It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
College students in today’s fraternities and sororities do not fully understand where the line is between new member education and hazing, and the student affairs professionals who advise them do not have a common understanding of when and where they should intervene. While the Stop Campus Hazing Act helped with a federal definition of hazing, obstacles still remain. The purpose of this phenomenological study is to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of student affairs professionals who advise active fraternity and sorority members on college campuses. The study will focus on their understanding of hazing, as well as their identification of intervention strategies to enhance student safety.
This study utilized a phenomenological research approach to explore how student affairs professionals described their definition of hazing. In this qualitative study, I reported lived experiences surrounding the phenomenon of hazing on college campuses. Nine student affairs professionals revealed common meaning in what they have experienced and how they experienced it through interviews. The research questions were: How do student affairs professionals describe their definition of hazing? How is hazing prevention and intervention addressed through practices, priorities, and policies?
The findings include inconsistencies around hazing (definitions, activities, and stated values of the organizations versus actions), building trust and early intervention are critical in preventing hazing, there are funding and capacity issues within the Fraternity and Sorority Life office, there is a lack of data in the profession, a heavy emotional burden is being placed on Student Affairs professionals, and universities are circumventing the law by hiring external partners to resolve hazing cases that will be undocumented.
The implications for institutional policy include building a greater awareness of the new federal laws, finding ways to encourage students to come forward with hazing reports, creating a hazing prevention task force with campus-wide representation, creating transparency in hazing reporting across universities and national organization, building a national database of Fraternity/Sorority members to advocate, investing more resources and staffing in the Fraternity and Sorority Life offices, and starting education on hazing prevention in K-12 schools.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer