It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective
Dose optimization of TNF inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is attractive, but it is unclear for which patients this approach might be appropriate.
Methods
Seventy-one patients with axSpA, from six UK centres, were identified who had reduced their dose of TNF inhibitor after being considered to be stable responders. All completed a questionnaire concerning their approach to and experience of dose reduction. Data on patient characteristics, metrology and CRP were retrieved retrospectively from patient records.
Results
Over 2 years of observation, 60 (84.5%) remained (REM) on reduced-dose medication and 11 (15.5%) reverted (REV) to the original dose. The overall mean dose reduction was 39% for REM patients and 44% for REV patients. Both groups initially responded in a similar manner to treatment, but the data showed a trend that younger women were more likely to revert. Neither BMI nor smoking was associated with continued low-dose responsiveness. Eight of the 11 REV patients reverted by 6 months. None reached criteria of secondary drug failure, and all regained control after increasing back to the original dose. Most patients in both groups reached the decision to reduce the dose jointly with clinicians. A preference for taking the reduced dose was not associated with low-dose drug survival.
Conclusion
Many patients with axSpA remain well symptomatically after stepping down the dose of TNF inhibitor, but young women are less likely to do well on a reduced dose. Dose reduction should be one element of the management of patients with axSpA.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Research and Development, East Kent Hospital University Foundation Trust, Canterbury
2 Department of Rheumatology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading
3 AK Gilbert Ltd, Brighton
4 Department of Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Foundation Trust, Norwich
5 Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London
6 Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London; Department of Rheumatology & Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
7 Department of Rheumatology & Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
8 Department of Rheumatology, Royal United Hospitals Trust, Bath
9 Statsconsultancy Ltd, Amersham, UK