It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
Iron deficiency (ID) is prevalent in chronic heart failure (HF) but lacks a consensus definition. This study evaluates the prevalence and the prognostic impact of ID using different criteria on all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as first hospitalization for HF in patients with new‐onset chronic HF.
Methods
In this nationwide registry‐based cohort, we explored four definitions of ID: the current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines [ferritin <100 ng/mL or ferritin 100–299 ng/mL and transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%], ferritin level <100 ng/mL, TSAT < 20% and serum iron ≤13 μmol/L. Patients were identified through the Danish Heart Failure Registry.
Results
Of 9477 new‐onset chronic HF patients registered in the Danish Heart Failure Registry from April 2003 to December 2019, we observed ID prevalence rates ranging from 35.8% to 64.3% depending on the ID definition used. Among patients with ID defined by iron ≤13 μmol/L or TSAT < 20%, 26% and 15.5%, respectively, did not meet the ESC guidelines definition for ID. Conversely, 11% of patients meeting the ESC criteria exhibited serum iron >13 μmol/L and TSAT > 20%. Regardless of anaemia status, ID defined by TSAT < 20% or serum iron ≤13 μmol/L was associated with all‐cause mortality [non‐anaemic, hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30–1.89 and HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24–1.73; anaemic, HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07–1.38 and HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09–1.44, respectively] and cardiovascular mortality (non‐anaemic, HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.59–3.06 and HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12–1.95; anaemic, HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.11–1.69 and HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.61, respectively), as well as increased risk of first hospitalization for HF (non‐anaemic, HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09–1.1.50 and HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10–1.46; anaemic, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08–1.44 and HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05–1.42, respectively). ID defined by ESC guidelines was associated with all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality only in non‐anaemic patients (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18–1.1.70 and HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.12.). Furthermore, the ESC guideline definition was associated with increased risk of first hospitalization for HF, regardless of anaemia status (non‐anaemic, HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08–1.1.47; anaemic, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.17–1.53).
Conclusions
ID, when defined by TSAT < 20% or serum iron ≤13 μmol/L, is associated with increased risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as first hospitalization for HF in patients with new‐onset chronic HF, regardless of anaemia status. Conversely, ID defined as ESC guidelines is associated with all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality only in non‐anaemic patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
4 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
5 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
6 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
7 Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Center for Advanced Heart Disease, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA





