Seismic Behavior of a Timber Structure Based on a Soft-Kill BESO Optimization Algorithm

Abstract

The seismic performance assessment of timber structures and topology optimization have been widely researched in recent years. Furthermore, the use of wood as a construction material has increased due to new sustainability challenges. This research assesses the seismic performance of a topologically optimized timber building located in Concepcion, Chile. The structure is a five-story glulam braced frame, designed following current Chilean standards. The structural configuration was obtained through a topology optimization process using a variation of a soft-kill BESO algorithm implemented in MATLAB R2015a, obtaining topologies with low structural redundancy. For the analysis, a full 3D nonlinear model was prepared using OpenSees (Version 3.7.1), and the nonlinear behavior of the structure was only considered at joints using the backbone curves introduced in ASCE 41-13. Six different study cases were analyzed, varying joint strengths and ductility. The fragility curves were determined from a static pushover analysis (SPO) using SPO2FRAG (V1.1), considering the performance levels established in ASCE 41-13. The seismic hazard of the building’s site is estimated through a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), and the seismic performance of each case is determined by computing the probabilities of exceedance of the considered limit states. Analysis results show that wood braced-frame structures with low structural redundancy (and fewer main joints to dissipate energy), such as those obtained from topology optimization algorithms, exhibit a markedly brittle behavior with almost no displacement ductility. This undesirable behavior does not improve by providing more deformation capacity to this structure’s reduced number of main joints. Currently, the Chilean standard for seismic design requires a unique response modification factor R for wood structures. This research suggests that this requirement should be revisited, specifying different R values depending on the wood structure’s redundancy, considering that its displacement ductility comes almost exclusively from the nonlinear deformation capacity of joints.