It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective
Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important complication of cryptococcal meningitis (CM) and impacts morbidity and mortality. Factors associated with permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement are poorly characterized.
Method
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 1996 through 2015. Characteristics of patients at time of CM diagnosis who did and did not receive a VP shunt were compared with use of the 2-group chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the 2-group t test for continuous variables. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of shunt placement.
Results
Of 422 patients with cryptococcosis, 257 (60.9%) had CM. Mean age was 47.7 years, 71.6% were male, and 44.4% were African American. The most common underlying conditions were HIV (42.4%), solid organ transplantation (29.6%), and corticosteroid use (34.2%). Forty-four (17.1%) received a VP shunt a median of 17 days (range, 1–320 days) post-diagnosis. By multivariable analysis, baseline opening pressure >30 cm H2O (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 3.0, 28.8; P < .0001), being a normal host (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5, 26.1; P = .011) and hydrocephalus (OR, 4.9, 95% CI, 1.3, 17.9); P = .017) were associated with increased odds of shunting (Table 2). In contrast, age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92, 0.99; P = .037) and male gender (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.55; P = .023) were associated with decreased odds of shunting.
Conclusions
Identification of factors at time of CM diagnosis associated with need for permanent VP shunt placement may allow for earlier, more aggressive treatment and potentially improve outcomes associated with increased ICP from cryptococcal meningitis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Medical Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Alabama
2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California–Davis Medical Center
3 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham
5 Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham