The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]:
Replacing the following sentences in “3.3. Comparison between Experimental and Computational Data”:
(1) With 88.5% of the natural gas being methane from the gas chromatography (GC) data, the injected methane was 182.3 g/bhp-hr.
with
With 77.6% of the natural gas being methane from the gas chromatography (GC) data, the injected methane was 182.3 g/bhp-hr.
(2) At the nominal point (injection pressure: 500 psi, SOA: −120 degrees), CFD predicts that 7.7% of the injected methane escapes complete combustion, while experimental results show only 0.03% of the injected methane escaping as emissions.
with
At the nominal point (injection pressure: 500 psi, SOA: −120 degrees), the CFD predicts that 7.7% of the injected methane escapes complete combustion, while the experimental results show only 4% of the injected methane escaping as emissions.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reference
1. Banji, T.I.; Arney, G.; Patterson, M.; Olsen, D.B. Reduction of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Integral Compressor Engines through Fuel Injection Control. Sustainability; 2024; 16, 5943. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su16145943]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;
2 Pipeline Research Council International, Chantilly, VA 20151, USA;
3 Pipeline Research Council International, Chantilly, VA 20151, USA;