1. Introduction
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are a group of plant-specific steroid hormones that were first identified in oilseed rape. They constitute the sixth class of phytohormones, in addition to auxin, gibberellin, cytokinin, abscisic acid, and ethylene [1,2]. BRs play an important role in various aspects of plant growth, development, and reproduction, as well as in responses to high- and low-temperature stress, drought, salinity, and insect attacks [3,4,5,6]. BRs also promote cell elongation, influence vascular differentiation, coordinate cell layer interactions, participate in photomorphogenesis, stomata formation, and stem cell self-renewal and death, promote seed germination, regulate flowering and male fertility, and enhance plant stress resistance [5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The BR signaling pathway can interact with several other pathways to regulate plant growth and development and respond to abiotic stresses. For instance, it interacts with abscisic acid (ABA) signaling to enhance plant resistance to abiotic stress [14]. Additionally, the BR signaling pathway interacts with the drought response through RD26, exerting a negative regulatory effect on the plant’s response to drought [15]. Other studies have shown that the BR signaling pathway also crosstalks with other hormone signaling pathways such as auxin [16], ethylene (ET), jasmonic acid (JA) [4], salicylic acid (SA) [17], abscisic acid (ABA) [18,19], and gibberellin (GA) [20,21]. These functions of BRs are facilitated by the participation of an important transcription factor, Bri1 EMS Suppressor 1 (BES1).
BES1 is a prominent transcription factor in modulating the BR signaling pathway and downstream gene expression [22], as shown in Figure 1. The BES1 gene family comprises BES1 (also known as BZR2), BZR1, and four homologs named BEH1, BEH2, BEH3, and BEH4 [23,24]. BES1 has an atypical basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) domain, which can specifically bind to the E-box (CANNTG) or the BR response element (BRRE, CGTG(T/C)G), thereby directly activating or inhibiting downstream gene expression [25,26]. The mechanism by which the BES1 transcription factor regulates the BR signaling pathway has been elucidated. The BR signaling pathway comprises well-defined components, including Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1 (BRI1), BAK1, BKI1, BSKs, BSU1, and BIN2. BRI1 is a membrane-localized leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) containing 25 leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) and an island domain that binds to BR [27,28,29,30]. BRI1 has three homologs, BRL1, BRL2, and BRL3, but only BRL1 and BRL3 encode BR receptors [31]. BAK1 is another leucine-rich repeat-rich serine/threonine-type receptor-like kinase that forms a heterodimer with BRI1 to transmit BR signals [32,33]. When BR binds to BRI1, it initially activates BRI1 to a basal level, which then binds to BAK1 and activates it [34,35]. Activated BAK1 phosphorylates BRI1, enhancing BRI1 kinase activity and substrate phosphorylation, leading to the amplification of BR signaling [33,34,36]. BKI1 is a plasma membrane-bound phosphorylated protein that directly interacts with the kinase domain of BRI1 to interfere with BRI1 activation [37]. BSKs are substrates of BRI1 kinases and include three homologous BR-signaling kinases: BSK1, BSK2, and BSK3 [38]. BSU1 is a nuclear-localized phosphatase with an N-terminal Kelch-repeat domain [39]. BIN2 is a negative regulator in the BR signaling pathway, phosphorylating BES1 and BZR1 to inhibit their activity [39,40].
When BR is absent, phosphorylated BES1 and BZR1 recruit and bind to 14-3-3 proteins and remain in the cytoplasm, preventing these transcription factors from entering the nucleus to bind to BR-responsive genes [43]. In the presence of BR, BKI1 dissociates from the membrane. Isolated BKI1 is not directly degraded but enhances BR signaling by interacting with the 14-3-3 protein [44,45]. BRI1 phosphorylates BSK. Phosphorylated BSK dissociates from BRI1 and activates BSU1 phosphatase. Activated BSU1 inhibits BIN2 by dephosphorylating it at Tyr200, dephosphorylating BES1 and BZR1 [40,46]. Consequently, BES1 and BZR1 can enter the nucleus and bind to the promoters of BR target genes to regulate their expression [47]. Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) additionally enhances BR signaling by dephosphorylating BZR1 and BES1, thereby exerting a positive regulatory effect [38,48,49].
Longan is one of the most important subtropical fruit trees in the world [50]. BES1, an important hormone-related transcription factor, has been identified and analyzed in many species, such as Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) [51], Oryza sativa L. [52], and Piper nigrum L. [53]. We conducted whole-genome identification and analysis of the BES1 genes in longan. In our study, we analyzed the physicochemical properties, evolutionary tree, gene structure, conserved structural domains, and intraspecific and interspecific collinear relationships of the longan BES1 genes. We also determined DlBES1 in different tissues and the differences in the expression levels of DlBES1 genes under hormone treatments and abiotic stress. These results laid a foundation for further exploring the function of the BES1 gene family in D. longan.
2. Results
2.1. Identification and Physicochemical Property Analysis of DlBES1 Gene Family
It can be obtained through analysis that eight BES1 proteins were identified in longan, designated as DlBES1.1 to DlBES1.8 based on their chromosomal distribution (Table 1). The encoded BES1 proteins range from 202 (DlBES1.6) to 1178 (DlBES1.8) amino acids in length, with protein size typically reflecting the length of their amino acid sequences. In this study, the relative molecular weights of the eight DlBES1 proteins varied from 21,720.31 Da (DlBES1.6) to 130,421.6 Da (DlBES1.8). Among them, DlBES1.2 and DlBES1.7 showed acidic profiles (pI < 7.0), while the remaining proteins showed alkaline profiles. Moreover, all DlBES1 proteins, except for DlBES1.7, were unstable (instability index > 40), with a range of 41.64 to 65.83. The results demonstrate that the aliphatic index ranged from 54.98 to 75.98, reflecting the thermal stability of the DlBES1 proteins. The negative GRAVY values of DlBES1s indicate that all DlBES1 proteins are hydrophilic. Subcellular localization predictions indicate that six DlBES1 proteins are exclusively localized in the nucleus, while DlBES1.2 and DlBES1.7 were found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. These findings indicate that BES1 proteins mainly function in the nucleus, and some members may be involved in the process in the cytoplasm.
2.2. Chromosomal Localization of DlBES1 Gene Family
Chromosomal localization analysis of BES1 genes using genomic data from D. longan Lour (Figure 2) showed that no BES1 gene was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 11, and 12. Regarding the distribution of BES1 genes on chromosomes, apart from two BES1 genes (BES1.5 and BES1.6) located on chromosome 10, each of the remaining chromosomes has only one BES1 gene distributed on it. Further analysis showed that there was no correlation between chromosome length and the number of BES1 genes, indicating that gene distribution was not related to chromosome size.
2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of the DlBES Gene Family
To study the phylogenetic relationships and biological functions of the DlBES1 genes among other species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using BES1 protein sequences from six species, including D. longan, A. thaliana, O. sativa, Vitis vinifera L., Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.), and Malus pumila Mill. (Figure 3). Analysis shows that the BES1 genes of D. longan, A. thaliana, O. sativa, V. vinifera, C. lanatus, and M. pumila are divided into four subfamilies (I–IV). The distribution of BES1 genes in these subfamilies varies from species to species; among the eight BES1 genes identified in longan, subfamily I contains four DlBES1 members (DlBES1.2, DlBES1.6, DlBES1.7, and DlBES1.8), while subfamily II contains two DlBES1 members (DlBES1.3 and DlBES1.4). Subfamily III and subfamily IV each contain one DlBES1 member (DlBES1.5 in subfamily III and DlBES1.1 in subfamily IV).
2.4. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis of DlBES Gene Family
By analyzing the conserved protein sequence motifs and intron–exon structures of eight DlBES1 gene members, we identified 10 conserved motifs. The results in Figure 4A show that motifs 1 and 2 exist in all DlBES1 genes, indicating their vital role in DlBES1 gene function. DlBES1.2 and DlBES1.7 share eight motifs, while DlBES1.1, DlBES1.3, DlBES1.4, and DlBES1.5 share seven motifs. DlBES1.6 contains the fundamental motifs (motifs 1 and 2) of the DlBES1 gene family, while DlBES1.8 has an additional motif (motif 5) compared to DlBES1.6. In terms of intron–exon analysis (Figure 4C), we found that DlBES1.2, DlBES1.7, and DlBES1.8 have a large number of exons and introns compared to the other five DlBES1s, which only contain two exons and one intron.
2.5. Cis-Acting Element Analysis of DlBES1 Genes
In order to understand the biological function and regulatory network of DlBES1 genes in longan, we detected the cis-regulatory elements in the 2000 bp promoter region upstream of DlBES1 genes. The results reveal various cis-acting elements in DlBES1 genes, indicating their responsibility for multiple plant functions (Figure 5). These elements are categorized into phytohormone elements, stress response elements, plant growth and development elements, and light response elements. Specifically, DlBES1.1 contains 7 phytohormone elements, 3 stress response elements, 2 plant growth and development elements, and 15 light response elements; DlBES1.2 contains 17 phytohormone elements, 3 stress response elements, 1 plant growth and development element, and 10 light response elements; DlBES1.3 contains 11 phytohormone elements, 5 stress response elements, 1 plant growth and development element, and 4 light response elements; DlBES1.4 contains 8 phytohormone elements, 2 stress response elements, 2 plant growth and development elements, and 14 light response elements; DlBES1.5 contains 5 phytohormone elements, 5 stress response elements, 2 plant growth and development elements, and 12 light response elements; DlBES1.6 contains 8 phytohormone elements, 4 stress response elements, 4 plant growth and development elements, and 13 light response elements; DlBES1.7 contains 7 phytohormone elements, 5 stress response elements, 1 plant growth and development element, and 6 light response elements; DlBES1.8 contains 6 phytohormone elements, 3 stress response elements, 1 plant growth and development element, and 12 light response elements. According to the provided results, DlBES1.2 has the largest number of hormone response elements, followed by DlBES1.3. Among the DlBES1 genes, DlBES1.1 has the largest number of light-responsive elements, followed by DlBES1.4 and DlBES1.6. Each gene has relatively fewer stress response elements and plant growth and development elements. Overall, within the DlBES1 genes, there are a greater number of cis-acting elements related to hormone and light responses compared to stress response elements and plant growth and development elements, suggesting that DlBES1 genes may play an essential role in D. longan hormone responses and are likely involved in a wide range of response processes.
2.6. Interspecific and Intraspecific Collinearity Analysis of DlBES1 Gene Family
In the interspecific collinearity analysis of BES1, we investigated the collinearity relationships among A. thaliana, O. sativa, and D. longan (Figure 6). The results demonstrate nine pairs of genes with collinearity relationships between longan and A. thaliana (DlBES1.2 in DlChr5 and one gene in AtChr2; DlBES1.3 in DlChr6 and two genes in AtChr1; one gene in AtChr4; DlBES1.4 in DlChr7 and AtChr3 and AtChr4; DlBES1.5 in DlChr10 and AtChr4; DlChr13 and AtChr5; DlChr14 and AtChr5) (Figure 2 and Figure 6). In the collinearity relationship between longan and O. sativa, only BES1.5 in DlChr10 showed a collinearity relationship, with three genes in O. sativa distributed in OsChr1, OsChr2, and OsChr6. These findings suggest that DlBES may be more closely related to Arabidopsis than rice. Regarding the intraspecific collinearity relationship of BES1 in longan, a collinearity relationship was identified between DlBES1.3 in Chr6 and DlBES1.4 in Chr7.
2.7. Analysis of Specific Expression of DlBES1 in Different Tissues, Early Developmental Stages of Somatic Embryos and Temperature
The expression patterns of the DlBES1 genes in nine tissues of longan, including flower, flower bud, leaf, pericarp, pulp, root, seed, stem, and young fruit, were compared using the longan database (Figure 7). Our results indicate that the expression of the DlBES1 genes was generally low in flowers and buds. However, in roots and seeds, DlBES1 gene expression was notably high compared to other tissues, except for a few genes. Among all DlBES1 genes, DlBES1.4 exhibited the highest expression levels in roots, stems, and leaves, while the lowest expression was observed in pulp, flowers, and flower buds. DlBES1.7 showed high expression in roots, seeds, stems, and young fruits, with the lowest expression levels in flowers and flower buds. Additionally, DlBES1.1, DlBES1.4, DlBES1.5, and DlBES1.7 exhibited high expression levels in roots but lower expression levels in flowers and flower buds. Conversely, DlBES1.6 showed low expression levels in all nine tissues. Furthermore, we constructed an expression heat map of the DlBES1 genes during different early developmental stages of somatic embryos (EC: embryogenic callus; ICpEC: incomplete pro-embryogenic callus; GE: globular embryo) based on the longan transcriptome database (Figure 8A). The results demonstrate that DlBES1.4, DlBES1.2, DlBES1.1, and DlBES1.5 are highly expressed in the GE stage but their expression is low in the EC stage. Conversely, the expressions of DlBES1.8, DlBES1.6, DlBES1.3, and DlBES1.7 are down-regulated in the development stage from EC to GE.
By analyzing the expression levels of DlBES1 genes at 15 °C, 25 °C, and 35 °C (Figure 8B), the results show that there are significant differences in the expression trend of DlBES1 genes under heat stress at different temperatures. Expressions of DlBES1.1, DlBES1.4, DlBES1.5, and DlBES1.6 were highest at 15 °C and decreased with increasing temperature. In contrast, expressions of DlBES1.2, DlBES1.3, and DlBES1.8 were lowest at 15 °C and increased with rising temperature. Although DlBES1.7 exhibited the highest expression in the entire gene family, its expression level was not significantly affected by temperature. We speculated that expressions of DlBES1.1, DlBES1.4, DlBES1.5, and DlBES1.6 may be related to longan’s resistance to low-temperature environmental stress, while the expressions of DlBES1.2, DlBES1.3, and DlBES1.8 may be associated with longan’s resistance to heat stress. However, whether DlBES1.7 is related to longan’s response to heat stress remains unknown.
2.8. Expression Patterns of D. longan DlBES1 Genes During Somatic Embryogenesis and in Response to IAA Treatment
By analyzing the expression of DlBES1.3, DlBES1.4, DlBES1.5, DlBES1.7, and DlBES1.8 genes in different early stages of longan somatic embryogenesis (Figure 9a), the results show that the expression of DlBES1.5 and DlBES1.7 was up-regulated with the development of longan embryos, while the expression of DlBES1.8 was down-regulated. Initially, the expression levels of DlBES1.3 and DlBES1.4 were up-regulated, reaching their peak in ICpEC, and then down-regulated between ICpEC and GE. Next, by analyzing the gene expression of DlBES1 family members after indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) treatment (Figure 9b), the DlBES1 family members responded differently to varying concentrations of IAA. Specifically, DlBES1.3, DlBES1.4, and DlBES1.5 up-regulated their expression as the IAA concentration increased from 0 µmol·L−1 to 100 µmol·L−1, while DlBES1.7 and DlBES1.8 down-regulated their expression from 0 µmol·L−1 to 50 µmol·L−1 and then up-regulated it from 50 µmol·L−1 to 100 µmol·L−1. Overall, the tested DlBES1 family members exhibited the highest expression at 100 µmol·L−1, and all of them showed down-regulated expression from 100 µmol·L−1 to 200 µmol·L−1, possibly due to the inhibitory effects of excess IAA on the DlBES1 genes.
3. Discussion
Brassinosteroids, a class of plant-specific steroid hormones, exert critical regulatory functions in plant growth, development, and stress responses. Temperature fluctuations, drought, salinity, and insect infestations are among the environmental factors that present formidable challenges to the growth and development of D. longan. The survival of this plant hinges on intricate molecular mechanisms. Central to the BR signaling pathway is the Bri1 EMS Suppressor 1 (BES1) transcription factor family, which modulates downstream gene expression to govern plant growth and stress responses. As observed in other plant species, BES1 in D. longan is likely to play a vital role in mediating BR signaling and orchestrating adaptive responses to environmental stressors. Considering the pivotal role of BES1 genes in the signaling pathways of D. longan, investigating their expression patterns is of utmost importance. Undertaking extensive bioinformatics research will not only aid in the precise identification of abiotic stress-tolerant genes in D. longan but also offer significant insights into their regulatory mechanisms, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the breeding and cultivation management of stress-resistant D. longan.
Transcriptional regulation underlies the biological effects of hormones in many plants [54]. The BES1 gene encodes a transcription factor that plays a key role in the BR signaling transduction pathway [8]. BES1 transcription factors are widely present in plants. Since its identification in A. thaliana [51], genome-wide identification of the BES1 gene family has been conducted in many species, including Gossypium hirsutum Linn. [55], Glycine max (L.) [56] Brassica napus L. [57], Zea mays L. [58], Brassica oleracea L. [59], M. pumila [60], O. sativa [52], P. nigrum [53], and Triticum aestivum L. [61], while few reports have focused on the functions of this gene family in D. longan. The structure of a gene is a typical feature of the gene family that represents their evolutionary process [62]. The comprehensive analysis of the phylogeny, the protein motif, and the gene structure of DlBES1 genes revealed that the genes of the same group were highly conserved for the types of motifs, gene lengths, and even the distribution positions of exons and introns, indicating that the genes within the group may have similar biological functions, consistent with the results of other studies [63]. Phylogenetic trees summarize valuable information about gene evolution and can help us better understand the evolutionary relationships between genes [64].
In this study, a total of 41 BES1 genes were obtained from six plants: A. thaliana, O. sativa, C. lanatus, V. vinifera, M. pumila, and D. longan. According to the deep duplication nodes of the BES1 gene family, BES1 can be divided into four gene subfamilies from subfamily I to IV. In terms of the number of BES1 genes, longan and grape both have eight BES1 genes, which is more than that of herbs such as A. thaliana, O. sativa, and V. vinifera. However, the number of BES1 genes in D. longan is significantly less than that in M. pumila, which is a closely related woody plant. This suggests that the number of BES1 genes in apples may have increased during the evolution of the DlBES1 genes. Subfamily I and II contain three-quarters of the BES1 genes, indicating that these two subfamilies, especially subfamily I, maybe the oldest of the four subfamilies just based on the number of BES1 genes. Gene structure analysis showed that DlBES1.2 and DlBES1.7 of subfamily I contain the largest number of conserved motifs, while DlBES1.8 contains a large number of exons, indicating that this subfamily might assume the main function of BES1 genes. Notably, all BES1 family members have motif 1 and motif 2, which suggests that motif 1 and motif 2 are highly conserved and might play an important role in DlBES1 genes.
The DlBES1 gene family contains a variety of elements that regulate plant growth and respond to environmental stress, which may help plants resist various stresses and regulate their growth. In the gene comparison, the BES1 genes of longan were more similar to those of A. thaliana and far away from that of rice, suggesting that the BES1 genes of monocots and dicots may be different in plant evolution. The duplication event of a gene is another important feature that represents the evolution of gene families. During the duplication of a gene, its functions gradually become complex and diverse [65]. Segmental duplications of multiple genes occur through polyploidy by chromosome rearrangements [66]. The analysis result of the intraspecific collinearity relationship shows that only DlBES1.3 in Chr6 and DlBES1.4 in Chr7 have a collinear relationship, indicating that the ancestors of longan probably had one segment duplication event in their evolutionary history; the results are similar to those of Wang Shiping’s team [67]. Within the collinearity region, those gene pairs that present a conserved state are most likely to show a certain degree of functional similarity. Therefore, we can use the existing research results of model crops to speculate the potential function of the longan BES1 gene. For example, the function of some BES1 genes in A. thaliana in specific physiological processes is known. We can speculate that the known collinear BES1 genes in longan may have similar or related functions, which can be used as a reference for further study of longan BES1 genes [68].
Promoters contain important cis-acting elements for gene initiation and transcription regulation [69]. The upstream sequences of the BES1 genes have a variety of cis-acting elements (Figure 5), including stress, hormone, and light response elements, indicating its potential involvement in a variety of stress and hormone response processes as a mechanism of promoting plant growth, development, and stress tolerance. Recent reports reveal that specific promoter elements within BES1 genes are essential for mediating a plant’s response to environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, and temperature fluctuations [70]. These promoter elements are responsible for initiating the transcription of BES1 genes, thereby influencing the expression levels of BES1 and promoting resistance to drought, salinity, temperature changes, and other stresses.
The BR–auxin interaction mechanism is the regulation of genes involved in auxin response and transport by the BES1 transcription factor [71]. The non-linear alterations in the expression patterns of DlBES1 genes under IAA treatment hint at a potential feedback regulatory mechanism within the framework of how the BES1 transcription factor modulates the auxin response to suppress the expression of BES1 genes. Investigations into the expression of BES1 genes across varying temperatures have unveiled that the expression trajectories of DlBES1 gene family members diverge markedly under different temperature and heat stress scenarios. Future endeavors, encompassing gene-specific overexpression studies as well as analyses of BES1 knockout plants, hold significant promise for unraveling the precise roles that these genes play.
Under different temperature conditions, the DlBES1 gene family members showed specific expression. At low temperatures, the expression DlBES1 genes enhances cell viability by activating low-temperature response genes, involving membrane lipid metabolism, osmotic regulation, and antioxidant defense. Specific members such as DlBES1.1, DlBES1.4, DlBES1.5, and DlBES1.6 may regulate the degree of membrane lipid unsaturation and cell osmotic adjustment ability, and reduce cold damage. At high temperatures, the expression of DlBES1 genes is different [72]; they may be involved in the regulation of heat shock protein expression and cell membrane stability, and may reduce the effects of high temperature. This process involves the interaction of temperature sensors, transcription factors, and signaling molecules. DlBES1 genes regulate the expression of stress-resistant genes to resist temperature damage.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Transcriptome Data Sources
In this study, we used somatic embryos (SEs) of longan ‘Honghezi (HHZ)’ as the main research material. These materials were carefully cultivated in the Institute of Horticultural Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, and obtained according to the methods previously studied by the institute [73,74]. The whole culture process includes three stages: embryogenic callus (EC), incomplete compact embryo culture (IcpEC), and globular embryo (GE). Specifically, we selected 0.2 g of embryogenic callus (EC), placed it in MS medium, and treated it with IAA at concentrations of 50 μM, 100 μM, and 200 μM. In order to ensure the reliability of the experimental results, three biological replicates were performed for each treatment. After the treatment, we collected all of the samples, quickly frozen them in liquid nitrogen, and then stored them in a refrigerator at −80 °C to maintain the stability and activity of the samples and provide protection for subsequent experimental analysis. In this study, the longan BES1 gene sequence, CDS sequence, amino acid sequence, and gene annotation information were downloaded from the longan genome database independently constructed by the institute [75].
4.2. Identification of BES1 Genes in D. longan
The reported A. thaliana BES1 gene sequences were obtained from the TAIR [76] (
4.3. Evolutionary Relationships, Genomic Architecture, and Conserved Sequence Motif Investigation
Phylogenetic trees of the BES1 family of six species, namely longan, watermelon, apple, grape, rice, and A. thaliana, were constructed using MEGA11 [81] software. Grape and rice BES1 sequences were obtained from the website of Phytozome [82] (
4.4. Chromosomal Positioning, Cis-Regulatory Element Examination, and Synteny Study
Longan BES1 gene annotation files were imported into TBtools software to obtain the chromosomal location, cis-acting elements analyses, and collinear analysis with other species. PlantCARE [85] (
4.5. Hormonal Processing of D. longan EC, RNA Extraction, and qRT-PCR Analysis
Longan EC materials with good growth status were selected, mixed thoroughly, and added to 100 μmol-L-1 IAA liquid medium in equal amounts. Longan EC materials added to MS liquid medium without any hormone were used as a blank control. The above treatments were set up in three replicates, and longan EC materials were cultured in darkness at 25 °C for 24 h. After that, they were filter-dried and frozen in the refrigerator at −80 °C for later use. DNAMAN6 software was used to design the qRT-PCR primers for longan BES1 genes, and the primer sequences are shown in Table S1. The RNA of the above hormone-treated materials was extracted using the TransZol kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), and the specific method was described in the instruction manual. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Revertaid Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Beijing, China) kit. Ubiquitin [87] (UBQ) was used as an internal reference. The Roche Light Cycler 96 real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was used to detect the BES1 gene expression levels after IAA hormone treatment at the longan EC stage.
4.6. Analysis of Specific Expression of DlBES1 Family Genes
The FPKMs (Fragments Per Kilobase Million) of longan BES1 gene members at three stages of early somatic embryogenesis (EC, ICpEC, GE), under high and low temperatures (35 °C, 15 °C), with 2,4-D treatments for different days, and at nine different tissue sites (seeds, roots, stems, leaves, flowers, buds, fruit pulp, young fruits, and pericarp) were obtained from the longan early somatic embryogenesis transcriptome database (SRA050205). The above data were log-transformed (log2) and finally plotted into a heat map using TBtools.
5. Conclusions
In this study, eight BES1 genes were identified in D. longan and their functional characteristics were analyzed. All DlBES1 proteins were localized in the nucleus, and some DlBES1 proteins were also present in the cytoplasm. Through the analysis of cis-acting elements, we found that DlBES1 genes have many cis-acting elements related to hormone response and environmental stress tolerance, indicating that DlBES1 genes may promote plant growth and development through hormone response and enhance environmental stress tolerance. DlBES1 genes showed different expression patterns in nine tissues, indicating that the BES1 genes have a variety of functional roles in promoting root development, stem elongation, leaf growth, and flower and fruit ripening. The differential expression of DlBES1 in hormone response experiments under IAA treatment indicates that there may be an unknown feedback mechanism in the regulation of BES1 response to auxin. Our preliminary results provide a solid foundation for further study of the role of the DlBES1 genes in longan. It provides new insights into the functional characteristics of the BES1 genes in longan and has certain significance for revealing the mechanism of the BES1 genes in plant hormone signal transduction and stress response.
Conceptualization, J.Z.; funding acquisition, S.C.; methodology, H.W.; project administration, S.C.; software, S.L.; supervision, Y.L.; writing—original draft, Z.Z. and R.L.; writing—review and editing, H.Y. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study.
The authors are grateful to reviewers for their suggestions related to this article.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Working model of BES1 transcription factor and schematic diagram of plant cell responses to stress (modified from Li, etc. [41]; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, etc. [42]).
Figure 2. The distribution of BES1 genes in D. longan chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown at the top of each chromosome, with their approximate size (Mb) and location on the left. The name of each BES1 gene is annotated on the right side of the chromosome.
Figure 3. A phylogenetic tree of 6 species of BES1 proteins. The different colored arcs represent the BES1 protein subfamily. The tree was built using 8 BES1 proteins from longan (represented by the red circle), 5 BES1s from A. thaliana (represented by ‘AT-’), 6 BES1s from O. sativa (represented by ‘LOC-’), 8 BES1s from grape (represented by ‘VIT-’), 4 BES1s from watermelon (represented by ‘Cla-’), and 20 BES1s from apple (represented by ‘XP-’).
Figure 4. DlBES1 gene phylogenetic relationship and gene structure schematic diagram. (A) The conserved motifs of DlBES1 genes. The non-conserved sequences are presented using black lines, and 10 motifs are presented by different colored boxes numbered on the right. (B) The conserved domains of DlBES1 proteins. The gene’s length can be approximated using the scale at the bottom. (C) Intron and exon structures of BES1 in D. longan. The yellow boxes indicate exons and the black lines indicate introns, while the green boxes indicate untranslated regions (UTRs) in the upstream and downstream regions. The figure legends are shown at the bottom of each graphic.
Figure 5. (a) The cis-element prediction of 8 DlBES1 gene promoter sequences (−2000 bp) was analyzed. The cis-acting elements predicted for 2000 bp upstream of the gene are indicated on the left. Squares of different colors represent different cis-acting elements. The names of cis-acting elements and corresponding color annotations are on the right; (b) a heat map of 38 kinds of cis-acting elements in 8 DlBES1 genes. The different cis-acting elements are classified into four categories: hormone response, stress response, plant growth and development, and light response. Each category is annotated in text below the heat map. The numbers in the heat map boxes indicate specific expression levels. Greater values mean higher expression, while smaller values mean lower expression.
Figure 6. (a) The intraspecific collinearity of DlBES1 genes; the red line represents the BES1 gene pairs with a collinear relationship in the longan genome; (b) D. longan, A. thaliana, and O. sativa BES1 genes interspecific collinearity analysis. The red lines highlight the syntenic gene pairs, while the gray lines in the background show the collinear blocks in the genomes of longan with A. thaliana and O. sativa.
Figure 7. The expression profiles of DlBES1 genes in nine different tissues. The more red the box color, the higher the tissue expression, and the more blue the box color, the lower the tissue expression.
Figure 8. (A) The expression patterns of DlBES1 during different early developmental stages of somatic embryos. (B) The expression patterns of DlBES1 genes at 15 °C, 25 °C, and 35 °C. The higher the intensity of the red color in the box, the greater the tissue expression; conversely, a lower intensity of the blue color indicates decreased tissue expression.
Figure 9. (a) The expression of some DlBES1 genes during different development stages of longan early somatic embryos was analyzed using Prism 8.0.2 software. The one-way ANOVA method was employed to determine the significant difference in DlBES1 expression during different stages of longan somatic embryos. The experiment was conducted thrice and the average value was calculated. Standard deviation was used as a statistical method to describe the extent of data dispersion. (b) The expression of DlBES1 genes during embryogenic callus (EC) stage under different IAA treatments. The expression of certain DlBES1 genes was subjected to exogenous IAA treatment at concentrations of 0 µmol·L−1, 50 µmol·L−1, 100 µmol·L−1, and 200 µmol·L−1. The identical letters on the top of the bar chart indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a significant difference (** p [less than] 0.01, *** p [less than] 0.001, **** p [less than] 0.0001). Note: EC: embryogenic callus; ICpEC: incomplete pro-embryogenic callus; GE: globular embryo.
Detailed information of 8 DlBES1 genes and their encoded proteins.
Gene Accession | Gene ID | Size/aa1 | MW2/Da | Theoretical | Instability | Aliphatic | GRAVY4 | Subcellular |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dlo009294 | DlBES1.1 | 328 | 35,264.37 | 8.79 | 56.42 | 55.09 | −0.584 | Nuclear |
Dlo012787 | DlBES1.2 | 701 | 78,532.89 | 5.44 | 41.64 | 75.35 | −0.373 | Cytoplasmic and Nuclear |
Dlo013572 | DlBES1.3 | 309 | 33,848.83 | 8.90 | 62.70 | 56.67 | −0.708 | Nuclear |
Dlo015717 | DlBES1.4 | 327 | 35,229.57 | 8.83 | 65.83 | 65.96 | −0.509 | Nuclear |
Dlo021810 | DlBES1.5 | 327 | 34,990.97 | 8.59 | 62.87 | 54.98 | −0.606 | Nuclear |
Dlo022049 | DlBES1.6 | 202 | 21,720.31 | 9.62 | 62.33 | 60.89 | −0.669 | Nuclear |
Dlo028252 | DlBES1.7 | 642 | 72,341.40 | 5.48 | 36.96 | 75.34 | −0.366 | Cytoplasmic and Nuclear |
Dlo028973 | DlBES1.8 | 1178 | 130,421.60 | 9.04 | 43.79 | 75.98 | −0.501 | Nuclear |
Note: aa1: amino acid number; MW2: molecular weight; pI3: isoelectric point; GRAVY4: grand average of hydropathicity.
Supplementary Materials
The supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Mitchell, J.W.; Mandava, N.; Worley, J.F.; Plimmer, J.R.; Smith, M.V. Brassins—A new family of plant hormones from rape pollen. Nature; 1970; 225, pp. 1065-1066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/2251065a0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16056912]
2. Peres, A.; Soares, J.S.; Tavares, R.G.; Righetto, G.; Zullo, M.A.T.; Mandava, N.B.; Menossi, M. Brassinosteroids, the Sixth Class of Phytohormones: A Molecular View from the Discovery to Hormonal Interactions in Plant Development and Stress Adaptation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020331]
3. Khripach, V. Twenty Years of Brassinosteroids: Steroidal Plant Hormones Warrant Better Crops for the XXI Century. Ann. Bot.; 2000; 86, pp. 441-447.
4. Campos, M.L.; de Almeida, M.; Rossi, M.L.; Martinelli, A.P.; Litholdo Junior, C.G.; Figueira, A.; Rampelotti-Ferreira, F.T.; Vendramim, J.D.; Benedito, V.A.; Peres, L.E. Brassinosteroids interact negatively with jasmonates in the formation of anti-herbivory traits in tomato. J. Exp. Bot.; 2009; 60, pp. 4347-4361. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19734261]
5. Planas-Riverola, A.; Gupta, A.; Betegón-Putze, I.; Bosch, N.; Ibañes, M.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development; 2019; 146, dev151894.
6. Chaudhuri, A.; Halder, K.; Abdin, M.Z.; Majee, M.; Datta, A. Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: Brassinosteroids Navigate Competently. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 14577. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314577]
7. Gonzalez-Garcia, M.P.; Vilarrasa-Blasi, J.; Zhiponova, M.; Divol, F.; Mora-Garcia, S.; Russinova, E.; Cano-Delgado, A.I. Brassinosteroids control meristem size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development; 2011; 138, pp. 849-859.
8. Wang, Z.Y.; Bai, M.Y.; Oh, E.; Zhu, J.Y. Brassinosteroid signaling network and regulation of photomorphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Genet.; 2012; 46, pp. 701-724.
9. Kono, A.; Yin, Y. Updates on BES1/BZR1 Regulatory Networks Coordinating Plant Growth and Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci.; 2020; 11, 617162.
10. Goda, H.; Shimada, Y.; Asami, T.; Fujioka, S.; Yoshida, S. Microarray analysis of brassinosteroid-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.; 2002; 130, pp. 1319-1334.
11. Müssig, C.; Fischer, S.; Altmann, T. Brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression. Plant Physiol.; 2002; 129, pp. 1241-1251. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12114578]
12. Nolan, T.M.; Vukašinović, N.; Liu, D.; Russinova, E.; Yin, Y. Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional Regulators of Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses. Plant Cell; 2020; 32, pp. 295-318. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776234]
13. Kelly-Bellow, R.; Lee, K.; Kennaway, R.; Barclay, J.E.; Whibley, A.; Bushell, C.; Spooner, J.; Yu, M.; Brett, P.; Kular, B. et al. Brassinosteroid coordinates cell layer interactions in plants via cell wall and tissue mechanics. Science; 2023; 380, pp. 1275-1281.
14. Bulgakov, V.P.; Avramenko, T.V. Linking Brassinosteroid and ABA Signaling in the Context of Stress Acclimation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 5108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145108]
15. Jiang, H.; Tang, B.; Xie, Z.; Nolan, T.; Ye, H.; Song, G.Y.; Walley, J.; Yin, Y. GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates RD26 to potentiate drought signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2019; 100, pp. 923-937. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14484]
16. Chaiwanon, J.; Wang, Z.Y. Spatiotemporal brassinosteroid signaling and antagonism with auxin pattern stem cell dynamics in Arabidopsis roots. Curr. Biol.; 2015; 25, pp. 1031-1042.
17. Divi, U.K.; Rahman, T.; Krishna, P. Brassinosteroid-mediated stress tolerance in Arabidopsis shows interactions with abscisic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid pathways. BMC Plant Biol.; 2010; 10, 14.
18. Steber, C.M.; McCourt, P. A role for brassinosteroids in germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.; 2001; 125, pp. 763-769.
19. Moon, J.; Park, C.H.; Son, S.H.; Youn, J.H.; Kim, S.K. Endogenous level of abscisic acid down-regulated by brassinosteroids signaling via BZR1 to control the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2021; 16, 1926130.
20. Gallego-Bartolome, J.; Minguet, E.G.; Grau-Enguix, F.; Abbas, M.; Locascio, A.; Thomas, S.G.; Alabadi, D.; Blazquez, M.A. Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 13446-13451.
21. Unterholzner, S.J.; Rozhon, W.; Papacek, M.; Ciomas, J.; Lange, T.; Kugler, K.G.; Mayer, K.F.; Sieberer, T.; Poppenberger, B. Brassinosteroids Are Master Regulators of Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2015; 27, pp. 2261-2272. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26243314]
22. Sablowski, R.; Harberd, N.P. Plant sciences. Plant genes on steroids. Science; 2005; 307, pp. 1569-1570. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15761142]
23. Kim, S.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, T.-K.; Tian, Y.; Yu, K.; Lee, B.-h.; Bai, M.-Y.; Cho, S.-J.; Kim, T.-W. Comparative analysis of BZR1/BES1 family transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2024; 117, pp. 747-765.
24. Park, C.-R.; Van Tinh, N.; Min, J.-H.; Sang, H.; Lim, G.-H.; Kim, C.S. Isolation and Functional Characterization of Soybean BES1/BZR1 Homolog 3-Like 1 (GmBEH3L1) Associated with Dehydration Sensitivity and Brassinosteroid Signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants; 2022; 11, 2565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192565]
25. Toledo-Ortiz, G.; Huq, E.; Quail, P.H. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell; 2003; 15, pp. 1749-1770.
26. Nosaki, S.; Miyakawa, T.; Xu, Y.; Nakamura, A.; Hirabayashi, K.; Asami, T.; Nakano, T.; Tanokura, M. Structural basis for brassinosteroid response by BIL1/BZR1. Nat. Plants; 2018; 4, pp. 771-776.
27. Man, J.; Gallagher, J.P.; Bartlett, M. Structural evolution drives diversification of the large LRR-RLK gene family. New Phytol.; 2020; 226, pp. 1492-1505.
28. Hothorn, M.; Belkhadir, Y.; Dreux, M.; Dabi, T.; Noel, J.P.; Wilson, I.A.; Chory, J. Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. Nature; 2011; 474, pp. 467-471.
29. Kinoshita, T.; Caño-Delgado, A.; Seto, H.; Hiranuma, S.; Fujioka, S.; Yoshida, S.; Chory, J. Binding of brassinosteroids to the extracellular domain of plant receptor kinase BRI1. Nature; 2005; 433, pp. 167-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03227]
30. Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Choe, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Yuan, H.; Feldmann, K.A.; Tax, F.E. Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf mutants of Arabidopsis accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol.; 1999; 121, pp. 743-752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.3.743]
31. Caño-Delgado, A.; Yin, Y.; Yu, C.; Vafeados, D.; Mora-García, S.; Cheng, J.C.; Nam, K.H.; Li, J.; Chory, J. BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development; 2004; 131, pp. 5341-5351. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01403] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486337]
32. Li, J.; Wen, J.; Lease, K.A.; Doke, J.T.; Tax, F.E.; Walker, J.C. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell; 2002; 110, pp. 213-222. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12150929]
33. Nam, K.H.; Li, J. BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating brassinosteroid signaling. Cell; 2002; 110, pp. 203-212.
34. Bücherl, C.A.; van Esse, G.W.; Kruis, A.; Luchtenberg, J.; Westphal, A.H.; Aker, J.; van Hoek, A.; Albrecht, C.; Borst, J.W.; de Vries, S.C. Visualization of BRI1 and BAK1(SERK3) membrane receptor heterooligomers during brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Physiol.; 2013; 162, pp. 1911-1925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.220152]
35. Bishop, G.J.; Koncz, C. Brassinosteroids and plant steroid hormone signaling. Plant Cell; 2002; 14, pp. S97-S110.
36. Chinchilla, D.; Shan, L.; He, P.; de Vries, S.; Kemmerling, B. One for all: The receptor-associated kinase BAK1. Trends Plant Sci.; 2009; 14, pp. 535-541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.002]
37. Wang, X.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroids regulate dissociation of BKI1, a negative regulator of BRI1 signaling, from the plasma membrane. Science; 2006; 313, pp. 1118-1122.
38. Tang, W.; Kim, T.W.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Sun, Y.; Deng, Z.; Zhu, S.; Wang, R.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.Y. BSKs mediate signal transduction from the receptor kinase BRI1 in Arabidopsis. Science; 2008; 321, pp. 557-560.
39. Mora-García, S.; Vert, G.; Yin, Y.; Caño-Delgado, A.; Cheong, H.; Chory, J. Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeat domains modulate the response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev.; 2004; 18, pp. 448-460. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1174204]
40. Kim, T.W.; Guan, S.; Sun, Y.; Deng, Z.; Tang, W.; Shang, J.X.; Sun, Y.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.Y. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cell-surface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2009; 11, pp. 1254-1260.
41. Li, Q.F.; Lu, J.; Yu, J.W.; Zhang, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, Q.Q. The brassinosteroid-regulated transcription factors BZR1/BES1 function as a coordinator in multisignal-regulated plant growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech.; 2018; 1861, pp. 561-571. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673687]
42. Choudhary, S.P.; Yu, J.Q.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Tran, L.S. Benefits of brassinosteroid crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci.; 2012; 17, pp. 594-605. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22738940]
43. Oh, M.H.; Wang, X.; Clouse, S.D.; Huber, S.C. Deactivation of the Arabidopsis BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) receptor kinase by autophosphorylation within the glycine-rich loop. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 327-332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108321109] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22184234]
44. Gampala, S.S.; Kim, T.W.; He, J.X.; Tang, W.; Deng, Z.; Bai, M.Y.; Guan, S.; Lalonde, S.; Sun, Y.; Gendron, J.M. et al. An essential role for 14-3-3 proteins in brassinosteroid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell; 2007; 13, pp. 177-189.
45. de Vries, S.C. 14-3-3 proteins in plant brassinosteroid signaling. Dev. Cell; 2007; 13, pp. 162-164.
46. Vert, G.; Chory, J. Downstream nuclear events in brassinosteroid signalling. Nature; 2006; 441, pp. 96-100.
47. Kim, T.W.; Guan, S.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.Y. The CDG1 kinase mediates brassinosteroid signal transduction from BRI1 receptor kinase to BSU1 phosphatase and GSK3-like kinase BIN2. Mol. Cell; 2011; 43, pp. 561-571.
48. Li, J.; Jin, H. Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling. Trends Plant Sci.; 2007; 12, pp. 37-41.
49. Vert, G.; Nemhauser, J.L.; Geldner, N.; Hong, F.; Chory, J. Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2005; 21, pp. 177-201.
50. Zerpa, D.; Li, J.; Ming, R. In Genomic and morphological analyses of Sapindaceae species. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Lychee, Longan and Other Sapindaceae Fruits; Hanoi, Vietnam, 7–11 June 2019; pp. 125-128.
51. Yin, Y.; Vafeados, D.; Tao, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. A new class of transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Cell; 2005; 120, pp. 249-259.
52. Jiao, X.; Wang, H.; Yan, J.; Kong, X.; Liu, Y.; Chu, J.; Chen, X.; Fang, R.; Yan, Y. Promotion of BR Biosynthesis by miR444 Is Required for Ammonium-Triggered Inhibition of Root Growth. Plant Physiol.; 2020; 182, pp. 1454-1466. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00190] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871071]
53. Mumtaz, M.A.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, C.; Kamran, H.M.; Altaf, M.A.; Hao, Y.; Shu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, X.; Abbas, H.M.K. et al. Interaction between transcriptional activator BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR 1 and HSPs regulates heat stress tolerance in pepper. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2023; 211, 105341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105341]
54. Asensi-Fabado, M.A.; Amtmann, A.; Perrella, G. Plant responses to abiotic stress: The chromatin context of transcriptional regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech.; 2017; 1860, pp. 106-122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.07.015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27487458]
55. Liu, Z.; Qanmber, G.; Lu, L.; Qin, W.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Ma, S.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Z. Genome-wide analysis of BES1 genes in Gossypium revealed their evolutionary conserved roles in brassinosteroid signaling. Sci. China Life Sci.; 2018; 61, pp. 1566-1582. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9412-x]
56. Li, Q.; Guo, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, C.; Shen, Y. In silico genome-wide identification and comprehensive characterization of the BES1 gene family in soybean. Heliyon; 2019; 5, e01868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01868]
57. Song, X.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Hu, J.; Yang, Q.; Wang, T.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Guo, D.; Ge, W. et al. Comprehensive analyses of the BES1 gene family in Brassica napus and examination of their evolutionary pattern in representative species. BMC Genom.; 2018; 19, 346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4744-4]
58. Manoli, A.; Trevisan, S.; Quaggiotti, S.; Varotto, S. Identification and characterization of the BZR transcription factor family and its expression in response to abiotic stresses in Zea mays L. Plant Growth Regul.; 2018; 84, pp. 423-436. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0350-8]
59. Wu, P.; Song, X.; Wang, Z.; Duan, W.; Hu, R.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Hou, X. Genome-wide analysis of the BES1 transcription factor family in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Plant Growth Regul.; 2016; 80, pp. 291-301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-016-0166-y]
60. Cao, X.; Khaliq, A.; Lu, S.; Xie, M.; Ma, Z.; Mao, J.; Chen, B. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the BES1 gene family in apple (Malus domestica). Plant Biol.; 2020; 22, pp. 723-733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.13109]
61. Bradai, M.; Amorim-Silva, V.; Belgaroui, N.; Esteban del Valle, A.; Chaboute, M.-E.; Schmit, A.-C.; Lozano-Duran, R.; Botella, M.A.; Hanin, M.; Ebel, C. Wheat Type One Protein Phosphatase Participates in the Brassinosteroid Control of Root Growth via Activation of BES1. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 10424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910424]
62. Roy, S.W.; Penny, D. A very high fraction of unique intron positions in the intron-rich diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana indicates widespread intron gain. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2007; 24, pp. 1447-1457.
63. Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Huang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, B. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of BES1 gene family in tomato. BMC Plant Biol.; 2021; 21, 161.
64. McLennan, D.A. How to Read a Phylogenetic Tree. Evol. Educ. Outreach; 2010; 3, pp. 506-519.
65. Bowers, J.E.; Chapman, B.A.; Rong, J.; Paterson, A.H. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature; 2003; 422, pp. 433-438. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12660784]
66. Panchy, N.; Lehti-Shiu, M.; Shiu, S.H. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants. Plant Physiol.; 2016; 171, pp. 2294-2316.
67. Li, J.; Wang, L.; Leng, F.; Ma, C.; Zhang, C.; Wang, S. Genome-wide identification, characterization and gene expression of BES1 transcription factor family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci. Rep.; 2023; 13, 240.
68. Kaifa, W.; Huiqin, C. Comparative functional genomics analysis of bHLH gene family in rice, maize and wheat. BMC Plant Biology.; 2018; 18, 309.
69. Cartharius, K.; Frech, K.; Grote, K.; Klocke, B.; Haltmeier, M.; Klingenhoff, A.; Frisch, M.; Bayerlein, M.; Werner, T. MatInspector and beyond: Promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics; 2005; 21, pp. 2933-2942.
70. Lv, L.; Zuo, D.; Wang, X.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Song, G.; Ma, Z. Genome-wide identification of the expansin gene family reveals that expansin genes are involved in fibre cell growth in cotton. BMC Plant Biol.; 2020; 20, 223.
71. Yu, X.; Li, L.; Zola, J.; Aluru, M.; Ye, H.; Foudree, A.; Guo, H.; Anderson, S.; Aluru, S.; Liu, P. et al. A brassinosteroid transcriptional network revealed by genome-wide identification of BESI target genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.; 2011; 65, pp. 634-646.
72. Li, B.; Gao, K.; Ren, H.; Tang, W. Molecular mechanisms governing plant responses to high temperatures. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 2018; 60, pp. 757-779. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030890]
73. Lai, Z.; Pan, L.; Chen, Z. Establishment and maintenance of longan embryogenic cell lines. Fujian Agric. Univ.; 1997; 2, pp. 33-40.
74. Zhai, T.; Lan, S.; Xv, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, J.; Chen, Y.; Lai, Z.; Lin, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis Reveal bZIP Transcription Factors Mediated Hormones that Functions during Early Somatic Embryogenesis in Dimocarpus longan. Plants; 2024; 13, 662. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants13050662] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38475508]
75. Lin, Y.; Min, J.; Lai, R.; Wu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yu, L.; Cheng, C.; Jin, Y.; Tian, Q.; Liu, Q. et al. Genome-wide sequencing of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) provides insights into molecular basis of its polyphenol-rich characteristics. Gigascience; 2017; 6, gix023.
76. Lamesch, P.; Berardini, T.Z.; Li, D.; Swarbreck, D.; Wilks, C.; Sasidharan, R.; Muller, R.; Dreher, K.; Alexander, D.L.; Garcia-Hernandez, M. et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2012; 40, pp. D1202-D1210.
77. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant; 2020; 13, pp. 1194-1202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009]
78. Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Blum, M.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Pinto, B.L.; Salazar, G.A.; Bileschi, M.L.; Bork, P.; Bridge, A.; Colwell, L. et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2023; 51, pp. D418-D427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac993]
79. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2003; 31, pp. 3784-3788. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg563]
80. Chen, Y.; Yu, P.; Luo, J.; Jiang, Y. Secreted protein prediction system combining CJ-SPHMM, TMHMM, and PSORT. Mamm. Genome; 2003; 14, pp. 859-865. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00335-003-2296-6]
81. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2018; 35, pp. 1547-1549.
82. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N. et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2012; 40, pp. D1178-D1186. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr944] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110026]
83. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2021; 49, pp. W293-W296. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885785]
84. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2009; 37, pp. W202-W208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp335] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19458158]
85. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2002; 30, pp. 325-327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.325]
86. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H. et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2012; 40, e49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1293]
87. Lin, Y.L.; Lai, Z.X. Reference gene selection for qPCR analysis during somatic embryogenesis in longan tree. Plant Sci.; 2010; 178, pp. 359-365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.02.005]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
BES1 (BRI1 EMS SUPPRESSOR 1) is a critical transcription factor involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses. Although BES1 genes have been characterized in several species, their roles in longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) remain unclear. This study identified and analyzed eight BES1 genes in the longan genome. Phylogenetic analysis classified these genes into four subgroups (I-IV), with conserved motifs and intron–exon structures indicating potential functional similarities within subgroups. Cis-element analysis revealed that the promoters of DlBES1 genes contain numerous hormone-related elements, including ABRE, TGACG, and TCA motifs, suggesting their involvement in hormonal signaling and stress responses. Expression profiling showed differential expression patterns of DlBES1 genes across nine tissues, with notable up-regulation in roots and seeds. Additionally, DlBES1 genes exhibited distinct expression trends under varying temperatures and in response to IAA treatment, indicating potential roles in temperature stress adaptation and hormone signaling. These findings provide novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms of BES1 genes in longan and highlight their potential significance in stress tolerance and growth regulation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2 Institute of Horticultural Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
3 College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;