Introduction
The minimum acceptable diet (MAD) is a combination of the minimum dietary diversity (MDD) and minimum meal frequency (MMF) for the child aged 6–23 months during the previous day [1]. Minimum dietary diversity assesses food intake among children aged 6–23 months from at least five out of eight food groups during the previous day [2]. Minimum meal frequency is the percentage of children 6–23 months of age who consumed solid, semi-solid, or soft foods at least the minimum number of times during the previous day [1, 2].
Globally, only two-thirds of 6-8-month-olds are receiving any solid food at all; of this, 1 in 2 children receives a minimum meal frequency, and less than 1 in 3 receives minimum dietary diversity. Considering both minimum meal frequency and minimum diet diversity, only about 1 in 6 children receives a minimally acceptable diet [3, 4]. In developing countries, 1 in 5 children aged 6 to 23 months is fed the minimum recommended diverse diet [5]. According to the 2019 Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey (EMDHS), 11% of children aged 6–23 months meet the minimum standards concerning all three infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices (breastfeeding status, number of food groups, and times) they fed during the day or night before the survey. This indicates only 1 in 9 children receives a minimally acceptable diet, which is very low compared to the national recommendation [6].
At least one in three children is not getting the nutrients they need to grow well, particularly in the crucial first 1,000 days and often beyond [5]. For a child, the first two years are the period during which linear faltering of growth is most prevalent and the period when the process of becoming stunted is almost complete [7]. Inadequate dietary diversity and meal frequency lead children to undernutrition, morbidity, and mortality [6], impaired cognitive development, and low economic productivity in long life [8, 9]. These patterns reflect a profound triple burden of malnutrition that threatens the survival, growth and development of children and of nations [5]. Malnutrition has been responsible, directly or indirectly, for 60% of the deaths annually among children under five. Over two-thirds of these deaths, which were often associated with inappropriate feeding practices, occur during the first year of life [10].
In Ethiopia, more than 50% of deaths in under-five children were caused by inappropriate complementary feeding practices [11]. Undernutrition is also a major cause of disability, preventing children who survive from reaching their full developmental potential [12]. The Ethiopian government set targets to improve the nutritional status of children and to end child malnutrition by 2030 [11]. Despite the above efforts, currently, 37%, 21%, and 7% of under-five-year-old children in Ethiopia are stunted, underweight, and wasted, respectively, which might be due to a low minimum acceptable diet where only 11% of children aged 6–23 months have met the MAD [6].
In developing countries like Ethiopia, high levels of poverty contribute to persistent food insecurity, leading to various health problems. Inadequate feeding practices during infancy and childhood can result in delayed growth and development, stunting, wasting, and undernutrition, which, in turn, increase morbidity and mortality among children under five. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the prevalence and contributing factors of MAD among children aged 6–23 months to mitigate the adverse outcomes associated with inadequate nutritional practices.
Methods
Study design and setting
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 13 to April 30, 2023, in Dera, Oromia, Ethiopia. Dera is located 125 kilometers from Addis Ababa. The district is located in the Great Rift Valley and has an altitude of 1400–2500 meters above sea level with a climatic condition of 99% desert and 1% temperate. Mostly cultivated grains are wheat, teff, maize, and barley, and mostly cultivated vegetables are onions and garlic. Dera has 33714 people (17193 were females and 16521 were males). It has a total of 5539 under-five children; among these, 1804 were children aged 6–23 months.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
All children aged 6–23 months with a mother or caregiver living for at least 6 months or more were included in the study. Children whose mothers or caregivers were seriously ill and not able to respond to the interviews were excluded from the study.
Sample size and sampling technique
The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula by assuming the proportion of the minimum acceptable diet of 13.8% taken from Aleta wondo District of Sidama Region [13], a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, and a margin of error of 3%. After adding a 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 436. A systematic sampling technique was used to select the study participants.
Study variables and measurements
The dependent variable is the minimum acceptable diet. Independent variables include socio-demographic factors (age of the mother, educational status of the mother and the father, monthly income of the household, occupational status of the mother and the father, family size, marital status of the mother, age, and sex of the child). Health service-related factors (ANC visit, PNC visit, GMP follow-up, and health facility delivery) and behavioral factors (media exposure, access to information on IYCF).
Data collection procedures
Dera town comprises two kebeles, both of which were selected purposively for this study. Study participants were chosen using systematic random sampling. The number of children aged 6 to 23 months with mothers/caregivers during the study period was obtained from the Dera Health Center EPI registration. The sample size was proportionally allocated based on the number of eligible children in each kebele.
The first respondent was randomly selected using the lottery method. Subsequent respondents were selected every Kth interval, where K = N/n = 1804/436 = 4 (N being the total population in the study area and n being the sample size). From each household, one eligible child with a mother/caregiver was selected. If more than one eligible child was present, one was randomly chosen by lottery method. This process was repeated until the required sample size for both kebeles was reached. If a mother/caregiver was not available on the date of data collection, the next mother was approached after two subsequent visits (S1 Fig).
Data quality control
The questionnaire was created after reviewing different pieces of literature and then adapted to the local context [2, 14–17]. Data was collected using structured questionnaires. The twenty-four-hour recall method and food frequency questionnaire were used to assess dietary diversity and meal frequency. The questionnaire was translated into the local language (the participants’ language) Afan Oromo by a language expert and translated into English to validate its consistency. A pretest on 5% of the sample size was taken in Awash Bishola kebele. Six female nurses as data collectors and two male public health officers as supervisors were involved in the survey after being trained for one day.
Data processing and analysis
Descriptive statistics like frequency and percentage were used for qualitative variables. A bivariate and multiple binary logistic regression analysis is used to determine the association between independent and dependent variables. The crude odd ratio (COR) and adjusted odd ratio (AOR) were calculated. To determine the factors statistically significantly associated with MAD, the odd ratio at 95% CI was determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The goodness of fit for the final model was evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, resulting in a p-value of 0.635. This indicates that the model is a good fit for the logistic regression. Multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). All tested variables had VIF values less than 10, indicating that there was no multicollinearity. An adjusted odd ratio with a p-value < 0.05 was used to report the significant factors associated with MAD. All analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 25).
Operational definitions
Minimum dietary diversity.
Percentage of children 6–23 months of age who consumed foods and beverages from at least five out of eight defined food groups during the previous day. Consumption of any amount of food or beverage from a food group is sufficient to “count”, i.e. there is no minimum quantity [2, 18, 19].
The eight food groups used for the tabulation of this indicator are [2]
1. Breast milk, 2. Grains; roots; tubers and plantains, 3. Pulses (beans, peas, lentils); nuts and seeds, 4. Dairy products (milk, infant formula, yogurt, cheese), 5. Flesh foods (meat, fish, poultry, organ meats), 6. Eggs, 7. Vitamin-A-rich fruits and vegetables and 8. Other fruits and vegetables.
Minimum meal frequency.
Percentage of children 6–23 months of age who consumed solid, semi-solid, or soft foods (but also including milk feeds for non-breastfed children) at least the minimum number of times during the previous day [2, 6, 19].
The minimum number of times is defined as:
Two feedings of solid, semi-solid, or soft foods for breastfeeding infants aged 6–8 months and three feedings of solid, semi-solid, or soft foods for breastfeeding children aged 9–23 months. Four feedings of solid, semi-solid, or soft foods or milk feeds for non-breastfeeding children aged 6–23 months whereby at least one of the four feeds must be a solid, semi-solid, or soft feed [2, 18, 19].
A minimum acceptable diet.
Is a combination of the minimum dietary diversity (MDD) and the minimum meal frequency (MMF) [1, 2]. For breastfed children: receiving at least the minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency for their age during the previous day; for non-breastfed children: receiving at least the minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency for their age during the previous day as well as at least two milk feeds [2].
Minimum milk feeding frequency for non-breastfed children 6–23 months (MMFF).
Percentage of non-breastfed children 6–23 months of age who consumed at least two milk feeds- during the previous day.
Infant and young child feeding practices.
Appropriate IYCFP includes early initiation (within one hour of birth) of exclusive breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, followed by nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods, while breastfeeding continues for up to two years of age or beyond [1, 20, 21].
Exposure to communication media.
Communication media encompasses a wide range of channels and tools used to convey information related to child feeding practices, such as digital media, social media, print media, broadcast media, and mobile media. In our study, if mothers had exposure to at least one of these media, they were categorized as "Yes"; otherwise, they were labeled as "No."
Ethics approval and consent to participate
An ethical issue was obtained from the Institutional Review Board Ethical Committee of Adama Hospital Medical College. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/guardian of each participant under 18 years of age.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants
Four hundred thirty (430) mothers or caregivers with their respective children aged 6–23 months participated in this study (with a response rate of 98.6%). The median age of the mothers or caregivers was 27 years, and 417 (97%) of them lived with their husbands (married). One hundred seventy (39.5%) of the mothers had an elementary level. Three hundred seventy-five (87.2%) of the mothers or caregivers were Oromo and 298 (69.3%) of them were followers of the Muslims. Around 328 (76.3%) of the mothers were housewives. Two hundred fifty-two (58.6%) of the households had less than five family members, and 153 (35.6%) had a monthly income of more than 4501 birr. More than half (50.2%) of the children were female. The majority (35.6%) of the children were in the age group of 12 and 17 months, and the median age of the children was 15 ± 10 months (Table 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Maternal and child healthcare-related characteristics
Four hundred thirty (100%) of the mothers had a history of antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, and 300 (70%) of the mothers had PNC follow-up. Regarding GMP, 404 (94%) of the children had GMP follow-up, and 401 (93.3%) of the children were delivered at health facilities. Of the total participants, 383 (89%), mothers had exposure to communication media, while 43.3% had awareness about infant and young child feeding practice (IYCFP) (Table 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Feeding practice of the children
The majority, 404 (94%) of the parents feed their children grains, roots, and tubers followed by breast milk 339 (78.8%). Only 26 (6%) of the children fed flesh food (organ meat, processed meat, any other meat, and fish or shellfish) was the least consumed food group, which was only consumed by twenty-six (6%) of children (Fig 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The diet practice for children
Regarding diet practice, 169 (39.3%) children received minimum dietary diversity, and 157 (36.5%) of them received a minimum acceptable diet. Of the total, 135 (39.8%) breast milk-feeding children received a minimum acceptable rating. Regarding non-breastfeeding children, 73 (80%) received MMF and 52 (57%) received MMFF. Among three hundred thirty-nine breastfeeding children, 276 (81.4%) received MMF (Fig 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Factors associated with the minimum acceptable diet
In the adjusted model, the odds of receiving MAD for IYC aged 6–23 months were 2.67 (AOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.25, 5.70) and 4.25 (AOR = 4.25; 95% CI: 1.40, 13.00) times higher among mothers or caregivers who had primary, and college and above-level education, respectively. The odds of gaining a MAD for mothers who had antenatal care visits ≥ 4 were 2 (AOR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.20, 3.36) times higher than their counterparts. Children aged between 12–17 months (AOR = 6.20; 95% CI: 2.81, 13.50) and between 18–23 months (AOR = 4.61; 95% CI: 2.04, 10.40) had odds of 6.2 and 4.6 times higher in gaining MAD when compared with those aged 6–8 months, respectively. The odds of gaining MAD among non-breast-feeding children were 0.15 (AOR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.31) times less than those who fed breast-milk children (Table 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Discussion
This study was aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of the minimum acceptable diet among children aged 6–23 months in Dera town, Oromia, Ethiopia. A preprint has previously been published [Charkos TG_ et.al 2024] [22]. This study revealed that the practice of providing a minimum acceptable diet in our study area was very low 36.5% (95%CI: 32, 41%), according to the World Food Program target. Key predictors of achieving a minimum acceptable diet included the mother’s educational status, antenatal care visits, the child’s age, and breastfeeding practices.
In our study setting, the practice of providing a minimum acceptable diet for children aged 6–23 months was lower than that reported in a study conducted in Mongolia (43.8%) [23], in rural areas of China (46.4%) [24], and in Latin America and the Caribbean (43.7%) [3]. The possible reasons for the discrepancy might be sample size, study setting, study period, cultural variation related to child feeding practice, and educational and economic differences within the country. Our studies were conducted in areas where culturally similar child feeding was practiced and in less educated communities.
However, this finding is higher than studies conducted in South Asia (12.1%) [3], Philippines (6.7%) [25], Sub-Saharan Africa (10.1%) [17], East Africa (11.56%) [26], Ethiopia (11%), and Oromia regional state 16.4% [6], Sidama region 13.8% [13], Goncha district, northwest Ethiopia (12.6%) [16] and Sheno town, North Showa, and Oromia (13.6%) [9]. The possible explanation for the difference might be the study period, study setting, sociodemographic characteristics of the study population, geographic variation, cultural beliefs of the countries, economic level of the study area, and the inclusion of breast milk into food groups to assess the dietary diversity of the children aged 6–23 months. The current study was conducted in economically better areas than the previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [6], as a reason a high prevalence of MAD was found. This study was conducted among urban children, a culturally similar population, and included breast milk as one food group according to the revised indicators of the IYCF assessment. In other sides, our findings was lower than studies conducted in Addis Ababa 74.6% [27]. This might be because of the educational level of the mothers, health accessability and coverage, and economic difference. Since, it is conducted in the capital city of Ethiopia.
In the adjusted model, having four or more ANC visits was more likely to provide the recommended minimum acceptable diet. This finding is similar to a study done in sub-Saharan Africa and Debre Berhan town [15, 17]. This is because those mothers who had antenatal care follow-ups might have better nutritional advice and counseling provided by health workers during antenatal care visits.
The study suggested that the educational level of the mothers was significantly associated with a minimally acceptable diet. This finding is similar to a study done in Nepal [28], sub-Saharan Africa [17], Mareka district southern region [29], Aleta Wondo district, Sidama region [13], and Debre Berhan town, central Ethiopia [15]. This might be because mothers may perceive the young child as having the poor ability of the intestine to digest certain foods and perceive that if they get animal milk in addition, breast milk is enough for them during the infancy period, which shows a poorly diversified diet. In this study, having a high level of education was positively associated with a minimum acceptable diet. The findings were in line with the studies done in sub-Saharan Africa [17], east Africa [26] and Mareka district [29], Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2019 [4], Debre Berhan town [15], and Goncha district [16]. This might be because educated mothers were more likely to have information and a better understanding of messages and any information about child-feeding practice and its advantages.
In this study, children who currently fed breast milk were 85% more likely to get a minimum acceptable diet than those who did not feed breast milk. This finding is similar to the study done in Nepal and sub-Saharan Africa [17, 28]. This might be because breast milk is easily and equally available to those who feed breastmilk and need no expense. On the other hand, non-breast milk-fed children should get the minimum amount of milk at least two times per day, which needs extra money and might be impossible for some parents due to economic shortages.
The possible limitations of this study could be that the 24-hour dietary recall method might not show the usual intake and feeding pattern of the child. It is a cross-sectional study; it does not show a cause-and-effect relationship. Since we used a single-day 24-hour food recall questionnaire, we are not able to assess a day-to-day variation of dietary habits. Lastly, the study was conducted in the town, the results may be overestimated to represent the general population of Ethiopia.
Conclusion
The study showed that the practice of a minimum acceptable diet among children aged between 6–23 months in the study area was low when compared to the World Food Program target. Having antenatal care follow-up visits more than or equal to four, maternal education level of primary and college and above, child age between 12–17 months, and 18–23 months, not feeding breast milk were significantly associated with the minimum acceptable diet.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Schematic representation for sampling procedure among children aged 6–23 months in Dera town, Oromia Ethiopia.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315121.s001
(PNG)
S1 Data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315121.s002
(SAV)
Acknowledgments
The authors would also like to extend their appreciation to all the mothers/caregivers, data collectors, and supervisors.
References
1. 1. CSA, Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016.
2. 2. WHO and UNICEF, Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: definitions and measurement methods. 2021.
3. 3. Gatica G., et al., Complementary Feeding Practices in 80 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Prevalence of and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dietary Diversity, Meal Frequency, and Dietary Adequacy. J Nutr, 2021. 151(7): p. 1956–1964. pmid:33847352
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
4. 4. Firanbon T. and Afework T., Trends and determinants of minimum acceptable diet intake among infant and young children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Nutrition, 2022. 8(44).
* View Article
* Google Scholar
5. 5. UNICEF, The State of the World’s Children 2019 –Children, food, and nutrition: Growing well in a changing world. 2019.
6. 6. EPHI and ICF, Ethiopian Minidemographic and health survey 2019. 2021, Rockville, Maryland: EPHI ICF.
7. 7. Geda N., et al., Infant and young child feeding practices in Ethiopia: analysis of socioeconomic disparities based on nationally representative data. Arch Public Health, 2021. 79(1): p. 35. pmid:33726847
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
8. 8. Beyene M., Worku A., and Wassie M., Dietary diversity, meal frequency and associated factors among infant and young children in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health, 2015. 15: p. 1007. pmid:26433689
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
9. 9. Gizaw G. and Tesfaye G., Minimum Acceptable Diet and Factor Associated with It Among Infant and Young Children Age 6–23 Months in North Shoa, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Homeopathy & Natural Medicines, 2019. 5(1): p. 1–7.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
10. 10. WHO and UNICEF, global strategy for infant and young child feeding. 2003, Geneva.
11. 11. FDRE, NATIONAL NUTRITION PROGRAM(2016–2020). 2016, addis Abeba.
12. 12. WHO, World health statistics. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
13. 13. Bezuayehu Y., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Aleta Wondo District, Sidama Region, Ethiopia. EJMH, 2022. 2 (1): p. 44–60.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
14. 14. Ahmed A., Sadeta K., and Lenbo H., Magnitude and factors associated with appropriate complementary feeding practice among mothers of children 6–23 months age in Shashemene town, Oromia- Ethiopia: Community based cross sectional study. PLoS One, 2022. 17(3): p. e0265716. pmid:35349586
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
15. 15. Molla A., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among infants and young children aged 6–23 months in Amhara region, Central Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 2021. 11(5): p. e044284. pmid:33972337
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
16. 16. Birie B., et al., Minimum acceptable diet practice and its associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in rural communities of Goncha district, north West Ethiopia. BMC Nutr, 2021. 7(1): p. 40.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
17. 17. Belay G., Taddese A., and Gelaye A., Minimum acceptable diet intake and its associated factors among children age at 6–23 months in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of the sub-Saharan Africa demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22(1): p. 684.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
18. 18. WHO, Guiding principles complementary feeding of breastfed child 2001, Washington: Pan American Health Organization.
19. 19. WHO, Guiding principles for feeding non-breastfed children 6–24 months of age. 2005, Geneva.
20. 20. UNHCR, INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING PRACTICE ASTEP BY STEP GUIDE, ed. 3. 2018.
21. 21. MoH, E., Guideline for Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies for ethiopia. 2021.
22. 22. Girma Cheru Bikila, G.A., Sultan Kalu, Kedir Teji Roba, Tesfaye Getachew Charkos, The drivers of minimum acceptable diet among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3981972/v1. 2024.
23. 23. Amynah J., et al., Complementary feeding practices and associated factors among Mongolian children 6–23 months of age. wiley maternal and child nutr, 2020. 16(s2): p. e12838.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
24. 24. Jing F., et al., Complementary Feeding and Malnutrition among Infants and Young Children Aged 6–23 Months in Rural Areas of China. NUutrients, 2022. 14(1807).
* View Article
* Google Scholar
25. 25. Mildred O., et al., Determinants of Meeting the Minimum Acceptable Diet Among Filipino Children Aged 6–23 Month. hilippine Journal of Science 2018. 147(1): p. 75–89.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
26. 26. Worku G., et al., Minimum acceptable diet feeding practice and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in east Africa: a multilevel binary logistic regression analysis of 2008–2018 demographic health survey data. Arch Public Health, 2022. 80(1): p. 127.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
27. 27. Abebe H., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia. Ital J Pediatr, 2021. 47(1): p. 215.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
28. 28. Sapkota S., et al., Predictors of Minimum Acceptable Diet among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Nepal: A Multilevel Analysis of Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019. Nutrients, 2022. 14(17).
* View Article
* Google Scholar
29. 29. Feleke F. and Mulaw G., Minimum Acceptable Diet and its Predictors among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Mareka District, Southern Ethiopia: Community Based Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 2020. 9(4): p. 202–211.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
Citation: Bikila GC, Arero G, Kalu S, Roba KT, Charkos TG (2024) The prevalence and associated factors of the minimum acceptable diet among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 19(12): e0315121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315121
About the Authors:
Girma Cheru Bikila
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
Godana Arero
Roles: Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
Sultan Kalu
Roles: Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
Kedir Teji Roba
Roles: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
Tesfaye Getachew Charkos
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-8385
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
[/RAW_REF_TEXT]
1. CSA, Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016.
2. WHO and UNICEF, Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: definitions and measurement methods. 2021.
3. Gatica G., et al., Complementary Feeding Practices in 80 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Prevalence of and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dietary Diversity, Meal Frequency, and Dietary Adequacy. J Nutr, 2021. 151(7): p. 1956–1964. pmid:33847352
4. Firanbon T. and Afework T., Trends and determinants of minimum acceptable diet intake among infant and young children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Nutrition, 2022. 8(44).
5. UNICEF, The State of the World’s Children 2019 –Children, food, and nutrition: Growing well in a changing world. 2019.
6. EPHI and ICF, Ethiopian Minidemographic and health survey 2019. 2021, Rockville, Maryland: EPHI ICF.
7. Geda N., et al., Infant and young child feeding practices in Ethiopia: analysis of socioeconomic disparities based on nationally representative data. Arch Public Health, 2021. 79(1): p. 35. pmid:33726847
8. Beyene M., Worku A., and Wassie M., Dietary diversity, meal frequency and associated factors among infant and young children in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health, 2015. 15: p. 1007. pmid:26433689
9. Gizaw G. and Tesfaye G., Minimum Acceptable Diet and Factor Associated with It Among Infant and Young Children Age 6–23 Months in North Shoa, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Homeopathy & Natural Medicines, 2019. 5(1): p. 1–7.
10. WHO and UNICEF, global strategy for infant and young child feeding. 2003, Geneva.
11. FDRE, NATIONAL NUTRITION PROGRAM(2016–2020). 2016, addis Abeba.
12. WHO, World health statistics. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
13. Bezuayehu Y., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Aleta Wondo District, Sidama Region, Ethiopia. EJMH, 2022. 2 (1): p. 44–60.
14. Ahmed A., Sadeta K., and Lenbo H., Magnitude and factors associated with appropriate complementary feeding practice among mothers of children 6–23 months age in Shashemene town, Oromia- Ethiopia: Community based cross sectional study. PLoS One, 2022. 17(3): p. e0265716. pmid:35349586
15. Molla A., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among infants and young children aged 6–23 months in Amhara region, Central Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 2021. 11(5): p. e044284. pmid:33972337
16. Birie B., et al., Minimum acceptable diet practice and its associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in rural communities of Goncha district, north West Ethiopia. BMC Nutr, 2021. 7(1): p. 40.
17. Belay G., Taddese A., and Gelaye A., Minimum acceptable diet intake and its associated factors among children age at 6–23 months in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of the sub-Saharan Africa demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22(1): p. 684.
18. WHO, Guiding principles complementary feeding of breastfed child 2001, Washington: Pan American Health Organization.
19. WHO, Guiding principles for feeding non-breastfed children 6–24 months of age. 2005, Geneva.
20. UNHCR, INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING PRACTICE ASTEP BY STEP GUIDE, ed. 3. 2018.
21. MoH, E., Guideline for Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies for ethiopia. 2021.
22. Girma Cheru Bikila, G.A., Sultan Kalu, Kedir Teji Roba, Tesfaye Getachew Charkos, The drivers of minimum acceptable diet among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3981972/v1. 2024.
23. Amynah J., et al., Complementary feeding practices and associated factors among Mongolian children 6–23 months of age. wiley maternal and child nutr, 2020. 16(s2): p. e12838.
24. Jing F., et al., Complementary Feeding and Malnutrition among Infants and Young Children Aged 6–23 Months in Rural Areas of China. NUutrients, 2022. 14(1807).
25. Mildred O., et al., Determinants of Meeting the Minimum Acceptable Diet Among Filipino Children Aged 6–23 Month. hilippine Journal of Science 2018. 147(1): p. 75–89.
26. Worku G., et al., Minimum acceptable diet feeding practice and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in east Africa: a multilevel binary logistic regression analysis of 2008–2018 demographic health survey data. Arch Public Health, 2022. 80(1): p. 127.
27. Abebe H., et al., Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia. Ital J Pediatr, 2021. 47(1): p. 215.
28. Sapkota S., et al., Predictors of Minimum Acceptable Diet among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Nepal: A Multilevel Analysis of Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019. Nutrients, 2022. 14(17).
29. Feleke F. and Mulaw G., Minimum Acceptable Diet and its Predictors among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Mareka District, Southern Ethiopia: Community Based Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 2020. 9(4): p. 202–211.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 Bikila et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
A minimum acceptable diet for children aged 6–23 months is limited globally, with Ethiopia’s proportion reducing to one in nine. This study was aimed to assess the prevalence of the minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Dera town, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Methods
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Systematic random sampling techniques were used to select the study subjects. The data was coded, entered into Epi-Info version 7, and then exported to SPSS version 24 for analysis. The variance inflation factor and tolerance test are used to check multicollinearity. Descriptive statistics of frequency (%) were used. Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness-of-fit test at a P-value > 0.05 is considered the model fit. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were computed with a 95% confidence interval, and a P-value < 0.05 was, considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 430 study subjects were included in this study. The prevalence of a minimum acceptable diet was 36.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32, 41%). In the adjusted model, mothers attaining a primary school (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.3, 4.8), college and above education (AOR = 4.3, 95%CI: 1.4, 13), child age between 12–17 months (AOR = 6.2, 95%CI: 2.80, 13.50) and 18–23 months (AOR = 4.61, 95%CI: 2.04, 10.40), ANC visit four or more (AOR = 2.0, 95%CI: 1.2, 3.4), and not feeding breast (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.31) were significantly associated with meeting the minimum acceptable diet.
Conclusion
This study showed that the practice of a minimum acceptable diet was low, according to the World Food Program target. Mothers’ educational status, antenatal care visits, age of the child, and breastfeeding were the predictors of the minimum acceptable diet.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer