Content area

Abstract

China’s rapidly aging population has intensified demand for long-term services and supports (LTSSs), yet geographic disparities in accessibility persist despite policy reforms like long-term care insurance (LTCI). This study evaluates spatial inequities in Chengdu, a megacity piloting LTCI, using an enhanced two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method with demand intensity coefficients and a spatial mismatch index (SMI). Results reveal critically low average accessibility: 0.126 LTSS beds and 0.019 formal caregivers per thousand recipients within a 60 min travel threshold. Accessibility declines sharply along urbanization gradients, with urban cores (“first loop”) exceeding suburban “second” and “third loop” by ratios of 1.5–2.1 and 2.0–8.0, respectively. Strong correlations with impervious surface ratios (R2 = 0.513–0.643) highlight systemic urban bias in resource allocation. The SMI analysis uncovers divergent spatial mismatches: home care accessibility predominates in western suburbs due to decentralized small-scale providers, while institutional care clusters in eastern suburbs, reflecting government prioritization of facility-based services. Despite LTCI’s broad coverage (67% of Chengdu’s population), rural and peri-urban older adults face compounded barriers, including sparse LTSS facilities, inadequate transportation infrastructure, and reimbursement policies favoring urban institutional care. To address these inequities, this study proposes a multi-stakeholder framework: (1) strategic expansion of LTSS facilities in underserved suburban zones, prioritizing institutional care in the “third loop”; (2) road network optimization to reduce travel barriers in mountainous regions; (3) financial incentives (e.g., subsidies, tax breaks) to attract formal caregivers to suburban areas; (4) cross-regional LTCI coverage to enable access to adjacent district facilities; and (5) integration of informal caregivers into reimbursement systems through training and telehealth support. These interventions aim to reconcile spatial mismatches, align resource distribution with Chengdu’s urban–rural integration goals, and provide scalable insights for aging megacities in developing contexts. By bridging geospatial analytics with policy design, this study underscores the imperative of data-driven governance to ensure equitable aging-in-place for vulnerable populations.

Details

1009240
Title
Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis
Author
Sen, Lin 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Qin, Shikun 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Li, Peng 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sun, Xueying 4 ; Dou, Xiaolu 5 

 Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; [email protected] 
 School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China; [email protected] 
 College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China; [email protected] 
 School of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China; [email protected] 
 School of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100080, China 
Publication title
Volume
17
Issue
7
First page
3222
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
20711050
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-04-04
Milestone dates
2024-12-20 (Received); 2025-04-02 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
04 Apr 2025
ProQuest document ID
3188885734
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/assessing-geographic-barriers-access-long-term/docview/3188885734/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-04-12
Database
ProQuest One Academic