A Hybrid Strategy for Forward Kinematics of the Stewart Platform Based on Dual Quaternion Neural Network and ARMA Time Series Prediction

Abstract

The forward kinematics of the Stewart platform is crucial for precise control and reliable operation in six-degree-of-freedom motion. However, there are some shortcomings in practical applications, such as calculation precision, computational efficiency, the capacity to resolve singular Jacobian matrix and real-time predictive performance. To overcome those deficiencies, this work proposes a hybrid strategy for forward kinematics in the Stewart platform based on dual quaternion neural network and ARMA time series prediction. This method initially employs a dual-quaternion-based back-propagation neural network (DQ-BPNN). The DQ-BPNN is partitioned into real and dual parts, composed of parameters such as driving-rod lengths, maximum and minimum lengths, to extract more features. In DQ-BPNN, a residual network (ResNet) is employed, endowing DQ-BPNN with the capacity to capture deeper-level system characteristics and enabling DQ-BPNN to achieve a better fitting effect. Furthermore, the combined modified multi-step-size factor Newton downhill method and the Newton–Raphson method (C-MSFND-NR) are employed. This combination not only enhances computational efficiency and ensures global convergence, but also endows the method with the capability to resolve a singular matrix. Finally, a traversal method is adopted to determine the order of the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model according to the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). This approach efficiently balances computational efficiency and fitting accuracy during real-time motion. The simulations and experiments demonstrate that, compared with BPNN, the R² value in DQ-BPNN increases by 0.1%. Meanwhile, the MAE, MAPE, RMSE, and MSE values in DQ-BPNN decrease by 8.89%, 21.85%, 6.90%, and 3.3%, respectively. Compared with five Newtonian methods, the average computing time of C-MSFND-NR decreases by 59.82%, 83.81%, 15.09%, 79.82%, and 78.77%. Compared with the linear method, the prediction accuracy of the ARMA method increases by 14.63%, 14.63%, 14.63%, 14.46%, 16.67%, and 13.41%, respectively.