Content area
Abstract
Research has frequently demonstrated negative effects of placing students into developmental education, but very little inquiry has considered the impact of placing students into different levels of non-developmental coursework. The present study explored this issue within sequenced pairs of STEM gateway courses using doubly-robust propensity score analyses and a total sample of 11,532 undergraduates. The results indicate that starting in a lower-level course frequently predicted favorable short-term academic outcomes, but course level was unrelated to retention, and starting in lower-level coursework was often inversely associated with the likelihood of graduating from the university or receiving a STEM bachelor's degree.
Details
Cutting Scores;
Literature Reviews;
Community College Students;
Grade Point Average;
Course Selection (Students);
Acceleration (Education);
Prior Learning;
Academic Advising;
Advanced Placement Programs;
Enrollment Trends;
College Transfer Students;
Meta Analysis;
English Curriculum;
Mathematics Education;
Repetition;
Educational Change;
College Mathematics;
College Students;
Developmental Studies Programs;
Mathematics Activities;
School Policy;
Admission Criteria;
High Schools;
Remedial Instruction
