Abstract
As degradation of sensitive habitats like Sphagnum L. (Sphagnales: Sphagnaceae) peatbogs is endangering their invertebrate fauna, artificial peat pools may offer peatbog insect fauna a chance of survival. The entomofauna of seven peat pools in a peatbog and its surrounding natural marginal zone in SE Poland was investigated at the level of species, assemblages and faunistic metrics, indicating the key environmental drivers of the insect distribution and their implications for the biodiversity and potential conservation of these habitats. The species composition, specialists, and insect assemblages of the peat pools were linked with the fauna typical of both peatbogs and dystrophic pools with an open water surface. The most specialized fauna was found in the pools with the largest Sphagnum cover: only tyrphobionts, of all the ecological elements, significantly discriminated the fauna of peat pools and the marginal zone. Sphagnum cover was the key structural factor affecting the distribution of all the insects. Additionally, dragonflies were dependent on pH, beetles on temperature, and caddisflies on dissolved oxygen; however, structural factors—apart from Sphagnum cover—pool perimeter and emergent vegetation cover were predominant. Our results show that appropriate management of the structural factors of peat pools, especially Sphagnum cover, and the provision of different successional stages, can enhance biodiversity and help to maintain a valuable specialist fauna. Even along small environmental gradients and in a homogeneous area, the response of insects is highly differentiated. Dragonflies probably best represent the conservation value of the overall invertebrate fauna of Sphagnum bogs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology and Wildlife Management, Akademicka, Lublin, Poland
2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka, Lublin, Poland





