1. Introduction
Laccaria belongs to the family Hydnangiaceae, order Agaricales, phylum Basidiomycota, and kingdom Fungi, and is known for its important role in forest ecosystems, where, as with all mycorrhizal fungi, species facilitate the exchange of nutrients between plants and soil [1,2,3]. Approximately 85% of the terrestrial plants form mycorrhizal associations with fungi [4], and species of Laccaria are an important member of them [5].
The genus is characterized by collybioid to omphaloid basidiomata; echinulate acyanophilous and inamyloid basidiospores; a convex, plane, or umbilicate, and hygrophanous pileus; and a clamp present in all parts of the basidiomata [6,7,8]. Laccaria species are found worldwide in association with both Angiosperms and Gymnosperms worldwide [2]; forming ectomycorrhizas with tree species, many of which are of major economic importance [9,10]. The genus includes over 100 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, which form symbiotic relationships with more than 20 genera of plants [11,12,13].
Since the establishment of Laccaria by Berk. and Broome in 1883, the taxonomy of this genus has been a subject of significant interest and research among mycologists [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. To date, species of Laccaria have been divided into two sub-genera (L. subgen. Laccaria Berk. and Broome, L. subgen. Maritimae (Bon) Pázmány); seven sections (L. sect. Amethystinae Bon, L. sect. Bisporae Pázmány, L. sect. Laccaria Berk. and Broome, L. sect. Maritimae Bon, L. sect. Obscurae Pázmány, L. sect. Purpureobadia Pázmány, L. sect. Violacei Pázmány); and three subsections (L. subsect. Amethystinae (Bon) Contu, L. subsect. Bisporae Contu and L. subsect. Laccaria Berk. and Broome) [23,24,25,26]. However, the data lack phylogenetic support, which has made the taxonomic study of Laccaria consistently perplexing.
The species diversity of Laccaria is important; firstly, the mutualistic relationships of Laccaria with plant roots help improve nutrient uptake and support plant growth [2]. Different Laccaria species have been found to have different preferences for host plants. Therefore, a diverse community of Laccaria species can contribute to the health and diversity of plant communities in a given ecosystem [2]. Laccaria bicolor (Maire) P.D. Orton and L. japonica Popa and K. Nara have been found to have potential for use in bioremediation, as they are capable of breaking down and detoxifying a range of organic pollutants in soil [27,28]. A diverse community of Laccaria species could, therefore, provide a more comprehensive suite of tools for the remediation of contaminated soils. Furthermore, Laccaria species have been found to produce a range of bioactive compounds with potential for use in medicine, biotechnology, and agriculture. Therefore, a diverse community of Laccaria species could provide a wider range of compounds for exploration and development. The diversity of Laccaria species is important for maintaining healthy ecosystems, promoting bioremediation, and supporting biotechnological research and development [29].
With the development of molecular biology, the number of Laccaria species described from Asia has been increasing [14,15,16]. So far, 41 species of Laccaria have been described in Asia [11,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], of which 56% (23/41) are native to China.
Yunnan’s biodiversity is reflected in its diverse ecosystems, ranging from tropical rainforests in the south to alpine meadows in the north. The province is home to many plant species, with studies indicating that it hosts one of the richest floras in the world, making Yunnan one of the richest regions in the world in terms of fungal resources [11,18,30]. In this study, four new species of Laccaria are described from Yunnan Province with morphological and molecular data. The discovery contributes to understanding the diversity of fungal species in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Morphological Study
Specimens were collected from Puer City, Qujing City, and Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province, China. They were photographed in the field; important collection information was recorded [31], separately wrapped in aluminium foil, or kept in a plastic collection box and taken to the laboratory of the Fungal Diversity Conservation and Utilization Team in Northwest Yunnan (Dali University). The fresh basidiomes were macro-morphologically described on the same day of collection. Color identification was performed using the Color Hexa website (
2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing
Macro-morphological studies were conducted following the protocols provided by Genomic DNA, which was extracted from dried specimens using the Ezup Column Fungi Genomic DNA extraction kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Primer pairs for PCR were, respectively, ITS1/ITS4 [36], LR5/LR0R [37], rpb2-5F/rpb2-7cR [38], and EF1-983F/EF1-2218R [39]. ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α were amplified in 25 μL reactions containing 12.5 μL of 2× Taq Plus Master Mix II (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), 9.5 μL of ddH2O, 1 μL and 10 μM of forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL of DNA. The PCR amplicons were sent to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) for Sanger sequencing. Sequence reads were assembled in SeqMan II (DNA STAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA).
2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis
The newly generated sequences were checked using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.0.4 and assembled using SeqMan (DNAstar, Madison, WI, USA). The sequences were then blasted using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (
Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed separately for each locus, and the concatenated dataset using RAxML-HPC2 v. 8.2.12 [43] as implemented on the CIPRES portal [44], with the GTR + G model for both genes and 1000 rapid bootstrap (BS) replicates, the GTR + G model was obtained by MrModeltest 2.2. For Bayesian inference (BI), the best substitution model for each character set was determined with MrModeltest 2.2 [45] on CIPRES, using the Akaike information criterion. Bayesian analysis was performed using MrBayes ver. 3.2.7a [46], as implemented on CIPRES.
3. Results
3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses
A total of 56 new sequences (ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α) were generated for Laccaria species and deposited in GenBank (Table 1). The ITS-LSU-rpb2-tef1-α dataset includes 116 specimens related to 63 species. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with a 5.8S + LSU, ITS1 + ITS2, rpb2 codon, rpb2 introns + tef1-α introns, and tef1-α codon concatenated matrix [37]. The concatenated matrix contained 3533 positions (1058 for 5.8S + LSU, 450 for ITS1 + ITS2, 1026 for rpb2 exons, 163 for tef1-α introns + rpb2 introns, and 836 for tef1-α exons). Based on previous phylogenies [2,10,11,17,18,19,20,21,22], species of the Mythicomyces corneipes (Fr.) Redhead and A.H. Sm. (AFTOLID972; ES11.10.2.A) were selected as the outgroup. In the ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α datasets, the models selected by mrModelTest were GTR + I + G for 5.8S + LSU and tef1-α codon, GTR + G for ITS1 + ITS2 and rpb2 codon, and GTR + G for rpb2 introns + tef1-α introns.
In MrBayes analyses, two runs of five chains each were run for 2,000,000 generations and sampled every 200 generations. Convergence was further evaluated by checking that the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) statistic was close to 1 for all parameters. Moreover, the effective sample size (ESS) was much higher than 200 for all parameters. A clade was considered to be supported if showing a bootstrap support value (BS) ≥ 75% and/or a posterior probability (PP) ≥ 0.90. Trees were edited in FigTree version 1.4.0 and PowerPoint.
The phylogeny from the combined datasets is presented in Figure 1. Fourteen specimens collected in southwestern China formed four monophyletic clades, described here as L. brownii, L. orangei, L. ruber, and L. stipalba, respectively. Each clade was well supported by both ML and BI analyses (Figure 1).
3.2. Taxonomy
Laccaria brownii S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 14a,b
Fungal Name. FN 572202
Diagnosis. Laccaria brownii is characterized by a slightly desaturated orange to brown pileus and stipe, soft orange lamellae, globose to subglobose basidiospores, pileipellis element by grayish inflate hyaline, narrowly clavate to subclavate cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “brownii” refers to the brown pileus and stipe of this fungus.
Holotype. China. Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Ailao Mountains, 24°03′2.0″ N, 101°00′10″ E, elev. 2420 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080307 (HKAS 123286).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 15–27 mm in diam., convex to hemispherical when young, plano-concave to concave, dark (#0a0a0a) at the center, slightly desaturated orange (#bd9b85) with a margin; a slightly depressed to depressed shape of center; margin inflexed when young, sometimes reflexed when old; context thin, 1–2 mm, soft orange (#f2d4bf), unchanging. Lamellae distant, segmentiform, subdecurrent, soft orange (#f2d4bf), 2–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 3–4 tiers. Stipe 20.8–39.2 × 3.0–4.3 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, slightly desaturated orange (#bd9b85) to light grayish orange (#dac3b9), smooth, basal mycelium white (#ffffff); stipe context broadly fistulose, soft orange (#f2d4bf). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 21–40 × 8–14 μm (mean length = 29.9 ± 5.6, mean width = 11.4 ± 1.8), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 4–8 μm × 1–3 μm (mean length = 6.0 ± 1.23, mean width = 2.8 ± 0.68). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [105/3/2] 6.5–8.4× 6.1–7.7 μm (mean length = 7.3 ± 0.58, mean width = 7.1 ± 0.49), Q = 1.04–1.25, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.09, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 0.6–1.1 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 13–20 × 3–7 μm (mean length = 18 ± 4.8, mean width = 5.3 ± 1.4), narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 12–18 × 2–6 μm (mean length = 15 ± 2.2, mean width = 4 ± 1.1), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 80–120 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 3–5 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in a number of sterile basidia. Subhymenium 8–11 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 4–10 × 3–5 μm (mean length = 6 ± 2.1, mean width = 3.9 ± 0.6). Pileipellis 21–50 μm thick, grayish, inflated hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 10–15 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–8 μm wide; stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, grayish in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled hyphae hyaline, 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered, gregarious, or caespitose on the ground in Fagus.
Additional specimens examined. China. Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Ailao Mountains, N 24°03′2.0”, E 101°00′10”, elev. 2420 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080305 (HKAS 123243); ibid., elev. 2322 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080309 (HKAS 144550); ibid., elev. 2108 m, 6 August 2020, S.M. Tang, 2020080609 (HKAS 123243); ibid., elev. 2112 m, 6 August 2020, S.M. Tang, 2020080610 (HKAS 144549); Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, elev. 1825 m, 14 July 2019, S.M. Tang, 2019071406 (HKAS 144548).
Notes. In our multi-locus phylogeny, five specimens of L. brownii were clustered together with 100/1.00. Laccaria murina S. Imai and L. anthracina K. Wang, G.J. Li, Z. Du, and T. Z. Wei are similar to L. brownii in having gray to brown pileus. However, L. murina has relatively smaller basidiomata (pileus size 10–15 mm) and relatively larger basidiomata [47]. Laccaria anthracina has a relatively smaller basidiomata (pileus size 25–65 mm), and relatively larger basidiospores (7.0–9.5 × 7–9.0 μm) [48].
Laccaria orangei S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 14c,d
Fungal Names. FN 572019
Diagnosis. Laccaria orangei is distinguished by its hemispherical to paraboloid pileus and soft orange basidiomata, narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate of pleurocystidia, and narrowly clavate, flexuose branches of cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “orangei” refers to the orange pileus of this fungus.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, 27°75′ 81.3″ N, E 103°23′ 51.1″ E, elev. 1789 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072410 (HKAS 123244).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–32 (–41) mm in diam., hemispherical to paraboloid, becoming campanulate with age, soft orange (#e7a582), unchanging, when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; subumbonate of center; margin reflexed; context thin, 1–2 mm, slightly desaturated orange (#c59682), unchanging. Lamellae distant, arcuate, adnate with a decurrent tooth, soft orange (#f1c7b7), 3–5 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 2–3 tiers. Stipe 46.0–55.1 × 3.4–5.5 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, soft orange (#e9ad88), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); stipe context fistulose, soft orange (#e9ad88). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 30–40 × 7–10 μm (mean length = 35 ± 4.1, mean width = 8 ± 1.4), clavate, mostly two-spored, rarely four-spored, sterigmata 2–5 μm × 1–3 μm (mean length = 4.4 ± 1.1, mean width = 2.2 ± 0.82). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [109/2/2] 5.8–8.0 × 5.5– 7.3 μm (mean length = 6.9 ± 0.58, mean width = 6.5 ± 0.49), Q = 1.00–1.29, Qm = 1.05 ± 0.11, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 0.7–1.8 μm long, ca. 0.5–0.8 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 20–49 × 4–5 μm (mean length = 34.5 ± 4.5, mean width = 4.8 ± 0.6), narrowly clavate, flexuose, branches, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 15–30 × 5–7 (–10) μm (mean length = 33.6 ± 10.7, mean width = 6.5 ± 2.1), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 90–127 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 2–8 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in many sterile basidia and pleurocystidia. Subhymenium 13–20 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 5–9 × 3–6 μm (mean length = 7 ± 1.9, mean width = 4.4 ± 1.4). Pileipellis 30–60 μm thick, orange hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 7–9 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–7 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, pastel red in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered, gregarious, or caespitose on the ground in the Dipterocarpus and Fagus.
Additional specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, elev. 1689 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072410 (HKAS 123246); ibid., elev. 1521 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072405 (HKAS 123301); ibid., elev. 1782 m, 24 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A202124-1 (HKAS 123242); ibid., elev. 1643 m, 24 July 2021, L. Wang, W007 (HKAS 123248).
Notes. Phylogenetically, the species is closely related to L. fagacicola Yang-Yang Cui, Qing Cai, and Zhu L. Yang; L. rubroalba X. Luo, L. Ye, P.E. Mortimer, and K.D. Hyde; and L. aurantia Popa, Rexer, Donges, Zhu L. Yang, and G. Kost. Laccaria fagacicola differs from L. orangei by its convex to applanate, brownish orange to brownish pileus, relatively longer basidia (45–60 × 9–12 μm), and sterigmata (5–8 μm), pleurocystidia lacking and cheilocystidia filamentous to narrowly clavate [49], the ITS sequences differences between L. orangei (HKAS 123244, holotype) and L. fagacicola (HKAS 90435, holotype) were 0.78% (5/643, no gaps). Laccaria rubroalba has a reddish-white pileus, flexuous to narrowly cylindrical pleurocystidia, and cylindrical to capitate cheilocystidia [20]. Laccaria aurantia has relatively larger basidiomata (pileus size 35–40 mm in diam.), basidia (40–45 × 10–12 μm), and basidiospores (9–10 × 8–10 μm) [18].
Laccaria acanthospora A.W. Wilson and G.M. Muell. and L. ambigua K. Hosaka, A.W. Wilson, and G.M. Mueller are morphologically similar to L. orangei for having an orange pileus. Laccaria acanthospora is different by smaller basidiomata (pileus size 4–15 mm in diam.), and larger basidia (40–56 × 10–14 μm) [17]. Laccaria ambigua, originally reported from New Zealand North, has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 8–10 mm) and larger basidiospores (9–9.6 × 9.6–9.9 μm) [2].
Laccaria ruber S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 14e,f
Fungal Names. FN 572203
Diagnosis. Laccaria ruber is characterized by its soft orange basidiomata, which are narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate, and branched cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “ruber” refers to the red margin of the pileus.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province: Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2001 m, 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang (HKAS 123291).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–24 mm in diam., convex to applanate, hemispherical, applanate to plano-concave, soft orange (#f2b790), when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; depressed to subumbonate of center when young, becoming umbilicate with age; margin straight, clearly red (#c71e0c); and context thin, 1–2 mm, soft orange (#f2b790), unchanging. Lamellae distant, segmentiform to subventricose, adnate to narrowly adnate, soft orange (#ec9c7f), 1–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire, clearly red color; lamellulae in 3–4 tiers. Stipe 34.0–49.1 × 3.7–5.5 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, soft orange (#f7a160), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); and stipe context broadly fistulose, soft orange (#f7a160). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 33–39 × 10–14 (–17) μm (mean length = 35.6 ± 1.7, mean width = 13 ± 1.9), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 4–8 μm × 2–3 μm (mean length = 5.7 ± 1.9, mean width = 2.9 ± 0.47). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [120/3/2] 7.2–10.3 × 7.3–9.4 (–10.8) μm (mean length = 8.6 ± 0.74, mean width = 8.2 ± 0.80), Q = 1.00–1.21, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.09, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 0.8–1.2 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 14–35 × 4–7 μm (mean length = 24.1 ± 4.1, mean width = 5.5 ± 1.1), narrowly clavate, flexuose or mucronate, branches, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 18–48 × 3–5 μm (mean length = 35.8 ± 11, mean width = 4.5 ± 0.7), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 130–150 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 4–7 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in several sterile basidia. Subhymenium 7–10 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 4–7 × 3–6 μm (mean length = 6.1 ± 0.9, mean width = 4.6 ± 1.3). Pileipellis 100–130 μm thick, orange hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 7–10 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 2–5 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, pastel red in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 4–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered or gregarious on the ground in Fagus and Pinus mixed forest.
Additional specimens examined. China. Yunnan Province, Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2005 m., 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073021 (HKAS 123292, paratype); ibid., elev. 2018 m., 30 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A20210730-10 (HKAS 123293); ibid., elev. 2100 m., 29 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A20210729-05 (HKAS 123294); ibid., elev. 2100 m., 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073008 (HKAS 123295).
Notes: In our phylogenetic analysis, L. ruber is sister to L. torosa. However, L. torosa differs by its orange-brown to brown pileus and lamellae, relatively larger basidia (39–47 × 12–17 μm), cheilocystidia filamentous to subclavate, no branch, and present abundant caulocystidia on the stipe surface. The ITS sequence differences between L. torosa (SFC 20150902-17, holotype) and L. ruber (HKAS 123291, holotype) were 2.95% (19/643, no gaps) [21].
Laccaria acanthospora, L. ambigua, L. aurantia, and L. indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera, and Vizzini are similar to L. ruber in their orange basidiomata. However, Laccaria acanthospora has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 4–15 mm in diam.), relatively larger basidia (40–56 × 10–14 μm), and absent cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [17]. Laccaria ambigua also has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 8–10 mm in diam.) and absent cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [17]. Laccaria aurantia has larger basidiomata (35–40 mm) and basidia (40–50 × 10–12 μm), relatively longer stipe (80 mm) [18]. Laccaria indohimalayana has larger basidiomata (pileus size 40–95 mm, stipe 80–150 × 12–65 mm), smaller basidiospores (7.60–8.26 × 6.59–7.19 μm), and no cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [50].
Laccaria stipalba S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14g,h
Fungal Names. FN 572204
Diagnosis. Laccaria stipalba is distinctive because of the white stipe, relatively longer sterigmata, and narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “stipalba” refers to the white stipe surface of the holotype.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province. Zhaotong City, 27°27′ 52″ N, 103° 43′ 23″ E, elev. 2200 m., 23 July 2021, L. Wang, W2021-11 (HKAS 123300).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–42 mm in diam., convex to applanate at young, becoming hemispherical, applanate to plano-concave with age, desaturated dark orange (#a6795f) at the center, light grayish pink (#e6e0e4) with margin, when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; depressed of center; margin straight; context thin, 1–2 mm, pale orange light grayish pink (#e6e0e4), unchanging. Lamellae distant, broadly ventricose, adnexed, soft orange (#e7c89c), 2–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 1–2 tiers. Stipe 46.0–66.1 × 2.6–5.7 mm, cylindrical, central, white (#fcfcfc) to light grayish yellow (#e5e4ce), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); stipe context fistulose, white (#fcfcfc). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 29–35 × 10–12 μm (mean length = 31.2 ± 1.6, mean width = 10.4 ± 1.2), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 6–13 μm × 2–3 μm (mean length = 9.5 ± 4.15, mean width = 3.0 ± 0.36). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [150/3/2] 5.8–8.4 × 5.5–8.1 μm (mean length = 6.9 ± 0.68, mean width = 6.6 ± 0.67), Q = 1.00–1.29, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.13, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 1–2 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia (10–) 20–30 × 4–7 μm (mean length = 24.0 ± 3.2, mean width = 5.1 ± 1.2), narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 12–26 × 2–7 μm (mean length = 21 ± 5.1, mean width = 5 ± 1.5), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose, or mucronate, rarely branch, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 69–81 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 2–8 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in number of sterile basidia and cheilocystidia. Subhymenium 7–10 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 5–7 × 3–4 μm (mean length = 6 ± 1.2, mean width = 3.5 ± 0.5). Pileipellis (42–) 59–100 μm thick, colorless hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 4–7 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–7 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, colorless in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered or gregarious on the ground in Fagus and Pinus mixed forest.
Additional specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province. Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2015 m, 29 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072923 (HKAS 123296); ibid., elev. 2011 m, 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073020 (HKAS 123297); ibid., elev. 2035 m, 30 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A2021073005 (HKAS 123235); Zhaotong City, elev. 2180 m, 23 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072306 (HKAS 123285).
Notes: In our phylogenetic analysis, L. stipalba is close to L. salmonicolor and L. versiformis. However, L. salmonicolor has a reddish-brown to pale brown-buff pileus, shorter spines (1–3 μm), larger basidia (39–52 × 12–14 μm), and absent pileocystidia [17]. Laccaria versiformis has a pale brown to pale orange buff pileus and stipe, relatively larger basidiospores (7.5–10 × 7.5–9.5 μm), and basidia (41–55 × 10–14 μm) [21].
In the field, L. stipalba is easily confused with L. alba Zhu L. Yang and Lan Wang and L. pseudoalba S.M Tang and S.H. Li due to their similar orange-white to whitish basidiomata. However, L. alba has a relatively thicker pileipellis (30–75 μm), shorter sterigmata (1.5–2 μm), absent pleurocystidia, narrower cheilocystidia (4–6 μm), and clavate, hyaline caulocystidia [16]. Laccaria pseudoalba, originally reported from Thailand, has a stipe surface that is pale to pastel red; the ITS sequence difference between L. pseudoalba (MFLU 22-0106, holotype) and L. stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype) is 6.38% (41/643, no gaps) [11].
Figure 14Characteristics of basidiospore ornamentations under scanning electron microscope (SEM). (a,b) Laccaria brownii; (c,d) Laccaria orangei; (e,f) Laccaria ruber; and (g,h) Laccaria stipalba.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
4. Discussion
The taxonomic knowledge of Laccaria species in China, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, is still nascent and requires further exploration. Historically, many Chinese specimens of Laccaria were misidentified as L. amethystea (Bull.) Murrill, L. bicolor, L. laccata (Scop.) Cooke and L. vinaceoavellanea based solely on morphological characteristics [11]. However, advancements in phylogenetic studies have enhanced our understanding of certain species within China, and the discovery of new species in Laccaria is rising [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Molecular data have been instrumental in the identification of species in this genus, which has led to a better appreciation of their diversity. Despite these advancements, the distribution and accurate identification of species such as L. amethystea, L. bicolor, and L. laccata in China necessitate further investigation. We will continue to collect specimens of the Laccaria from the Asian region and add species to the phylogeny of the Laccaria; the aim is to study the species diversity of Laccaria in Asia and to establish a phylogenetic framework for the genus, laying the groundwork for subsequent species research within Laccaria.
In our study, we found that several morphological features (see Table 2) of Laccaria species are important for species identification. These features include the pileipellis, stipitipellis, basidia, number, and length of sterigmata, basidiospore size, and surface ornamentation, as well as the size and shape characteristics of the cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia.
Some previous studies have described cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia in Laccaria species as non-existent; we speculate that some of these structures in Laccaria species may have been misidentified as terminal hyphae. This issue will be a focus of our future work, as the size and shape of the cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia are important for identified species of Laccaria. Most researchers have widely accepted the description of the narrowly clavate to subclavate structures on the hymenial surface as cystidia [16,17,18,19,20,21,30,49,51,52], rather than as terminal hyphae.
Recently, with the application of molecular systematics, the species of Laccaria in Asia have been updated [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Morphological examination and phylogenetic analyses identified 45 (see Table 2) species of Laccaria in Asia (including those introduced in this paper); these species are described from China (60%, 27/45), South Korea (26.7%, 12/45), Japan (15.6%, 7/45), India (15.6%, 7/45), and Thailand (3/45). While numerous Laccaria species have been documented in China, most of these reports originate from southwestern China.
Most basidiomata of larger Laccaria species, such as L. yunnanensis, L. moshuijun, and L. fengkaiensis, are highly valued for their culinary properties in Asia. They can be mixed with chili peppers, garlic, and chives for a stir-fry, creating an exceptional and delicious edible mushroom dish (Figure 15). These mushrooms are not only appreciated for their unique flavors but also their potential health benefits. In the subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern China, where these species are commonly found, they play a significant role in local gastronomy. Collecting these mushrooms is often a seasonal activity, reflecting the biodiversity and culinary traditions of the region [11].
The relationship between fungi, plants, and insects has always attracted the attention of researchers [55]. This fungus is often found in symbiotic relationships with plants, where it can enhance plant growth and resistance to pathogens. In a unique ecological interaction, the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor has been shown to transfer nitrogen directly from soil-dwelling springtails (collembola) to white pine trees (Pinus strobus) [55,56,57]. This nitrogen transfer occurs specifically in white pine, as L. bicolor primarily associates with the roots of pine and spruce species in temperate forests. This process highlights the intricate symbiotic relationships between fungi, insects, and plants, where the fungus acts as a mediator to enhance nutrient acquisition for its host plant.
From an evolutionary perspective, Laccaria is known to form symbiotic relationships with a wide range of plant hosts. Initially, Laccaria species likely established symbiotic associations with angiosperms [2], which are characterized by their broad diversity and ecological dominance. Over time, these fungi expanded their host range to include both gymnosperms and angiosperms, reflecting an adaptive strategy to thrive in diverse environments. This evolutionary shift allowed Laccaria species to colonize a broader range of plant hosts, enhancing their ecological resilience and nutrient cycling capabilities [58]. For example, Laccaria bicolor has been shown to form ectomycorrhizal associations with various tree species, including Pinus (pine) and Fagus (beech), demonstrating the ability of these fungi to interact with both gymnosperms and angiosperms [59]. The ability to form symbiotic relationships with multiple plant species simultaneously further supports the idea that Laccaria have evolved to maximize their ecological fitness by adapting to different host environments. Further research is needed to confirm these associations and explore the specific mechanisms and benefits involved.
Methodology, Z.-L.L., S.-M.T. and F.-M.Y.; formal analysis, S.-M.T. and G.Z.; investigation, K.-Y.N., R.-Y.L. and G.Z.; resources, R.-Y.L., G.Z. and K.-Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-M.T.; writing—review and editing, S.-M.T., S.C.K., L.L., K.D.H., F.-M.Y., X.-J.S. and Z.-L.L.; funding acquisition, Z.-L.L. and X.-J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The data presented in this study are openly available in Species Diversity of Edible MushroomsⅠ–Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China at 10.6084/m9.figshare.28022549.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequence data of Laccaria. ML bootstrap (≥70%) and posterior probabilities (≥0.90) are indicated above branches or in front of the branch leading to each node. The new species are highlighted in red; the holotype of each species is in bold.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequence data of Laccaria. ML bootstrap (≥70%) and posterior probabilities (≥0.90) are indicated above branches or in front of the branch leading to each node. The new species are highlighted in red; the holotype of each species is in bold.
Figure 2. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria brownii ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123286, (c–e) HKAS 1234243, and (f,g) HKAS 144548). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 3. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 123286). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) cheilocystidia; and (d) pleurocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 12328). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria orangei ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123244), ((c–f) HKAS 123246). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 6. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) basidiospores; (b) basidia; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d,e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 8. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria ruber ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123291, (c,d) HKAS 123292, (e,f) HKAS 123294). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 9. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 10. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 11. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria stipalba ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123300, (c,d) HKAS 123285, and (e,f) HKAS 123296). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 12. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) basidia; (b) hymenium; (c) basidiospores; (d) pleurocystidia; and (e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 13. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 15. Laccaria fengkaiensis ((a) Growing in the wild; (b) as food after cooking).
Names, sample numbers, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequences of the Laccaria taxa were newly generated in this study. “*” following a species name indicates that the specimen is the holotype. All specimen locations are in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin (Yunnan).
Species Name | Sample No. | GenBank Accession | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | LSU | rpb2 | tef1-α | ||
Laccaria brownii | HKAS 123286 * | PQ651574 | PQ721003 | PQ753337 | PQ753351 |
L. brownii | HKAS 123243 | PQ651575 | PQ721004 | PQ753338 | PQ753352 |
L. brownii | HKAS 144548 | PQ651576 | PQ721005 | PQ753339 | PQ753353 |
L. brownii | HKAS 144549 | PQ651577 | PQ721006 | PQ753340 | PQ753354 |
L. brownii | HKAS 144550 | PQ651578 | PQ721007 | PQ753341 | PQ753355 |
L. orangei | HKAS 123244 * | PQ651572 | PQ720997 | PQ753335 | PQ753349 |
L. orangei | HKAS 123246 | PQ651573 | PQ720998 | PQ753336 | PQ753350 |
L. ruber | HKAS 123291 * | PQ651570 | PQ776317 | PQ753333 | PQ753347 |
L. ruber | HKAS 123292 | PQ651571 | PQ776318 | PQ753334 | PQ753348 |
L. stipalba | HKAS 123300 * | PQ651565 | PQ753313 | PQ753328 | PQ753342 |
L. stipalba | HKAS 123285 | PQ651566 | PQ753314 | PQ753329 | PQ753343 |
L. stipalba | HKAS 123297 | PQ651567 | PQ753315 | PQ753330 | PQ753344 |
L. stipalba | HKAS 123296 | PQ651568 | PQ753316 | PQ753331 | PQ753345 |
L. stipalba | HKAS 123235 | PQ651569 | PQ753317 | PQ753332 | PQ753346 |
The main morphological features and geographical distribution of known Asian Laccaria species. The newly added species in this study are in bold.
Species | Cap Size | Cap Color | Basidiospores Size | Cheilocystidia Size | Pleurocystidia Size | Distribution | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laccaria acanthospora | 4–15 mm | Orange | 7.0–10.0 × 7.0–10.0 μm | N/A | N/A | China | [ |
L. angustilamella | 20–30 mm | Pinkish flesh-colored to buff | 8.5–11.5 × 8.0–11.0 μm | 11–66 × 3–7 μm | Absent | China | [ |
L. alba | 10–35 mm | Pinkish to pale flesh | 7.0–9.5 × 7.0–9.0 μm | 20–48 × 4–6 μm | Absent | China; South Korea; Japan | [ |
L. araneosa | 10–18 mm | Orange brown or light brown | 8.0–9.0 × 7.4–9.0 μm | Absent | Absent | Japan; South Korea | [ |
L. aurantia | 35–40 mm | Orange | 9.0–10.0 × 8.0–10.0 μm | 25–40 × 5–10 μm | 25–40 × 5–10 μm | China; Japan | [ |
L. bicolor | 15–60 mm | Pinkish flesh to reddish brown | 6.5–8.0 × 6.0–7.5 μm | 24–54 × 2–8 μm | N/A | China; South Korea | [ |
L. bullipellis | 22 mm | Brown to orange brown | 6.0–9.0 × 6.0–10.0 μm | N/A | 50–62 × 6–29 μm | China | [ |
L. brownii | 15–27 mm | Dark at center, slightly desaturated orange | 6.5–8.4× 6.1–7.7 μm | 13–20 × 3–7 μm | 12–18 × 2–6 μm | China | This study |
L. cinnabarina | 10–90 mm | Dark brown to orange red | 7.0–9.5 × 7.0–9.0 μm | Absent | Absent | China | [ |
L. fagacicola | 20–45 mm | Orange brown or brown | 7.0–9.0 × 6.5–8.0 μm | 15–50 × 3–8 μm | Absent | China | [ |
L. fengkaiensis | 50–90 mm | Orange white, pale white when young; light orange, pale red to pastel red with age | 5.2–6.3 × 5.1–6.3 μm | Absent | Absent | China | [ |
L. fulvogrisea | <30 mm | Grey to reddish brown | 8.0–10.0 × 8.0–11.0 μm | 30–50 × 3–7 μm | 30–50 × 3–7 μm | China | [ |
L. griseolilacina | 20–35 mm | Light grayish to orange brown | 8.0–10.8 × 8.2–10.9 μm | Absent | 20–31 × 4–8 μm | South Korea | [ |
L. guizhouensis | 15–63 mm | Flesh-colored to brownish white to brown | 7–8 × 6–8 μm | 20–35 × 3–6 μm | 27–46 × 3–7 μm | China | [ |
L. himalayensis | 6–34 mm | Brown to orange pink | 6.5–10.0 × 6.5–10.0 μm | N/A | N/A | China | [ |
L. indohimalayana | 40–95 mm | Brownish orange to light orange | 6.9–8.3 × 6.6–8.1 μm | 19–29 × 4–6 μm | 15–39 × 3–5 μm | India | [ |
L. japonica | 10–30 mm | Bright violet to purple, pale tan to flesh color | 9.0–10.0 × 7.0–9.0 μm | 30–50 × 3–7 μm | 30–50 × 3–7 μm | Japan; South Korea; China | [ |
L. longistriata | 5–45 mm | Brownish to brown at the center, cream, flesh-colored to brownish toward the margin | 6.5–8.0 × 6.0–8.0 μm | Absent | 30–60 × 4–8 μm | China | [ |
L. laccata | 10–52 mm | Grayish purple to buff | 7.5–9.5 × 7.5–9.5 μm | 34–86 × 2–12 μm | Absent | India | [ |
L. macrobasidia | 15–45 mm | Orange brown to light brown | 8.7–11.4 × 7.9–10.3 μm | Absent | 19–27 × 4–7 μm | South Korea | [ |
L. moshuijun | 30 mm | Violet to bluish | 8.0–9.0 × 9.0–10.0 μm | 30–50 × 5–8 μm | 30–50 × 3–6 μm | China | [ |
L. montana | 7–35 mm | Reddish orange to brown | 8.5–13.0 × 8.0–10.5 μm | N/A | N/A | India | [ |
L. murina | 45 mm | Dark reddish brown to reddish orange brown | 13.5–17.0 × 7.5–9.5 μm | N/A | N/A | Japan; South Korea; India | [ |
L. nanlingensis | 30–55 mm | Brownish orange to brownish red | 6.5–7.5 × 6–7 µm | 40–60 × 4–6 µm | Absent | China | [ |
L. negrimarginata | 5–15 mm | Orange brown to buff, blackish brown to dark brown | 7.0–10.0 × 6.0–10.0 μm | N/A | N/A | China | [ |
L. neovinaceoavellanea | 15–40 mm | Purplish pink to pale violet | 7.0–8.0 × 7.0–8.0 μm | 25–50 × 4–8 μm | Absent | China | [ |
L. nobilis | 20–50 mm | Pale pinkish orange to dark orange | 5.4–9.5 × 5.0–7.8 μm | 29–44 × 1–4 μm | N/A | China | [ |
L. olivaceogrisea | 9–32 mm | Grey | 7.5–9.0 × 8.0–9.0 μm | Absent | Absent | India | [ |
L. orangei | 18–32 mm | Soft orange | 5.8–8.0 × 5.5–7.3 μm | 20–49 × 4–5 μm | 15–30 × 5–7 μm | China | This study |
L. pallidorosea | 10–25 mm | Brown to pink at center, becoming cream to white | 7.0–9.0 × 6.5–8.5 μm | 25–40 × 3–8 μm | Absent | China | [ |
L. parva | 5–25 mm | Bright brown | 8.0–10.0 × 8.5–10.0 μm | 19–40 × 4–6 μm | 25–33 × 4–6 μm | Japan; South Korea; China | [ |
L. prava | 35–75 mm | Pastel red, pale red to reddish white | 6.5–7.5 × 7.0–8.0 μm | Absent | Absent | China | [ |
L. pseudoalba | 9–15 mm | Pale orange to orange white | 6.9–11.3 × 6–10.4 μm | 20–31 × 6–9 μm | 15–31 × 6–8 μm | Thailand | [ |
L. pumila | 10–35 mm | Orange brown to fading lighter | 11.5–13.0 × 10–11.5 μm | N/A | N/A | India | [ |
L. rubroalba | 22–40 mm | Reddish white | 6.0–9.0 × 5.0–7.0 μm | 12–26 × 5–9 μm | 25–40 × 4–6 μm | China | [ |
L. ruber | 18–24 mm | Soft orange | 7.2–10.3 × 7.3–9.4 μm | 14–35 × 4–7 μm | 18–48 × 3–5 μm | China | This study |
L. rufobrunnea | 12–35 mm | Brownish orange to brownish red | 8–9 × 7–8 µm | 35–50 × 3–7 μm | Absent | China | [ |
L. salmonicolor | 10–35 mm | Reddish brown | 7.5–10.0 × 7.5–10.0 μm | N/A | N/A | China | [ |
L. spinulosa | 8–25 mm | Brownish orange to brown | 9–11.0 × 9–10.5 μm | Absent | Absent | China | [ |
L. stipalba | 18–42 mm | Light grayish pink | 5.8–8.4 × 5.5–8.1 μm | 20–30 × 4–7 μm | 12–26 × 2–7 μm | China | This study |
L. subroseoalbescens | 2–8 mm | Pale yellow to light yellow | 7.0–8.9 × 6.8–9.0 μm | 23–37 × 4–8 μm | 36–59 × 5–8 μm | Thailand | [ |
L. torosa | 10–70 mm | Orange brown or brown | 8.0–9.0 × 8.0–9.5 μm | 54–94 × 5–9 μm | 55–75 × 7–13 μm | South Korea | [ |
L. tortilis | <30 mm | Orange brown to pinkish flesh | N/A | N/A | N/A | South Korea | [ |
L. umbilicata | 10–28 mm | Pale yellow, pale orange to light orange | 8–10 × 8–10 µm | 30–47 × 3–8 µm | Absent | China | [ |
L. versiformis | 10–35 mm | Pale brown to brown | 7.5–8.2 × 7.5–9.5 μm | 42–54 × 6–8 μm | 42–65 × 7–9 μm | South Korea | [ |
L. vinaceoavellanea | N/A | Brownish vinaceous | 7.4–9.2 × 7.4–9.2 μm | Absent | N/A | Japan; South Korea | [ |
L. violaceotincta | 4–38 mm | Dark brown at the center, reddish brown towards the margin when young | 7.0–8.0 × 7.0–8.0 μm | 19–104 × 4–10 μm | Absent | India | [ |
L. yunnanensis | 60–100 mm | Brown to flesh-colored | 8.0–9.0 × 8.0–10.0 μm | 30–50 × 4–6 μm | 55–65 × 15–25 μm | China; Thailand | [ |
Annotation: “N/A” refers to not mentioned in the original description.
References
1. Hyde, K.D.; Noorabadi, M.T.; Thiyagaraja, V.; He, M.Q.; Johnston, P.R.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; Armand, A.; Biketova, A.Y.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Erdoğdu, M. et al. The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere; 2024; 15, pp. 5146-6239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25]
2. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Mueller, G.M. Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytol.; 2017; 213, pp. 1862-1873. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14270] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164331]
3. Niego, A.G.T.; Rapior, S.; Thongklang, N.; Olivier, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Peter, M. Reviewing the contributions of macrofungi to forest ecosystem processes and services. Fungal Biol. Rev.; 2023; 44, 100294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2022.11.002]
4. Niego, A.G.T.; Lambert, C.; Mortimer, P.; Thongklang, N.; Sylvie, R.; Miriam, G.; Hedda, S.; Esteban, C.G.; Arttapon, W.; Hyde, K.D. The contribution of fungi to the global economy. Fungal Diver.; 2023; 121, pp. 95-137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00520-9]
5. Wu, F.; Zhou, L.W.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Li, T.H.; Dai, Y.C. Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Diver.; 2019; 98, pp. 1-76.
6. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy; 4th ed. Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1986; 981p.
7. Mueller, G.M. Systematics of Laccaria (Agaricales) in the Continental United States and Canada, with Discussions on Extralimital Taxa and Descriptions of Extant Types; Field Museum of Natural History: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992; 158p.
8. Latha, K.D.; Raj, K.A.; Manimohan, P. Laccaria violaceotincta: A new species from tropical India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa; 2019; 392, pp. 140-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.392.2.3]
9. Kropp, B.R.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Key Genera in Profile; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 65-88.
10. Ramos, A.; Bandala, V.M.; Montoya, L. A new species and a new record of Laccaria (Fungi, Basidiomycota) found in a relict forest of the endangered Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana. MycoKeys; 2017; 27, pp. 77-94. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.27.21326] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29559819]
11. Zhang, M.; Gao, X.L.; Mu, L.Q.; Deng, W.Q. Morphology and molecular phylogeny reveal five new species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China. J. Fungi; 2023; 9, 1179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof9121179] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38132780]
12. Tang, S.M.; Vadthanarat, S.; Raghoonundon, B.; Luo, Z.L.; Zhu, X.Y.; Yu, F.M.; He, J.; Li, S.H. New species and new records of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Northern Thailand. MycoKeys; 2024; 107, pp. 189-217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.107.127907]
13. Orton, P.D. New check list of British Agarics and Boleti, part III (keys to Crepidotus, Deconica, Flocculina, Hygrophorus, Naucoria, Plutes and Volvaria). Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.; 1960; 43, pp. 159-439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(60)80065-4]
14. McNabb, R.F.R. The Tricholomataceae of New Zealand 1. Laccaria Berk. Br. N. Z. J. Bot.; 1972; 10, pp. 461-484.
15. Mueller, G.M. New North American species of Laccaria (Agaricales). Mycotaxon; 1984; 20, pp. 101-116.
16. Wang, L.; Yang, Z.L.; Liu, J.H. Two new species of Laccaria (Basidiomycetes) from China. Nova Hedwig.; 2004; 79, pp. 511-517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2004/0079-0511]
17. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Perry, B.A.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from Tibet (Xizang Autonomous Region, China). Mycoscience; 2013; 54, pp. 406-419. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2013.01.006]
18. Popa, F.; Rexer, K.H.; Donges, K.; Yang, Z.L.; Kost, G. Three new Laccaria species from Southwest (Yunnan). Mycol. Prog.; 2014; 13, 998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-014-0998-7]
19. Popa, F.; Jimenéz, S.Y.C.; Weisenborn, J.; Donges, K.; Rexer, K.H.; Piepenbring, M. A new Laccaria species from cloud forest of Fortuna, Panama. Mycol. Prog.; 2016; 15, 19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1139-7]
20. Luo, X.; Ye, L.; Chen, J.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Xu, J.; Hyde, K.D.; Mortimer, P.E. Laccaria rubroalba sp. nov. (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southwestern China. Phytotaxa; 2016; 284, pp. 41-50. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.284.1.4]
21. Cho, H.J.; Park, M.S.; Lee, H.; Oh, S.Y.; Wilson, A.W.; Mueller, G.M.; Lim, Y.W. A systematic revision of the ectomycorrhizal genus Laccaria from Korea. Mycologia; 2018; 110, pp. 948-961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1507542]
22. Li, F. Two new species of Laccaria from South China, with a note on Hodophilus glaberipes. Mycol. Prog.; 2020; 19, pp. 525-539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01573-9]
23. Cullings, K.; DeSimone, J. Rapid response by the ectomycorrhizal (ECM) community of a lodgepole Pine forest to diesel application as indicated by laccase gene fragment diversity. Biorem. Biodegrad.; 2014; 5, 235.
24. Quan, L.; Shi, L.; Zhang, S.; Yao, Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, Y.W.; Liu, Y.L.; Lian, C.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Shen, Z.G. et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi, two species of Laccaria, differentially block the migration and accumulation of cadmium and copper in Pinus densiflora. Chemosphere; 2023; 334, 138857. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138857] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187383]
25. Bon, M. Tricholomataceae de France et d’Europe occidentale-6-Tribu Clitocybeae Fayod. Clé monographique des genres Clitocybe, Lepista, Ripartites, Laccaria. Doc. Mycol.; 1983; 13, pp. 1-53.
26. Pázmány, D. Zur Systematik der Gattung Laccaria Bk. et Br. Z. Für Mykol.; 1994; 60, pp. 5-12.
27. Mueller, G.M. Laccaria laccata complex in North America and Sweden: Intercollection pairing and morphometric analyses. Mycologia; 1991; 83, pp. 578-594. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1991.12026057]
28. Osmundson, T.W.; Cripps, C.L.; Mueller, G.M. Morphological and molecular systematics of Rocky Mountain alpine Laccaria. Mycologia; 2005; 97, pp. 949-972. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832746]
29. Stadler, M.; Sterner, O. Production of bioactive secondary metabolites in the fruit bodies of macrofungi as a response to injury. Phytochemistry; 1998; 49, pp. 1013-1019. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00800-5]
30. Wang, K.; Chen, S.L.; Dai, Y.C.; Jia, Z.F.; Li, T.H.; Liu, T.Z.; Phurbu, D.; Mamut, R.; Sun, G.Y.; Bau, T. et al. Overview of China’s nomenclature novelties of fungi in the new century (2000–2020). Mycosystema; 2021; 40, pp. 822-833.
31. Hu, Y.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Li, H.; Galappaththi, M.C.; Zhao, C.L.; Kakumyan, P.; Mortimer, P.E. The impact of drying temperature on basidiospore size. Diversity; 2022; 14, 239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14040239]
32. Rathnayaka, A.R.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Jones, G.E.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Bhat, D.J.; Priyashantha, A.H.; Stephenson, S.L.; Tibpromma, S.; Karunarathna, S.C. Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. N. Z. J. Bot.; 2024; pp. 1-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734]
33. Tang, S.M.; He, M.Q.; Raspe, O.; Luo, X.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, Y.J.; Li, S.H.; Hyde, K.D. Two new species of Termitomyces (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from China and Thailand. Phytotaxa; 2020; 439, pp. 231-242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.439.3.5]
34. Tang, S.M.; Lv, T.; He, J.; Yu, F.M.; Luo, H.M.; Li, S.H. Hodophilus pseudoglabripes (Clavariaceae, Agaricales), a new species from Thailand. Phytotaxa; 2023; 597, pp. 219-230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.597.3.3]
35. Tang, S.M.; Wisitrassameewong, K.; Yu, F.M.; Ye, L.; Gao, L.; Xia, L. Lactarius pseudoaurantiozonatus (Russulales), A new Species of Lactarius subgenus Lactarius from China. Chiang Mai J. Sci.; 2022; 49, pp. 1307-1316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12982/CMJS.2022.080]
36. White, T.J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315-322.
37. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol.; 1990; 172, pp. 4238-4246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990]
38. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 1999; 16, pp. 1799-1808. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092]
39. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia; 2005; 97, pp. 84-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84]
40. Nilsson, R.H.; Ryberg, M.; Kristiansson, E.; Abarenkov, K.; Larsson, K.H.; Kõljalg, U. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: A fungal perspective. PLoS ONE; 2006; 1, e59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000059] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17183689]
41. Hall, T. BioEdit v7. 2007; Available online: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/BioEdit.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
42. Salvador, C.G.; José, M.S.M.; Toni, G. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics; 2009; 25, pp. 1972-1973.
43. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics; 2014; 30, pp. 1312-1313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033]
44. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010.
45. Nylander, J.A.A. MrModeltest, Version 2.2; Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.
46. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.; Teslenko, M. MrBayes Version 3.2 Manual: Tutorials and Model Summaries. 2011; Available online: http://brahms.biology.rochester.edu/software.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
47. Imai, S. Studies on the Agaricaceae of Hokkaido. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.; 1938; 43, pp. 1-378.
48. Wang, K.; Liu, D.M.; Li, G.J.; Liu, T.Z.; Xie, M.L.; Du, Z.; Wei, T.Z. Taxonomy of Laccaria in China based on the specimens collected in the HMAS. J. Fungal Res.; 2023; 20, pp. 271-284.
49. Cui, Y.Y.; Cai, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.L. Two new Laccaria species from China based on molecular and morphological evidence. Mycol. Prog.; 2021; 20, pp. 567-576. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01698-5]
50. Wang, X.H.; Kanad, D.; Ishika, B.; Chen, Y.H.; Bhatt, R.P.; Ghosh, A.; Hembrom, M.E.; Hofstetter, V.; Parihar, A.; Vizzini, A. et al. Fungal biodiversity profiles 81–90. Cryptogam. Mycol.; 2019; 40, pp. 57-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a5]
51. Li, J.; Che, N.J.; Cui, Y.Y. Three new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Southwest China (Yunnan) based on morphological and multi-gene sequence data. Front. Microbiol.; 2024; 15, 1411488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1411488]
52. Cho, H.J.; Lee, H.; Park, M.S.; Park, K.H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, Y.; Kim, C.; Lim, Y.W. Two new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Korea. Mycobiology; 2020; 48, pp. 288-295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2020.1786961]
53. Zhang, S.F.; Gui, Y.; Zhu, G.S.; Shang, N.J.; Li, B.; Yang, T.J.; Gong, G.L.; Huang, W.B.; Liu, Z.B. Laccaria guizhouensis sp. nov. (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Southwest China. N. Z. J. Bot.; 2024; 62, pp. 138-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2024.2304754]
54. Mueller, G.M.; Vellinga, E.C. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Laccaria, B. & Br. Laccaria amethystea, L. fraterna, L. laccata, L. pumila, and their synonyms. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi; 1986; 13, pp. 27-43.
55. Behie, S.W.; Zelisko, P.M.; Bidochka, M.J. Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science; 2012; 336, pp. 1576-1577. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1222289] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723421]
56. Klironomos, J.N.; Hart, M.M. Animal nitrogen swap for plant carbon. Nature; 2001; 410, pp. 651-652. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35070643]
57. Richter, D.L.; Bruhn, J.N. Mycorrhizal fungus colonization of Pinus resinosa Ait. transplanted on northern hardwood clearcuts. Soil Bio. Biochem.; 1993; 25, pp. 355-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(93)90135-X]
58. Ángeles-Argáiz, R.E.; Cruz-Gutiérrez, R.; Medel-Ortiz, R.; Pérez-Moreno, J.; Velázquez-López, O.E.; Mata, G. Recognizing symbiotic compatibility between Laccaria trichodermophora and Pinus teocote. Symbiosis; 2024; 94, pp. 151-164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13199-024-01021-2]
59. Zhang, K.; Chen, X.; Shi, X.; Yang, Z.; Yang, L.; Liu, D.; Yu, F. Endophytic bacterial community, core taxa, and functional variations within the fruiting bodies of Laccaria. Microorganisms; 2024; 12, 2296. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112296] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39597685]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
As symbiotic mycorrhizal associates, species within the genus Laccaria play pivotal roles in forest ecosystems, specifically forming ectomycorrhizal relationships with the root systems of various plants. Some Laccaria species are recognized for their edibility, holding potential as a sustainable food source in the context of future food security and dietary diversification. In this study, the species diversity of Laccaria in Yunnan was investigated, and four novel species were identified. Their taxonomical positions and phylogenetic affinities were confirmed through phylogenetic analysis based on ITS, nrLSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence data. Macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the new species are also given here. Laccaria brownii sp. nov. has a dark to slightly desaturated orange pileus, stipe context broadly fistulose and soft orange, and relatively smaller cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia. Laccaria orangei sp. nov. has a hemispherical to paraboloid pileus, abundant narrowly clavate, flexuose, and branched cheilocystidia. Laccaria ruber sp. nov. pileus is red on the margin, clearly striate on the pileus surface, basidia clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored. Laccaria stipalba sp. nov. stipe surface is white, long sterigmata (4–13 μm × 2–3 μm), pleurocystidia narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, rarely branch. The descriptions, illustrations, and phylogenetic analysis results of the new taxa are provided. In addition, the new taxa are compared with closely related taxa.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 College of Agriculture and Biological Science, Dali University, Dali 671003, China;
2 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity, Biogeography of East Asia, Fungal Diversity and Green Development, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China;
3 Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biologyand Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China;
4 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiangrai 57100, Thailand;
5 College of Agriculture and Biological Science, Dali University, Dali 671003, China;