It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Brain drain poses a substantial challenge to Nigerian higher education, impacting faculty retention and educational standards. Guided by SET and PPFT theories, this basic qualitative study explored administrative strategies to mitigate brain drain. Ten people, including deans and faculty members, participated in virtual interviews for the study. The data analysis used open coding, which found 303 code segments. These were grouped into 12 subthemes and then combined into five main themes: institutional responses to migration, drivers of brain drain, administrative and structural challenges, effective retention strategies, and leadership roles and strategies. Key findings highlighted diverse institutional responses, emphasizing recruitment improvements, competitive compensation, and international partnerships. Economic factors, inadequate working conditions, and limited professional growth opportunities emerged as primary factors driving faculty migration. Participants stressed the critical need for competitive salaries, improved working conditions, and better career prospects to retain faculty. The study also identified significant administrative hurdles, such as chronic underfunding and bureaucratic obstacles, that impede effective leadership strategies. Effective retention strategies, including incentives, supportive work environments, and professional development opportunities, are crucial for mitigating brain drain. Similarly, leadership support was significant, highlighting the importance of having a clear strategy and open communication. This study proposes a framework for addressing brain drain in Nigerian higher education through administrative reforms, institutional enhancements, leadership development, and effective retention strategies. It underscores the urgency of policies promoting inclusive and supportive educational environments. Further research is recommended to deepen understanding and evaluate interventions aimed at sustaining quality higher education in Nigeria.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





