Membrane-Based Persulfate Activation for Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review of Materials, Mechanisms and Expectation

Abstract

Membrane-based persulfate catalysis technology offers a dual approach to wastewater treatment by facilitating both physical separation and chemical oxidation. This innovative method significantly enhances pollutant removal efficiency while mitigating membrane fouling, positioning it as a promising advanced oxidation technology for wastewater management. This review comprehensively examines the critical aspects of material design, activation mechanisms, and technological challenges. Membrane materials and structures are crucial for enhancing the overall efficiency of the technology. By analyzing various catalytic materials and modification strategies, the study reveals the intricate interactions between membrane structures, catalytic performance, and pollutant degradation. The clear mechanism of pollutant degradation is the key to achieve accurate degradation. The research highlights three primary activation pathways: free radical, non-radical, and hybrid mechanisms, each offering unique advantages in addressing complex water contamination. Finally, the future challenges and research directions are put forward. Despite remarkable progress, challenges remain in membrane stability, economic feasibility, and large-scale implementation. Therefore, this study outlines the latest materials, mechanisms, and prospects of membrane-based persulfate technology, which are expected to promote its widespread application in environmental governance.

1. Introduction

With the rapid advancement of industrialization, the composition of wastewater from industries such as printing and dyeing, healthcare, and chemical manufacturing has grown more complex [1,2,3,4]. The rising prevalence of pollutants such as antibiotics, azo dyes, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are characterized by high toxicity, environmental persistence, and bioaccumulation potential, poses a significant challenge [5,6]. These pollutants cannot be completely mineralized by traditional methods like physical adsorption and biodegradation. The residual pollutants left in the environment have far-reaching impacts, threatening ecological systems and human health in multiple ways [7,8]. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop new water treatment technologies that are efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally sustainable.

Persulfate advanced oxidation processes (PS-AOPs) offer unique advantages due to their broad pH adaptability, cost-effectiveness of persulfate, and the generation of highly oxidative sulfate radicals (SO₄·⁻, E₀ = 2.5–3.1 V) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH, E₀ = 2.8 V), which enable non-selective degradation of pollutants. These features make PS-AOPs promising for advanced water treatment applications [9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, traditional PS-AOPs face practical limitations. Homogeneous catalysts risk secondary pollution and are difficult to recover, while heterogeneous catalysts are constrained by slow solid–liquid interfacial reaction rates and metal ion leaching. Additionally, activation methods relying on light or heat require significant energy inputs [15,16].

As a well-established separation technology, membrane technology offers distinct advantages in water treatment, including high separation efficiency, environmental sustainability, and ease of operation [17]. However, traditional membrane technologies primarily rely on physical screening mechanisms, which limits their ability to achieve deep degradation of pollutants simultaneously [18]. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in integrating membrane technology with persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (PS-AOPs) to address the limitations inherent in both approaches and to enhance the separation and degradation of pollutants.

To attain dual functionality characterized by efficient catalytic separation, researchers began modifying membrane materials early in the 21st century [19]. Initially, efforts concentrated on the straightforward combination of homogeneous catalysts with ultrafiltration membranes; for instance, metal ions supported by polymer membranes were explored to investigate the preliminary coupling between catalytic oxidation and membrane separation [20]. Subsequently, composites comprising ceramic films and carbon-based materials, such as graphene and carbon nanotubes, emerged as focal points of research due to their enhanced stability and regeneration properties for catalysts [21]. With advancements in nanotechnology and materials science, innovative designs such as smart responsive membranes and biomimetic catalytic membranes have surfaced. Additionally, the utilization of porous framework materials like covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), along with various two-dimensional materials, has significantly enhanced both catalytic efficiency and selectivity [22,23,24]. Table 1 compares membrane-based persulfate technology with other processes.

In this paper, the research progress, challenges, and future directions of membrane-based persulfate activation technology in wastewater treatment were reviewed, focusing on the following contents: (1) The selection of membrane materials and modification strategies; (2) selection of catalytic materials and optimization of membrane structure; and (3) the catalytic separation coordination mechanism and its practical application in different scenarios are introduced in detail; followed by (4) an analysis of current challenges and future prospects, research needs, and opportunities in the field.

2. Material Selection and Modification Strategy

2.1. Basic Membrane Materials and Main Performance Parameters

The selection and performance parameters of membrane materials have a decisive impact on the wastewater treatment effect [25]. According to material types and structural characteristics, membrane materials can be mainly divided into polymer membranes [26], ceramic membranes [27], and composite membranes [28]. Reasonable selection of membrane materials and optimization of their performance parameters are very important to improve the activation efficiency of persulfate and the removal rate of pollutants.

Polymer membranes are prevalent in water treatment due to their low cost and favorable processing properties [29]. Among them, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes stand out for their excellent mechanical strength, chemical stability, and oxidation resistance. The unique molecular structure of PVDF membranes enables them to endure oxidation treatment and facilitates combination with catalysts, making them an ideal substrate for preparing catalytic composite membranes [30]. It has been reported that PVDF-based composite membranes can be preserved in hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid (90%) at 50 °C for at least 30 days [31]. PES membrane has good thermal stability and oxidation resistance. A thermal performance test by Yue et al. [32] showed that the glass transition temperature decreased from 184 °C to 157 °C with the increase in aliphatic chain size. However, its hydrophilicity is poor [33], and surface modification is needed to improve its performance. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane has excellent chemical stability, can withstand strong acids and bases, has good hydrophilicity and retention rate, and is widely used in ultrafiltration applications, but has low mechanical strength [34]. Polyamide (PA) membrane has excellent separation performance, but it is prone to chlorine oxidation damage in wastewater containing Cl⁻, so it needs to be modified by various means to improve its antioxidant capacity and durability [35].

Ceramic membranes have experienced rapid development in recent years, offering significant advantages over polymer membranes [36]. Research indicates that ceramic films exhibit excellent corrosion resistance across a wide pH range, can withstand temperatures up to 700 °C, and possess high mechanical strength with a service life of 5–10 years [37]. Among these materials, Al₂O₃ ceramic membranes are notable for their adjustable porosity and compressive strength [38], making them suitable for treating high-salinity wastewater [39]; thus, they have become the most commonly utilized ceramic membrane material. TiO₂ ceramic membranes demonstrate photocatalytic activity and can generate active free radicals under UV light; however, practical applications necessitate modifications for visible light responsiveness. For instance, nitrogen doping extends the light absorption range to 500 nm, facilitating in situ degradation of organic pollutants [40]. SiO₂ ceramic films are characterized by good hydrophilicity and exceptional anti-fouling performance [41]. ZrO₂ ceramic films exhibit even higher hydrophilicity and remarkable chemical stability within a pH range of 1–14 [42], although their preparation involves large energy consumption due to high sintering temperature [43].

Composite films can leverage synergistic performance by integrating complementary material advantages; however, challenges related to interface compatibility and long-term stability must be addressed [44]. Experimental findings indicate that organic–inorganic composite membranes can concurrently achieve the high flux characteristic of organic membranes and the superior stability of inorganic materials [45]. Through rational design of the functional layer, the retention rate of multilayer composite membranes can be enhanced by 20–30%. Surface-modified composite membranes significantly improve anti-pollution performance and increase the reversibility of membrane fouling by 40–60% [46]. While material type directly influences membrane properties, practical applications also necessitate consideration of key parameters such as catalytic activity, stability, and anti-pollution characteristics.

In the persulfate catalytic membrane system, the performance evaluation framework for membrane materials encompasses several critical aspects: catalytic activity [47], stability and durability, fouling resistance, and separation efficiency [48]. The collaborative optimization of these parameters is essential for enhancing overall treatment efficiency. Comprehensive evaluation of membrane material properties should consider the following parameters (Table 2). During modification, it is crucial to balance trade-offs between performance parameters, particularly the inherent conflict between catalytic activity and stability. For instance, highly active catalysts tend to dissolve easily, but encapsulating the catalytic entities within the membrane can mitigate this issue and balance activity with stability [48]. Additionally, there is a trade-off between high throughput and high retention [49], as well as cost-performance considerations, such as ceramic membranes that offer long lifespans but entail high initial investment costs. Modular designs, like short-channel structures, can reduce unit processing costs [50]. Further research is necessary to investigate the interactions between different parameters and their mechanisms of influence on overall performance.

2.2. Selection of Catalytic Materials

The selection of catalytic materials plays a pivotal role in determining the performance of membrane-based persulfate activation systems. Research has demonstrated that the structural characteristics, surface electronic states, and interfacial reactivity of these materials directly influence the activation efficiency and pathways of free radical generation from persulfate [51]. Currently, mainstream catalytic materials can be categorized into three types: nanomaterials, porous materials, and novel catalytic materials. Optimizing their performance requires consideration of catalytic activity, stability, and compatibility with the membrane matrix [52]. The composition, application scenarios, and treatment effects are summarized in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5.

2.3. Modification Methods

Membrane material modification techniques significantly enhance catalytic activity and separation performance by regulating surface properties, internal structure, and functional component distribution. Current mainstream modification methods include surface modification, grafting modification, material compounding, and novel functionalization strategies, with each method requiring targeted selection based on material characteristics and application scenarios [78,79,80].

Surface modification methods optimize membrane surface characteristics through physical or chemical means. Physical coating methods such as impregnation, spraying, and spin-coating can quickly construct catalytic layers, but the coating adhesion is weak and requires chemical crosslinking to enhance interface bonding [81]. Layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly utilizes electrostatic adsorption or hydrogen bonding to alternately deposit polyelectrolytes and nanomaterials, forming functionally controllable layers (10–100 nm) thick, though interlayer stacking may block pores and reduce flux [82]. Chemical oxidation–reduction methods generate active groups (such as -OH or carboxyl groups) through plasma treatment or UV light initiation, improving surface hydrophilicity and providing anchoring sites for catalysts [78].

Surface grafting modification fixes functional molecules to the membrane surface through covalent or non-covalent interactions. Free radical polymerization can introduce hydrophilic groups under mild conditions, but grafting rates are limited by monomer diffusion rates (typically < 10%) [81]. Click chemistry offers near 100% reaction efficiency and can precisely graft thiol or amino functional groups, though residual copper catalysts may cause secondary pollution [83]. Non-covalent modifications are simple to operate but prone to functional molecule detachment under long-term external forces, resulting in poor stability [84].

Material composite modification enhances membrane performance through multi-component synergy. In situ growth methods can achieve uniform loading within membrane pores, but high-temperature conditions may damage polymer matrices [85]. Mixed composite methods improve filler dispersion by optimizing dispersant ratios, but excessive addition can lead to membrane brittleness, requiring careful parameter design [86]. Chemical crosslinking enhances interface bonding by sacrificing porosity.

Other novel modification technologies provide innovative directions for functional design, with current challenges focusing on balancing modification effects and scalability. Future research should emphasize directional design of modification strategies.

2.4. Membrane Structure Optimization and Performance Enhancement

Precise regulation of membrane structure is the core strategy for improving catalytic-separation synergistic efficiency, with the key lying in balancing the competitive relationships between mass transfer dynamics, catalytic activity, and mechanical stability [87]. Through multi-scale structural design (from nanoscale pores to microscale surface morphology), the coupling process of pollutant interception and degradation can be significantly optimized.

Pore structure optimization focuses on the coordinated design of pore size distribution and porosity. Designing composite membranes with gradient pore sizes can simultaneously address selectivity and flux while providing hierarchical space for catalyst loading [88,89]. Porosity regulation requires balancing permeability and mechanical strength, but excessively high porosity may lead to structural collapse risks, which need to be maintained through methods such as crosslinking agents or nanofiber reinforcement [90,91]. Additionally, catalytic membranes with nanoscale pores in ceramic substrates or 2D spacing formed by assembling porous carbon materials (such as graphene oxide) combined with functional nanoparticles can enhance free radical-based oxidation processes [92]. Precise control of pore size or spacing improves reaction efficiency within these confined spaces.

Mass transfer channel design using biomimetic principles, such as leaf vein fractal structures, can reduce mass transfer resistance, shortening pollutant diffusion paths by 30–50% and improving contact efficiency [93]. Synergistic optimization of surface roughness and hydrophilicity can form a stable hydration layer, reducing pollutant adsorption [94]. However, excessive roughness may trigger local turbulence, leading to catalyst detachment and reduced service life [95]. Loading multi-layer catalytic membranes can also address limitations such as short retention time within the catalytic layer and interference from co-existing organic pollutants in actual water [96].

Interface structure engineering aims to solve compatibility issues between catalytic components and membrane matrix, with the core strategy being efficient anchoring and stable operation of catalysts through chemical modification, physical confinement, or dynamic bonding. Silane coupling agents (such as APTES) can increase interface bonding strength by 3–5 times (peeling force increasing from 0.5 N/m to 2.5 N/m). Li et al. used in situ growth strategies to fix ZnCo-ZIF nanoparticles on PAN fibers, achieving chemical bonding that prevents catalyst loss while demonstrating higher PMS activation efficiency [97]. Constructing core-shell structures can protect loaded catalysts to enhance dynamic interface stability while also strengthening synergistic interactions between components [98].

However, further research is still needed to explore the structure–performance relationship of membranes and develop novel structural design strategies to achieve continuous membrane performance improvement.

3. Activation Mechanism

3.1. Free Radical Pathway

The free radical activation mechanism is the most extensively researched and applied reaction pathway in PS processing technology. Through specific activation methods, the O-O bond in PS is cleaved to generate core active oxidative species SO₄·⁻ and ·OH, whose strong oxidative properties are key to treating complex organic pollutants [99]. Existing research further reveals that in some systems, multiple free radical species can be produced, including superoxide radicals (O₂·⁻). The advantages of the free radical mechanism lie in its exceptional reaction rate and powerful oxidative capacity, enabling the decomposition of various hard-to-degrade organic compounds. However, its inherent limitations cannot be overlooked: free radicals can be quenched by NOM or inorganic ions (such as Cl⁻, HCO₃⁻) in water, significantly reducing oxidation efficiency [100]. Moreover, when local free radical concentrations are too high, complex self-quenching reactions between free radicals will further decrease oxidation efficiency, and most free radicals lack selectivity, making it difficult to perform directional oxidation of specific pollutants [101]. More critically, some activators are prone to oxidative deactivation and may potentially cause secondary pollution [102].

To enhance the scientific effectiveness of the free radical mechanism, nanomaterials (such as ZVI, Fe₃O₄, Co₃O₄) or carbon-based materials (like graphene, carbon nanotubes) are often used as catalysts. These advanced materials not only significantly enhance catalytic activity but also effectively reduce metal ion leaching [103]. Based on the free radical characteristics shown in Table 6, researchers can more precisely understand and regulate the free radical activation mechanism, providing a crucial scientific basis for innovative wastewater treatment technologies.

3.2. Non-Radical Pathway

In recent years, non-radical pathways that have attracted significant academic attention primarily include mechanisms such as ¹O₂, surface-bound oxides, electron transfer, and high-valence metal species (such as Fe (IV)) [104]. Distinctly different from traditional radical oxidation mechanisms, non-radical mechanisms do not rely on generating highly active free radicals. Instead, they achieve degradation through direct interactions between catalyst surfaces and pollutants or indirect oxidation via intermediate products [104]. Some novel functional materials, such as oxygen vacancy-rich metal oxides, graphene nanodiamond (G-ND), and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), can promote non-radical pathways by fine-tuning surface chemical properties and porous structures [105]. The advantages of non-radical mechanisms lie in their unique environmental adaptability: lower sensitivity to water background interference, relatively low energy consumption, and more precise and controllable degradation capabilities for specific pollutant types [104,106]. Compared to radical oxidation, the reaction process is milder, applicable across a wider pH range, and effectively avoids potentially harmful byproducts generated in radical mechanisms. However, their oxidation capacity is typically weaker, reaction rates are slower, and they have higher requirements for catalyst surface properties [106,107,108].

3.3. Radical-Non-Radical Hybrid Mechanism

The radical-non-radical hybrid mechanism combines the advantages of both mechanisms, achieving rapid oxidation through radical pathways while simultaneously improving reaction selectivity and stability via non-radical pathways through synergistic effects [106]. For instance, a series of advanced composite materials demonstrate exceptional multi-oxidation mechanisms when activating persulfate: generating SO₄·⁻ and ·OH while also enabling pollutant degradation through surface-mediated electron transfer or singlet oxygen generation pathways [109]. The advantages of the hybrid mechanism lie in its unique adaptability: it can accommodate complex water environments and exhibit significantly enhanced degradation efficiency in the presence of multiple pollutants. More critically, the hybrid mechanism can effectively reduce radical quenching effects and substantially improve catalyst utilization [110]. However, this innovative approach is not without drawbacks: its primary limitation is the increased complexity of the reaction process, which places more stringent requirements on catalyst design and preparation [111].

3.4. Process Integration and Optimization

Membrane-based persulfate technology can construct a multi-technology coupled system through synergistic integration with other water treatment processes, significantly enhancing the comprehensive treatment efficiency of complex wastewater. Specifically, when combined with biological treatment technologies (such as membrane bioreactors, MBR), persulfate oxidation precisely breaks down recalcitrant organic compounds (like antibiotics and dyes) into biodegradable small molecules [112]. The subsequent biological unit further mineralizes and removes nitrogen and phosphorus, while the membrane components effectively retain microorganisms to maintain system stability. However, careful handling of oxidant residuals that may potentially inhibit microbial activity is necessary [113].

In the field of electrochemical collaborative treatment, when coupled with electrochemical oxidation, electrical energy drives the anode to directly degrade pollutants or generate active oxygen, while the cathode simultaneously activates persulfate to generate free radicals [114]. This approach is particularly suitable for high-salinity wastewater treatment, but simultaneously faces severe challenges of high electrode costs and membrane material corrosion. Photocatalytic synergistic technology, as an emerging direction, utilizes photocatalysts loaded on membrane surfaces to activate persulfate under light irradiation, successfully achieving solar-driven efficient degradation, though still limited by membrane material light transmittance and light energy utilization efficiency [115].

Additionally, membranes modified with adsorption materials (such as MOFs and activated carbon) can enhance pollutant removal through a “concentration-oxidation” cycle, while coagulation pretreatment can significantly reduce membrane fouling and utilize residual metal ions to activate oxidants. For heavy metal wastewater, reduction–oxidation sequential processes (such as zero-valent iron reducing Cr (VI) followed by persulfate oxidation of organic compounds) demonstrate unique synergistic advantages [116].

4. Applications in Seawater Desalination

In desalination systems, the integration of membrane-based persulfate activation has revolutionized pretreatment and membrane performance enhancement strategies [117]. As a pretreatment stage, ceramic membranes functionalized with persulfate-activating catalysts (β-PDI/MIL-101 (Fe)) effectively reduce organic fouling potential by degrading NOM and algal organic matter (AOM) through radical-mediated oxidation (·OH and SO₄·⁻) and direct hole (h+) transfer mechanisms. The membrane properties are improved [118].

Beyond pretreatment, the technology directly enhances desalination membrane performance through three key pathways: persulfate-derived reactive species modify CaCO₃ and CaSO₄ crystallization kinetics, reducing scaling propensity compared to conventional antiscalants [119]; continuous in situ oxidation of adsorbed foulants maintains RO membrane flux with little deviation over long-term operation [120]; sustained generation of ¹O₂ and O₂·⁻ radicals achieves reduction of marine microorganism, extending membrane cleaning intervals [121]. It is worth noting that this technology has a unique advantage in the degradation of emerging pollutants in seawater, so that seawater with complex substrates can be processed through integrated treatment [122].

5. Current Technical Challenges

As a critical element of persulfate activation technology, the stability and longevity of the membrane directly influence the efficacy and economic viability of the entire treatment system. In practical operations, membrane materials are often exposed to extreme high-concentration pollutants, strong oxidants, and complex and variable water environments, which may lead to accelerated chemical degradation, mechanical damage, or significant declines in catalytic activity. Although ceramic membranes and composite membranes have better chemical resistance, their preparation costs are high and their complexity increases [123].

The economic viability of persulfate activation technology represents a critical factor constraining its widespread adoption. The substantial costs associated with catalyst preparation, intricate reactor design, and high operational energy consumption pose significant economic challenges for commercial applications. Compared to polymer membranes, the complex manufacturing process for these materials results in a cost increase of 30–50%, or even more. The preparation costs for nano-catalysts can reach several hundred dollars per kilogram, while the installation of high-performance membrane components constitutes 40–60% of the initial investment, significantly elevating the overall expenses associated with water treatment processes. Although advanced membranes initially demonstrate an impressive contaminant rejection rate of 80–90%, prolonged oxidative stress from persulfate radicals leads to irreversible alterations in pore structure. Consequently, regular maintenance and replacement of the diaphragm are necessary. Furthermore, energy consumption during persulfate activation and the costs associated with reaction reagents exacerbate the economic burden. Therefore, reducing technology costs while preserving processing efficiency has emerged as a critical challenge that researchers and engineers must collaboratively address [104,106,124].

From laboratory-scale to industrial application scaling, membrane-based persulfate activation technology confronts numerous critical challenges. Specifically, process parameters optimized under laboratory conditions may be difficult to fully reproduce in industrial applications, and the preparation and installation of large-scale membrane components involve complex technical difficulties. Even more troublesome is that the extremely high complexity and variability of industrial wastewater pose unprecedentedly higher requirements for the technology’s stability and adaptability [120,125].

6. Conclusions and Outlook

Membrane-based persulfate activation technology shows immense potential for advanced wastewater treatment. Future developments should focus on novel material design, deeper mechanism understanding, and process optimization. Interdisciplinary approaches combining advanced characterization techniques, theoretical modeling, and innovative material synthesis will be crucial in overcoming current technological limitations and realizing the full environmental governance potential of this promising technology. The following aspects should be further explored.

(1). Targeting technological breakthroughs, developing efficient, stable, and low-cost novel membrane materials and catalysts is the core research demand for membrane-based persulfate activation technology [126]. Simultaneously, active exploration of bio-based materials and renewable resources in membrane material preparation should be pursued to promote technological greening and sustainability [127].

(2). Deeply understanding the reaction mechanism of membrane-based persulfate activation is a critical pathway for enhancing technological performance. Current research requires significant advancements in the following areas: elucidating the precise kinetic mechanisms of both free radical and non-free radical reactions [128], establishing a comprehensive molecular mechanism model for pollutant degradation, and developing in situ characterization and real-time monitoring techniques to uncover the dynamic changes at the reaction interface. These mechanistic studies will provide a robust theoretical foundation for optimizing technologies [129].

(3). At the practical level, optimizing the operational parameters and process design of membrane-based persulfate activation is a key approach to improving technological efficiency and economic viability [130]. Additionally, active exploration of deep integration with other wastewater treatment technologies (such as biological treatment and adsorption) should be pursued to achieve collaborative removal of multiple pollutants and resource recovery. Finally, intelligent process control strategy should be developed, and process optimization models based on big data and artificial intelligence established. The processing efficiency and economy can be significantly improved through refined process design [131].

Overall, membrane-based persulfate activation technology demonstrates significant advantages in wastewater treatment but still faces complex technical challenges. Through new material development, mechanism understanding, and process optimization, technological performance and economic feasibility can be significantly improved. In the future, intelligent reaction membranes, green and sustainable technologies, and industrial applications will become important development directions for this technology, promising widespread application in environmental governance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.X., W.G. and H.Y.; methodology, W.L. and L.G.; validation, W.L., L.G. and F.J.; formal analysis, W.L.; investigation, W.L.; resources, Z.L.; data curation, W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L.; writing—review and editing, B.X. and W.G.; visualization, B.X.; supervision, B.X. and J.W.; project administration, B.X. and W.G.; funding acquisition, B.X., W.G. and G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Tables

Table 1

Comparison between membrane-based persulfate technology and other processes.

Treatment Technology	Advantages	Limitations	Cost
Membrane-based Persulfate Activation	Physical separation and chemical oxidationHigh pollutant removal efficiencyReduced membrane foulingBroad pH adaptabilityContinuous operation	Initial investment costsMembrane stability concerns	Moderate to high
Traditional Membrane Filtration	Physical separationStable operationMature technology	Severe membrane foulingNo degradation capabilityRegular cleaning required	Moderate
Conventional Persulfate Oxidation	Strong oxidation capabilityHigh mineralization rate	No separation functionSecondary pollution riskPoor selectivity	Low to moderate
Biological Treatment	Low operating costEnvironmentally friendlyGood nutrient removal	Limited for refractory pollutantsLong retention timeSensitive to toxic substances	Low

Table 2

Important parameters of membrane materials.

Performance Parameter	Representative Index	Optimization Strategy
Catalytic activity	Free radical yield	Catalyst loading
Stability and durability	Mechanical strength, chemical tolerance	Crosslinked modified, protective coating
Antifouling property	Pollution index	Hydrophilic modification, surface charge regulation
Separation efficiency	Flux and retention	Gradient hole structure and functional layer design

Table 3

Nanometer materials.

Catalytic Material	Mechanisms	Application Scenarios	Treatment Effect	References
Fe3O4 nanoparticle	Efficient activation of Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS)	Antibiotic wastewater	Short hydraulic retention time achieved 99% Atrazine removal in 5.7 s	Liangdy et al. [53]
Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO)	N-doped active sites activate PS	Organic micropollutant wastewater	After 24 h of continuous operation of three fluoroquinolone antibiotics, the removal rate of pollutants was as high as 91%	Vieira et al. [54]
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanofiber membrane	SO4·− and ·OH are generated. The hydrophilic surface is rich in hydroxyl (-OH) groups and adsorbs methyl blue (MB) dyes	Dye wastewater	The degradation rate of MB reached 94%. The removal rates of MB and methyl orange (MO) double dye systems reached 76% and 68%, respectively	Pervez et al. [55]
CuO/Cu2(V2O7)/V2O5	The synergistic effect between Cu and V facilitates the regeneration of the catalyst and the generation of the active species SO4·−, ·OH, and singlet oxygen (1O2)	Antibiotic wastewater	The degradation rate of ciprofloxacin reached 90%	Xue et al. [56]
CuO@CuS	CuO can produce Cu (III), which collaborates with CuS to activate the PS reaction to produce SO4·− and 1O2	Antibiotic wastewater	Under the condition of pH 3, the degradation rate of tetracycline reached 87.4% within 3 h	Liu et al. [57]
Iron-supported nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (Fe-NCNT-W)	Electron transfer pathway, non-radical pathway of hypervalent ferrite species, and radical pathway of ·OH and SO4·−	Complex matrix wastewater	Fe-NCNT-W/PMS system showed high degradation efficiency for acidic orange 7 (AO7) and phenol mixed wastewater, and the Kobs of AO7 was 0.452 min−1, with little interference from solution pH or background matter	Wang et al. [58]
Mn3O4 nanodot-g-C3N4 nanosheet (Mn3O4/CNNS) composites	The surface-OH group of Mn (IV/III) reacts with HSO5− to form 1O2, Mn (III), and Mn (IV), yielding ·OH and SO4·−	Highly toxic and refractory wastewater	Within 60 min, the degradation rate of 4-chlorophenol was more than 90%, and the removal efficiency of TOC was more than 80%	Chen et al. [59]
NiCo@NCNT	NiCo alloy nanoparticles can effectively facilitate the transfer of electrons from contaminants (electron donors) to PMS	Complex matrix wastewater	100% Ibuprofen degradation was achieved, and the Kobs = 0.31 min−1. The degradation efficiency of MB, MO, naproxen, sulfamicloropyridine, and phenol reached 99%, 100%, 89%, 85%, and 78%	Kang et al. [60]
Zero-valent iron (ZVI)	The activation of PMS on the membrane surface generates SO4·− and Fe3+. Fe3+ has flocculation and can reduce membrane contamination	Algal wastewater	The flux reached 387.9 L·m−2·h−1 in the stationary phase, and no severe cell rupture was observed	Huang et al. [20]
MnO2	MnO2 activates PMS on the surface of the ceramic membrane to produce SO4·−, ·OH and 1O2	Organic refractory wastewater	The catalytic membrane with 1.67% MnO2 load also achieved 98.9% degradation of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid within 30 min	Wu et al. [61]
NiO/C	NiO activates PS to form SO4·−, and the reduced Ni (0) directly transfers electrons with PS through a non-radical pathway	Organic refractory wastewater	The removal rate of diclofenac by NiO/C membrane in the presence of PS was more than 97%, and showed good stability in the presence of HCO3− and Cl−.	Hesaraki et al. [62]
Co nanoparticle-modified N-doped carbon nanosheet array (Co-N-C)	Through plasma effect and molecular thermal vibration effect of N-doped carbon, Co NPs promote the decomposition of PS, generate 1O2, and degrade organic pollutants through non-free radical pathway	Solar powered interfacial water evaporation and treatment of organic refractory wastewater	Under sunlight, the water evaporation rate reaches 1.88 kg m−2 h−1, the solar-steam efficiency is about 87%, and the phenolic pollutants can be effectively removed	Cui et al. [63]
MnCo2O4	The spinel structure provides a variety of active sites that promote electron transfer through valence changes (Mn3+/Mn4+ and Co2+/Co3+), thereby activating PMS	Dye wastewater	The rhodamine B(RhB) degradation rate of 0.04 g L−1 by MnCo2O4/PMS system reached 99.92%	Shi et al. [64]

Table 4

Porous material.

Catalytic Material	Mechanisms	Application Scenarios	Treatment Effect	References
Cu@C/SiO2	Zero-valent copper generates Cu+ and Cu2+ by electron transfer, activates PMS to generate SO4·− and ·OH radicals, and degrades organic pollutants by 1O2 and other non-radical pathways	Antibiotic wastewater	95% tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) can be degraded within 40 min at a reaction rate of 0.054 min−1	Shan et al. [65]
Mil-53 (Fe)	Under visible light irradiation, Mil-53(Fe) produces photoelectron (e−) and hole (h+) pairs. At the same time, the coordination-unsaturated metal sites (CUS) can activate PS to generate free radicals	Oil–water separation and dye wastewater	For different concentrations of water-in-oil emulsions (1 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm), the separation efficiency remained above 90%, and the degradation efficiency of RhB, methylene blue, and methyl violet reached 100% within 60 min	Xiang et al. [66]
Cobalt-coated nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials (Co/CoOx@NC)	The extraction of hydrophobic organic pollutants simultaneously rejects the passage of natural organic matter (NOM) and water	Organic refractory wastewater	It can achieve a phenol removal rate of 80%, while the amount of PMS and catalyst are reduced by 40% and 97.8%, and can be used for soil remediation	Qiu et al. [67]
ZIF-67	The oxygen vacancy increased the active site of the catalyst, promoted the adsorption and activation of PMS, and the electrophilic attack characteristic of 1O2 selectively attacked SMX	Antibiotic wastewater	The removal rate of SMX was 96.3%, much higher than with membrane filtration alone (0.4%) and PMS oxidation alone (25.4%)	Ma et al. [68]

Table 5

Novel catalytic material.

Catalytic Material	Mechanisms	Application Scenarios	Treatment Effect	References
CC/FeOCl	FeOCl promotes the mutual conversion of Fe (II) and Fe (III) through internal charge transfer and activates persulfate to produce SO4·− and ·OH	Antibiotic wastewater	Under the action of electric field, the degradation rate of TC reached 93%, and the composite membrane showed excellent separation performance and anti-pollution performance	Wang et al. [69]
PLA-CNF@ZIF-8	ZIF-8 produces SO4·− and ·OH by activating persulfate	Dye wastewater	The degradation efficiency of RhB reached more than 90% and remained above 75% after five cycles of use	Moyo et al. [70]
B-NiFe2Ox	B doping in B-Nife2Ox forms oxygen vacancies (OVs), promotes electron transfer, and generates SO4·− and ·OH	Secondary sewage treatment	The removal rates of COD and UV254 in secondary wastewater were significantly increased, reaching 67.14% and 92.16%	Mao et al. [71]
NG/rGO/CNTs	Free radical and non-free radical synergism	Antibiotic wastewater	The SMX removal rate of NG/rGO/CNTs composite membrane reached 94.3%, and the corresponding SMX removal rate was 21.7 mg m−2·h−1, which was about 17% higher than that achieved with rGO/CNT composite membrane	Qian et al. [72]
Prussian blue analogue-modified Mg-Al hydrotalcite PBA−LDH	The metal site Co (II) rapidly activates the PMS to form SO4·− by single electron transfer. The resulting Co (III) is subsequently reduced by Fe (II), promoting the REDOX cycle of the Co species. Reactive species with oxidation potential are formed on the surface through non-radical pathways	Antibiotic wastewater	The degradation efficiency of sulfadiazine (SDZ) was increased to 92.8% and showed excellent anti-fouling performance	Liu et al. [73]
Iron embedded with S and N co-doped carbon (NSC-Fe)	The S and N doped carbon matrix improved electron transfer efficiency. Iron nanoparticles (Fe NPs) activated the PMS by single electron transfer in the carbon matrix, forming SO4·−. The Fe2+ can further generate SO4·−and ·OH by reacting with the PMS	Dyewastewater	The degradation efficiency of Orange II reached 97.7%, and the pH value in the range of 2.05–10.85 had little effect on the degradation efficiency	Yao et al. [74]
MIL-88A(Fe)/g-C3N4	The Fe2+ site activates PDS to form SO4·− by single electron transfer, simultaneously promoting the Fe3+/Fe2+ cycle and enhancing catalytic activity.The introduction of g-C3N4 increases the active Fe2+ content of MIL-88A(Fe) surface, promoting the adsorption and activation of PDS	Antibiotic wastewater	TC removal rate of 95.71% was achieved in a short time (<10 min)	Wang et al. [75]
Iron and nitrogen co-doped biochar membrane (Fe/N/BC membrane)	It has high electron transport efficiency and promotes the activation of PDS and the degradation of SMX	Antibiotic wastewater	The SMX removal rate of Fe/N/BC membrane reached 99.4%	Liu et al. [76]
Nitrogen-doped biochar supported monoatomic cobalt (CoNBC)	The PMS is activated by an internal electron transfer process to form a surface-bound active complex (CoNBC600-PMS*), which then degrades APAP through the electron transfer process	Organic refractory wastewater	APAP was completely degraded within 11 min and kobs = 0.46 min−1. The organic pollutants with low half-wave potential and high occupied molecular orbitals (EHOMO) were selectively degraded	Meng et al. [77]

Table 6

Advantages and disadvantages of common free radicals, reinforcement materials, and application scenarios.

Free Radical	Advantages	Disadvantages	Reinforcement Materials	Application Scenarios
SO4·−	High oxidation potential, suitable for degradation of refractory pollutantsLong half-life period and can be diffused to the depth of membrane poresStrong pH adaptability (more stable in acidic conditions)	Some reactions depend on transition metal activation, which may lead to metal dissolution. In the presence of high concentration Cl−, it is easy to form chlorine byproducts	Transition metal oxides; Carbon-based material	High salt wastewater, wastewater containing perfluorinated compounds
·OH	The oxidizing capability is exceptionally strong, allowing it to indiscriminately attack most organic matter	It possesses a very short half-life and is readily quenched. Its effectiveness is significantly higher under neutral to acidic conditions, while its activity diminishes in alkaline environments	Ultraviolet photocatalyst; Bimetallic catalyst	Medical wastewater, dye wastewater
O2−·	It can act as an intermediate in chain reactions. Under alkaline conditions, it readily forms and exhibits a reducing effect on certain pollutants, such as Cr(VI)	The capacity for direct oxidation is limited and relies on the synergistic action of other free radicals. This process is prone to disproportionation, leading to energy loss	Materials rich in oxygen vacancies; Graphene quantum dots	Alkaline wastewater treatment, heavy metal reduction
Cl·/ClO·	Chloride ions (Cl−) can serve as a source of free radicals in high-salinity wastewater	There is a tendency to generate chlorine byproducts, which may elevate ecological risks	SO4·− and ·OH transformation	High salt and high Cl− wastewater

References

1. Zhou, Y.; Chen, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, R.; Zhu, N.; Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Occurrence and Ecological Risk Assessment of Highly Toxic Halogenated Byproducts during Chlorination Decolorization of Textile Printing and Dyeing Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2024; 58, pp. 17970-17978. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07888]

2. Zou, Y.; Ge, Q. Smart organic–inorganic polyoxomolybdates in forward osmosis for antiviral-drug wastewater treatment and drug reclamation. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2023; 57, pp. 5872-5880. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00084] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976836]

3. Lai, L.-L.; Wang, S.-F.; Qi, Z.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Wang, R.; Yuan, L.-J. A deep treatment process for chemical polishing wastewater towards resource recovery: Optimization and performance. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2025; 358, 130285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130285]

4. Zhu, L.; Lin, X.; Di, Z.; Cheng, F.; Xu, J. Occurrence, Risks, and Removal Methods of Antibiotics in Urban Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Review. Water; 2024; 16, 3428. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w16233428]

5. Akhtar, M.S.; Ali, S.; Zaman, W. Innovative adsorbents for pollutant removal: Exploring the latest research and applications. Molecules; 2024; 29, 4317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184317] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39339312]

6. Camarillo, M.K.; Stringfellow, W.T. Biological treatment of oil and gas produced water: A review and meta-analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy; 2018; 20, pp. 1127-1146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1564-9]

7. Negrete-Bolagay, D.; Zamora-Ledezma, C.; Chuya-Sumba, C.; De Sousa, F.B.; Whitehead, D.; Alexis, F.; Guerrero, V.H. Persistent organic pollutants: The trade-off between potential risks and sustainable remediation methods. J. Environ. Manag.; 2021; 300, 113737.

8. Dhokpande, S.R.; Deshmukh, S.M.; Khandekar, A.; Sankhe, A. A review outlook on methods for removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2024; 350, 127868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127868]

9. Guerra-Rodríguez, S.; Rodríguez, E.; Singh, D.N.; Rodríguez-Chueca, J. Assessment of sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment: A review. Water; 2018; 10, 1828. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w10121828]

10. Xiao, J.; He, D.; Ye, Y.; Yang, B.; Duan, A.; Wang, D. Recent progress in persulfate to improve waste activated sludge treatment: Principles, challenges and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J.; 2023; 469, 143956. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143956]

11. Su, P.; Fu, W.; Du, X.; Song, G.; Zhou, M. Confined Fe0@ CNTs for highly efficient and super stable activation of persulfate in wide pH ranges: Radicals and non-radical co-catalytic mechanism. Chem. Eng. J.; 2021; 420, 129446.

12. Zou, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, J. Comment on electrolytic manipulation of persulfate reactivity by iron electrodes for TCE degradation in groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2014; 48, pp. 4630-4631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501061n] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679118]

13. Dibene, K.; Yahiaoui, I.; Cherif, L.Y.; Aitali, S.; Amrane, A.; Aissani-Benissad, F. Paracetamol degradation by photo-activated peroxydisulfate process (UV/PDS): Kinetic study and optimization using central composite design. Water Sci. Technol.; 2020; 82, pp. 1404-1415.

14. Hamiche, A.; Yahiaoui, I.; Khenniche, L.; Amrane, A.; Aissani-Benissad, F. Degradation of paracetamol by sulfate radicals using UVA-irradiation/heat activated peroxydisulfate: Kinetics and optimization using Box–Behnken design. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal.; 2024; 137, pp. 433-451.

15. Dong, L.; Xia, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Qiao, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, S. Research progress of persulfate activation technology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2024; 31, pp. 31771-31786. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33404-9]

16. Su, H.; Nilghaz, A.; Liu, D.; Mehmood, R.; Sorrell, C.C.; Li, J. Degradation of phenolic pollutants by persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes: Metal and carbon-based catalysis. Rev. Chem. Eng.; 2023; 39, pp. 1269-1298.

17. Deng, Y.; Dai, M.; Wu, Y.; Peng, C. Emulsion system, demulsification and membrane technology in oil–water emulsion separation: A comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2023; 53, pp. 1254-1278.

18. Yi, M.; Xia, Q.; Tan, J.; Shang, J.; Cheng, X. Catalytic-separation technology for highly efficient removal of emerging pollutants, desalination, and antimicrobials: A new strategy for complex wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J.; 2024; 493, 152568.

19. Shi, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chang, Q.; Ma, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Pan, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ding, G. Performance Stability and Regeneration Property of Catalytic Membranes Coupled with Advanced Oxidation Process: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability; 2023; 15, 7556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15097556]

20. Huang, R.; Liu, Z.; Yan, B.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, D.; Wang, P.; Cui, F.; Shi, W. Interfacial catalytic oxidation for membrane fouling mitigation during algae-laden water filtration: Higher efficiency without algae integrity loss. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2020; 251, 117366.

21. Ma, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Z.; Xu, R.; Wang, G.; Fan, X.; Lu, H.; Zhao, S.; Song, C. Nanoconfined Cobalt Ferrite Composite Carbon Nanotube Membrane Oxidation-Filtration System for Water Decontamination. ACS EST Eng.; 2024; 4, pp. 2460-2473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00282]

22. Xiao, C.; Guo, X.; Li, J. From nano-to macroarchitectures: Designing and constructing MOF-derived porous materials for persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes. Chem. Commun.; 2024; 60, pp. 4395-4418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D4CC00433G] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38587500]

23. Sharma, V.; Borkute, G.; Gumfekar, S.P. Biomimetic nanofiltration membranes: Critical review of materials, structures, and applications to water purification. Chem. Eng. J.; 2022; 433, 133823. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133823]

24. Xia, X.; Luo, J.; Liu, D.; Liu, T.; Wu, C.; Qian, F. Metal-free graphene-based catalytic membranes for persulfate activation toward organic pollutant removal: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2022; 29, pp. 75184-75202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23063-z]

25. Zuo, K.; Wang, K.; DuChanois, R.M.; Fang, Q.; Deemer, E.M.; Huang, X.; Xin, R.; Said, I.A.; He, Z.; Feng, Y. Selective membranes in water and wastewater treatment: Role of advanced materials. Mater. Today; 2021; 50, pp. 516-532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.06.013]

26. Kumar, A.; Chang, D.W. Optimized polymeric membranes for water treatment: Fabrication, morphology, and performance. Polymers; 2024; 16, 271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym16020271]

27. Jarrar, R.; Abbas, M.; Al-Ejji, M. Environmental remediation and the efficacy of ceramic membranes in wastewater treatment—A review. Emergent Mater.; 2024; 7, pp. 1295-1327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42247-024-00687-0]

28. Hasan, M.R.; Coronas, J. How Can the Filler-Polymer Interaction in Mixed Matrix Membranes Be Enhanced?. ChemPlusChem; 2024; 89, e202400456. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202400456] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39194134]

29. Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, Z.; Rui, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Z. A review on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes for water purification. Polymers; 2019; 11, 1252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11081252]

30. Yang, F.; Li, Y.; Yu, X.; Wu, G.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride fibrous membranes with simultaneously water/windproof and breathable performance. RSC Adv.; 2016; 6, pp. 87820-87827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6RA17565A]

31. Saxena, P.; Shukla, P. A comprehensive review on fundamental properties and applications of poly (vinylidene fluoride)(PVDF). Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater.; 2021; 4, pp. 8-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0]

32. Yue, C.; Sun, T.; Pang, J.; Han, X.; Cao, N.; Jiang, Z. Synthesis and performance of comb-shape poly (arylene ether sulfone) with flexible aliphatic brush. Polymer; 2020; 210, 122953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122953]

33. Hu, C.-H.; Weber, M.; Huang, Y.-H.; Lai, J.-Y.; Chung, T.-S. Investigating the impact of the sulfonation degree in sulfonated polyphenylsulfone (sPPSU) on PES/sPPSU polymer blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci.; 2024; 705, 122890. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122890]

34. Zhang, G.; Song, X.; Li, J.; Ji, S.; Liu, Z. Single-side hydrolysis of hollow fiber polyacrylonitrile membrane by an interfacial hydrolysis of a solvent-impregnated membrane. J. Membr. Sci.; 2010; 350, pp. 211-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.030]

35. Goh, P.S.; Wong, K.C.; Wong, T.W.; Ismail, A.F. Surface-tailoring chlorine resistant materials and strategies for polyamide thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.; 2022; 16, pp. 564-591. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2109-z]

36. Arumugham, T.; Kaleekkal, N.J.; Gopal, S.; Nambikkattu, J.; Rambabu, K.; Aboulella, A.M.; Wickramasinghe, S.R.; Banat, F. Recent developments in porous ceramic membranes for wastewater treatment and desalination: A review. J. Environ. Manag.; 2021; 293, 112925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112925]

37. Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Sun, R.; Zhang, W. Preparation of ceramic membranes and their application in wastewater and water treatment. Water; 2023; 15, 3344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w15193344]

38. Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Cui, Z.; Li, X.; Mo, J.; Li, J. An ultrathin Al₂O₃ ceramic membrane prepared by organic-inorganic blending with solvent evaporation and high-temperature sintering for highly efficient oil/water separation. J. Water Process Eng.; 2025; 70, 107116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107116]

39. Eren, M.Ş.; Arslanoğlu, H. α-Alumina (α-Al₂O₃) ceramic microfiltration membranes in industrial wastewater treatment: Production, design, filtration behavior and performance. Ceram. Int.; 2025; 51, pp. 10234-10241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.454]

40. Pu, H.; Tian, C.; Zhang, H. Preparation of Red TiO₂ with Excellent Visible Light Absorption from Industrial TiOSO₄ Solution for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. ACS Omega; 2024; 9, pp. 51611-51622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c09262]

41. Omar, N.M.A.; Othman, M.H.D.; Tai, Z.S.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Puteh, M.H.; Jaafar, J.; Rahman, M.A.; Ismail, A.F.; Rajamohan, N.; Abdullah, H. Recent strategies for enhancing the performance and lifespan of low-cost ceramic membranes in water filtration and treatment processes: A review. J. Water Process Eng.; 2024; 62, 105399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105399]

42. Coelho, F.E.B.; Magnacca, G.; Boffa, V.; Candelario, V.M.; Luiten-Olieman, M.; Zhang, W. From ultra to nanofiltration: A review on the fabrication of ZrO₂ membranes. Ceram. Int.; 2023; 49, pp. 8683-8708. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.076]

43. Huang, S.; Wu, H.; Jiang, C.; Fu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, L.; Yang, P.; Deng, X.; Wu, S. Preparation of high-strength ZrO₂ ceramics by binder jetting additive manufacturing and liquid glass infiltration. Ceram. Int.; 2024; 50, pp. 44175-44185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.08.266]

44. Mei, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Guo, Y. Enhanced antibacterial activity, dye rejection and anti-fouling performance of ZrO₂-SiO₂ composite ceramic membranes embedded by silver nanoparticles. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.; 2025; 114, pp. 413-429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10971-025-06697-6]

45. Nie, M.; Wan, F.; Song, J.; Tian, T.; Zeng, S.; Tang, H. An Ultra-Thin and Advanced Composite Membrane for High-Performance Alkaline Water Electrolysis. Available at SSRN 5132278. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5132278 (accessed on 11 February 2025).

46. Hu, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lu, H.; Li, N.; Zhang, H. The effect of surficial function groups on the anti-fouling and anti-scaling performance of thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci.; 2023; 668, 121276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121276]

47. Wu, W.; Wang, Y.; Du, K.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, T.; Wei, N.; Liu, G.; Guo, J. Enhancing the performance of catalytic membranes for simultaneous degradation of dissolved organic phosphonates and phosphorous recovery: A fit-for-purpose loose nanofiltration design. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy; 2024; 354, 124118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124118]

48. Zheng, L.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, Z.; Yin, S.; Xian, W.; Meng, Q.-W.; Dai, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Meng, X.; Ma, S. Covalent organic framework membrane reactor for boosting catalytic performance. Nat. Commun.; 2024; 15, 6837. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51250-8]

49. Hou, D.; Qiao, G.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Yan, Y.; Du, S. Challenges in Scaling Up Testing of Catalyst Coated Membranes for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. Front. Energy Res.; 2025; 13, 1557069. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1557069]

50. Plazaola, A.A.; Tanaka, D.A.P.; Van Sint Annaland, M.; Gallucci, F. Recent advances in Pd-based membranes for membrane reactors. Molecules; 2017; 22, 51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010051]

51. Zhao, Y.; Wang, H. Structure–function correlations of carbonaceous materials for persulfate-based advanced oxidation. Langmuir; 2021; 37, pp. 13969-13975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02755]

52. Yan, H.; Lai, C.; Wang, D.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Yi, H.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, L. In situ chemical oxidation: Peroxide or persulfate coupled with membrane technology for wastewater treatment. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2021; 9, pp. 11944-11960. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1TA01063H]

53. Liangdy, A.; Tonanon, P.; Webster, R.D.; Snyder, S.A.; Lim, T.-T. Versatile Fe₃O₄-impregnated catalytic ceramic membrane for effective atrazine removal: Confined catalytic oxidation processes, reactive oxygen species selectivity and performance in real wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2024; 12, 112727. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112727]

54. Vieira, O.; Ribeiro, R.S.; Pedrosa, M.; Ribeiro, A.R.L.; Silva, A.M. Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide–PVDF nanocomposite membrane for persulfate activation and degradation of water organic micropollutants. Chem. Eng. J.; 2020; 402, 126117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126117]

55. Pervez, M.N.; Stylios, G.K.; Liang, Y.; Ouyang, F.; Cai, Y. Low-temperature synthesis of novel polyvinylalcohol (PVA) nanofibrous membranes for catalytic dye degradation. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 262, 121301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121301]

56. Xue, Y.; Kamali, M.; Yu, X.; Appels, L.; Dewil, R. Novel CuO/Cu₂ (V₂O₇)/V₂O₅ composite membrane as an efficient catalyst for the activation of persulfate toward ciprofloxacin degradation. Chem. Eng. J.; 2023; 455, 140201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140201]

57. Liu, Y.; Guo, R.; Shen, G.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Gou, J.; Cheng, X. Construction of CuO@ CuS/PVDF composite membrane and its superiority for degradation of antibiotics by activation of persulfate. Chem. Eng. J.; 2021; 405, 126990. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126990]

58. Wang, J.; Lv, H.; Tong, X.; Ren, W.; Shen, Y.; Lu, L.; Zhang, Y. Modulation of radical and nonradical pathways via modified carbon nanotubes toward efficient oxidation of binary pollutants in water. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2023; 459, 132334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132334]

59. Chen, C.; Xie, M.; Kong, L.; Lu, W.; Feng, Z.; Zhan, J. Mn₃O₄ nanodots loaded g-C₃N₄ nanosheets for catalytic membrane degradation of organic contaminants. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2020; 390, 122146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122146]

60. Kang, J.; Zhang, H.; Duan, X.; Sun, H.; Tan, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, S. Magnetic Ni-Co alloy encapsulated N-doped carbon nanotubes for catalytic membrane degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem. Eng. J.; 2019; 362, pp. 251-261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.035]

61. Wu, H.; Xu, X.; Shi, L.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, L.-C.; Wu, Z.; Duan, X.; Wang, S.; Sun, H. Manganese oxide integrated catalytic ceramic membrane for degradation of organic pollutants using sulfate radicals. Water Res.; 2019; 167, 115110. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115110]

62. Hesaraki, S.A.H.; Ulbricht, M.; Fischer, L. All-in-one fabrication of NiO nanorods/carbon-containing porous catalytic polymer membranes for persulfate-facilitated oxidation-adsorption of diclofenac in flow–through. Chem. Eng. J.; 2024; 498, 155266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155266]

63. Cui, L.; Wang, P.; Che, H.; Gao, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Ao, Y. Co nanoparticles modified N-doped carbon nanosheets array as a novel bifunctional photothermal membrane for simultaneous solar-driven interfacial water evaporation and persulfate mediating water purification. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2023; 330, 122556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122556]

64. Shi, Q.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, R.; Li, M.; Lei, X.; Sun, M.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, G.; Jia, J. Controllable preparation of MnCo₂O₄ spinel and catalytic persulfate activation in organic wastewater treatment: Experimental and immobilized evaluation. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int.; 2024; 34, pp. 776-786. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2024.07.002]

65. Shan, H.; Dong, X.; Cheng, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Highly flexible, mesoporous structured, and metallic Cu-doped C/SiO₂ nanofibrous membranes for efficient catalytic oxidative elimination of antibiotic pollutants. Nanoscale; 2019; 11, pp. 14844-14856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9NR04118D] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31355834]

66. Xiang, X.; Chen, D.; Li, N.; Xu, Q.; Li, H.; He, J.; Lu, J. Mil-53 (Fe)-loaded polyacrylonitrile membrane with superamphiphilicity and double hydrophobicity for effective emulsion separation and photocatalytic dye degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2022; 282, 119910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119910]

67. Qiu, Z.; Xiao, X.; Yu, W.; Zhu, X.; Chu, C.; Chen, B. Selective separation catalysis membrane for highly efficient water and soil decontamination via a persulfate-based advanced oxidation process. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2022; 56, pp. 3234-3244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06721]

68. Ma, H.; Li, X.; Pan, Z.; Xu, R.; Wang, P.; Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Fan, X.; Song, C. MOF derivative functionalized titanium-based catalytic membrane for efficient sulfamethoxazole removal via peroxymonosulfate activation. J. Membr. Sci.; 2022; 661, 120924. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120924]

69. Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Shen, L.; Li, R.; Lin, H. A sustainable solution for organic pollutant degradation: Novel polyethersulfone/carbon cloth/FeOCl composite membranes with electric field-assisted persulfate activation. Water Res.; 2023; 244, 120530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120530]

70. Moyo, S.; Mahlangu, O.T.; Vilakati, G.D.; Mamba, B.B.; De Kock, L.A.; Gumbi, N.N.; Nxumalo, E.N. MOF incorporated Polyethersulfone/Polylactic Acid ultrafiltration membranes for the catalytic removal of dyes via persulfate activation. Inorg. Chem. Commun.; 2025; 171, 113634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113634]

71. Mao, X.; Cai, J.; Xie, F.; Yan, P.; Liu, B. Dynamic catalytic membrane for secondary effluent treatment: Mechanisms of persulfate activation, water quality improvement and in-situ membrane cleaning. Chem. Eng. J.; 2025; 504, 159026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.159026]

72. Qian, F.; Yin, H.; Liu, F.; Sheng, J.; Gao, S.; Shen, Y. The in situ catalytic oxidation of sulfamethoxazole via peroxydisufate activation operated in a NG/rGO/CNTs composite membrane filtration. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2021; 28, pp. 26828-26839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12545-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33496953]

73. Liu, B.; Xue, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, H.; Zhao, C.; Deng, L.; Shi, Z. Layer-by-Layer-Assembled Loose Nanofiltration Membrane for Persulfate Activity Enhancement: Performance and Process Regulation. ACS EST Water; 2022; 2, pp. 1614-1624. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.2c00267]

74. Yao, Y.; Lian, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Heteroatoms doped metal iron–polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for enhancing oxidation of organic contaminants. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2017; 338, pp. 265-275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.026]

75. Wang, H.; Cao, Y.; Guo, C.; Ge, M. MIL-88A (Fe)/g-C₃N₄ composite and its catalytic membrane for tetracycline removal via peroxydisulfate activation: Performance, mechanism and toxicity evaluation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2024; 12, 112843. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112843]

76. Liu, H.; Xin, F.; Wen, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Wei, J. Iron and nitrogen co-doped biochar membrane for SMX removal in water by filtration and catalytic oxidation. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2025; 359, 130562. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130562]

77. Meng, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, W.; Chen, Y.; Jia, C.Q. Single-atom Co-N3 sites induce peroxymonosulfate activation for acetaminophen degradation via nearly 100% internal electron transfer process. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy; 2025; 366, 125038. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125038]

78. Liu, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, B.; Liu, C. Superhydrophobic-slip surface based heat and mass transfer mechanism in vacuum membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci.; 2020; 614, 118505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118505]

79. Soyekwo, F.; Wen, H.; Liao, D.; Liu, C. Fouling-resistant ionic graft-polyamide nanofiltration membrane with improved permeance for lithium separation from MgCl2/LiCl mixtures. J. Membr. Sci.; 2022; 659, 120773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120773]

80. Wen, H.; Soyekwo, F.; Liu, C. Highly permeable forward osmosis membrane with selective layer “hooked” to a hydrophilic Cu-Alginate intermediate layer for efficient heavy metal rejection and sludge thickening. J. Membr. Sci.; 2022; 647, 120247. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120247]

81. Liu, W.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Hu, B.; Ding, R.; Deng, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, R. In-situ construction of nanocomposite coating by electrostatic enhanced surface segregation toward antifouling oil-water separation membrane. J. Membr. Sci.; 2025; 717, 123663. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123663]

82. Kanth, M.S.; Rani, S.L.S.; Raja, V.K. Advancing Ceramic Membrane Technology in Chemical Industries Applications by Evaluating Cost-effective Materials, Fabrication and Surface Modifications Methods. Hybrid Adv.; 2025; 8, 100380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100380]

83. Qiu, Z.; Chen, C.; Zeng, X.; Shen, G.; Ye, Q.; Fu, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, B. Redox-copolymer-enhanced electrochemical catalysis membrane for efficient water decontamination. Chem. Eng. J.; 2025; 505, 159383. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.159383]

84. Yang, Y.-K.; He, C.-E.; Peng, R.-G.; Baji, A.; Du, X.-S.; Huang, Y.-L.; Xie, X.-L.; Mai, Y.-W. Non-covalently modified graphene sheets by imidazolium ionic liquids for multifunctional polymer nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem.; 2012; 22, pp. 5666-5675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2jm16006d]

85. Xu, X.; Jiao, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Shu, L.; Su, G.; Huang, M.; Jiang, H. Thermally induced in-situ growth strategy for flexible ZIF-8 composite membranes with efficient hydrogen separation. Chem. Eng. J.; 2025; 505, 158973. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158973]

86. Lei, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Z. High-performance solid-state proton gating membranes based on two-dimensional hydrogen-bonded organic framework composites. Nat. Commun.; 2025; 16, 754. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56228-8]

87. Meng, L.; Guo, H.; Dong, Z.; Jiang, H.; Xing, W.; Jin, W. Ceramic hollow fiber membrane distributor for heterogeneous catalysis: Effects of membrane structure and operating conditions. Chem. Eng. J.; 2013; 223, pp. 356-363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.049]

88. Tao, H.; Li, G.; Xu, Z.; Lian, C.; Liu, H. Optimizing pore structure of nanoporous membranes for high-performance salinity gradient power conversion. Chem. Eng. J.; 2022; 444, 136675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136675]

89. Liu, Z.; Yang, W.-W.; Zhang, J.-R.; Lin, Y.-W.; Zhang, J.-F.; Qu, Z.-G. Gradient catalyst layer design for low-Pt-loading PEM fuel cell based on artificial neural network and multi-objective optimization. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy; 2025; in press

90. Ni, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, B. Unveiling the impact of pore structure of cathode catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane cell performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy; 2024; 60, pp. 1404-1413. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.303]

91. Du, H.-G.; Zhang, X.-F.; Ding, L.-W.; Liu, J.-L.; Yu, L.-H.; Zhang, X.-H.; Dou, Y.; Cao, L.-M.; Zhang, J.; He, C.-T. Engineering pore-size distribution of metal-loaded carbon catalysts by in situ cavitation for boosting electrochemical mass transfer. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2024; 342, 123396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123396]

92. Chen, B.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Han, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Liu, B.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z. Enhanced organic pollutant degradation in a two-dimensional Fe-doped crystalline carbon nitride membrane with near 100% singlet oxygen generation through the Fe–O–N configuration. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy; 2025; 363, 124827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124827]

93. Wang, H.; Chang, K.; Yang, J.; Luo, Z.; Cheng, Q. Multi-objective optimization of bionic leaf-vein flow field for a PEMEC based on neural network and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy; 2025; 100, pp. 1083-1094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.413]

94. Zhang, L.; Chen, B.; Ghaffar, A.; Zhu, X. Nanocomposite membrane with polyethylenimine-grafted graphene oxide as a novel additive to enhance pollutant filtration performance. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2018; 52, pp. 5920-5930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00524] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29664651]

95. Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Jiang, J. Membrane fouling: Microscopic insights into the effects of surface chemistry and roughness. Adv. Theory Simul.; 2022; 5, 2100395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adts.202100395]

96. Gao, Q.; Jin, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Liu, P.; Li, P.; Luo, X.; Gong, W.; Xu, D.; Dewil, R. Catalytic membrane with dual-layer structure for ultrafast degradation of emerging contaminants in surface water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2024; 480, 136333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136333] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39486327]

97. Li, Q.; Sheng, J.; Fei, W.-Q.; Zhang, C.-M.; Wan, Z.-H.; Wu, X.; Sun, X.-F. In-situ green synthesis of fibrous leaf-like bimetallic ZIF/PAN membranes for high-performance norfloxacin degradation. J. Membr. Sci.; 2024; 709, 123069. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123069]

98. Zou, H.; Luo, Z.; Yang, X.; Xie, Q.; Zhou, Y. Toward emerging applications using core–shell nanostructured materials: A review. J. Mater. Sci.; 2022; 57, pp. 10912-10942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07328-z]

99. Zhang, L.; Peng, W.; Wang, W.; Cao, Y.; Fan, G.; Huang, Y.; Qi, M. A comprehensive review of the electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: Detection of free radical, electrode materials and application. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2024; 12, 113778. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113778]

100. Zou, L.; Hu, Y.; Lv, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ye, X.; Lin, C.; Song, L.; Tian, C.; Yang, G.; Liu, M. Non-free radical regulation mechanism based on pH in the peroxymonosulfate activation process mediated by single-atom Co catalyst for the specific rapid degradation of emerging pollutants. J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2025; 687, pp. 617-629. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2025.02.110]

101. Kong, F.; Liu, J.; Xiang, Z.; Fan, W.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xi, B. Degradation of water pollutants by biochar combined with advanced oxidation: A systematic review. Water; 2024; 16, 875. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w16060875]

102. Ma, W.; Liu, C.; Zhu, L.; Han, R.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, L.; Wang, S.; Chen, L.; Li, Y. Novel catalytic membrane based on γ-FeOOH@ PVDF/peroxymonosulfate for efficient ammonia recovery: Self-cleaning mechanism and emerging organic contaminant degradation performance. Chem. Eng. J.; 2024; 498, 155090. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155090]

103. Miao, J.; Geng, W.; Alvarez, P.J.; Long, M. 2D N-doped porous carbon derived from polydopamine-coated graphitic carbon nitride for efficient nonradical activation of peroxymonosulfate. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 54, pp. 8473-8481. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03207]

104. Duan, X.; Sun, H.; Shao, Z.; Wang, S. Nonradical reactions in environmental remediation processes: Uncertainty and challenges. Appl. Catal. B Environ.; 2018; 224, pp. 973-982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.051]

105. Su, Y.; Li, G.; Long, Y.; Zhang, Z. Oxygen vacancy-rich mixed-valence manganese oxide mesoporous nanofiber membranes for the efficient removal of organic micropollutants. Environ. Funct. Mater.; 2025; in press

106. Shi, L.-J.; Huang, G.-X.; Wang, Z.-H.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Chen, J.-J.; Li, W.-W.; Yu, H.-Q.; Elimelech, M. Dual-substrate synergistic catalysis for highly efficient water purification. Nat. Water; 2025; 3, pp. 345-353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00400-3]

107. Huang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Chen, K.; Huang, B.; Jin, R. A review of persulfate-based advanced oxidation system for decontaminating organic wastewater via non-radical regime. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.; 2024; 18, 134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1894-2]

108. Miao, J.; Song, J.; Lang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, J.; Wei, Y.; Long, M.; Shao, Z.; Zhou, B.; Alvarez, P.J. Single-atom MnN5 catalytic sites enable efficient peroxymonosulfate activation by forming highly reactive Mn (IV)–oxo species. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2023; 57, pp. 4266-4275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08836]

109. Song, D.; Pan, Y.; Chen, H.; Shi, Y.; Huang, Y.; Niu, B.; Long, D.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Electron Transfer in Fes2-Femoo4 Heterojunction for Nearly 100% Singlet Oxygen Generation in Efficient Water Remediation. Available at SSRN 5131639. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5131639 (accessed on 10 February 2025).

110. Zhu, H.; Ma, H.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, M.; Liu, W.; Lai, B.; Vithanage, M.; Pu, S. Electron transfer tuning for persulfate activation via the radical and non-radical pathways with biochar mediator. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2025; 486, 136825. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136825]

111. Tan, J.; Chang, L.; Zhang, X.; Chai, H.; Huang, Y. Radical to non-radical conversion during PMS activation triggered by optimized electronic structure: Orientational regulation of oxidation pathway for water remediation. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2025; 357, 130034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130034]

112. Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Su, P.; Li, Y.; Mu, Y.; Zhou, W. A critical review on the activation of peroxymonosulfate by MOFs for antibiotics degradation: Affecting factor, performance and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2024; 12, 113634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113634]

113. Liu, T.; Li, C.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Cui, K.; Wang, D.; Wei, Q. Peroxymonosulfate Activation by Fe@ N Co-Doped Biochar for the Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole: The Key Role of Pyrrolic N. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2024; 25, 10528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910528]

114. Kishor, R.; Kumari, S.; Paul, N. Electrocatalysis Techniques for Wastewater Treatment. Electrochemical Perspective Towards Wastewater Treatment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 243-262.

115. Othmen, W.B.H.; Hamdi, A.; Addad, A.; Sieber, B.; Elhouichet, H.; Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. Fe-doped SnO₂ decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.; 2018; 367, pp. 145-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.08.016]

116. Zhou, X.; Zhou, C.; Huang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Z. Enhancing nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) performance for Cr (VI) removal through zeolite imidazole framework-8 (ZIF-8) coating. Water Cycle; 2025; 6, pp. 195-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2025.01.001]

117. Henning, N.; Wick, A.; Ternes, T.A. Biotransformation of pregabalin in surface water matrices and the occurrence of transformation products in the aquatic environment-comparison to the structurally related gabapentin. Water Res.; 2021; 203, 117488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117488] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482236]

118. Liu, W.; Xu, S.; Ma, H.; Li, Y.; Mąkinia, J.; Zhai, J. Anaerobic consortia mediate Mn (IV)-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Chem. Eng. J.; 2023; 468, 143478. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143478]

119. Takabatake, H.; Taniguchi, M.; Kurihara, M. Advanced technologies for stabilization and high performance of seawater ro membrane desalination plants. Membranes; 2021; 11, 138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes11020138]

120. Yu, W.; Xu, Y. Advancements on Single-Atom Catalysts-Mediated Persulfate Activation: Generating Reactive Species for Contaminants Elimination in Water. Molecules; 2024; 29, 5696. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules29235696]

121. Yu, C.; Xiong, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, H.; Huang, R.; Yao, G.; Lai, B. Marriage of membrane filtration and sulfate radical-advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs) for water purification: Current developments, challenges and prospects. Chem. Eng. J.; 2022; 433, 133802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133802]

122. García-Ávila, F.; Zambrano-Jaramillo, A.; Velecela-Garay, C.; Coronel-Sánchez, K.; Valdiviezo-Gonzalez, L. Effectiveness of membrane technologies in removing emerging contaminants from wastewater: Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration. Water Cycle; 2024; in press

123. Tian, K.; Xu, X.; Zhu, J.; Cao, S.; Yin, Z.; Li, F.; Yang, W. A critical review of oxidation for membrane fouling control in water treatment: Applications, mechanisms and challenges. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2024; 12, 114718. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.114718]

124. Hu, P.; Su, H.; Chen, Z.; Yu, C.; Li, Q.; Zhou, B.; Alvarez, P.J.; Long, M. Selective degradation of organic pollutants using an efficient metal-free catalyst derived from carbonized polypyrrole via peroxymonosulfate activation. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2017; 51, pp. 11288-11296. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03014]

125. Kim, J.; Wu, B.; Jeong, S.; Jeong, S.; Kim, M. Recent advances of membrane-based hybrid membrane bioreactors for wastewater reclamation. Front. Membr. Sci. Technol.; 2024; 3, 1361433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2024.1361433]

126. Khoiruddin, K.; Boopathy, R.; Kawi, S.; Wenten, I. Towards Next-Generation Membrane Bioreactors: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions. Curr. Pollut. Rep.; 2025; 11, 15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40726-025-00345-x]

127. Van Dijk, L.; Roncken, G. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: The state of the art and new developments. Water Sci. Technol.; 1997; 35, pp. 35-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0353]

128. Huang, M.; Zhang, H.; Wu, S.; Liu, J.; Yu, P.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Yuan, R. A novel passive-active coupled pathway of catalytic superwetting membrane with peroxymonosulfate activation self-cleaning for dual and efficient oily/organic pollutants wastewater purification. J. Membr. Sci.; 2025; 719, 123744. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2025.123744]

129. Jeong, S.; Kim, H.-W. In situ real-time monitoring technologies for fouling detection in membrane processes. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 43-64.

130. Zhang, L.; Ma, H.; Li, Y.; Pan, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, G.; Fan, X.; Zhao, S.; Lu, H.; Song, C. Activating peroxymonosulfate with MOF-derived NiO-NiCo₂O₄/titanium membrane for water treatment: A non-radical dominated oxidation mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2024; 676, pp. 1032-1043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.07.195] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39074406]

131. Yan, C.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, X.; Xia, S. Enhanced activation of peroxymonosulfate by oxygen-doped FeS₂/Co₃S₄ anchored on activated carbon fibers for sulfamethoxazole degradation and sulfonamide-resistant bacteria inactivation: The key role of surface and interface sulfur vacancies. Chem. Eng. J.; 2025; 505, 159028. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.159028]