Content area

Abstract

For dendrochemical research, it may be important to be aware of the effects of stem asymmetry and the intra-ring structure because these may introduce unwanted dispersion in the results. In dendrochemical studies, separate analysis of the elemental content of early- and latewood is rare. Also, explanations of how the elemental content may relate to stem asymmetry originating from conditions at the edges of contrasting environments are largely lacking in these studies. The purpose of the current study was to estimate the impact of the seasonal tree ring structure and stem asymmetry on the distribution of elements in tree stems. The study population was a plantation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) at an afforestation experiment area, with the sample trees being at the edge of the stand, causing strong crown asymmetry. Six pine trees were cored through the thickness from the maximal crown side (max-side) to the minimal crown side (min-side), and the cores were subsequently scanned through an Itrax Multiscanner unit. The count rates of aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), chlorine (Cl), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and strontium (Sr) in the tree rings from 1990 to 2022 were analyzed. A group of elements (Al, Si, P, S, and Cl) tended to consistently concentrate on the min-side, both in early- and latewood, the difference being most significant for S and Cl. Regarding early- vs. latewood, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Cu, and Zn always had lower concentration in earlywood than in latewood, while others (Ca, Fe, and Sr) had lower concentrations in latewood, the relations being consistently significant. Overall, the role of the min- or max-side of the stem in allocation of elements appears to have been weaker that the intra-ring structure (early- and latewood). Some elements such as Al, Si, P, S, Cl, and Ca (in latewood) were often more abundant on the min-side; other elements such as Fe and Sr (in latewood) were often more abundant on the max-side, but these relations were significant only on rare occasions. Intra-ring heterogeneity (in early- and latewood) appears to be more decisive than the asymmetry of the tree stem in regard to the distribution of elements in Scots pine xylem. Nevertheless, tree stems with high and obvious asymmetry should be more extensively explored because a possibility remains that extreme asymmetry does impact the allocation of elements.

Details

1009240
Location
Taxonomic term
Title
Early- and Latewood vs. Stem Asymmetry: Which Is More Important for Dendrochemistry in Scots Pine?
Author
Gavrikov, Vladimir L 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fertikov, Alexey I 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sharafutdinov, Ruslan A 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Vaganov, Eugene A 2 

 School Ecology and Geography, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] (A.I.F.); [email protected] (R.A.S.); [email protected] (E.A.V.) 
 School Ecology and Geography, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] (A.I.F.); [email protected] (R.A.S.); [email protected] (E.A.V.); Institute for Forest, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 
Publication title
Forests; Basel
Volume
16
Issue
3
First page
493
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
19994907
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-03-11
Milestone dates
2025-01-13 (Received); 2025-03-04 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
11 Mar 2025
ProQuest document ID
3181469441
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/early-latewood-vs-stem-asymmetry-which-is-more/docview/3181469441/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-03-27
Database
ProQuest One Academic