Content area

Abstract

Objectives

Advances in mobile apps, remote sensing, and big data have enabled remote monitoring of mental health conditions, but the cost-effectiveness is unknown. This study proposed a systematic framework integrating computational tools and decision-analytic modeling to assess cost-effectiveness and guide emerging monitoring technologies development.

Methods

Using a novel decision-analytic Markov-cohort model, we simulated chronic depression patients’ disease progression over 2 years, allowing treatment modifications at follow-up visits. The cost-effectiveness, from a payer’s viewpoint, of five monitoring strategies was evaluated for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups: (i) remote monitoring technology scheduling follow-up visits upon detecting treatment change necessity; (ii) rule-based follow-up strategy assigning the next follow-up based on the patient’s current health state; and (iii–v) fixed frequency follow-up at two-month, four-month, and six-month intervals. Health outcomes (effects) were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

Results

Base case results showed that remote monitoring technology is cost-effective in the three risk groups under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of U.S. GDP per capita in year 2023. Full scenario analyses showed that, compared to rule-based follow-up, remote technology is 74 percent, 67 percent, and 74 percent cost-effective in the high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively, and it is cost-effective especially if the treatment is effective and if remote monitoring is highly sensitive and specific.

Conclusions

Remote monitoring for chronic depression proves cost-effective and potentially cost-saving in the majority of simulated scenarios. This framework can assess emerging remote monitoring technologies and identify requirements for the technologies to be cost-effective in psychiatric and chronic care delivery.

Details

10000008
Business indexing term
Title
A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression
Author
Sun, Xiaonan 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Wissow, Lawrence 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Liu, Shan 1 

 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 
 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 
Volume
40
Issue
1
Publication year
2025
Publication date
Jan 2025
Section
Method
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Place of publication
Cambridge
Country of publication
United Kingdom
ISSN
02664623
e-ISSN
14716348
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-01-16
Milestone dates
2023-08-31 (Received); 2024-07-29 (Revised); 2024-09-20 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
16 Jan 2025
ProQuest document ID
3155894801
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/decision-analytic-method-evaluate-cost/docview/3155894801/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-01-21
Database
ProQuest One Academic