It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Dentistry is shifting from traditional to digital practices owing to the rapid development of “artificial intelligence” (AI) technology in healthcare systems. The dental curriculum lacks the integration of emerging technologies such as AI, which could prepare students for the evolving demands of modern dental practice. This study aimed to assess dental faculty members’ knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward AI and provide consensus-based recommendations for increasing the adoption of AI in dental education and dental practice.
Method
This mixed-method study was conducted via a modified version of the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). Four hundred faculty members from both public and private dental colleges in Pakistan participated. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Otter.ai was used to transcribe the data, followed by thematic analysis to generate codes, themes, and subthemes.
Results
The majority of the faculty members was aware of the application of AI in daily life and learned about AI mainly from their colleagues and social media. Fewer than 20% of faculty members were aware of terms such as machine learning and deep learning. 81% of the participants acknowledged the need for and limited opportunities to learn about AI. Overall, the dental faculty demonstrated a generally positive attitude toward AI, with a mean score of 3.5 (SD ± 0.61). The benefits of AI in dentistry, the role of AI in dental education and research, and barriers to AI adoption and recommendations for AI integration in dentistry were the main themes identified from the FGD.
Conclusions
The dental faculty members showed general awareness and positive attitudes toward AI; however, their knowledge regarding advanced AI concepts such as machine learning and deep learning was limited. The major barriers identified in AI adoption are financial constraints, a lack of AI training, and ethical concerns for data management and academics. There is a need for targeted education initiatives, interdisciplinary and multi-institutional collaborations, the promotion of local manufacturing of such technologies, and robust policy initiatives by the governing body.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer