Content area
This study examined the relationship between the Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress (ISASP) and the English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century (ELPA21) to evaluate the effectiveness of reclassification practices of English learners (ELs). Grounded in the QuantCrit framework, the research interrogated how a singular pathway to reclassification based on ELPA21 may perpetuate systemic inequities. Using quantitative research design, the study analyzed state-protected data collected from ELs in grades 9-11, including scores from ELPA21 and ISASP. Multiple regression analyses revealed a significantly significant and predictive relationship between ISASP English Language Arts (ELA) scores and ELPA21 domain scores of reading, writing, listening, and speaking. The findings suggest that ISASP results could serve as a valid measure for reclassification, challenging the current singular and restrictive standard for reclassification. The research highlights the need for reclassification policies that reflect the complex academic and linguistic proficiencies of ELs and advocates policymakers to reevaluate current practices and dismantle inequitable practices.