It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic put the life science sector to the test. Vaccines were developed at unprecedented speed, benefiting from decades of fundamental research and now honoured by a Nobel Prize. However, we saw that the fruits of science were inequitably distributed. Most low- and middle-income countries were left behind, deepening the inequalities that the Sustainable Development Goals were set to reduce. We argue that the life science sector must reinvent itself to be better and more equitably prepared for the next health crisis and to ensure fair access to health across current and future generations. Our recommendations include global governance, national strategies and the role of universities and corporations. Improved and more equitable health care should be centre stage for global health action and a core mission of a reframed Life Science sector – what we call Life Science 2.0.
- Paper Context
Main findings: During the COVID-19 pandemic the Life Science sector stepped up to the challenge, but vaccines and medicines were not equitably distributed.
Added knowledge: Obstacles were identified that hindered global access to medical innovations.
Global health impact for policy and action: Global and national governance, universities and the private sector should join forces to create a Life Science sector (Life Science 2.0) that affords equitable access to medical advances across geographical and generational boundaries and socio-economic strata.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Chemical Biology Consortium Sweden, SciLifeLab, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Charité Centre of Global Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
5 Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
6 College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
7 Charité Centre of Global Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Sustainable Health Unit and Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden