It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Previous studies have investigated treatment patterns among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Denmark and found that, in an unselected nationwide Danish registry cohort, only 36% of patients received systemic anticancer therapy. The objective of this study was to identify socioeconomic factors associated with the receipt of systemic treatment in patients with mUC in Denmark, a country with universal free access to healthcare.
Methods
This retrospective, population-based study was based on data from the Danish national healthcare registers. We identified all patients diagnosed with mUC from 2010 to 2017 who were potentially eligible for systemic chemotherapy (cohort 1). Two sub-cohorts of interest were identified: patients who received systemic anticancer treatment (cohort 2) and patients who did not receive any systemic anticancer treatment or surgery following the diagnosis of mUC (cohort 3).
Results
A total of 3,206 patients diagnosed with mUC were identified (cohort 1), of whom 1,223 (38%) did not meet the study inclusion criteria (i.e., received treatments other than those pre-specified). For patients who received systemic anticancer treatment (cohort 2; n = 1,141 [36%]), the mean time to treatment was 1.3 months. Among untreated patients (cohort 3; n = 842 [26%]), 246 patients died within 1.3 months after the diagnosis of metastatic disease; thus, to account for immortal time bias, these 246 patients were excluded from analyses. Comparing the remaining 596 patients in cohort 3 with all patients in cohort 2, increasing age and region of residence were found to be associated with a lower probability of receiving systemic treatment. Moreover, completion of at least a high school education and being married were associated with a higher probability of receiving systemic treatment.
Conclusions
We found significant and measurable inequality in access to treatment for mUC. Among other factors, residence in two relatively rural regions was associated with lower probability of receiving systemic anticancer treatment compared to residence in other regions. In addition, marital status and education level had a significant impact on treatment rates.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer