Content area

Abstract

Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery."

Details

Company / organization
Title
Should BIBFRAME Die?
Publication title
Technicalities; Prairie Village
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
18-21
Publication year
2025
Publication date
May/Jun 2025
Section
Making and Managing Metadata
Publisher
Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
Place of publication
Prairie Village
Country of publication
United States
ISSN
02720884
Source type
Trade Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Feature
ProQuest document ID
3216946862
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/should-bibframe-die/docview/3216946862/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
Copyright Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc. 2025
Last updated
2025-06-09
Database
ProQuest One Academic