Abstract
Background
Environmental fungi are threats to personal and public health. Fungal in vitro diagnostics help diagnose invasive fungal infections (IFIs), but clinicians remain underinformed about their use and interpretation. Given the increasing use of social media to share infectious diseases–related content, we designed and implemented a multisite Twitter-based curriculum focused on IFIs and related diagnostics.
Methods
Questions were posted through a dedicated Twitter account twice weekly over 8 weeks. We surveyed clinicians at 3 US academic centers before and after completion of the curriculum and interviewed a subset of participants. We undertook quantitative and qualitative evaluations and reviewed Twitter analytics.
Results
We surveyed 450 participants. One hundred twenty-one participants (27%) completed the knowledge assessment precurriculum, 68 (15%) postcurriculum, and 53 (12%) pre- and postcurriculum. We found a significant increase (72% vs 80%, P = .005) in the percentage of correct answers in the pre- versus postcurriculum knowledge assessments. Perceived benefits included a well-executed curriculum that facilitated engagement with appropriately detailed tweetorials from a dedicated Twitter account. Perceived barriers included lack of awareness of tweetorial posts and timing, competing priorities, and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The Twitter account accrued 1400 followers from 65 countries during the 8-week period. Tweets with multiple-choice questions had a median of 14 904 impressions (interquartile range [IQR], 12 818–16 963), 798 engagements (IQR, 626–1041), and an engagement rate of 6.1% (IQR, 4.2%–6.6%).
Conclusions
Educators can leverage social media to share content with a large audience and improve knowledge while being mindful of the barriers associated with implementing a curriculum on social media.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Tackett, Sean 2 ; Grieb, Suzanne 3 ; Laracy, Justin C 4 ; Belcher, Anne 5 ; Marr, Kieren A 6 ; Shoham, Shmuel 6
; Avery, Robin K 6
; Melia, Michael T 6 1 Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine , Tucson, Arizona , USA
2 Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
3 Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Data Management Core, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York , USA
5 Johns Hopkins University School of Education , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
6 Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA





