- Gcd
- glucose dehydrogenase
- Glf
- glucose facilitator protein
- GRC3
- genome-reduced chassis strain number 3
- MC-III
- malonyl-CoA chassis strain number 3
- MC-IV
- malonyl-CoA chassis strain number 4
- MSM
- mineral salt medium
Abbreviations
Introduction
The uptake of carbohydrates is a fundamental process of microbial life. Especially for the uptake of sugars across biological membranes, a plethora of different sugar utilisation and transport systems have evolved in bacteria (Jeckelmann and Erni 2020) in high dependency on the respective ecological niche. Biotechnological processes usually differ significantly from the microorganism's natural habitats, for example, by high concentrations of carbon sources and a lack of microbial competition. It is thus not surprising that the native sugar uptake and metabolism are not necessarily ideal for the applied bioprocess. In Pseudomonas, glucose enters the periplasm from the extracellular space via porins like one of four OprB (Wylie and Worobec 1995). It is subsequently taken up into the cytosol via ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter GtsABCD at the expense of ATP (del Castillo et al. 2007; Thomas and Tampé 2020) or oxidised to gluconate by periplasmic glucose dehydrogenase (GDH, Gcd) and gluconolactonases (Nerke et al. 2024). Periplasmic oxidation of glucose allows pseudomonads to shunt electrons via the pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) cofactor directly into the respiratory chain (An and Moe 2016) and is considered the major route for glucose utilisation in many pseudomonads (Kohlstedt and Wittmann 2019). Periplasmic gluconate can further be oxidised to 2-ketogluconate by the gluconate 2-dehydrogenase complex (Gad; PP_3382-3384) in some pseudomonads (Kohlstedt and Wittmann 2019; Volke et al. 2023).
After translocation into the cytosol, glucose is phosphorylated by glucokinase (Glk) and subsequently converted by one of the three glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Zwf) isoenzymes (Volke, Olavarría, and Nikel 2021) and 6-phosphogluconolactonase (Pgl) to yield 6-phosphogluconate, which is an intermediate of the EDEMP cycle (Nikel et al. 2015) (Figure 1). Regulation of glucose uptake and sugar catabolism is controlled inter alia by the two-component system response regulator GltR-II (PP_1012 in
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Native energy-driven glucose transport systems are often beneficial in environments with low carbohydrate concentration because they allow uptake with high affinity (Jeckelmann and Erni 2020). This can be a distinct advantage under competitive conditions with limited glucose availability. In an artificial laboratory environment, substrates are usually supplied in concentrations exceeding the physiological KM values of the respective uptake systems by several orders of magnitude. Therefore, the native sugar transport is usually not adapted to bioprocess requirements (Jeckelmann and Erni 2020) and in the case of some pseudomonads, it leads to excessive acidification by gluconate as a carbon sequestration strategy (del Castillo et al. 2007).
An alternative glucose uptake system, specifically interesting for biotechnological applications, can be found in
In this study, GlfZm was introduced into several genome-reduced chassis strains (GRC3) of
Materials and Methods/Experimental Section
Cultivation Conditions, Media,
Cultivations for the production of cinnamate (Otto et al. 2019) or resveratrol were performed in a 24-square well plate system Duetz as described previously by Schwanemann et al. (2023).
Analytical Methods
Growth characterisation experiments were performed in 96-square well plates in the Growth Profiler 960 with respective calibration for conversion of ‘green values’ from pixels of a picture into OD600 equivalents.
Determination of the optical density was performed at 600 nm with GE Healthcare Ultrospec 10 device from Fischer Scientific GmbH (Schwerte, Germany).
To determine biomass concentration after 24 h by cell dry weight (CDW) and OD600, experiments were executed in 100 mL shake flasks with 11% filling volume, and samples of 10 mL were collected in dried and pre-weighted glass centrifuge tubes from Glaswarenfabrik Karl Hecht GmbH & Co KG (Sondheim, Germany) that were centrifuged for 20 min at 4000 g and washed with 5 mL of a 0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride solution. After discarding the supernatant, the pellets were dried at 65°C. A respective medium control was processed in parallel.
For the analysis of resveratrol, 1 mL culture broth was extracted with ethyl acetate and processed further in amber glass vials, as described in detail previously (Schwanemann et al. 2023). Cinnamate and p-coumarate were quantified from filtered culture supernatant, and all supplemented precursors and products were analysed by HPLC.
For the detection and quantification of cinnamate, p-coumarate and resveratrol, a 1260 Infinity II HPLC with a 1260 DAD WR (Agilent Technologies) and an ISAspher 100-5 C18 BDS column (Isera, Düren, Germany) was used, utilising the identical settings and gradients of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and acetonitrile as previously for resveratrol analysis (Schwanemann et al. 2023). Cinnamate, p-coumarate and resveratrol were measured at 245, 280, and 310 nm and eluted after 11.54, 7.13, and 9.08 min, respectively.
All experiments were executed in replicates, and significance analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA with a confidence interval of p < 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Effect of
The expression of Zm_glf, encoding the glucose facilitator of
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Upon expression of Zm_glf in strain GRC3Δ6 MC-III, which was metabolically engineered for increased malonyl-CoA supply including a gcd deficiency (Schwanemann et al. 2023), no significant changes were determined regarding biomass yield, but a reduced growth rate was observed. A trend to yield a high final biomass for the exchanged transporter strain was noted, although the respective control reached a slightly lower final biomass than the GRC3 control strains. That might not be surprising given that strain MC-III was engineered for bioproduction.
When comparing growth rates of the respective strains (Figures 2B, S5) the deletion of Gcd alone did not decrease the maximal growth rate, but the malonyl-CoA platform strain, GRC3Δ6 MC-III, has a 24% decreased growth rate (0.36 h−1) compared to the GRC3 (0.47 h−1). Strains with intact periplasmic gluconate formation showed no impact on their growth rate compared to the parental strain. However, strains with deleted Gcd and GtsABCD replaced by GlfZm, in which glucose is taken up solely via the heterologous GlfZm, showed a severe growth rate reduction of approximately half. The additional expression of GlfZm decreased the rate by 23% or 19% for strains lacking only Gcd (GRC3Δgcd) or the malonyl-CoA platform strain (GRC3Δ6 MC-III), respectively.
In general, it can be concluded that the glucose uptake systems in
Effect of
To test the effect of GlfZm in
Cinnamate biosynthesis was evaluated in engineered strains featuring either native or modified glucose transport, as well as with and without periplasmic oxidation of glucose to gluconate (Figure 3). In strains with exchanged glucose uptake system, titres were significantly improved by 5% to 4.3 ± 0.03 mM. Further, a 15% increase to 4.7 ± 0.03 mM was observed in the production strain with additional expression of Zm_glf. In this strain, the expression driven by the Pgts promoter may compete with native GtsABCD expression and gluconate uptake. Deletion of gcd slightly reduced final OD600 and had a minor but significant negative effect on cinnamate titres (4.1 ± 0.04 mM for GRC3 PHE, 4.0 ± 0.03 mM GRC3 PHE Δgcd). This relatively minor effect on production would likely be offset in scaled-up batch cultures through the avoidance of transient acid formation. Without periplasmic Gcd, both expression strategies for GlfZm improved cinnamate titres to approximately 4.4 mM from 30 mM glucose compared to strain GRC3 PHE Δgcd, which constitutes a significant 10% improvement in production.
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Effect of
High-yield cinnamate production poses a high drain on central metabolites with a relatively non-toxic product. In contrast, secondary metabolites are typically produced at lower yields and titres, but their production can pose a higher stress on the cell in terms of metabolic burden. To differentiate between these effects, a malonyl-CoA platform strain (GRC3Δ6 MC-III) was evaluated for its ability to produce resveratrol from glucose and p-coumarate (Figure 4) with implemented Zm_glf modifications. Resveratrol production was enabled by equipping the strain with the corresponding stilbene production module (attTn7::FRT-P14f-his.AhSTS-Sc4CLA294G). The GRC3Δ6 MC-III control with the stilbene module produced 77.6 mg L−1 (0.34 mM) resveratrol from 30 mM glucose and 1 mM p-coumarate with 0.72 mM remaining precursor. This resveratrol production is in a similar range to those previously reported (Schwanemann et al. 2023). By exchanging the GtsABCD glucose transporter with GlfZm, resveratrol titres were increased to 97.7 mg L−1 (0.43 mM), which represents a 26% improvement and a yield of 18.1 mgresveratrol gglucose−1. Since this strain background already features a gcd knockout, this constitutes a complete replacement of glucose uptake by GlfZm. In contrast to previous reports (Braga et al. 2018), no product loss was observed (Figure S6), with only 0.54 mM p-coumarate remaining. The additional expression of Zm_glf in a GtsABCD+ background reduced overall biomass and resveratrol titre (Figure 4).
[IMAGE OMITTED. SEE PDF]
Consequently, GRC3Δ6 MC-III ΔgtsABCD::Zm_glf with stilbene production module was identified as a better platform for resveratrol production from p-coumarate than GRC3Δ6 MC-III in spite of its reduced growth rate (Figure 2) and thus strain
Conclusion
In this study, we investigated the impact of modified glucose uptake by a passive facilitator in
Author Contributions
Tobias Schwanemann: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, funding acquisition, writing – original draft, visualization. Nicolas Krink: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, supervision. Pablo I. Nikel: conceptualization, resources. Benedikt Wynands: validation, writing – review and editing, supervision. Nick Wierckx: conceptualization, validation, resources, writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU) [PhD Scholarship 20019/638-32], the German Academic Exchange Service [DAAD Scholarship 57556281], the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with the project NO-STRESS [FKZ 031B0852A], and the European Research Council via the project PROSPER (grant number 101044949). P.I.N. acknowledges funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation through grant numbers NNF20CC0035580, NNF18OC0034818, and NNF21OC0067996. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
An, R., and L. A. Moe. 2016. “Regulation of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone‐Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase Activity in the Model Rhizosphere‐Dwelling Bacterium
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Glucose is the most abundant monosaccharide and a principal substrate in biotechnological production processes. In
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Institute of Bio‐ and Geosciences, IBG‐1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
2 The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark