023; 71, pp. 4441-4449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08758]

144. Rodríguez, R.; Barra, P.J.; Larama, G.; Carrion, V.J.; de la Luz Mora, M.; Hale, L.; Durán, P. Microbiome Engineering Optimized by Antarctic Microbiota to Support a Plant Host under Water Deficit. Front. Plant Sci.; 2023; 14, 1241612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1241612]

145. Zhang, Y.; Trivedi, P.; Xu, J.; Roper, M.C.; Wang, N. The Citrus Microbiome: From Structure and Function to Microbiome Engineering and Beyond. Phytobiomes J.; 2021; 5, pp. 249-262. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-11-20-0084-RVW]

146. Li, H.; Li, Y.; Bao, M.; Li, S. Solid Inoculants as a Practice for Bioaugmentation to Enhance Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Areas. Chemosphere; 2021; 263, 128175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128175]

147. Lu, X.-L.; Ding, K.; Dong, X.-X.; Li, G.; Ma, J. A Bioaugmentation Strategy for Promoting the Humification Process during Composting by Microbial Inoculants: A Review. Organic Fertilizers-New Advances and Applications [Working Title]; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2023.

148. Adetunji, C.O.; Anani, O.A. Bioaugmentation: A Powerful Biotechnological Techniques for Sustainable Ecorestoration of Soil and Groundwater Contaminants. Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 373-398.

149. Brzeszcz, J.; Kapusta, P.; Steliga, T.; Turkiewicz, A. Hydrocarbon Removal by Two Differently Developed Microbial Inoculants and Comparing Their Actions with Biostimulation Treatment. Molecules; 2020; 25, 661. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030661] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033085]

150. Tondera, K.; Chazarenc, F.; Chagnon, P.-L.; Brisson, J. Bioaugmentation of Treatment Wetlands—A Review. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 775, 145820. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145820] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618303]

151. Gorodylova, N.; Seron, A.; Michel, K.; Joulian, C.; Delorme, F.; Soulier, C.; Bresch, S.; Garreau, C.; Giovannelli, F.; Michel, C. Zeolite-Supported Biofilms as Inoculants for the Treatment of MCPA-Polluted Soil and Sand by Bioaugmentation: A Microcosm Study. Appl. Soil Ecol.; 2022; 180, 104614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104614]

152. Balseiro-Romero, M.; Wick, L.Y.; Vila, J.; Grifoll, M.; Ortega-Calvo, J.J. Drivers for Efficient Bioaugmentation and Clean-Up of Contaminated Soil. Soil Remediation Science and Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 261-291.

153. Dehnavi, S.M.; Ebrahimipour, G. Comparative Remediation Rate of Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation, and Phytoremediation in Hydrocarbon Contaminants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2022; 19, pp. 11561-11586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04343-0]

154. Song, Y.Q.; Shahir, S.; Abd Manan, F. Bacterial Inoculant-Assisted Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil: Inoculant Development and the Inoculation Effects. Biologia; 2021; 76, pp. 2675-2685. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00804-y]

155. López, A.M.Q.; dos Santos Silva, A.L. Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation. Genomics Approach to Bioremediation; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 53-68.

156. Agrawal, A.; Maharana, J.K.; Patel, A.K. Microbial Inoculants and Their Potential Application in Bioremediation. Microbes Based Approaches for the Management of Hazardous Contaminants; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 321-344.

157. Mawang, C.-I.; Azman, A.-S.; Fuad, A.-S.M.; Ahamad, M. Actinobacteria: An Eco-Friendly and Promising Technology for the Bioaugmentation of Contaminants. Biotechnol. Rep.; 2021; 32, e00679. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00679]

158. Baker, B.P.; Green, T.A.; Loker, A.J. Biological Control and Integrated Pest Management in Organic and Conventional Systems. Biol. Control; 2020; 140, 104095. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104095]

159. Deguine, J.-P.; Aubertot, J.-N.; Flor, R.J.; Lescourret, F.; Wyckhuys, K.A.G.; Ratnadass, A. Integrated Pest Management: Good Intentions, Hard Realities. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev.; 2021; 41, 38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w]

160. Akanmu, A.O.; Babalola, O.O.; Venturi, V.; Ayilara, M.S.; Adeleke, B.S.; Amoo, A.E.; Sobowale, A.A.; Fadiji, A.E.; Glick, B.R. Plant Disease Management: Leveraging on the Plant-Microbe-Soil Interface in the Biorational Use of Organic Amendments. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 12, 700507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.700507]

161. Fahad, S.; Saud, S.; Akhter, A.; Bajwa, A.A.; Hassan, S.; Battaglia, M.; Adnan, M.; Wahid, F.; Datta, R.; Babur, E. et al. Bio-Based Integrated Pest Management in Rice: An Agro-Ecosystems Friendly Approach for Agricultural Sustainability. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci.; 2021; 20, pp. 94-102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2020.12.004]

162. Dannon, H.F.; Dannon, A.E.; Douro-Kpindou, O.K.; Zinsou, A.V.; Houndete, A.T.; Toffa-Mehinto, J.; Elegbede, I.A.T.M.; Olou, B.D.; Tamò, M. Toward the Efficient Use of Beauveria Bassiana in Integrated Cotton Insect Pest Management. J. Cotton Res.; 2020; 3, 24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42397-020-00061-5]

163. Niu, B.; Wang, W.; Yuan, Z.; Sederoff, R.R.; Sederoff, H.; Chiang, V.L.; Borriss, R. Microbial Interactions Within Multiple-Strain Biological Control Agents Impact Soil-Borne Plant Disease. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 11, 585404. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.585404] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162962]

164. Benmrid, B.; Ghoulam, C.; Zeroual, Y.; Kouisni, L.; Bargaz, A. Bioinoculants as a Means of Increasing Crop Tolerance to Drought and Phosphorus Deficiency in Legume-Cereal Intercropping Systems. Commun. Biol.; 2023; 6, 1016. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05399-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803170]

165. Poveda, J. Cyanobacteria in Plant Health: Biological Strategy against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Crop Prot.; 2021; 141, 105450. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105450]

166. Bhattacharjee, P.; Nath, S.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Yadav, M.R. Exploring the Synergy of Microbes and Plants: A Promising Strategy for Managing Moisture Stress in Medicinal and Aromatic Crops. Microbial Biostimulants for Plant Growth and Abiotic Stress Amelioration; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 367-395.

167. Sani, M.N.H.; Yong, J.W.H. Harnessing Synergistic Biostimulatory Processes: A Plausible Approach for Enhanced Crop Growth and Resilience in Organic Farming. Biology; 2021; 11, 41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11010041]

168. Lin, P.-A.; Paudel, S.; Lai, P.-C.; GC, R.K.; Yang, D.-H.; Felton, G.W. Integrating Water and Insect Pest Management in Agriculture. J. Pest Sci.; 2024; 97, pp. 521-538. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01701-w]

169. Gvozdenac, S.; Dedić, B.; Mikić, S.; Ovuka, J.; Miladinović, D. Impact of Climate Change on Integrated Pest Management Strategies. Climate Change and Agriculture; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 311-372.

170. Sammauria, R.; Kumawat, S.; Kumawat, P.; Singh, J.; Jatwa, T.K. Microbial Inoculants: Potential Tool for Sustainability of Agricultural Production Systems. Arch. Microbiol.; 2020; 202, pp. 677-693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01795-w]

171. Bamdad, H.; Papari, S.; Lazarovits, G.; Berruti, F. Soil Amendments for Sustainable Agriculture: Microbial Organic Fertilizers. Soil Use Manag.; 2022; 38, pp. 94-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12762]

172. Bertola, M.; Ferrarini, A.; Visioli, G. Improvement of Soil Microbial Diversity through Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Its Evaluation by -Omics Approaches: A Perspective for the Environment, Food Quality and Human Safety. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 1400. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071400]

173. Elnahal, A.S.M.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Rady, M.M.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A. The Use of Microbial Inoculants for Biological Control, Plant Growth Promotion, and Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.; 2022; 162, pp. 759-792. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02393-7]

174. Poveda, J.; Baptista, P. Filamentous Fungi as Biocontrol Agents in Olive (Olea europaea L.) Diseases: Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi. Crop Prot.; 2021; 146, 105672. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105672]

175. Vidal, C.; González, F.; Santander, C.; Pérez, R.; Gallardo, V.; Santos, C.; Aponte, H.; Ruiz, A.; Cornejo, P. Management of Rhizosphere Microbiota and Plant Production under Drought Stress: A Comprehensive Review. Plants; 2022; 11, 2437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11182437] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145836]

176. Silverstein, M.R.; Segrè, D.; Bhatnagar, J.M. Environmental Microbiome Engineering for the Mitigation of Climate Change. Glob. Change Biol.; 2023; 29, pp. 2050-2066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16609] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36661406]

177. Curiel-Alegre, S.; Velasco-Arroyo, B.; Rumbo, C.; Khan, A.H.A.; Tamayo-Ramos, J.A.; Rad, C.; Gallego, J.L.R.; Barros, R. Evaluation of Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation, and Organic Amendments Application on the Bioremediation of Recalcitrant Hydrocarbons of Soil. Chemosphere; 2022; 307, 135638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135638]

178. Bakina, L.G.; Chugunova, M.V.; Polyak, Y.M.; Mayachkina, N.V.; Gerasimov, A.O. Bioaugmentation: Possible Scenarios Due to Application of Bacterial Preparations for Remediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil. Environ. Geochem. Health; 2021; 43, pp. 2347-2356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00755-4]

179. Galindo, F.S.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Fernandes, G.C.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Jalal, A.; Rosa, P.A.L.; Buzetti, S.; Lavres, J.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Enhancing Agronomic Efficiency and Maize Grain Yield with Azospirillum Brasilense Inoculation under Brazilian Savannah Conditions. Eur. J. Agron.; 2022; 134, 126471. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126471]

180. Yasuda, M.; Dastogeer, K.M.G.; Sarkodee-Addo, E.; Tokiwa, C.; Isawa, T.; Shinozaki, S.; Okazaki, S. Impact of Azospirillum Sp. B510 on the Rhizosphere Microbiome of Rice under Field Conditions. Agronomy; 2022; 12, 1367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061367]

181. Ingrey, S.D.; Pearson, L.A.; Kalaitzis, J.A.; Neilan, B.A. Australian Bush Medicines Harbour Diverse Microbial Endophytes with Broad-spectrum Antibacterial Activity. J. Appl. Microbiol.; 2021; 131, pp. 2244-2256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15122]

182. Mathur, P.; Roy, S. Insights into the Plant Responses to Drought and Decoding the Potential of Root Associated Microbiome for Inducing Drought Tolerance. Physiol. Plant.; 2021; 172, pp. 1016-1029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13338]

183. Etesami, H. Potential Advantage of Rhizosheath Microbiome, in Contrast to Rhizosphere Microbiome, to Improve Drought Tolerance in Crops. Rhizosphere; 2021; 20, 100439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100439]

184. Loiko, N.; Islam, M.N. Plant–Soil Microbial Interaction: Differential Adaptations of Beneficial vs. Pathogenic Bacterial and Fungal Communities to Climate-Induced Drought. Agronomy; 2024; 14, 1949. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091949]

185. Kang, J.; Peng, Y.; Xu, W. Crop Root Responses to Drought Stress: Molecular Mechanisms, Nutrient Regulations, and Interactions with Microorganisms in the Rhizosphere. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 9310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169310] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012575]

186. Muhammad, M.; Waheed, A.; Wahab, A.; Majeed, M.; Nazim, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Li, L.; Li, W.-J. Soil Salinity and Drought Tolerance: An Evaluation of Plant Growth, Productivity, Microbial Diversity, and Amelioration Strategies. Plant Stress; 2024; 11, 100319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100319]

187. Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Ye, S.; Ding, Y.; Guo, S.; Fan, N. Inhibitory Action of Ginkgolic Acid against Pathogenic Fungi and Characterisation of Its Inhibitory Activities on Nigrospora oryzae. Folia Hortic.; 2023; 35, pp. 49-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0004]

188. Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Dai, M. Improving Crop Drought Resistance with Plant Growth Regulators and Rhizobacteria: Mechanisms, Applications, and Perspectives. Plant Commun.; 2022; 3, 100228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100228]

189. Sudheer, S.; Bai, R.G.; Usmani, Z.; Sharma, M. Insights on Engineered Microbes in Sustainable Agriculture: Biotechnological Developments and Future Prospects. Curr. Genom.; 2020; 21, pp. 321-333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389202921999200603165934]

190. Allison, S.D. Microbial Drought Resistance May Destabilize Soil Carbon. Trends Microbiol.; 2023; 31, pp. 780-787. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2023.03.002]

191. Azeem, M.; Sun, T.-R.; Jeyasundar, P.G.S.A.; Han, R.-X.; Li, H.; Abdelrahman, H.; Shaheen, S.M.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Li, G. Biochar-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter (BDOM) and Its Influence on Soil Microbial Community Composition, Function, and Activity: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2023; 53, pp. 1912-1934. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2023.2190333]

192. Yadav, V.K.; Raghav, M.; Sharma, S.K.; Bhagat, N. Rhizobacteriome: Promising Candidate for Conferring Drought Tolerance in Crops. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol.; 2020; 14, pp. 73-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.14.1.10]

193. Fulcher, M.R.; Tancos, M.A.; Mueller, R.C.; Tannières, M. Importance of Pathobiomes to the Success of Microbial Weed Biocontrol Agents. Biol. Control; 2024; 192, 105498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105498]

194. Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C.; Li, B. Dynamic Interplay between Nano-Enabled Agrochemicals and the Plant-Associated Microbiome. Trends Plant Sci.; 2023; 28, pp. 1310-1325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2023.06.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37453924]

195. Allan, J.; Belz, S.; Hoeveler, A.; Hugas, M.; Okuda, H.; Patri, A.; Rauscher, H.; Silva, P.; Slikker, W.; Sokull-Kluettgen, B. et al. Regulatory Landscape of Nanotechnology and Nanoplastics from a Global Perspective. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.; 2021; 122, 104885. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104885] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617940]

196. Rossi, S.; Antal, A.; Bestmann, S.; Bikson, M.; Brewer, C.; Brockmöller, J.; Carpenter, L.L.; Cincotta, M.; Chen, R.; Daskalakis, J.D. et al. Safety and Recommendations for TMS Use in Healthy Subjects and Patient Populations, with Updates on Training, Ethical and Regulatory Issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin. Neurophysiol.; 2021; 132, pp. 269-306. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003]

197. Sofo, A.; Zanella, A.; Ponge, J. Soil Quality and Fertility in Sustainable Agriculture, with a Contribution to the Biological Classification of Agricultural Soils. Soil Use Manag.; 2022; 38, pp. 1085-1112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12702]

198. Kumawat, K.C.; Razdan, N.; Saharan, K. Rhizospheric Microbiome: Bio-Based Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture Development and Future Perspectives. Microbiol. Res.; 2022; 254, 126901. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126901]

199. Diatta, A.A.; Min, D.; Jagadish, S.V.K. Drought Stress Responses in Non-Transgenic and Transgenic Alfalfa—Current Status and Future Research Directions. Adv. Agron.; 2021; 170, pp. 35-100.

200. Afzal, I.; Javed, T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Modern Seed Technology: Seed Coating Delivery Systems for Enhancing Seed and Crop Performance. Agriculture; 2020; 10, 526. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110526]

201. Qiu, Y.; Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.; Chen, Z.; Taylor, A.G. Biostimulant Seed Coating Treatments to Improve Cover Crop Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy; 2020; 10, 154. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020154]

202. Sheoran, S.; Kaur, Y.; Kumar, S.; Shukla, S.; Rakshit, S.; Kumar, R. Recent Advances for Drought Stress Tolerance in Maize (Zea Mays L.): Present Status and Future Prospects. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 872566. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.872566]

203. Akbar, S.; Coiera, E.; Magrabi, F. Safety Concerns with Consumer-Facing Mobile Health Applications and Their Consequences: A Scoping Review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.; 2020; 27, pp. 330-340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz175]

204. Testa, C.J.; Hu, C.; Shvedova, K.; Wu, W.; Sayin, R.; Casati, F.; Halkude, B.S.; Hermant, P.; Shen, D.E.; Ramnath, A. et al. Design and Commercialization of an End-to-End Continuous Pharmaceutical Production Process: A Pilot Plant Case Study. Org. Process Res. Dev.; 2020; 24, pp. 2874-2889. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00383]

205. Haddi, K.; Turchen, L.M.; Viteri Jumbo, L.O.; Guedes, R.N.; Pereira, E.J.; Aguiar, R.W.; Oliveira, E.E. Rethinking Biorational Insecticides for Pest Management: Unintended Effects and Consequences. Pest. Manag. Sci.; 2020; 76, pp. 2286-2293. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5837] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237033]

206. Karlsson Green, K.; Stenberg, J.A.; Lankinen, Å. Making Sense of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in the Light of Evolution. Evol. Appl.; 2020; 13, pp. 1791-1805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13067] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908586]

207. Lundin, O.; Rundlöf, M.; Jonsson, M.; Bommarco, R.; Williams, N.M. Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management—Expanding the Concept. Front. Ecol. Environ.; 2021; 19, pp. 283-291. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.2325]

208. Snyder, L.D.; Gómez, M.I.; Power, A.G. Crop Varietal Mixtures as a Strategy to Support Insect Pest Control, Yield, Economic, and Nutritional Services. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.; 2020; 4, 60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00060]

209. Kumar, V.; Nautiyal, C.S. Plant Abiotic and Biotic Stress Alleviation: From an Endophytic Microbial Perspective. Curr. Microbiol.; 2022; 79, 311. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03012-2]

210. Pereira, S.I.A.; Abreu, D.; Moreira, H.; Vega, A.; Castro, P.M.L. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Improve the Growth and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Maize (Zea Mays L.) under Water Deficit Conditions. Heliyon; 2020; 6, e05106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05106]

211. Wang, H.; Liu, R.; You, M.P.; Barbetti, M.J.; Chen, Y. Pathogen Biocontrol Using Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPR): Role of Bacterial Diversity. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 1988. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091988]

212. Adedeji, A.A.; Häggblom, M.M.; Babalola, O.O. Sustainable Agriculture in Africa: Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to the Rescue. Sci. Afr.; 2020; 9, e00492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00492]

213. Muter, O. Current Trends in Bioaugmentation Tools for Bioremediation: A Critical Review of Advances and Knowledge Gaps. Microorganisms; 2023; 11, 710. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030710]

214. Afridi, M.S.; Ali, S.; Salam, A.; César Terra, W.; Hafeez, A.; Sumaira,; Ali, B.; Al Tami, M.S.; Ameen, F.; Ercisli, S. et al. Plant Microbiome Engineering: Hopes or Hypes. Biology; 2022; 11, 1782. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11121782] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552290]

215. Neshat, M.; Abbasi, A.; Hosseinzadeh, A.; Sarikhani, M.R.; Dadashi Chavan, D.; Rasoulnia, A. Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPR) Induce Antioxidant Tolerance against Salinity Stress through Biochemical and Physiological Mechanisms. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants; 2022; 28, pp. 347-361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01128-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35400886]

216. Łotocka, B.; Wysokińska, E.; Pitera, E.; Szpadzik, E. Ultrastructure of Receptive Stigma and Transmitting Tissue at Anthesis in Two Pear Species. Acta Agrobot.; 2023; 76, 169344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa/169344]

217. Das, P.P.; Singh, K.R.; Nagpure, G.; Mansoori, A.; Singh, R.P.; Ghazi, I.A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, J. Plant-Soil-Microbes: A Tripartite Interaction for Nutrient Acquisition and Better Plant Growth for Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Environ. Res.; 2022; 214, 113821. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113821]

218. Alsharif, W.; Saad, M.M.; Hirt, H. Desert Microbes for Boosting Sustainable Agriculture in Extreme Environments. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 11, 1666. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01666]

219. Wiesnerová, L.; Hřebečková, T.; Jablonský, I.; Koudela, M. Effect of Different Water Contents in the Substrate on Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus Jacq. P. Kumm. Folia Hortic.; 2023; 35, pp. 25-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0002]

220. Łysiak, G.P.; Szot, I. The Possibility of Using Fruit-Bearing Plants of Temperate Climate in the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes. Life; 2023; 13, 1795. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13091795]

221. Trivedi, P.; Mattupalli, C.; Eversole, K.; Leach, J.E. Enabling Sustainable Agriculture through Understanding and Enhancement of Microbiomes. New Phytol.; 2021; 230, pp. 2129-2147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17319]

222. Ullah, S.; Bano, A.; Ullah, A.; Shahid, M.A.; Khan, N. A Comparative Study of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Sowing Methods on Nutrient Availability in Wheat and Rhizosphere Soil under Salinity Stress. Rhizosphere; 2022; 23, 100571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100571]

223. Shaffique, S.; Khan, M.A.; Imran, M.; Kang, S.-M.; Park, Y.-S.; Wani, S.H.; Lee, I.-J. Research Progress in the Field of Microbial Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 870626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.870626]

224. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ali, D.F.I.; Xiong, Y.-C.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Ulhassan, Z.; Shaghaleh, H.; AbdElgawad, H.; Farooq, M. et al. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Soybean Plants Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Bradyrhizobium under Drought Stress. BMC Plant Biol.; 2021; 21, 195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02949-z]

225. Gehring, C.A.; Sthultz, C.M.; Flores-Rentería, L.; Whipple, A.V.; Whitham, T.G. Tree Genetics Defines Fungal Partner Communities That May Confer Drought Tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2017; 114, pp. 11169-11174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704022114]

226. Alwutayd, K.M.; Rawat, A.A.; Sheikh, A.H.; Almeida-Trapp, M.; Veluchamy, A.; Jalal, R.; Karampelias, M.; Froehlich, K.; Alzaed, W.; Tabassum, N. et al. Microbe-induced Drought Tolerance by ABA-mediated Root Architecture and Epigenetic Reprogramming. EMBO Rep.; 2023; 24, e56754. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.202256754]

227. Xie, J.; Dawwam, G.E.; Sehim, A.E.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, D. Drought Stress Triggers Shifts in the Root Microbial Community and Alters Functional Categories in the Microbial Gene Pool. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 744897. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.744897]

228. Akhtar, M.N.; Balodi, R.; Ghatak, A. Microbe-Mediated Mitigation of Plant Stress. Microbial Services in Restoration Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 271-282.

229. Sood, G.; Kaushal, R.; Sharma, M. Alleviation of Drought Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Using Endogenous Endophyte Bacillus subtilis in North West Himalayas. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci.; 2020; 70, pp. 361-370. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1743749]

230. Bauer, S.; McNamara, J.M.; Barta, Z. Environmental Variability, Reliability of Information and the Timing of Migration. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.; 2020; 287, 20200622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0622]

231. Sangare, N.; Lo-Yat, A.; Le Moullac, G.; Pecquerie, L.; Thomas, Y.; Lefebvre, S.; Gendre, R.L.; Beliaeff, B.; Andréfouët, S. Impact of Environmental Variability on Pinctada Margaritifera Life-History Traits: A Full Life Cycle Deb Modeling Approach. Ecol. Modell.; 2020; 423, 109006. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109006]

232. Watson, J.W.; Boyd, R.; Dutta, R.; Vasdekis, G.; Walker, N.D.; Roy, S.; Everitt, R.; Hyder, K.; Sibly, R.M. Incorporating Environmental Variability in a Spatially-Explicit Individual-Based Model of European Sea Bass. Ecol. Modell.; 2022; 466, 109878. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109878]

233. Castelo, W.F.L.; Martins, M.V.A.; Martínez-Colón, M.; Guerra, J.V.; Dadalto, T.P.; Terroso, D.; Soares, M.F.; Frontalini, F.; Duleba, W.; Socorro, O.A.A. et al. Disentangling Natural vs. Anthropogenic Induced Environmental Variability during the Holocene: Marambaia Cove, SW Sector of the Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2021; 28, pp. 22612-22640. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12179-9]

234. Kumar, R.E.; Tiihonen, A.; Sun, S.; Fenning, D.P.; Liu, Z.; Buonassisi, T. Opportunities for Machine Learning to Accelerate Halide-Perovskite Commercialization and Scale-Up. Matter; 2022; 5, pp. 1353-1366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.04.016]

235. Usmani, Z.; Sharma, M.; Awasthi, A.K.; Lukk, T.; Tuohy, M.G.; Gong, L.; Nguyen-Tri, P.; Goddard, A.D.; Bill, R.M.; Nayak, S.C. et al. Lignocellulosic Biorefineries: The Current State of Challenges and Strategies for Efficient Commercialization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2021; 148, 111258. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111258]

236. Saini, R.; Osorio-Gonzalez, C.S.; Hegde, K.; Brar, S.K.; Magdouli, S.; Vezina, P.; Avalos-Ramirez, A. Lignocellulosic Biomass-Based Biorefinery: An Insight into Commercialization and Economic Standout. Curr. Sustain./Renew. Energy Rep.; 2020; 7, pp. 122-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40518-020-00157-1]

237. Mula, C.; Zybura, N.; Hipp, T. From Digitalized Start-up to Scale-up: Opening the Black Box of Scaling in Digitalized Firms towards a Scaling Process Framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change; 2024; 202, 123275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123275]

238. Chen, Y.; Ma, X.; Ma, W.; Xu, L.; Lai, C.; Zhang, X.; Guan, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lai, Z. et al. AGL61/80 Regulates BGAL9, Which Participates in Early Somatic Embryogenesis and Increases Longan Resistance to Heat Stress. Fruit Res.; 2024; 4, e013. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.48130/frures-0024-0005]

239. Poveda, J.; Eugui, D. Combined Use of Trichoderma and Beneficial Bacteria (Mainly bacillus and Pseudomonas): Development of Microbial Synergistic Bio-Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture. Biol. Control; 2022; 176, 105100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105100]

240. Paravar, A.; Piri, R.; Balouchi, H.; Ma, Y. Microbial Seed Coating: An Attractive Tool for Sustainable Agriculture. Biotechnol. Rep.; 2023; 37, e00781. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00781]

241. Ebrahimi-Zarandi, M.; Etesami, H.; Glick, B.R. Fostering Plant Resilience to Drought with Actinobacteria: Unveiling Perennial Allies in Drought Stress Tolerance. Plant Stress; 2023; 10, 100242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100242]

242. Bonanomi, G.; De Filippis, F.; Zotti, M.; Idbella, M.; Cesarano, G.; Al-Rowaily, S.; Abd-ElGawad, A. Repeated Applications of Organic Amendments Promote Beneficial Microbiota, Improve Soil Fertility and Increase Crop Yield. Appl. Soil Ecol.; 2020; 156, 103714. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103714]

243. Imran,; Amanullah,; Arif, M.; Shah, Z.; Bari, A. Integration of Peach (Prunus persica L.) Residues, Beneficial Microbes and Phosphorous Enhance Phenology, Growth and Yield of Soybean. Russ. Agric. Sci.; 2020; 46, pp. 223-230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S1068367420030064]

244. Warrad, M.; Hassan, Y.M.; Mohamed, M.S.M.; Hagagy, N.; Al-Maghrabi, O.A.; Selim, S.; Saleh, A.M.; AbdElgawad, H. A Bioactive Fraction from Streptomyces sp. Enhances Maize Tolerance against Drought Stress. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2020; 30, pp. 1156-1168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03034]

245. Imathiu, S. Benefits and Food Safety Concerns Associated with Consumption of Edible Insects. NFS J.; 2020; 18, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2019.11.002]

246. Khaliq, A.; Perveen, S.; Alamer, K.H.; Zia Ul Haq, M.; Rafique, Z.; Alsudays, I.M.; Althobaiti, A.T.; Saleh, M.A.; Hussain, S.; Attia, H. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Symbiosis to Enhance Plant–Soil Interaction. Sustainability; 2022; 14, 7840. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14137840]

247. Ayilara, M.S.; Adeleke, B.S.; Akinola, S.A.; Fayose, C.A.; Adeyemi, U.T.; Gbadegesin, L.A.; Omole, R.K.; Johnson, R.M.; Uthman, Q.O.; Babalola, O.O. Biopesticides as a Promising Alternative to Synthetic Pesticides: A Case for Microbial Pesticides, Phytopesticides, and Nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol.; 2023; 14, 1040901. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1040901]

248. Morales-Quintana, L.; Moya, M.; Santelices-Moya, R.; Cabrera-Ariza, A.; Rabert, C.; Pollmann, S.; Ramos, P. Improvement in the Physiological and Biochemical Performance of Strawberries under Drought Stress through Symbiosis with Antarctic Fungal Endophytes. Front. Microbiol.; 2022; 13, 939955. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.939955]

249. Li, M.; Ren, Y.; He, C.; Yao, J.; Wei, M.; He, X. Complementary Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes and Trichoderma Strains on Growth and Active Ingredient Accumulation of Astragalus Mongholicus under Drought Stress. J. Fungi; 2022; 8, 920. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090920]

250. Chen, Y.; Kang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, Z.; He, X.; Li, X.; Tavajohi, N. et al. A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Safety Concerns: The Issues, Strategies, and Testing Standards. J. Energy Chem.; 2021; 59, pp. 83-99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017]

251. Djebaili, R.; Pellegrini, M.; Rossi, M.; Forni, C.; Smati, M.; Del Gallo, M.; Kitouni, M. Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Traits and Inoculation Effects on Triticum Durum of Actinomycetes Isolates under Salt Stress Conditions. Soil Syst.; 2021; 5, 26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5020026]

252. Ahmad, H.M.; Fiaz, S.; Hafeez, S.; Zahra, S.; Shah, A.N.; Gul, B.; Aziz, O.; Mahmood-Ur-Rahman,; Fakhar, A.; Rafique, M. et al. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Eliminate the Effect of Drought Stress in Plants: A Review. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 875774. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.875774]

253. Afridi, M.S.; Fakhar, A.; Kumar, A.; Ali, S.; Medeiros, F.H.V.; Muneer, M.A.; Ali, H.; Saleem, M. Harnessing Microbial Multitrophic Interactions for Rhizosphere Microbiome Engineering. Microbiol. Res.; 2022; 265, 127199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127199]

254. Yan, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, R.; Ju, M.; Gu, P. Transcriptional Response of Wolfberry to Infestation with the Endophytic Fusarium nematophilum Strain NQ8GII4. Plant Dis.; 2024; 108, pp. 1514-1525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-23-1397-RE]

255. Iqbal, S.; Iqbal, M.A.; Li, C.; Iqbal, A.; Abbas, R.N. Overviewing Drought and Heat Stress Amelioration—From Plant Responses to Microbe-Mediated Mitigation. Sustainability; 2023; 15, 1671. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15021671]

256. Singh, D.; Thapa, S.; Singh, J.P.; Mahawar, H.; Saxena, A.K.; Singh, S.K.; Mahla, H.R.; Choudhary, M.; Parihar, M.; Choudhary, K.B. et al. Prospecting the Potential of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms for Mitigating Drought Stress in Crop Plants. Curr. Microbiol.; 2024; 81, 84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03606-4]

257. Gu, Z.; Hu, C.; Gan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Tian, G.; Gao, L. Role of Microbes in Alleviating Crop Drought Stress: A Review. Plants; 2024; 13, 384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants13030384]

258. Khan, N.; Ali, S.; Tariq, H.; Latif, S.; Yasmin, H.; Mehmood, A.; Shahid, M.A. Water Conservation and Plant Survival Strategies of Rhizobacteria under Drought Stress. Agronomy; 2020; 10, 1683. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111683]

259. Fincheira, P.; Quiroz, A.; Tortella, G.; Diez, M.C.; Rubilar, O. Current Advances in Plant-Microbe Communication via Volatile Organic Compounds as an Innovative Strategy to Improve Plant Growth. Microbiol. Res.; 2021; 247, 126726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126726]

260. Inbaraj, M.P. Plant-Microbe Interactions in Alleviating Abiotic Stress—A Mini Review. Front. Agron.; 2021; 3, 667903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.667903]

261. Vessey, J.K. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers. Plant Soil; 2003; 255, pp. 571-586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893]

262. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in Agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2012; 28, pp. 1327-1350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9]

263. Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E. How the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Azospirillum Promotes Plant Growth—A Critical Assessment. Adv. Agron.; 2010; 108, pp. 77-136.

264. Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Prabhu, S.R.; Hernandez, J.-P. Advances in Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Inoculant Technology: Formulations and Practical Perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil; 2014; 378, pp. 1-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x]

265. Glick, B.R. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Scientifica; 2012; 2012, 963401. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401]

266. Pérez-Montaño, F.; Alías-Villegas, C.; Bellogín, R.A.; del Cerro, P.; Espuny, M.R.; Jiménez-Guerrero, I.; López-Baena, F.J.; Ollero, F.J.; Cubo, T. Plant Growth Promotion in Cereal and Leguminous Agricultural Important Plants: From Microorganism Capacities to Crop Production. Microbiol. Res.; 2014; 169, pp. 325-336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011]

267. Van Der Heijden, M.G.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; Van Straalen, N.M. The Unseen Majority: Soil Microbes as Drivers of Plant Diversity and Productivity in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Ecol. Lett.; 2008; 11, pp. 296-310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x]

268. Ryan, M.H.; Graham, J.H. Is There a Role for Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Production Agriculture?. Plant Soil; 2002; 244, pp. 263-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020207631893]

269. Herrmann, L.; Lesueur, D. Challenges of Formulation and Quality of Biofertilizers for Successful Inoculation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2013; 97, pp. 8859-8873. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8]

270. Singh, J.S.; Pandey, V.C.; Singh, D.P. Efficient Soil Microorganisms: A New Dimension for Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Development. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.; 2011; 140, pp. 339-353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.017]

271. Malusá, E.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Ciesielska, J. Technologies for Beneficial Microorganisms Inocula Used as Biofertilizers. Sci. World J.; 2012; 2012, 491206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/491206]

272. Bakos, J.L.; Ladányi, M.; Szalay, L. Frost Hardiness of Flower Buds of 16 Apricot Cultivars during Dormancy. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 81-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0005]

273. Barrios, E. Soil Biota, Ecosystem Services and Land Productivity. Ecol. Econ.; 2007; 64, pp. 269-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004]

274. Smith, P.; Bustamante, M.; Ahammad, H.; Clark, H.; Dong, H.; Elsiddig, E.A.; Tubiello, F. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014.

275. EL-Bauome, H.A.; Doklega, S.M.; Saleh, S.A.; Mohamed, A.S.; Suliman, A.A.; Abd El-Hady, M.A.M. Effects of Melatonin on Lettuce Plant Growth, Antioxidant Enzymes and Photosynthetic Pigments under Salinity Stress Conditions. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 1-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0001]

276. San-Martín-Hernández, C.; Martínez-Téllez, M.Á.; Valenzuela-Amavizca, O.N.; Aispuro-Hernández, E.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M.; Hernández-Camarillo, E.; López-Martínez, L.X.; Quintana-Obregón, E.A. Byrsonima crassifolia L. Kunth a Bio-Resource with Potential: Overview and Opportunities. Folia Hortic.; 2023; 35, pp. 61-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0005]

277. Compant, S.; Clément, C.; Sessitsch, A. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in the Rhizo- and Endosphere of Plants: Their Role, Colonization, Mechanisms Involved and Prospects for Utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2010; 42, pp. 669-678. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024]

278. O’Callaghan, M. Microbial Inoculation of Seed for Improved Crop Performance: Issues and Opportunities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2016; 100, pp. 5729-5746. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7590-9]

279. Rutkowski, K.; Łysiak, G.P. Weather Conditions, Orchard Age and Nitrogen Fertilization Influences Yield and Quality of ‘Łutówka’ Sour Cherry Fruit. Agriculture; 2022; 12, 2008. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122008]

280. Siddique, S.; Naveed, M.; Yaseen, M.; Shahbaz, M. Exploring Potential of Seed Endophytic Bacteria for Enhancing Drought Stress Resilience in Maize (Zea mays L.). Sustainability; 2022; 14, 673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14020673]

281. Hwang, H.-H.; Chien, P.-R.; Huang, F.-C.; Yeh, P.-H.; Hung, S.-H.W.; Deng, W.-L.; Huang, C.-C. A Plant Endophytic Bacterium Priestia Megaterium StrainBP-R2 Isolated from the Halophyte Bolboschoenus Planiculmis Enhances Plant Growth under Salt and Drought Stresses. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 2047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10102047]

282. Diagne, N.; Ngom, M.; Djighaly, P.I.; Fall, D.; Hocher, V.; Svistoonoff, S. Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Growth and Performance: Importance in Biotic and Abiotic Stressed Regulation. Diversity; 2020; 12, 370. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d12100370]

283. Nawaz, T.; Saud, S.; Gu, L.; Khan, I.; Fahad, S.; Zhou, R. Cyanobacteria: Harnessing the Power of Microorganisms for Plant Growth Promotion, Stress Alleviation, and Phytoremediation in the Era of Sustainable Agriculture. Plant Stress; 2024; 11, 100399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100399]

284. Sharma, A.; Usha,; Gupta, S.; Chaubey, K.K.; Singh, S.V. An Overview of Microbial-Mediated Alleviation of Abiotic Stress Response in Plant. Plant Stress Mitigators; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 581-596.

285. Verma, H.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, V.; Kumari, M.; Singh, S.K.; Sharma, V.K.; Droby, S.; Santoyo, G.; White, J.F.; Kumar, A. The Potential Application of Endophytes in Management of Stress from Drought and Salinity in Crop Plants. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 1729. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081729]

286. Castaño, C.; Suarez-Vidal, E.; Zas, R.; Bonet, J.A.; Oliva, J.; Sampedro, L. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi with Hydrophobic Mycelia and Rhizomorphs Dominate in Young Pine Trees Surviving Experimental Drought Stress. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2023; 178, 108932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108932]

287. Ullah, S.; Ikram, M.; Sarfaraz, S.; ul Haq, I.; Khan, A.; Murad, Z.; Munsif, F. Influence of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the Growth and Yield of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Under Salt Stress. J. Crop Health; 2024; 76, pp. 1221-1234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-01006-7]

288. Ha-Tran, D.M.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Hung, S.-H.; Huang, E.; Huang, C.-C. Roles of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Stimulating Salinity Stress Defense in Plants: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 3154. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063154] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808829]

289. Meier, M.A.; Lopez-Guerrero, M.G.; Guo, M.; Schmer, M.R.; Herr, J.R.; Schnable, J.C.; Alfano, J.R.; Yang, J. Rhizosphere Microbiomes in a Historical Maize-Soybean Rotation System Respond to Host Species and Nitrogen Fertilization at the Genus and Subgenus Levels. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2021; 87, e03132-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03132-20]

290. Li, H.-P.; Han, Q.-Q.; Liu, Q.-M.; Gan, Y.-N.; Rensing, C.; Rivera, W.L.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, J.-L. Roles of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria in Mediating Soil Legacy Phosphorus Availability. Microbiol. Res.; 2023; 272, 127375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127375] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058784]

291. Poudel, M.; Mendes, R.; Costa, L.A.S.; Bueno, C.G.; Meng, Y.; Folimonova, S.Y.; Garrett, K.A.; Martins, S.J. The Role of Plant-Associated Bacteria, Fungi, and Viruses in Drought Stress Mitigation. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 743512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.743512]

292. Mushtaq, A.; Rawat, S. Plant–Microbe Interactions: An Insight into the Underlying Mechanisms to Mitigate Diverse Environmental Stresses. Microbes and Signaling Biomolecules Against Plant Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 127-150.

293. Panda, D.; Mishra, S.S.; Behera, P.K. Drought Tolerance in Rice: Focus on Recent Mechanisms and Approaches. Rice Sci.; 2021; 28, pp. 119-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.01.002]

294. Bashir, S.S.; Hussain, A.; Hussain, S.J.; Wani, O.A.; Zahid Nabi, S.; Dar, N.A.; Baloch, F.S.; Mansoor, S. Plant Drought Stress Tolerance: Understanding Its Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip.; 2021; 35, pp. 1912-1925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2021.2020161]

295. Wicław, H.; Podlasiński, M. Morphological Differences between Natural Populations of Carex viridula (Cyperaceae): Effects of Soil Conditions. Ann. Bot. Fenn.; 2013; 50, pp. 13-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5735/085.050.0102]

296. Murali, M.; Singh, S.B.; Gowtham, H.G.; Shilpa, N.; Prasad, M.; Aiyaz, M.; Amruthesh, K.N. Induction of Drought Tolerance in Pennisetum glaucum by ACC Deaminase Producing PGPR- Bacillus amyloliquefaciens through Antioxidant Defense System. Microbiol. Res.; 2021; 253, 126891. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126891]

297. French, E.; Kaplan, I.; Iyer-Pascuzzi, A.; Nakatsu, C.H.; Enders, L. Emerging Strategies for Precision Microbiome Management in Diverse Agroecosystems. Nat. Plants; 2021; 7, pp. 256-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00830-9]

298. Markuszewski, B.; Bieniek, A.A.; Wachowska, U.; Bieniek, A.; Krzymińska, I. Effect of Biological Treatment Used before Harvesting and Storage Methods on the Quality, Health and Microbial Characteristics of Unripe Hazelnut in the Husk (Corylus avellana L.). PeerJ; 2022; 10, e12760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12760] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174012]

299. Dellagnezze, B.M.; Sierra-Garcia, I.N. Immobilization of Microbial Inoculants for Improving Soil Nutrient Bioavailability. Microbial Inoculants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 161-181.

300. Ulukapi, K.; Nasircilar, A.G. The Role of Exogenous Glutamine on Germination, Plant Development and Transcriptional Expression of Some Stress-Related Genes in Onion under Salt Stress. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 19-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0002]

301. Abbasi, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Safaie, N. Streptomyces Alleviate Drought Stress in Tomato Plants and Modulate the Expression of Transcription Factors ERF1 and WRKY70 Genes. Sci. Hortic.; 2020; 265, 109206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109206]

302. Tymoszuk, A.; Szałaj, U.; Wojnarowicz, J.; Kowalska, J.; Antkowiak, M.; Kulus, D. Zinc Oxide and Silver Effects on the Growth, Pigment Content and Genetic Stability of Chrysanthemums Propagated by the Node Culture Method. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 35-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0003]

303. Demir, H.; Yalçi, H.K.; Katgici, A. Ameliorative Effects of Microbial Fertiliser on Yield and Quality Parameters of Curly Lettuce and Cucumber with Fertiliser Saving. Folia Hortic.; 2023; 35, pp. 91-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0007]

304. Ahmad, R.; Anjum, M.A.; Ercisli, S.; Malik, W.; Sakar, E.; Marc, R.A.; Karunakaran, R. Physico-Chemical Properties Revealed Huge Diversity in 50 Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Genotypes. Folia Hortic.; 2023; 35, pp. 107-122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0008]

305. Bahmani, R.; Razavi, F.; Mortazavi, S.N.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Gohari, G. Chitosan–Putrescine Nanoparticle Coating Attenuates Postharvest Decay and Maintains ROS Scavenging System Activity of Strawberry Cv. ‘Camarosa’ during Cold Storage. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 149-160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0009]

306. Kunc, N.; Hudina, M.; Osterc, G.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Changes in Various Secondary Metabolites by Crossing Modern Rose Cultivars. Folia Hortic.; 2024; 36, pp. 161-185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2024-0010]

307. Żelazny, W.R.; Licznar-Małańczuk, M. Living Mulch Persistence in an Apple Orchard and Its Effect on the Weed Flora in Temperate Climatic Conditions. Weed Res.; 2022; 62, pp. 85-99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wre.12515]

308. Bieniek, A.; Lachowicz-Wiśniewska, S.; Bojarska, J. The Bioactive Profile, Nutritional Value, Health Benefits and Agronomic Requirements of Cherry Silverberry (Elaeagnus multiflora Thunb.): A Review. Molecules; 2022; 27, 2719. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092719]

309. Bokszczanin, K.Ł.; Przybyłko, S.; Molska-Kawulok, K.; Wrona, D. Tree Root-Associated Microbial Communities Depend on Various Floor Management Systems in an Intensive Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) Orchard. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2023; 24, 9898. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129898]

310. Sosna, I.; Fudali, E. Living Mulches In-Rows as an Alternative for Herbicide Fallow in a Pear Pyrus communis L. Orchard. Hortic. Sci.; 2024; 51, pp. 160-167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17221/14/2023-HORTSCI]