Content area
Purpose
Most of the current literature investigates workplace-based formal and informal learning separately; thus, the relationship between these two types of learning remains unclear. This study aims to fill this research gap, drawing on self-determination theory to bridge teachers’ formal and informal learning and uncover the relationship between the two.
Design/methodology/approach
The participants of the study are 1,886 primary and secondary in-service teachers in China. Structural equation modeling and bootstrapping are used to test the proposed model.
Findings
The study reveals complicated influencing mechanisms of formal learning on different types of informal learning among in-service teachers. Teachers’ basic psychological needs, satisfaction and challenge-seeking behavior are found to play crucial mediating roles in this process.
Practical implications
First, this study suggests that different configurations of intervention strategies should be formulated depending on the foci for improving teachers’ learning. Second, this study indicates that only highlighting the importance of reflection, which is the approach currently used, is not sufficient to improve teachers’ daily reflective practice. Third, there is an urgent need to design training programs to improve teachers’ abilities to purposefully expand their job boundaries, which could not only benefit teachers’ performance but also contribute to school improvement. For policymakers and school principals, we suggest that more attention be given to the satisfaction of teachers’ basic needs.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the literature on workplace learning by connecting formal and informal learning and elucidating how teachers’ reported formal learning influences their informal learning activities via varied paths. The findings have implications for continuous professional development policy and training programs in the workplace.
Details
Educational Opportunities;
Learning Activities;
Professional Autonomy;
Educational Practices;
Independent Study;
Competence;
Achievement Need;
Educational Research;
Psychological Needs;
Educational Technology;
Personal Autonomy;
Need Gratification;
Professional Identity;
Instructional Leadership;
Cooperative Learning;
Classroom Techniques;
Educational Objectives;
Outcomes of Education;
Labor Demands;
Educational Environment;
Lifelong Learning;
Educational Needs;
Organizational Development;
Informal Education
Students;
Collaboration;
Curricula;
Mediators;
Professional development;
Learning activities;
Working groups;
Teachers;
Motivation;
Independent study;
Principals;
Basic needs;
Psychological needs;
Professional training;
Policy making;
Informal education;
Self determination;
Learning;
Academic achievement;
Satisfaction;
Development policy;
Bootstrapping;
Structural equation modeling;
Educational activities;
Workplace learning;
Workplaces;
Reflective practice;
Education work relationship;
Bootstrap method;
Educational programs
1 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2 Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3 Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
4 Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
5 College of Education, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
