It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who achieve reverse remodelling (RR) can experience a new decrease in ejection fraction (EF), and the predictors of sustained RR (SRR) are not completely understood.
Objectives
The study aims to identify predictors of SRR in patients with HFrEF after an increase in EF and evaluate SRR prognosis.
Methods
In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluated a real‐life cohort of patients with HFrEF and ≥2 consecutive echocardiograms, divided according to left ventricular EF (LVEF) trajectory: no RR (NRR: 3/3 LVEF measurements < 40%), non‐SRR (NSRR: second LVEF ≥ 40%, third LVEF < 40%), and SRR (SRR: second and third LVEF ≥ 40%).
Results
We included 3628 of 8072 assessed HF patients in the analysis, with mean age 56.2 (±13.4) years, 64.4% male and 77.7% New York Heart Association (NYHA) I–II. Improved EF was observed for 1342 (37%) patients. Among those who achieved RR, 310 (23%) were NSRR, and 1032 (77%) were SRR. The mean (±SE) survival after the second echocardiogram was 10.6 (±0.2) years. The SRR group had the longest survival (12.2 ± 0.3 years), followed by the NSRR (10.6 ± 0.5) and NRR (9.8 ± 0.2 years) groups (P < 0.001). According to logistic multivariable regression, second LVEF [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.90, P < 0.001], second left ventricular end‐systolic diameter (LVESD) (OR = 0.93, CI = 0.90–0.96, P < 0.001), second IV septum thickness (OR = 1.12, CI = 1.03–1.23, P = 0.012), systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.01, CI = 1.00–1.02, P = 0.014), NYHA I–II (OR = 1.86, CI = 1.27–2.74, P = 0.001) and furosemide non‐use (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.27–2.74, P < 0.001) independently predicted SRR.
Conclusions
Patients with greater EF increases and LVESD reductions at EF recovery, greater septum thickness, higher blood pressure, no need for diuretics and NYHA I/II maintenance had the best chance of maintaining recovered ventricular function.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Bocchi, Edimar Alcides 1 ; Lira, Maria Tereza Sampaio de Sousa 1 ; Wanderley, Mauro Rogerio de Barros 2 ; Marchi, Daniel Catto 1 ; Maciel, Pamela Camara 1 ; Zimerman, Andre 3 ; Ramires, Felix Jose Alvarez 1 ; Nastari, Luciano 1 ; Biselli, Bruno 1 ; Chizzola, Paulo Roberto 1 ; Munhoz, Robinson Tadeu 1 ; Fernandes, Fábio 1 ; Ayub‐Ferreira, Silvia Moreira 1 1 Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, EUA, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 Clinical Trials Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Moinhos de Vento College of Health Sciences, Porto Alegre, Brazil





