1. Introduction
Aortic dissection Stanford type A includes DeBakey type I and type II, affecting either both the ascending and descending aorta or the ascending aorta alone [1]. The tearing of the aortic media and intima leads to development of the dissection [2,3]. Aortic dissection type A accounts for 70–75% of all aortic dissections [3], and it is associated with high mortality and unfavorable outcomes [3,4]. In patients with aortic dissection type A, the mortality rate for those who undergo surgery is 26%, and the mortality rate for those who receive medical treatment alone without surgery is 58% [5]. Twenty-four percent of aortic dissection would extend to the common carotid artery (CCA), increasing the risk of stroke [6]. The diagnosis is highly dependent on clinical suspicion [4]. Common carotid artery dissection (CCAD) often manifests with neurological symptoms such as syncope, impaired consciousness, language dysfunction, headaches or neck pain, blindness in one eye, and hemiparesis [2,7]. Furthermore, CCA malperfusion is associated with postoperative stroke and prolonged stays in the intensive care unit and hospital [8]. However, an altered state of consciousness or aphasia may obscure the underlying aortic dissection and delay the diagnosis in stroke patients. Not being rare, the incidence of transient or permanent neurologic symptoms in patients with aortic dissection reaches up to 42%, of which the cerebrovascular events range from 6.1 to 32% [5,9]. Considering the high proportion of neurological symptoms, it is crucial to timely and accurately identify CCA dissection.
Cervical carotid dissection must be differentiated from other factors that cause thickening of the arterial wall, including radiation therapy, vasculitis, and atherosclerosis [10]. Prompt carotid ultrasonography performed in the emergency department represents a practical and effective diagnostic tool for detecting CCAD, which may serve as an important indicator of underlying aortic dissection. Several sonographically pathologic structures of dissection were addressed in previous studies. The most characteristic finding in the carotid duplex for dissection is a double lumen with a free flap [10,11]. However, an intimal flap floating in either the true or false lumen is rarely perceived [10]. Other B mode findings include intramural thrombus or hematoma, occlusion or severe stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and smooth or tapering vascular lumen [7,10,12,13]. The dissection-related intramural thrombus is presented in around one third of patients with CCAD, but it is hard to distinguish from an aging-related atherosclerotic thrombus [10,11]. We noticed the “train-line” pattern of intramural thrombus through observations in our patients, and it could help differentiate these two situations.
2. Materials and Methods
We conducted the retrospective case series by searching the medical database of the Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, which is a tertiary-centered hospital in Taipei, Taiwan. Patients who had aortic dissection listed in their discharge diagnosis and carotid ultrasound report were enrolled retrospectively over a period of three years. A total of 139 patients were recruited into our study.
The patients were investigated with a Philips (Bothell, WA, USA) ultrasound system (CX50) equipped with a 12–3 MHz phased linear array transducer probe. The procedures of carotid duplex sonography were performed by well-trained technicians. The patient lay on an examination bed in a supine position, while the technician sat at the patient’s superior cranial side. To maximize exposure of the ipsilateral neck, the patient’s head is rotated 45 degrees to the contralateral side. In addition, the patient should remain in a relaxed state to prevent unclear sonographic images. By placing a transducer probe on the lower part of the neck, we evaluated the echotomographies of CCA via real-time B-mode imaging, color Doppler, and pulsed Doppler. Sonographic images were saved on the CX50 and uploaded to the medical information system of Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital. Information on the CCA, including peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, resistance index, and blood flow, was collected.
We reviewed every medical file and image by two clinicians. The diagnosis of aorta and branch artery dissection would be confirmed by contrast computed tomography (CT) alone or by both CT and operation findings. The presence of ischemic stroke would be verified by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Information on in-hospital mortality was collected. The reports were interpreted by competent neurologists.
The “train-line” pattern on ultrasonography was detected, which was characterized by a margin consisting of two hyperechoic parallel linear reflections that are closely positioned and override a thickened wall. It was identified subjectively by neurologists specializing in neurosonography. To evaluate inter-observer agreement in identifying the “train-line” pattern, we used Cohen’s Kappa (κ), which is a statistical measure that quantifies the degree of agreement between two raters classifying items into categorical outcomes. A total of twelve representative carotid ultrasound images were selected, encompassing the following five categories: atherosclerotic plaque, double lumen with the train-line pattern, double lumen without the train-line pattern, intramural thrombus with the train-line pattern, and intramural thrombus without the train-line pattern. Two experienced neurologists specializing in neurosonography independently reviewed and categorized the images. The calculated Cohen’s Kappa value (standard error) was 0.824 (0.169), indicating almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.8). The study program was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.
3. Results
Among the 139 patients enrolled in the study, 23 patients had a final diagnosis of type A aortic dissection, while 113 patients had type B aortic dissection, abdominal arterial aneurysm, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, or intramural hematoma, and these diagnoses often overlap with each other. Two patients had mistaken coding in the discharge diagnosis, including one aortobronchial fistula and one mediastinitis. One patient had self-reported aortic dissection history without confirmed images or operational findings. Based on this anatomical and clinical rationale, we assumed that type B dissections do not involve the common carotid arteries. Therefore, patients with type B dissection were explicitly excluded during case selection. Eight of twenty-three patients with type A aortic dissection were associated with CCAD (Figure 1).
3.1. Patient Characteristics
The eight patients with type A dissection and concurrent CCAD were generally younger than the 15 patients without CCAD (CCAD, 56.9 [range 40–84] years versus no CCAD, 66.5 [range 41–83] years). The median age of all patients was 54 years (range 40–84). Ischemic stroke was more common in the CCAD group (CCAD, six [75.0%] versus no CCAD, four [26.7%]). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the CCAD group (CCAD, three [37.5%] versus no CCAD, two [13.0%]). The in-hospital mortality rate of all type A aortic dissection patients was 21%.
A total of eight patients who had type A aortic dissection with CCAD were further studied. In addition to carotid duplex ultrasonography, the presence of CCAD was also confirmed by CT scans with and without contrast in these eight patients. The clinical features, sonographic findings, and image findings of these eight patients are shown in Table 1. There were five male patients and three female patients. In total, nine CCAD events in eight patients were identified; seven were on the right side and two were on the left side. Brain MRI revealed ischemic stroke in six patients and no ischemic stroke in two. Among the patients without stroke, patient No. 5 had asymptomatic CCA involvement, while patient No. 8 initially presented with syncope. The criteria for aortic dissection type A with asymptomatic CCAD are fulfilled if the patient does not have any ischemic stroke, transient cerebral ischemic attack, syncope, amaurosis fugax, or dizziness [14].
3.2. Ultrasonography Findings
The B-mode findings of the nine CCAs revealed six typical double lumens with intimal flaps (Figure 2) and three intramural thrombi, which are also termed thrombosed false lumen (Figure 3). Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 contain the original ultrasound images. The “train-line” pattern was recognized in three of six intimal flaps and two of three intramural thrombi. The extracranial duplex sonography revealed a “train-line” pattern characterized by a thickened wall displaying hypoechoic properties, where the boundary was composed of closely placed parallel linear reflections. Patient No. 1 corresponds to Figure 2A; patient No. 2 corresponds to Figure 2B; patient No. 3 corresponds to Figure 2C,D; patient No. 4 corresponds to Figure 2E; and patient No. 5 corresponds to Figure 2F. Patient No. 6 corresponds to Figure 3A; patient No. 7 corresponds to Figure 3B; and patient No. 8 corresponds to Figure 3C. Interestingly, patient No. 5 had bilateral CCAD, but the train-line pattern was only on the right side. Figure 2C shows the right CCA with a double lumen and a clearly visible train-line pattern, and Figure 2D displays the left CCA, which also demonstrates a double lumen, but no train-line pattern is observed. Patient No. 8 presented with a hypoechoic intramural thrombus which resembled double lumens, but it was easy to distinguish under the color Doppler imaging.
Seven of nine CCA duplex waveforms were recorded. In the waveforms of seven true lumens, three were wide systolic, one was dampened, two were biphasic, and one was second-pulsed systolic. In the waveforms of five false lumens, four were biphasic, and one was dampened and nearly occlusive. Doppler ultrasound images and pulsed Doppler waveforms are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Follow-up carotid ultrasonography was performed in a subset of patients with the following observations: patient No. 1 underwent a follow-up carotid ultrasound six years after the initial event. The double lumen with intimal flap and the train-line pattern remained visible. Patient No. 2 did not undergo follow-up carotid ultrasonography. Patients No. 3 and No. 4 died during hospitalization and therefore did not have follow-up imaging. Patient No. 5 received a follow-up carotid ultrasound one year after the index event, which showed resolution of the double lumen and disappearance of the intimal flap. Patient No. 6 had two additional carotid ultrasound examinations on days 3 and 6 after the initial scan during hospitalization. Both studies showed a persistent intramural thrombus with a train-line pattern. Patients No. 7 and No. 8 did not undergo follow-up carotid ultrasound examinations.
We also retrospectively reviewed the carotid ultrasonographic data from the remaining 15 patients among the total 23 patients with type A aortic dissection who did not have CCAD. These patients served as a comparison group. In all 15 cases without CCAD, no train-line pattern was observed on B-mode ultrasonography. The carotid findings in these patients were limited to typical atherosclerotic plaques without features suggestive of dissection-related thrombus. This observation supports the hypothesis that the train-line pattern is specific to intramural thrombus associated with dissection and not seen in cases with only atherosclerotic changes.
4. Discussion
In our studies, around 33% of cases had an intramural thrombus, and 67% of cases had a double lumen with intimal flap. The “train-line” pattern is not limited to the double lumen group. It was presented in 67% of patients in the intramural thrombus group and 50% of patients in the double lumen group.
It is difficult to differentiate a dissection-related intramural thrombus from an aging-related atherosclerotic thrombus. The “train-line” pattern may help differentiate the two situations. We hypothesized that the “train-line” pattern was composed by the reflection of lumen-intima and media-intramural thrombus interfaces. Reviewing previous studies, one article also addressed the same concept that an inner intimal echo may help in distinguishing wall hematoma from the intraluminal thrombus or plaque in patients with thickened internal carotid walls [10].
The “train-line” pattern was not visualized in every case. We propose some possible explanations: different insonation angles; technical or conditional quality of ultrasound; pathologic structural difference such as intimal flap thickness or depth of vessel wall tear; the time relationship between duplex and surgery. In our study, the only two duplex ultrasonographies recorded before the operation were those of patient No. 1 and No. 6, and both patients presented with the “train-line” pattern. Further histopathology studies were required to approve the hypothesis.
Without the “train-line” pattern, we could still use traditional B mode findings to diagnose dissection in our cases. All patients in the intramural thrombus group had relatively long segments and a smooth surface of the thrombus as well as minimal atherosclerotic changes in the contralateral arterial wall. Specifically, intramural thrombus typically appears as crescentic or concentric mural thickening with a homogeneous or mildly heterogeneous hypoechoic echotexture. Its surface is usually smooth, and the lesion is located within the media or between the intima and media layers of the arterial wall [6]. Importantly, intramural thrombus is generally immobile and rarely demonstrates acoustic shadowing, as it lacks calcified components. The thrombus may cause uniform mural thickening with or without luminal narrowing. In contrast, atherosclerotic plaque is typically focal and eccentric with a heterogeneous echotexture often containing echogenic foci from fibrous or calcified elements. Its surface is irregular and may be ulcerated, and the lesion is generally confined to media [10,11]. Atherosclerotic plaques may present with instability (especially in lipid-rich soft plaques) and frequently generate posterior acoustic shadowing due to calcification. They commonly result in focal narrowing of the vessel lumen or stenosis. We summarized the distinguishing features in Table 2. But the interpretation of ultrasound was more technique-dependent, subjective and arbitrary, or sometimes equivocal [15].
In our study, patients with type A dissection and concurrent CCAD were generally younger than those without CCAD (CCAD patients: 56.9 years [range 40–84] versus non-CCAD patients: 66.5 years [range 41–83]). The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher in the CCAD group (75.0%, six patients) compared to the non-CCAD group (26.7%, four patients). Additionally, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the CCAD group (37.5%, three patients) compared to the non-CCAD group (13.0%, two patients). A previous retrospective study reported similar results, except for the mortality rate, which was equivalent between the two groups [16]. Therefore, cerebral malperfusion should be closely monitored when CCAD is present as an indicator [17].
A retrospective observational cohort study recruited only patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection without initial neurological deficits. It reported higher rates of fatal stroke and 30-day mortality in the CCAD group than in the non-CCAD group, which was consistent with our findings. However, survival rate after one month did not differ between the two groups [14].
When compared with a larger study (Charlton-Ouw et al., 2014) [6], the results of our study are similar in median age, gender distribution, side of CCAD, percentage of double lumen and intramural thrombus. The percentage of CCAD among all aortic dissection patients is 23% in the report by Charlton-Ouw et al. and 35% in our study. Among CCAD patients, the proportion of double lumen is 65% in the previous study and 67% in ours. Thrombosed false lumen is reported as 35% in the previous report and 33% in ours. There is one discrepancy regarding the short-term prognosis, in-hospital mortality, which is 9% in the previous report and 21% in our study (Table 3).
A recent retrospective study categorized thrombosed false lumen cases into three groups based on the ratio of the thrombosed false lumen diameter to the CCA diameter: occluded (>99%), severe stenosis (70–99%), and mild stenosis (<70%) [18]. Compared with non-thrombosed false lumen cases, thrombosed cases demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of postoperative neurological deficits (23.5% vs. 43.5%) and significantly lower 5-year and 10-year survival rates but no significant difference in postoperative death. Moreover, increasing stenosis of the thrombosed false lumen in the CCA was correlated with higher in-hospital mortality, postoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥5, postoperative neurological deficits, and 5-year mortality [18]. In our study, all patients with thrombosed false lumen were classified as experiencing mild stenosis, which may be attributable to the smaller sample size. The in-hospital mortality rate was similar between our thrombosed and non-thrombosed groups.
Emergent and proper diagnosis and treatment are key to favorable outcomes in acute aortic dissection [3,19]. The initial inaccurate diagnosis of acute aortic dissection may occur in up to 78.3% of patients [20]. Although chest pain and back pain are typical and frequent clinical presentations of aortic dissection [21], it is quite a challenge to make a timely diagnosis of aortic dissection in pain-free patients, especially when the condition is masked by ischemic stroke [22]. Up to 40% of cases who have aortic dissection are complicated with neurologic symptoms. In patients with aortic dissection, 5–15% are pain-free [5,7,23,24,25]. However, the prevalence of neurologic symptoms is even higher in patients with pain-free dissection [24]. Although studies approved the feasibility of isolated cervical artery dissection-related stroke treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) [26,27,28], contemporary consensus is avoidance of thrombolytic agent for aortic dissection-related stroke [29]. Inappropriate tPA therapy may lead to fatal course [15].
Current diagnostic clues to aortic dissection include blood pressure discrepancy, hypotension, widening mediastinum on chest X-ray, dissected artery on brain MRI or enhanced CT, and double lumen with intimal flap on carotid ultrasound. Physical examinations and chest radiography are unreliable due to unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity. CT angiography and MR angiography are sensitive to detecting aortic dissection-related stroke, but they are usually not performed routinely as initial stroke surveys [30,31]. The additional disadvantages of MRI include low availability, high cost, and consumption of time. In addition, enhanced brain CT with contrast medium brings an extra risk of nephrotoxicity.
Urgent carotid ultrasonography, which could be performed early in the emergency department, is a feasible and useful method to diagnose CCAD, which implied aortic dissection [32,33]. One case series showed that carotid ultrasonography disclosed a double lumen or an intimal flap in the CCA in 75% of the acute aortic dissection patients with stroke [34]. In many case reports, rapid carotid ultrasonography evaluation has been proven helpful to avoid possibly fatal thrombolytic treatment of acute aortic dissection with CCA extension in stroke patients [22,32,35,36,37,38,39,40]. These facts highlight the crucial role of carotid ultrasonography as an emergent bedside tool for detecting acute aortic dissection with extension to CCA in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
The advantages of carotid ultrasonography are low cost, brief examination time, and being free of radiation. It should be considered as an early diagnostic tool for detecting CCAD in these patients [41]. Disadvantages include difficulty in distinguishing dissection from atherostenosis and low sensitivity for detecting CCAD with low-grade stenosis [42]. The sensitivity of color Doppler ultrasound is 80–95% for craniocervical arterial dissection, but the sensitivity decreases with low-grade stenosis [6,10]. The “train-line” pattern, because of easy identification, is expected to increase sensitivity in diagnosing intramural hematoma irrespective of stenosis degree.
There are several inherent limitations in this study. First, our study is a retrospective design, and the findings are mainly based on observational analysis. We enrolled the patients who were diagnosed with aortic dissection and underwent carotid ultrasound during admission. Selection bias may have occurred because patients with either severe illness or excellent postoperative recovery were not included in our study due to the absence of carotid ultrasound tests. Second, the limited number of patients undergoing carotid duplex in the setting of acute type A aortic dissection with CCAD, a life-threatening emergency, represents a primary limitation of this study. The “train-line pattern” is a newly observed sonographic feature of carotid ultrasonography that, to our knowledge, has not been previously described in the literature. Our study represents the first attempt to characterize this sign based on retrospective image analysis. At present, the identification of this pattern is relatively subjective and lacks formal quantitative criteria. With a larger sample size, future studies could help develop more objective and reproducible diagnostic standards, such as measuring the length of the linear reflections, the distance between the lines, and establishing thresholds to define the presence of the pattern. These advancements could enable more standardized image interpretation and support the calculation of diagnostic performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and inter-observer agreement. As a result, the generalizability of the train-line sign remains to be validated in larger prospective or multicenter cohorts. Finally, the carotid duplex is unable to visualize the entire length of the CCA, and thus dissection limited in the proximal CCA or brachiocephalic trunk would be missed by ultrasound study. For the time being, further prospective study is necessary to find out the diagnostic accuracy of the “train-line” pattern of CCA dissection.
5. Conclusions
Ischemic stroke is a severe and fatal complication of aortic dissection. Neurologic symptoms such as impaired consciousness and aphasia often mask underlying aortic dissection and lead to poor prognosis. Carotid duplex examination is a timely, non-invasive, low-cost, and operator-dependent technique. Double lumens were observed in two thirds of patients with CCAD resulting from aortic dissection, and intramural thrombus was observed in one third of patients. However, intramural thrombus due to CCAD stemming from aortic dissection could be mistaken for atherosclerotic plaque on ultrasonography and thus be misinterpreted. We proposed that the “train-line” pattern was composed by the reflection of lumen-intima and media-intramural thrombus interfaces. In addition to double lumen with intimal flap, the “train-line” pattern may help to distinguish intramural thrombus of dissection from atheromatous plaque.
Conceptualization, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H. and L.-M.L.; methodology, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H., F.-I.H. and L.-M.L.; software, Y.-Y.H.; validation, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H., F.-I.H. and K.-Y.L.; formal analysis, F.-I.H.; investigation, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H., K.-Y.L., H.-L.Y., K.-J.Y. and L.-M.L.; resources, L.-M.L.; data curation, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H., F.-I.H., K.-Y.L., H.-L.Y., K.-J.Y. and L.-M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H. and L.-M.L.; writing—review and editing, M.-H.C., Y.-Y.H. and L.-M.L.; supervision, L.-M.L.; project administration, L.-M.L.; funding acquisition, L.-M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital on 22 January 2017 (protocol code: 20170204R).
Informed consent was waived for this retrospective study.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| CCA | common carotid artery |
| CCAD | common carotid artery dissection |
| CT | computed tomography |
| MCA | middle cerebral artery |
| MRI | magnetic resonance imaging |
| mRS | modified Rankin Scale |
| tPA | tissue plasminogen activator |
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 Study design flow chart of patients enrolled and reasons for exclusion. Abbreviation: CCAD, common carotid artery dissection.
Figure 2 Double lumen with intimal flap with train-line pattern (A–C) and without train-line pattern (D–F). The ultrasound image was obtained using a 4× magnification setting. Yellow arrows indicate the “train line”. The train-line pattern is characterized by two closely positioned, hyperechoic parallel linear reflections overlying a thickened vessel wall. Symbols such as “×”, “+”, arrows, and arrowheads were generated by the ultrasound machine and used by sonographers to mark regions of interest (ROIs) where the intimal flap was located.
Figure 3 Intramural thrombus with train-line pattern (A,B) and without train-line pattern (C). The ultrasound image was obtained using a 4× magnification setting. Yellow arrows indicate the train line. White arrows indicate intramural thrombus. Symbols such as “×” and “+” were generated by the ultrasound machine and used by sonographers to mark ROIs.
Data on patients who had type A aortic dissection with common carotid artery dissection.
| No. | Gender | Age | B Mode Findings | Train-Line | Doppler Waveform | Ischemic Stroke | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 59 | Double lumen in right CCA | Present | Biphasic flow in false lumen, wide systolic wave in true lumen | Right subcortical | Survival |
| 2 | Male | 42 | Double lumen in left CCA | Present | Biphasic waves in false and true lumen | Right MCA territory, left basal ganglia, left parietal lobe | Survival |
| 3 | Male | 47 | Double lumen in both right and left CCA | Right: present | Right: no data | Absent | Death |
| 4 | Female | 84 | Double lumen in right CCA | Absent | No data | Bilateral cerebral hemispheres and left cerebellum | Death |
| 5 | Male | 56 | Double lumen in right CCA | Absent | Dampened and nearly occluded wave in false lumen, normal in true lumen | Bilateral watershed | Survival |
| 6 | Female | 75 | Intramural thrombus in right CCA | Present | Normal waveforms in true lumen | Right MCA territory | Death |
| 7 | Male | 52 | Intramural thrombus in right CCA | Present | No data | Right MCA territory | Survival |
| 8 | Male | 40 | Intramural thrombus in right CCA | Absent | Biphasic in true lumen | Absent | Survival |
Abbreviation: CCA, common carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery.
Comparison of intramural thrombus and atherosclerotic plaque.
| Feature | Intramural Thrombus | Atherosclerotic Plaque |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | Crescentic or concentric mural thickening | Focal, eccentric |
| Echotexture | Homogeneous or mildly heterogeneous, hypoechoic | Heterogeneous, with echogenic foci (fibrous tissue or calcification) |
| Surface | Smooth, layered appearance | Irregular, possibly ulcerated |
| Wall location | Located within media or between intima and media | Confined to media |
| Mobility | Generally immobile | May present with instability (especially in soft plaques) |
| Acoustic shadowing | Rare | Common with calcified components |
| Intimal flap/double lumen | May be present, suggesting dissection | Absent |
| Train-line pattern | Present in part of our cases | Absent in our cases |
Clinical features of type A aortic dissection patients.
| Present Study | Charlton-Ouw et al., 2014 [ | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with type A aortic dissection who received carotid duplex sonography | 23 | 87 |
| Median age | 54 years (range: 40–84) | 59 years (range: 21–99) |
| Gender | 13 male (57%), 10 female (43%) | 62 male (71%), 25 female (29%) |
| CCAD | 8 patients (35%), 9 CCAD | 20 patients (23%), 26 CCAD |
| Side of CCAD | 7 right (78%), 2 left (22%) | 17 right (65%), 9 left (35%) |
| Double lumen | 6 (67%) | 17 (65%) |
| Thrombosed false lumen | 3 (33%) | 9 (35%) |
| Stroke | 6 (75%) | 5 (25%) |
| In-hospital mortality | 5 out of 23 (21%) | 8 out of 87 (9%) |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at
1. Gudbjartsson, T.; Ahlsson, A.; Geirsson, A.; Gunn, J.; Hjortdal, V.; Jeppsson, A.; Mennander, A.; Zindovic, I.; Olsson, C. Acute type A aortic dissection—A review. Scand. Cardiovasc. J.; 2020; 54, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1660401]
2. Sorber, R.; Hicks, C.W. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Dissection, Penetrating Aortic Ulcer, and Intramural Hematoma. Curr. Cardiol. Rep.; 2022; 24, pp. 209-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01642-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029783]
3. Chukwu, M.; Ehsan, P.; Aburumman, R.N.; Muthanna, S.I.; Menon, S.R.; Vithani, V.; Sutariya, B.; Montenegro, D.M.; Mohammed, L. Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes. Cureus; 2023; 15, e36301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36301] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077590]
4. Flower, L.; EArrowsmith, J.; Bewley, J.; Cook, S.; Cooper, G.; Flower, J.; Greco, R.; Sadeque, S.; Madhivathanan, P.R. Management of acute aortic dissection in critical care. J. Intensiv. Care Soc.; 2023; 24, pp. 409-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437231162219]
5. Hagan, P.G.; Nienaber, C.A.; Isselbacher, E.M.; Bruckman, D.; Karavite, D.J.; Russman, P.L.; Evangelista, A.; Fattori, R.; Suzuki, T.; Oh, J.K.
6. Charlton-Ouw, K.M.; Sandhu, H.K.; Burgess, W.; Vasquez, M.; Estrera, A.L.; Azizzadeh, A.; Coogan, S.M.; Safi, H.J. Duplex Ultrasound Protocol and Findings in Common Carotid Artery Dissection Extending from the Aortic Arch. J. Vasc. Ultrasound; 2014; 38, pp. 80-86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154431671403800203]
7. Zach, V.; Zhovtis, S.; Kirchoff-Torres, K.F.; Weinberger, J.M. Common Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.; 2012; 21, pp. 52-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.05.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20851634]
8. Raksamani, K.; Tangvipattanapong, M.; Charoenpithakwong, N.; Silarat, S.; Pantisawat, N.; Sanphasitvong, V.; Raykateeraroj, N. Postoperative stroke in acute type A aortic dissection: Incidence, outcomes, and perioperative risk factors. BMC Surg.; 2024; 24, pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02499-9]
9. Mészáros, I.; Mórocz, J.; Szlávi, J.; Schmidt, J.; Tornóci, L.; Nagy, L.; Szép, L. Epidemiology and Clinicopathology of Aortic Dissection. Chest; 2000; 117, pp. 1271-1278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.117.5.1271]
10. Rodallec, M.H.; Marteau, V.; Gerber, S.; Desmottes, L.; Zins, M. Craniocervical Arterial Dissection: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis. RadioGraphics; 2008; 28, pp. 1711-1728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085512]
11. Gardner, D.J.; Gosink, B.B.; Kallman, C.E. Internal carotid artery dissections: Duplex ultrasound imaging. J. Ultrasound Med.; 1991; 10, pp. 607-614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.11.607] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1811077]
12. Treiman, G.S.; Treiman, R.L.; Foran, R.F.; Levin, P.M.; Cohen, J.; Wagner, W.H.; Cossman, D.V. Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery: A nineteen-year clinical experience. J. Vasc. Surg.; 1996; 24, pp. 597-607. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70075-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8911408]
13. Ramesh, A.; Muthukumarassamy, R.; Karthikeyan, V.S.; Rajaraman, G.; Mishra, S. Pseudoaneurysm of internal carotid artery after carotid body tumor excision. Indian. J. Radiol. Imaging; 2013; 23, pp. 208-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120264]
14. Jia, S.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Gong, M.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, H. Effect of Asymptomatic Common Carotid Artery Dissection on the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. J. Am. Heart Assoc.; 2024; 13, e031542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031542]
15. Koga, M.; Iguchi, Y.; Ohara, T.; Tahara, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Noguchi, T.; Matsuda, H.; Minatoya, K.; Nagatsuka, K.; Toyoda, K. Acute ischemic stroke as a complication of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection: A review and proposed clinical recommendations for urgent diagnosis. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.; 2018; 66, pp. 439-445. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0956-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29948797]
16. Kreibich, M.; Rylski, B.; Czerny, M.; Beyersdorf, F.; Itagaki, R.; Okamura, H.; Kimura, N.; Yamaguchi, A.; Vallabhajosyula, P.; Szeto, W.Y.
17. Kreibich, M.; Desai, N.D.; Bavaria, J.E.; Szeto, W.Y.; Vallabhajosyula, P.; Beyersdorf, F.; Czerny, M.; Siepe, M.; Rylski, B.; Itagaki, R.
18. Inoue, T.; Omura, A.; Chomei, S.; Nakai, H.; Yamanaka, K.; Inoue, T.; Okada, K. Early and late outcomes of type A acute aortic dissection with common carotid artery involvement. JTCVS Open.; 2022; 10, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.024]
19. Carrillo-Alfonso, N.; Mugeiro, M.; Amado, I.; Ruivo, E.; Lares, A. Ischemic Stroke as a Form of Presentation of Aortic Dissection: A Case Report. Cureus; 2024; 16, e52866. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52866]
20. Zaschke, L.; Habazettl, H.; Thurau, J.; Matschilles, C.; Göhlich, A.; Montagner, M.; Falk, V.; Kurz, S.D. Acute type A aortic dissection: Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in emergency care—Surgical delay because of initial misdiagnosis. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care; 2020; 9, pp. S40-S47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048872620914931]
21. Ke, C.; Wu, H.; Xi, M.; Shi, W.; Huang, Q.; Lu, G. Clinical features and risk factors of postoperative in-hospital mortality following surgical repair of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.; 2021; 21, pp. 1-7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02107-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34384373]
22. He, Z.-Y.; Yao, L.-P.; Wang, X.-K.; Chen, N.-Y.; Zhao, J.-J.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, X.-F. Acute ischemic Stroke combined with Stanford type A aortic dissection: A case report and literature review. World J. Clin. Cases; 2022; 10, pp. 8009-8017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.8009]
23. Spittell, P.C.; Spittell, J.A.; Joyce, J.W.; Tajik, A.J.; Edwards, W.D.; Schaff, H.V.; Stanson, A.W. Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection: Experience With 236 Cases (1980 Through 1990). Mayo Clin. Proc.; 1993; 68, pp. 642-651. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60599-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8350637]
24. Gaul, C.; Dietrich, W.; Friedrich, I.; Sirch, J.; Erbguth, F.J. Neurological Symptoms in Type A Aortic Dissections. Stroke; 2007; 38, pp. 292-297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000254594.33408.b1]
25. Gaul, C.; Dietrich, W.; Erbguth, F.J. Neurological Symptoms in Aortic Dissection: A Challenge for Neurologists. Cerebrovasc. Dis.; 2008; 26, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000135646]
26. Derex, L.; Nighoghossian, N.; Turjman, F.; Hermier, M.; Honnorat, J.; Neuschwander, P.; Froment, J.; Trouillas, P. Intravenous tPA in acute ischemic stroke related to internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology; 2000; 54, pp. 2159-2161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.11.2159]
27. Shu, L.; Akpokiere, F.; Mandel, D.M.; Field, T.S.; Leon Guerrero, C.R.; Henninger, N.; Muppa, J.; Affan, M.; Haq Lodhi, O.U.; Heldner, M.R.
28. Shu, L.; Lee, E.; Field, T.S.; Guo, X.; Henninger, N.; Keser, Z.; Khan, M.; Mistry, E.A.; Nguyen, T.N.; Siegler, J.E.
29. Powers, W.J.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Ackerson, T.; Adeoye, O.M.; Bambakidis, N.C.; Becker, K.; Biller, J.; Brown, M.; Demaerschalk, B.M.; Hoh, B.
30. Alter, S.M.; Eskin, B.; Allegra, J.R. Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department Patients is Rare. West J. Emerg. Med.; 2015; 16, pp. 629-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.6.25752]
31. Shea, K.; Stahmer, S. Carotid and vertebral arterial dissections in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. Pract.; 2012; 14, pp. 1-23. quiz 23–24 [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567808]
32. Iguchi, Y.; Kimura, K.; Sakai, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Aoki, J.; Yamashita, S.; Shibazaki, K. Hyper-acute Stroke Patients Associated with Aortic Dissection. Intern. Med.; 2010; 49, pp. 543-547. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3026]
33. Takekawa, H.; Tsukui, D.; Kobayasi, S.; Suzuki, K.; Hamaguchi, H. Point-of-care ultrasound for stroke patients in the emergency room. J. Med. Ultrason.; 2022; 49, pp. 581-592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01185-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112168]
34. Ohara, T.; Koga, M.; Tokuda, N.; Tanaka, E.; Yokoyama, H.; Minatoya, K.; Nagatsuka, K.; Toyoda, K.; Minematsu, K. Rapid Identification of Type A Aortic Dissection as a Cause of Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.; 2016; 25, pp. 1901-1906. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.005]
35. Uchino, K.; Estrera, A.; Calleja, S.; Alexandrov, A.V.; Garami, Z. Aortic dissection presenting as an acute ischemic stroke for thrombolysis. J. Neuroimaging.; 2005; 15, pp. 281-283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00323.x]
36. Tsivgoulis, G.; Vadikolias, K.; Heliopoulos, I.; Patousi, A.; Iordanidis, A.; Souftas, V.; Piperidou, C.; Hibi, K.; Kimura, K.; Nakatogawa, T.
37. Morelli, N.; Rota, E.; Mancuso, M.; Immovilli, P.; Spallazzi, M.; Rocca, G.; Michieletti, E.; Guidetti, D. Carotid Ultrasound Imaging in a Patient with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Aortic Dissection: A Lesson for the Management of Ischemic Stroke?. Int. J. Stroke; 2013; 8, pp. E53-E54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00832.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24267907]
38. Hama, Y.; Koga, M.; Tokunaga, K.; Takizawa, H.; Miyashita, K.; Iba, Y.; Toyoda, K. Carotid Ultrasonography Can Identify Stroke Patients Ineligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis Therapy due to Acute Aortic Dissection. J. Neuroimaging; 2014; 25, pp. 671-673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.12186]
39. Vassileva, E.; Klissurski, M.G.; Vavrek, E.V.; Daskalov, M.P. Cerebrovascular Ultrasound as a First Method of Detecting Aortic Dissection in Acute Stroke Patients. Int. J. Stroke; 2014; 10, E8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12378]
40. Sukockienė, E.; Laučkaitė, K.; Jankauskas, A.; Mickevičienė, D.; Jurkevičienė, G.; Vaitkus, A.; Stankevičius, E.; Petrikonis, K.; Rastenytė, D. Crucial role of carotid ultrasound for the rapid diagnosis of hyperacute aortic dissection complicated by cerebral infarction: A case report and literature review. Medicina; 2016; 52, pp. 378-388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2016.11.001]
41. Chua, C.-H.; Lien, L.-M.; Lin, C.-H.; Hung, C.-R. Emergency surgical intervention in a patient with delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection presenting with acute ischemic stroke and undergoing thrombolytic therapy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.; 2005; 130, pp. 1222-1224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16214555]
42. Ortiz, J.; Ruland, S. Cervicocerebral artery dissection. Curr. Opin. Cardiol.; 2015; 30, pp. 603-610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000224] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447501]
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Yen-Yu, Huang 2 ; Fang-I, Hsieh 3 ; Kuan-Yu, Lin 1
; Hsu-Ling, Yeh 1 ; Kai-Jing, Yeh 1 ; Li-Ming, Lien 4
1 Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111045, Taiwan; [email protected] (M.-H.C.); [email protected] (K.-Y.L.); [email protected] (H.-L.Y.); [email protected] (K.-J.Y.)
2 Chen Sen-Feng United Clinic, Taipei 114002, Taiwan; [email protected]
3 School of Public Health, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; [email protected]
4 Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111045, Taiwan; [email protected] (M.-H.C.); [email protected] (K.-Y.L.); [email protected] (H.-L.Y.); [email protected] (K.-J.Y.), College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan