1. Introduction
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic non-contagious inflammatory skin disorder characterized by subcutaneous nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring [1,2]. HS primarily affects body regions rich in apocrine glands, such as the axillary, inguinal, gluteal, and inframammary areas [3]. The estimated prevalence of HS in the general population ranges from 0.05% to 4.0%, with diagnostic delays of up to 7 years due to non-specific symptoms and frequent misdiagnoses [4]. The exact etiology and pathogenesis of HS remain unclear [5]. The management of HS includes a range of therapeutic strategies, such as antibiotics to mitigate inflammation, novel biologic agents targeting specific cytokines implicated in HS pathogenesis, and surgical interventions for advanced cases [6]. Despite the availability of optimal treatments, the possibility of therapeutic resistance and lesion recurrence underscores the importance of integrating lifestyle modifications to enhance the treatment outcomes [7].
For patients with HS, lifestyle modifications that target the diet, physical activity, and weight management may help reduce disease severity [8]. Diets thought to alleviate HS symptoms typically focus on an increased intake of fruits and vegetables while reducing processed foods, refined carbohydrates, and sugars [8]. As such, the Mediterranean diet has gained attention for its health benefits and potential to reduce inflammation [9]. This diet emphasizes the consumption of extra-virgin olive oil, vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, and nuts, along with moderate amounts of fish, dairy products, and red wine, while limiting eggs and sweets [10]. The Mediterranean diet’s anti-inflammatory effects are attributed to its high content of fiber, polyphenols, carotenoids, and omega-3 fatty acids [10,11,12]. In contrast, the Western diet, which is rich in dairy products and refined carbohydrates, may cause hair follicle blockage. Dairy components such as casein and whey increase IGF-1 and insulin levels, respectively, thereby enhancing androgen receptor activity and exacerbating HS symptoms. Foods with a high glycemic index (GI), such as junk food (e.g., cakes, chocolate, cookies, and potato chips) and bakery products, may also worsen HS severity by inducing hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism [9].
Research has shown that patients with HS exhibit higher insulin resistance than age- and sex-matched controls, even after adjusting for body mass index [13]. The association between high-glycemic-index foods and HS is further supported by the presence of anti-CEL antibodies, which are linked to advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in patients with HS [14]. AGEs bind to specific receptors, triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF-α, which contribute to follicular hyperkeratosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [9]. As a result, a low-glycemic-index diet has been proposed as potentially beneficial for HS by reducing insulin spikes and androgen receptor activation [9,15].
Additionally, elimination diets that exclude nightshade vegetables (Solanaceae) have been suggested to relieve HS symptoms, possibly due to their glycoalkaloid content, including alpha-tomatine, capsaicin, and solanine [4]. However, evidence supporting specific dietary interventions for HS remains limited [9]. The 2018 British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines on HS management and the 2019 U.S. and Canadian clinical guidelines have both concluded that there is insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend any specific diet or nutrient supplementation for HS [16,17]. Therefore, further comprehensive research is needed to better understand the role of diet in HS management [18].
Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the nutritional status of patients with HS and investigate the relationship between HS’s clinical severity and modifiable lifestyle factors beyond diet, including body composition, anthropometric measurements, and physical activity levels. By clarifying the potential impact of these modifiable factors, our goal was to inform the development of more effective management strategies for patients with HS.
2. Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional, case–control study was conducted at the Dermatology and Venereology outpatient clinics of Hacettepe University Hospitals, Turkey, between January 2023 and January 2024. Approval for the study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Hacettepe University (16 March 2021; no. 202/06-22). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles laid out in the Declaration of Helsinki. The nature and scope the study were explained to all participants, and written informed consent was obtained.
2.1. Study Sample
The study included 50 patients diagnosed with HS and 50 controls, matched for body mass index (BMI), sex, and age. The control group consisted of individuals who attended the dermatology department due to skin disorders other than HS, such as xerosis cutis, and who did not have any chronic inflammatory diseases. Individuals in both groups were excluded if they were using multivitamin–mineral or antioxidant supplements, receiving any medical nutrition therapy, or pregnant or lactating. Data collected for both groups included sociodemographic characteristics, 3-day food records, food intake frequency for specific food items (dairy products, nightshade vegetables, junk foods, and bakery products), 24 h physical activity logs, body composition, anthropometric measurements, and Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) scores. The macronutrient and micronutrient intake, as well as the dietary GI, were also calculated. The severity of HS was assessed in the patient group.
2.2. Three-Day Food Records
A 3-day food diary was obtained from each participant to document the daily intake. These records were examined for macronutrient and micronutrient content using the Nutrition Information Systems Software. The food items consumed were entered into the program in grams, enabling the calculation of macronutrient and micronutrient content for each item.
2.3. Dietary Glycemic Index
The glycemic index (GI) was determined using each participant’s 3-day food records. The average GI of the diet was calculated based on the international glycemic index table by Atkinson et al. [19].
2.4. Food Frequency Questionnaire
This questionnaire was used to assess the quantity and frequency of foods identified in the literature as potentially associated with HS symptoms [4]. These foods included dairy products (e.g., milk, yogurt, cheese, and kefir), nightshade vegetables (e.g., potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, and peppers), refined sugar, junk foods (e.g., cakes, chocolate, cookies, and potato chips), and bakery products (e.g., bread, bagels, pastries, and pizza). The frequency of consumption was categorized as frequent (daily or 5–6 times per week), moderate (1–4 times per week), or rare (less than once per week).
2.5. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet
The adherence to the Mediterranean diet was assessed using the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Scale (MEDAS) developed by Schröder et al. [20]. The scale includes questions on core components of the Mediterranean diet, such as the consumption of extra-virgin olive oil, vegetables, fruits, oilseeds, and fish. A total MEDAS score ranging from 0 to 5 is classified as low adherence, a score between 6 and 9 indicates moderate adherence, and a score of ≥10 represents high adherence. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, while lower scores reflect non-adherence.
2.6. Body Composition and Anthropometric Measurements
Body weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured for all the participants. The BMI and waist-to-hip ratio were subsequently calculated. Body composition was analyzed using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (Tanita MC-980, Tanita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
2.7. Physical Activity Level
Each participant’s physical activity level (PAL) was assessed through a 24 h physical activity record. PAL values between 1.40 and 1.69 were considered sedentary, 1.70 to 1.99 was classified as moderate, and values of 2.0 or higher were categorized as vigorous physical activity, based on the WHO criteria [21].
2.8. Clinical Severity Assessment
For each patient, the clinical severity of HS was determined using the Hurley system and the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). The Hurley system, developed in 1989 and still widely used, qualitatively assesses HS in three stages based on the presence of nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring [22]. The IHS4, a more recent tool, provides a quantitative assessment of disease severity based on the number of nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and sinuses. In this scale, scores of 3 or below indicate mild HS, scores of 4–10 indicate moderate HS, and scores of 11 or higher indicate severe HS [23]. Additionally, data regarding the age at which the disease manifested, the age at which a diagnosis was given, the length of time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis, and the overall duration of the disease were gathered.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Qualitative data are presented as the frequency and percentage, while quantitative data are shown as the mean and standard deviation. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data distribution. Group comparisons were made using the Chi-square test for qualitative data, an independent samples t-test for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine relationships between normally distributed variables, while Spearman correlation analysis was employed for non-normally distributed variables. Additionally, linear regression analysis was used to identify predictive relationships. A significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all tests.
3. Results
No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, sex, physical activity level (PAL), anthropometric measurements, or body composition. Among the HS patients, 18% were classified as stage I, 28% as stage II, and 54% as stage III according to the Hurley staging system. Based on IHS4 scoring, 8% of the patients were categorized as having mild HS, 30% as moderate, and 62% as severe. The general characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.
A 3-day food consumption record was collected from both the HS patients and the controls. The mean dietary GI was significantly higher in the HS group than in the control group. Additionally, the food consumption records revealed that the HS group had significantly lower intakes of vitamin C and iron compared to the control group. The dietary GI and daily macro- and micronutrient intakes, based on the 3-day food records for both groups, are presented in Table 2.
The frequency of cheese and yogurt consumption, as well as junk food consumption, was significantly higher in HS patients compared to the control group. Furthermore, the daily intake of yogurt, peppers, nightshade vegetables (including potatoes, eggplants, tomatoes, and peppers), and junk food was significantly greater for HS patients than for the control group. Table 3 provides a comparison of the frequency and daily consumption quantities of these foods between the two groups.
The data from the MEDAS questionnaire indicated that the mean adherence score to the Mediterranean diet was 4.30 ± 1.78 for the HS group and 6.04 ± 1.92 for the control group (p = 0.000). In this study, the HS group demonstrated low adherence to the Mediterranean diet, while the control group exhibited moderate adherence. A significant majority of the patients with HS (86%, 43/50) showed low adherence to the Mediterranean diet, while 14% (7/50) demonstrated moderate adherence, and none (0%) achieved high adherence. In contrast, 56% (28/50) of the control group exhibited low adherence, 34% (17/50) demonstrated moderate adherence, and 10% (5/50) showed high adherence.
The highest frequency of affirmative responses was found for the use of extra-virgin olive oil as the primary culinary lipid: 60.0% (30/50) for HS patients and 72.0% (36/50) for controls. Conversely, the lowest frequency of affirmative responses was observed for the consumption of wine at ≥7 glasses per week (0% for both groups). Although some individuals in both groups consumed alcohol, none reported regularly consuming wine. Table 4 presents the MEDAS scores and response rates for dietary items listed in the MEDAS questionnaire.
Compared to the controls, the patients with HS showed significant differences in the consumption of extra-virgin olive oil, red meats, processed meats, butter, cream, margarine, carbonated beverages, sugar-sweetened beverages, and commercial pastries such as cookies or cake (p < 0.05). Additionally, specific dietary habits were associated with lower IHS4 scores, including using extra-virgin olive oil as the primary culinary lipid, consuming more than four tablespoons of extra-virgin olive oil daily, consuming three or more servings of nuts weekly, and limiting the intake of commercial pastries to fewer than two servings per day (p < 0.05). Furthermore, both the use of extra-virgin olive oil as the primary cooking fat and a daily intake of more than four tablespoons were associated with a reduction in the Hurley staging, as assessed by the Hurley staging system (p < 0.05).
Correlation analyses of clinical severity were conducted using both the Hurley staging and IHS4 scores. The results showed negative correlations between the IHS4 score and PAL, MEDAS score, and daily vitamin C intake. In contrast, positive correlations were observed between IHS4 scores and dietary glycemic index, daily intake of energy, protein, and fat, as well as BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, fat mass, and visceral fat in patients with HS.
Similarly, daily vitamin C intake, zinc intake, and the MEDAS score were negatively correlated with Hurley staging, while the dietary glycemic index and visceral fat were positively correlated with Hurley staging. The daily consumption of refined sugar, junk food, and bakery products was positively correlated with both Hurley staging and IHS4 scores. Table 5 shows the correlations between Hurley staging, IHS4 scores, and variables such as PAL, anthropometric measurements, BIA measurements, nutritional factors, MEDAS scores, and the daily consumption of specific foods.
Univariate regression analysis identified the MEDAS score and PAL as negative predictors of HS disease severity, while dietary glycemic index and BMI emerged as positive predictors. In multivariate models, however, only the MEDAS score consistently emerged as a significant predictor of HS disease severity for both Hurley staging and IHS4 scores (Table 6).
4. Discussion
This study is one of the most comprehensive investigations to date that has aimed to elucidate the impact of nutritional factors and adherence to the Mediterranean diet on the severity of HS. The primary findings of this cross-sectional case–control study indicate significant associations between the clinical severity of HS and several modifiable lifestyle factors. In particular, the study found that higher IHS4 scores in HS patients were associated with lower adherence to the Mediterranean diet; dietary patterns characterized by a higher glycemic index, increased energy, higher protein and fat intake, and reduced vitamin C consumption; elevated anthropometric measurements (e.g., body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio); increased BIA parameters (e.g., visceral fat, body fat mass); and reduced physical activity levels. Similarly, Hurley staging showed an inverse association with adherence to the Mediterranean diet and dietary vitamin C and zinc intake while exhibiting a positive association with visceral fat.
Obesity is widely recognized as a significant factor that exacerbates HS progression [1], and numerous studies have reported a positive correlation between higher BMI and greater disease severity in patients with HS [4,17,24,25]. In line with those reports, we found a positive correlation between BMI and IHS4 scores; however, no significant association was observed with Hurley staging. Additionally, the key indicators of abdominal obesity—waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and visceral fat—were significantly associated with IHS4 scores.
Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was another key focus of this study. We found that patients with HS had a significantly lower adherence to the Mediterranean diet compared to the control group, and disease severity was negatively correlated with adherence. Specifically, a high intake of olive oil and nuts, as well as the minimal consumption of commercial pastries, were most strongly associated with reduced disease severity. According to our findings, so far, only three studies have examined the effect of the Mediterranean diet on HS disease severity [12,26,27]. Barrea et al. [26] reported that greater compliance with the Mediterranean diet was linked to lower Sartorius scores. Similarly, Lorite-Fuentes et al. [27] found that higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet was correlated with lower self-reported Hurley and IHS4 scores. However, Velluzzi et al. [12] did not identify any notable correlations between disease severity and dietary factors. Nevertheless, their HS patients demonstrated lower adherence to the Mediterranean diet and more unfavorable anthropometric measurements compared to the control group [12].
Following the Mediterranean diet, another dietary model that stands out for its impact on HS symptoms is the ketogenic diet. A 28-day pilot study by Verde et al. [28] demonstrated that obese women with HS who adhered to a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) experienced significant reductions in disease severity, systemic inflammatory markers (including trimethylamine-N-oxide [TMAO], oxidized low-density lipoprotein [ox-LDL], and derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites [dROMs]), as well as improvements in anthropometric measures such as BMI and fat mass. The dietary regimen was carefully designed to be low in energy, was supplemented with essential vitamins and minerals to prevent deficiencies, and incorporated high-biological-value protein sources, including egg, pea, soy, and whey proteins. While these findings highlight the potential benefits of VLCKD for HS management, randomized longitudinal studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of this dietary approach [28].
Our analysis revealed that higher intakes of energy, protein, and fat were associated with elevated IHS4 scores, and a positive correlation was observed between the consumption of refined sugar, junk food, and bakery products, and increased disease severity. These findings align with previous research suggesting that diets rich in fat and sugar may exacerbate HS symptoms [29,30,31]. The Western diet, characterized by high-glycemic index foods, red meat, dairy products, and egg protein, has similarly been implicated in the worsening of HS severity [32]. Furthermore, studies have indicated that patients with HS have greater insulin resistance than age- and sex-matched controls, even after adjusting for BMI [13]. In light of these findings, a low-glycemic index diet has been proposed as a potentially beneficial dietary approach for managing HS [15]. In our study, the intake of a high-GI diet was significantly more common among patients with HS than controls, and higher GI was correlated with greater disease severity.
Dairy products may have adverse effects on HS [33]. Components of cow milk, such as casein, whey proteins, hormones, and growth factors, can elevate androgen receptor activity by increasing insulin and IGF-1 levels, leading to hyperandrogenism and potentially exacerbating HS symptoms [33]. Additionally, the amino acid leucine, present in dairy products, may contribute to HS by activating the mTOR pathway [32]. Notably, many patients with HS who eliminated dairy products from their diet reported improvements in their symptoms [34]. Furthermore, certain components of nightshade vegetables, such as alkaloids, alpha-tomatine, and capsaicin, are thought to affect HS progression negatively [4]. Dempsey et al. [30] reported that 75.8% of the 242 patients in their study modified at least one component of their diet, most commonly by reducing gluten, dairy products, refined sugars, tomatoes, and alcohol. However, these dietary modifications improved symptoms in some patients while exacerbating them in others. Another study by Fernandez et al. [29] reported that 32.6% of patients with HS identified specific foods—particularly sweets, bread/pasta, dairy products, and high-fat foods—as aggravating their condition. In our study, we observed a positive correlation between cheese consumption and Hurley staging, indicating that a higher cheese intake may be associated with greater disease severity. While dairy elimination diets have shown benefits in some cases, they should be reserved for HS patients with confirmed sensitivities or intolerances or evaluated on an individual basis [35].
A review of the macro- and micronutrient intake from the 3-day food records for both the HS and control groups showed lower intakes of vitamin C and iron in patients with HS compared to the controls. Daily vitamin C intake was negatively correlated with both IHS4 scores and Hurley staging, while zinc intake was negatively correlated with Hurley staging alone. Vitamin C is known to play a therapeutic role in skin health by stabilizing collagen, regulating ceramide levels, promoting wound healing, and exerting antioxidant effects [36]. Zinc, on the other hand, is crucial in regulating both innate and adaptive immune responses, and is involved in metabolic and hormonal pathways [9]. Its essential role in immune regulation and wound healing suggests its involvement in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin diseases such as HS, which are driven by immune dysregulation [9]. The lower serum zinc levels observed in patients with HS, compared to controls, suggest that zinc supplementation could serve as a beneficial adjunctive therapy [37].
We also observed a significant negative correlation between PAL and IHS4 scores, although no significant association was found with Hurley staging. This finding is consistent with the results of Lorite-Fuentes et al. [27], who noted that vigorous physical activity was associated with reduced IHS4 scores. While physical activity can support weight management and reduce inflammation [8], many patients face challenges in maintaining regular physical activity due to painful lesions and discomfort with movement [38]. Factors such as increased body temperature, sweating, and friction during exercise can also aggravate symptoms, discouraging patients from engaging in sports [38].
The findings of this study highlight the potential role of dietary strategies in managing HS; however, their integration into clinical practice may not be straightforward. A multidisciplinary approach involving dermatologists and dietitians can support the development of individualized dietary interventions. Nonetheless, future longitudinal studies are needed to validate these findings and establish robust dietary guidelines for HS management.
This study has several limitations, including its cross-sectional design, which precludes the establishment of causal relationships. Additionally, IGF-1 and insulin levels were not investigated, which could have provided further insights into the impact of high-glycemic index foods and dairy products on the disease severity. The study was conducted in a single geographic region, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to populations with different cultural and dietary patterns. However, the study’s strengths include the matched groups for age, sex, and BMI and its contribution to the relatively limited literature on the relationship between HS and nutrition.
5. Conclusions
Implementing practical lifestyle changes, such as adherence to the Mediterranean diet, maintaining a low-glycemic index diet, and sustaining an ideal body weight, may be effective strategies for reducing the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa. Therefore, incorporating dietary considerations into the treatment plan may be beneficial for managing the disease. Long-term studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.
Conceptualization, S.D.-G., M.F. and F.K.; methodology, S.D.-G., M.F. and F.K.; software, F.K. and M.F.; validation, S.D.-G., F.K. and M.F.; formal analysis, F.K. and M.F.; investigation, F.K.; resources, F.K.; data curation, M.F. and F.K.; writing—original draft preparation, F.K. and M.F.; writing—review and editing, S.D.-G., F.K. and M.F.; visualization, F.K.; supervision, M.F. and S.D.-G.; project administration, M.F. and S.D.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hacettepe University on 16 March 2021 (202/06-22) and is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in this study.
The data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
General characteristics of the participants.
HS Patients | Controls | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 34.06 ± 11.36 | 34.16 ± 9.55 | 0.702 |
Sex | |||
Female | 20 | 20 | 1.00 |
Male | 30 | 30 | |
Physical Activity | |||
PAL | 1.56 ± 0.062 | 1.58 ± 0.081 | 0.266 |
Anthropometric Measurements | |||
Height (m) | 172.12 ± 8.62 | 171.84 ± 9.07 | 0.874 |
Weight (kg) | 83.61 ± 20.20 | 80.29 ± 13.92 | 0.605 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.99 ± 6.08 | 27.16 ± 4.17 | 0.989 |
Waist Circumference (cm) | 93.44 ± 19.96 | 90.46 ± 14.10 | 0.642 |
Hip Circumference (cm) | 105.56 ± 11.90 | 106.04 ± 8.41 | 0.280 |
Waist-to-Hip Ratio | 0.87 ± 0.11 | 0.84 ± 0.11 | 0.202 |
Body Composition | |||
Fat Mass (kg) | 24.02 ± 11.44 | 21.58 ± 7.36 | 0.530 |
Fat Mass (%) | 27.64 ± 8.63 | 26.76 ± 7.24 | 0.615 |
Visceral Fat (%) | 7.60 ± 5.60 | 6.96 ± 3.99 | 0.923 |
Fat-Free Mass (%) | 72.57 ± 8.40 | 73.04 ± 7.14 | 0.828 |
Muscle Mass (%) | 69.07 ± 8.05 | 72.0 ± 10.5 | 0.869 |
Bone Mineral (%) | 3.63 ± 0.43 | 3.66 ± 0.33 | 0.699 |
Total Body Water (%) | 51.06 ± 5.97 | 53.22 ± 5.30 | 0.73 |
HS-Related Data | |||
Disease Duration (Years) | 10.32 (±7.91) | - | - |
Delay in Diagnosis (Years) | 5.28 (±6.08) | - | - |
Age at Diagnosis (Years) | 29.16 (±10.36) | - | - |
Age at Disease Onset | 23.68 (±9.01) | - | - |
Hurley Stage | |||
I | 9 (18%) | - | - |
II | 14 (28%) | ||
III | 27 (54%) | ||
IHS4 | |||
Mild | 4 (8%) | - | - |
Moderate | 15 (30%) | ||
Severe | 31 (62%) | ||
Mean IHS4 Score | 9.20 ± 3.42 | - | - |
Dietary glycemic index and daily macro- and micronutrient intake.
Nutritional Factor | HS Patients | Controls | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
Dietary Glycemic Index | 59.96 ± 6.31 | 55.01 ± 5.72 | 0.000 |
Energy (kcal/day) | 2079.85 ± 376.06 | 2160.74 ± 413.37 | 0.205 |
Protein (g) | 82.33 ± 20.90 | 86.71 ± 20.66 | 0.170 |
Protein (%) | 16.40 ± 3.90 | 16.56 ± 3.56 | 0.614 |
Fat (g) | 79.56 ± 18.78 | 82.74 ± 21.23 | 0.465 |
Fat (%) | 34.04 ± 4.07 | 33.98 ± 4.40 | 0.662 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 250.73 ± 55.82 | 259.22 ± 58.84 | 0.659 |
Carbohydrate (%) | 49.38 ± 6.31 | 49.26 ± 5.52 | 0.686 |
Fiber (g) | 25.07 ± 6.97 | 26.99 ± 8.20 | 0.288 |
Vitamin A | 1469.82 ± 1132.96 | 1742.79 ± 2479.21 | 0.804 |
Vitamin B12 | 3.64 ± 1.82 | 4.38 ± 4.99 | 0.860 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 109.54 ± 53.65 | 141.43 ± 44.72 | 0.001 |
Iron (mg) | 13.28 ± 3.08 | 15.16 ± 4.19 | 0.039 |
Zinc (mg) | 11.52 ± 3.36 | 12.08 ± 2.71 | 0.197 |
A bolded p-value indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Frequency and daily intake of foods.
Food | Consumption | Group | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
HS Patients | Controls | |||
Cow Milk | Frequent | 8 | 17 | 0.086 |
Moderate | 19 | 12 | ||
Rare | 23 | 21 | ||
AI * | 57.58 ± 76.23 | 68.68 ± 68.90 | 0.434 | |
Cheese | Frequent | 39 | 36 | 0.025 |
Moderate | 9 | 4 | ||
Rare | 2 | 10 | ||
AI * | 42.34 ± 25.98 | 35.36 ± 22.73 | 0.121 | |
Yogurt | Frequent | 27 | 17 | 0.011 |
Moderate | 18 | 16 | ||
Rare | 5 | 17 | ||
AI * | 119.94 ± 80.58 | 79.12 ± 39.95 | 0.007 | |
Kefir | Frequent | 0 | 0 | 0.307 |
Moderate | 3 | 1 | ||
Rare | 47 | 49 | ||
AI * | 2.62 ± 6.94 | 4.00 ± 12.51 | 0.228 | |
Dairy Products, Total ** | AI * | 222.48 ± 120.79 | 187.72 ± 88.11 | 0.133 |
Potatoes | Frequent | 15 | 19 | 0.176 |
Moderate | 24 | 15 | ||
Rare | 11 | 16 | ||
AI * | 62.60 ± 63.88 | 54.10 ± 43.85 | 0.708 | |
Eggplants | Frequent | 1 | 1 | 0.472 |
Moderate | 25 | 31 | ||
Rare | 24 | 18 | ||
AI * | 36.62 ± 36.78 | 34.58 ± 29.17 | 0.863 | |
Tomatoes | Frequent | 41 | 34 | 0.268 |
Moderate | 7 | 12 | ||
Rare | 2 | 4 | ||
AI * | 88.24 ± 52.55 | 71.38 ± 49.80 | 0.088 | |
Peppers | Frequent | 25 | 32 | 0.215 |
Moderate | 19 | 11 | ||
Rare | 6 | 7 | ||
AI * | 49.98 ± 43.39 | 29.66 ± 28.74 | 0.000 | |
Nightshade Vegetables, Total *** | AI * | 237.44 ± 98.67 | 189.72 ± 67.42 | 0.009 |
Refined Sugar | Frequent | 27 | 33 | 0.142 |
Moderate | 11 | 4 | ||
Rare | 12 | 13 | ||
AI * | 15.34 ± 10.04 | 11.98 ± 9.27 | 0.068 | |
Junk Foods | Frequent | 20 | 17 | 0.039 |
Moderate | 22 | 14 | ||
Rare | 8 | 19 | ||
AI * | 36.02 ± 26.12 | 15.52 ± 10.86 | 0.000 | |
Bakery Products | Frequent | 50 | 50 | - |
Moderate | 0 | 0 | ||
Rare | 0 | 0 | ||
AI * | 263.80 ± 104.07 | 253.1 ± 84.35 | 0.737 |
A bolded p-value indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). * AI: average intake (g/day). ** Dairy products, total: cow milk, cheese, yogurt, kefir. *** Nightshade vegetables, total: potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, eggplants.
Response rates for the dietary items listed in the MEDAS questionnaire.
MEDAS | HS Patients | Controls | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
MEDAS Score | 4.30 ± 1.78 | 6.04 ± 1.92 | 0.000 |
% | % | ||
Low adherence | 86% (43) | 56% (28) | 0.002 |
Moderate adherence | 14% (7) | 34% (17) | |
High adherence | 0% (0) | 10% (5) | |
Primary use of extra-virgin olive oil | 60.0% (30) | 72.0% (36) | 0.205 |
Extra-virgin olive oil, >4 tablespoons/day | 26.0% (13) | 48.0% (24) | 0.023 |
Vegetables, ≥2 servings/day | 34.0% (17) | 30.0% (15) | 0.668 |
Fruits, ≥3 servings/day | 28.0% (14) | 38.0% (19) | 0.288 |
Red meat/processed meat, <1 serving/day | 44.0% (22) | 68.0% (34) | 0.016 |
Butter, cream, and margarine, <1 serving/day | 40.0% (20) | 74.0% (37) | 0.001 |
Carbonated and/or sugar-sweetened beverages, <1 serving/day | 40.0% (20) | 60.0% (30) | 0.046 |
Wine, ≥7 glasses/week | %0 (0) | %0 (0) | - |
Pulses, ≥3 servings/week | 34.0% (17) | 46.0% (23) | 0.221 |
Fish/seafood, ≥3 servings/week | 8.0% (4) | 2.0% (1) | 0.169 |
Commercial pastries such as cookies or cake, <2 servings/day | 24.0% (12) | 46.0% (23) | 0.035 |
Nuts, ≥3 servings/day | 40.0% (20) | 58.0% (29) | 0.072 |
Poultry rather than red meat | 32.0% (16) | 44.0% (22) | 0.216 |
Olive oil vegetable sauce, ≥2 servings/day | 20.0% (10) | 16.0% (8) | 0.603 |
A bolded p-value indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Correlations with the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa.
Variable | Hurley Staging | IHS4 Score | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r | p-Value | r | p-Value | |
Physical Activity | ||||
Physical Activity Level (PAL) | −0.092 | 0.523 | −0.287 | 0.043 |
Anthropometric Measurements | ||||
Height (m) | 0.103 | 0.476 | 0.126 | 0.385 |
Weight (kg) | 0.202 | 0.159 | 0.409 | 0.003 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.191 | 0.185 | 0.380 | 0.006 |
Waist Circumference (cm) | 0.233 | 0.120 | 0.421 | 0.002 |
Hip Circumference (cm) | 0.137 | 0.343 | 0.373 | 0.008 |
Waist-to-Hip Ratio | 0.254 | 0.075 | 0.371 | 0.008 |
BIA Measurements | ||||
FM (kg) | 0.112 | 0.440 | 0.315 | 0.026 |
Fat Mass (%) | −0.016 | 0.913 | 0.129 | 0.373 |
Visceral Fat (%) | 0.320 | 0.024 | 0.463 | 0.001 |
Fat-Free Mass (%) | 0.052 | 0.722 | −0.094 | 0.514 |
Muscle Mass (%) | 0.058 | 0.688 | −0.088 | 0.542 |
Bone Mineral (%) | 0.025 | 0.863 | −0.126 | 0.384 |
Total Body Water (%) | 0.051 | 0.727 | −0.019 | 0.897 |
Nutritional Factors | ||||
Glycemic Index | 0.439 | 0.001 | 0.372 | 0.008 |
Energy (kcal/day) | 0.214 | 0.136 | 0.368 | 0.009 |
Protein (g) | 0.257 | 0.072 | 0.332 | 0.018 |
Protein (%) | 0.147 | 0.309 | 0.105 | 0.466 |
Fat (g) | 0.261 | 0.067 | 0.375 | 0.007 |
Fat (%) | 0.228 | 0.111 | 0.202 | 0.160 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 0.009 | 0.949 | 0.154 | 0.285 |
Carbohydrate (%) | −0.241 | 0.092 | −0.225 | 0.117 |
Fiber (g) | 0.194 | 0.177 | 0.229 | 0.110 |
Vitamin A | 0.156 | 0.279 | 0.169 | 0.241 |
Vitamin B12 | 0.090 | 0.534 | 0.162 | 0.261 |
Vitamin C (mg) | −0.291 | 0.040 | −0.309 | 0.029 |
Iron (mg) | 0.192 | 0.182 | 0.256 | 0.073 |
Zinc (mg) | −0.338 | 0.016 | −0.213 | 0.137 |
Adherence to Mediterranean Diet | ||||
MEDAS Score | −0.580 | 0.000 | −0.687 | 0.000 |
Daily Consumption of Specific Foods | ||||
Cow Milk | 0.166 | 0.249 | 0.092 | 0.526 |
Cheese | 0.315 | 0.026 | 0.248 | 0.082 |
Yogurt | 0.077 | 0.597 | −0.096 | 0.508 |
Kefir | 0.166 | 0.249 | 0.127 | 0.380 |
Dairy Products, Total * | 0.233 | 0.103 | 0.055 | 0.706 |
Potatoes | 0.108 | 0.454 | 0.152 | 0.292 |
Eggplants | 0.183 | 0.204 | 0.105 | 0.469 |
Tomatoes | −0.173 | 0.230 | −0.247 | 0.083 |
Peppers | −0.013 | 0.931 | −0.021 | 0.884 |
Nightshade Vegetables, Total ** | 0.041 | 0.779 | −0.004 | 0.980 |
Refined Sugar | 0.581 | 0.000 | 0.580 | 0.000 |
Junk Foods | 0.487 | 0.000 | 0.507 | 0.000 |
Bakery Products | 0.296 | 0.037 | 0.410 | 0.003 |
A bolded p-value indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). * Dairy products, total: cow milk, cheese, yogurt, kefir. ** Nightshade vegetables, total: potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, eggplants.
Factors potentially associated with disease severity.
IHS4 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate (Beta) | Model R2 | p-Value * | Multivariate (Beta) | Model R2 | p-Value ** |
PAL | −19.583 (6.378) | 0.164 | 0.004 * | −7.357 (6.623) | 0.500 | 0.273 |
MEDAS | −1.316 (0.201) | 0.472 | 0.000 * | −1.265 (0.287) | 0.000 * | |
GI | 0.202 (0.073) | 0.139 | 0.008 * | 0.059 (0.063) | 0.352 | |
BMI | 0.214 (0.075) | 0.145 | 0.006 * | −0.084 (0.086) | 0.335 | |
Hurley Stage | ||||||
Variable | Univariate (Beta) | Model R2 | p-Value * | Multivariate (Beta) | Model R2 | p-Value ** |
PAL | −2.570 (1.538) | 0.055 | 0.101 | −0.719 (1.606) | 0.428 | 0.657 |
MEDAS | −0.252 (0.051) | 0.336 | 0.000 * | −0.278 (0.070) | 0.000 * | |
GI | 0.054 (0.016) | 0.193 | 0.001 * | 0.027 (0.015) | 0.083 | |
BMI | 0.024 (0.018) | 0.036 | 0.185 | −0.037 (0.021) | 0.081 |
* p-value after using a simple linear regression model to compare the IHS4 score/Hurley stage and the other variables. ** p-value after using a multivariate regression model adjusted for PAL, MEDAS, glycemic index, and BMI. A bolded p-value indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
References
1. Choi, F.; Lehmer, L.; Ekelem, C.; Mesinkovska, N.A. Dietary and metabolic factors in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review. Int. J. Dermatol.; 2020; 59, pp. 143-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14691] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651051]
2. Johnston, L.A.; Alhusayen, R.; Bourcier, M.; Delorme, I.; George, R.; O’brien, E.; Wong, S.M.; Poelman, S.M. Practical guidelines for managing patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: An update. J. Cutan. Med. Surg.; 2022; 26, (Suppl. S2), pp. 2S-24S. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/12034754221116115] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000460]
3. Nowak-Liduk, A.; Kitala, D.; Ochała-Gierek, G.; Łabuś, W.; Bergler-Czop, B.; Pietrauszka, K.; Niemiec, P.; Szyluk, K.; Gierek, M. Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Interdisciplinary Problem in Dermatology, Gynecology, and Surgery—Pathogenesis, Comorbidities, and Current Treatments. Life; 2023; 13, 1895. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13091895] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763299]
4. Silfvast-Kaiser, A.; Youssef, R.; Paek, S.Y. Diet in hidradenitis suppurativa: A review of published and lay literature. Int. J. Dermatol.; 2019; 58, pp. 1225-1230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14465] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31006861]
5. Sabat, R.; Jemec, G.B.E.; Matusiak, Ł.; Kimball, A.B.; Prens, E.; Wolk, K. Hidradenitis suppurativa. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.; 2020; 6, 18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0149-1]
6. Goldburg, S.R.; Strober, B.E.; Payette, M.J. Hidradenitis suppurativa: Current and emerging treatments. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.; 2020; 82, pp. 1061-1082. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.089]
7. Hendricks, A.J.; Hirt, P.A.; Sekhon, S.; Vaughn, A.R.; Lev-Tov, H.A.; Hsiao, J.L.; Shi, V.Y. Non-pharmacologic approaches for hidradenitis suppurativa—A systematic review. J. Dermatol. Treat.; 2021; 32, pp. 11-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1621981]
8. Weber, I.; Giefer, J.; Martin, K.L. Effects of Exercise and Dietary Modifications on Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.; 2023; 24, pp. 343-357. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40257-023-00756-w]
9. Vural, S.; Baskurt, D.; Yıldırıcı, Ş.; Rasulova, G.; Danacı, S.; Botsalı, A. Evaluating dietary considerations in hidradenitis suppurativa: A critical examination of existing knowledge. Int. J. Dermatol.; 2024; 63, pp. 987-998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17101]
10. Davis, C.; Bryan, J.; Hodgson, J.; Murphy, K. Definition of the Mediterranean diet: A literature review. Nutrients; 2015; 7, pp. 9139-9153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7115459]
11. Pisanu, S.; Palmas, V.; Madau, V.; Casula, E.; Deledda, A.; Cusano, R.; Uva, P.; Vascellari, S.; Boi, F.; Loviselli, A. et al. Impact of a moderately hypocaloric mediterranean diet on the gut microbiota composition of Italian obese patients. Nutrients; 2020; 12, 2707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12092707] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899756]
12. Velluzzi, F.; Anedda, J.; Pisanu, S.; Dell'Antonia, M.; Deledda, A.; Boi, A.; Ferreli, C.; Atzori, L. Mediterranean diet, lifestyle and quality of life in sardinian patients affected with hidradenitis suppurativa. J. Public Health Res.; 2022; 11, jphr.2021.2706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2706] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850622]
13. Vilanova, I.; Hernández, J.; Mata, C.; Durán, C.; García-Unzueta, M.; Portilla, V.; Fuentevilla, P.; Corrales, A.; González-Vela, M.; González-Gay, M. et al. Insulin resistance in hidradenitis suppurativa: A case–control study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.; 2018; 32, pp. 820-824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14894] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29485215]
14. Macchiarella, G.; Macchiarella, G.; Cornacchione, V.; Cornacchione, V.; Cojean, C.; Cojean, C.; Riker, J.; Riker, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. et al. Disease association of anti–carboxyethyl lysine autoantibodies in hidradenitis suppurativa. J. Investig. Dermatol.; 2023; 143, pp. 273-283.e12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2022.08.051]
15. Jamgochian, M.; Alamgir, M.; Rao, B. Diet in dermatology: Review of diet’s influence on the conditions of rosacea, hidradenitis suppurativa, herpes labialis, and vitiligo. Am. J. Lifestyle Med.; 2023; 17, pp. 152-160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15598276211026592]
16. Ingram, J.; Collier, F.; Brown, D.; Burton, T.; Burton, J.; Chin, M.; Desai, N.; Goodacre, T.; Piguet, V.; Pink, A. et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) 2018. Br. J. Dermatol.; 2019; 180, pp. 1009-1017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17537]
17. Alikhan, A.; Sayed, C.; Alavi, A.; Alhusayen, R.; Brassard, A.; Burkhart, C.; Crowell, K.; Eisen, D.B.; Gottlieb, A.B.; Hamzavi, I. et al. North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part I: Diagnosis, evaluation, and the use of complementary and proce-dural management. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.; 2019; 81, pp. 76-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.067]
18. Khan, A.; Chang, M.W. The role of nutrition in acne vulgaris and hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin. Dermatol.; 2022; 40, pp. 114-121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.04.001]
19. Atkinson, F.S.; Foster-Powell, K.; Brand-Miller, J.C. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values 2021: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2021; 114, pp. 1625-1632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab233]
20. Schröder, H.; Fitó, M.; Estruch, R.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Corella, D.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.; Ros, E.; Salaverría, I.; Fiol, M. et al. A short screener is valid for assessing mediterranean diet adherence among older spanish men and women. J. Nutr.; 2011; 141, pp. 1140-1145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.135566]
21. FAOWHOUNU. Human Energy Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation; FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series, No. 1; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004; pp. 1-96.
22. Ovadja, Z.; Schuit, M.; Horst, C.; Lapid, O. Inter- and intrarater reliability of Hurley staging for hidradenitis suppurativa. Br. J. Dermatol.; 2019; 181, pp. 344-349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17588]
23. Zouboulis, C.C.; Tzellos, T.; Kyrgidis, A.; Jemec, G.B.E.; Bechara, F.G.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Ingram, J.R.; Kanni, T.; Karagiannidis, I.; Martorell, A. et al. Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS 4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity. Br. J. Dermatol.; 2017; 177, pp. 1401-1409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15748] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28636793]
24. Riis, P.T.; Saunte, D.; Benhadou, F.; del Marmol, V.; Guillem, P.; El-Domyati, M.; Abdel-Wahab, H.; Antoniou, C.; Dessinioti, C.; Gürer, M. et al. Low and high body mass index in hidradenitis suppurativa patients—Different subtypes?. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.; 2018; 32, pp. 307-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14599]
25. Saunte, D.M.L.; Jemec, G.B.E. Hidradenitis suppurativa: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA; 2017; 318, pp. 2019-2032. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.16691]
26. Barrea, L.; Fabbrocini, G.; Annunziata, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Donnarumma, M.; Marasca, C.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Role of nutrition and adherence to the mediterranean diet in the multidisciplinary approach of hidradenitis suppurativa: Evaluation of nutritional status and its association with severity of disease. Nutrients; 2018; 11, 57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010057] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597889]
27. Lorite-Fuentes, I.; Montero-Vilchez, T.; Arias-Santiago, S.; Molina-Leyva, A. Potential benefits of the mediterranean diet and physical activity in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A cross-sectional study in a spanish population. Nutrients; 2022; 14, 551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14030551]
28. Verde, L.; Cacciapuoti, S.; Caiazzo, G.; Megna, M.; Martora, F.; Cavaliere, A.; Mattera, M.; Maisto, M.; Tenore, G.C.; Colao, A. et al. Very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (Acne Inversa): An effective and safe tool for improvement of the clinical severity of disease. Results of a pilot study. J. Transl. Med.; 2024; 22, 149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-04853-0]
29. Fernandez, J.M.; Marr, K.D.; Hendricks, A.J.; Price, K.N.; Ludwig, C.M.; Maarouf, M.; Hsiao, J.L.; Shi, V.Y. Alleviating and exacerbating foods in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol. Ther.; 2020; 33, e14246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.14246]
30. Dempsey, A.; Butt, M.; Kirby, J.S. Prevalence and impact of dietary avoidance among individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology; 2020; 236, pp. 289-295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000503063]
31. Belamarić, M.; Miše, J.; Mokos, Z.B. The Association Between Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Diet: An Update. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat.; 2023; 31, pp. 213-219.
32. Maarouf, M.; Platto, J.F.; Shi, V.Y. The role of nutrition in inflammatory pilosebaceous disorders: Implication of the skin-gut axis. Australas. J. Dermatol.; 2019; 60, pp. E90-E98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12909] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175843]
33. De, D.R.; Rick, J.W.; Shih, T.; Alavi, A.; Hsiao, J.L.; Shi, V.Y. Lifestyle modifications and complementary treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol. Rev.; 2022; 3, pp. 126-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/der2.117]
34. Danby, F.W. Diet in the prevention of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa). J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.; 2015; 73, pp. S52-S54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.042] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26470617]
35. Haddad, N.R. The role of diet in managing hidradenitis suppurativa: A review of current evidence and future directions. Arch. Dermatol. Res.; 2024; 316, 508. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-03243-2]
36. Joshi, M.; Hiremath, P.; John, J.; Ranadive, N.; Nandakumar, K.; Mudgal, J. Modulatory role of vitamins A, B3, C, D, and E on skin health, immunity, microbiome, and diseases. Pharmacol. Rep.; 2023; 75, pp. 1096-1114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43440-023-00520-1]
37. Poveda, I.; Vilarrasa, E.; Martorell, A.; García-Martínez, F.J.; Segura, J.M.; Hispán, P.; Sánchez-Payá, J.; Álvarez, P.J.; González, I.; Pascual, J.C. Serum zinc levels in hidradenitis suppurativa: A case–control study. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.; 2018; 19, pp. 771-777. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40257-018-0374-5]
38. Long, V.; Tham, S.-L.; Choi, E.C.-E.; Chandran, N.S. Exercise Recommendations for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients Exercise for patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Ski. Appendage Disord.; 2023; 9, pp. 392-396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000532116]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease primarily affecting hair follicles, characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tract formation. Recent evidence suggests that weight management and nutritional factors may influence HS symptoms. This cross-sectional case–control study aimed to assess the impact of body composition and nutritional factors on HS severity. Materials and Methods: We included 50 patients with HS and 50 matched controls comparable in body mass index (BMI), sex, and age. The data collected included 3-day food records, a food frequency questionnaire, 24 h physical activity records, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) scores, body composition, and anthropometric measurements. The macronutrient and micronutrient intake, as well as dietary glycemic index (GI), were analyzed. HS severity was assessed using the Hurley staging system and the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4). Results: HS patients exhibited significantly lower adherence to the Mediterranean diet and a higher dietary GI compared to controls. Their micronutrient intake was also reduced, while the consumption of junk food, dairy products, and nightshade vegetables was more frequent. The MEDAS scores and physical activity levels were negatively correlated with the IHS4 scores, while higher anthropometric measurements, dietary energy, protein, total fat, and GI showed positive correlations. The Hurley stage was negatively correlated with the MEDAS scores and positively correlated with the GI and visceral fat. In multiple regression analysis, the MEDAS score emerged as the primary variable associated with disease severity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that an increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet, intake of food with a lower GI, and maintaining an ideal body weight may positively affect HS management. Long-term studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
2 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey;
3 Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey;