It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background and objectives
Understanding the social determinants of health is a major goal in evolutionary biology and human health research. Low socioeconomic status (often operationalized as absolute material wealth) is consistently associated with chronic stress, poor health and premature death in high-income countries. However, the degree to which wealth gradients in health are universal—or are instead made even steeper under contemporary, post-industrial conditions—remains poorly understood.
Methodology
We quantified absolute material wealth and several health outcomes among a population of traditional pastoralists, the Turkana of northwest Kenya, who are currently transitioning toward a more urban, market-integrated lifestyle. We assessed whether wealth associations with health differed in subsistence-level versus urban contexts. We also explored the causes and consequences of wealth-health associations by measuring serum cortisol, potential sociobehavioral mediators in early life and adulthood, and adult reproductive success (number of surviving offspring).
Results
Higher socioeconomic status and greater material wealth predicts better self-reported health and more offspring in traditional pastoralist Turkana, but worse cardiometabolic health and fewer offspring in urban Turkana. We do not find robust evidence for either direct biological mediators (cortisol) or indirect sociobehavioral mediators (e.g. adult diet or health behaviors, early life experiences) of wealth–health relationships in either context.
Conclusions and implications
While social gradients in health are well-established in humans and animals across a variety of socioecological contexts, we show that the relationship between wealth and health can vary within a single population. Our findings emphasize that changes in economic and societal circumstances may directly alter how, why and under what conditions socioeconomic status predicts health.
Lay Summary
High socioeconomic status predicts better health and more offspring in traditional Turkana pastoralists, but worse health and fewer offspring in individuals of the same group living in urban areas. Together, our study shows that under different economic and societal circumstances, wealth effects on health may manifest in very different ways.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Lewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
2 Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya; Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
3 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Lewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
4 Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
5 Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Institute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
6 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
7 Department of Anthropology, University of California: Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA