Content area
The Precambrian crystalline basement of Madagascar, shaped by its diverse geological history of magmatic activity, sedimentation, and metamorphism, is divided into six distinct geological units. Within this intricate geological framework, five primary types of uranium deposits are present. Despite the presence of these deposits, their resource potential remains largely unquantified. To address this, a comprehensive study was conducted on Madagascar’s uranium geochemical blocks. This study processed the original data of uranium elements across the region, following the “Theoretical Model Pedigree of Geochemical Block Mineralization” proposed by Xie Xuejin. The analysis is based on the geochemical mapping data of Madagascar at a scale of 1:100,000, which was jointly completed by the China–Madagascar team and involved the delineation of geochemical blocks and the division of their internal structures using the 15 km × 15 km window data. The study used an isoline with a uranium content greater than 3.2 × 10−6 as a boundary and considered five key factors for the classification of prospective areas. These factors included uranium bulk density, anomaly intensity, block structure, prospective area, and the tracing of uranium enrichment trajectories through the pedigree chart of 5-level geochemical blocks. By integrating these factors with potential resource assessment, uranium mining economics, and conditions for uranium mining and utilization, the study successfully classified and evaluated uranium resources in Madagascar. As a result, 10 uranium prospective areas were identified, ranging from Level I to IV, with 3 being Level I areas deemed highly promising for exploration and investment. For the first time, the study predicted a resource potential of 72,600 t of uranium resources, marking a significant step towards understanding Madagascar’s uranium endowment.
Details
; Wang, Tiangang 2
; Razafimbelo, Rachel 3 ; Xu, Fengming 4 ; Sun, Wei 4 ; Ralison, Bruno 3 ; Wang, Zhuo 4 ; Zhou, Yongheng 4 ; Zhao, Yuandong 5 ; Zhao, Jun 6 1 School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2 Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, China;
3 Mention Sciences de la Terre et de l’ Environnement, Faculté des Sciences, Université d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar;
4 Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China;
5 Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China;
6 Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China;