It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the effectiveness of whitening mouthwashes, both with and without hydrogen peroxide (HP), after at-home teeth whitening in preserving the achieved whiteness and assessing their impact on enamel surface hardness.
Methods
One hundred extracted human premolar teeth were divided into two groups, and home bleaching agents (Philips Zoom NiteWhite 22% Carbamide Peroxide, Ultradent Opalescence PF 16% Carbamide Peroxide) were applied to the groups. The teeth subjected to home bleaching were further divided into five subgroups, and each subgroup underwent a four-week cycle of application of a coloring agent and whitening mouthwash (Colgate Optic White (COW)(%2 HP), Rocs Black Edition (Rocs) (%1 HP), SPLAT Professional Bioactive gargle white Plus (SPLAT) (Ananas sativus fruit extract containing), Listerine Advanced White (Listerine) (Pyrophsphate containing), and distilled water (DW) (control)). Color and microhardness measurements were recorded at baseline, after home bleaching, and after treatment with whitening mouthwashes.
Results
Compared with those treated with Opalescence PF, the samples treated with Zoom achieved a significantly greater degree of whitening (p < 0.001). When the effects of postwhitening mouthwash were evaluated (ΔE002), Listerine presented the lowest ΔE002 value in both home bleaching groups, whereas the control group presented the highest ΔE002 value. Both home-bleaching agents caused a significant increase in the initial WID values (p < 0.05). After home-bleaching, the increased WID values (WID2) significantly decreased in all mouthwash groups following exposure to the staining and whitening mouthwash cycle (WID3) (p < 0.05). The impact of home bleaching agents on microhardness was not significantly different (p = 0.151). When we examined the impact of whitening mouthwashes on microhardness, in the Zoom group, no statistically significant difference was observed in surface hardness (p > 0.05). However, in the Opalescence PF group, only the Listerine group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Higher concentrations of carbamide peroxide provide faster and more effective whitening. Whitening mouthwash containing HP and pyrophosphate is effective in maintaining tooth whiteness after home bleaching; however, its impact on enamel microhardness depends on the formulation. Notably, only Listerine in the Opalescence PF group significantly increased surface hardness. Given the drawbacks of HP, pyrophosphate-based mouthwash may serve as a safer alternative.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer