It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The development of clinical reasoning in new graduate nurses is an essential component of nursing education. A lack of clinical reasoning in a new nurse can lead to poor patient outcomes and increased budget concerns for health care facilities. Limited studies were present regarding the use of the flipped classroom teaching method to promote development of clinical reasoning in the classroom setting. The question guiding the research was as follows: Is there a significant difference in the clinical reasoning skills of associate degree nursing students who have been instructed using the flipped classroom teaching method compared to those who have received instruction in a traditional lecture setting? A quasi experimental pretest/posttest design was utilized to answer the research question. Data produced from the Health Science Reasoning Test was analyzed using an analysis of covariance with the identified covariate of the pretest score to control for past developed clinical reasoning skills. The sample was consistent with national statistics related to gender and age of an associate degree nursing student. The intervention group had a large percentage of participants with previous experience as a health care worker. The career of a licensed practical nurse was the most represented health care career. Data analysis of the intervention group revealed a p 0.01; thereby indicating the flipped classroom teaching method had a positive effect on the development of clinical reasoning in associate degree nursing students. Results demonstrated the intervention was effective, however the resulted effect size was decreased due to the length of the intervention. Future recommendations for research included a longitudinal study of the flipped classroom to develop clinical reasoning, with the use of the intervention over multiple courses. Nurse educators and administrators should consider the length of the course instruction and the students’ previous experiences for maximum effectiveness of the method.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





